Who'd have thunk it?

Some Test series that didn't end up quite as they were expected to

Steven Lynch

April 29, 2013

Comments: 23 | Text size: A | A

Australian captain Richie Benaud shakes hands with England captain Peter May after Australia regained the Ashes, Australia v England, 4th Test, Adelaide, 6th day, February 5, 1959
Benaud and May shake hands after Australia regain the Ashes in Adelaide, 1959 © Getty Images

England v Australia, 1882
Perhaps it's pushing it a bit to call this one-off Test a series, but then again it did spawn the greatest ongoing sporting soap opera of them all - the Ashes. England were considered - in England at least - to be far too strong for the upstart Australians: it was generally thought to be inconceivable that the full might of the mother country could be beaten at home. And when England went in at The Oval needing only 85 to win, the normal order of things seemed likely to continue. But with the "Demon" Spofforth on top form - he ended up with 7 for 44, making for match figures of 14 for 90 - England, after being 66 for 4, were skittled for 77. During the tense climax one spectator died of heart failure, and another apparently chewed through the handle of his umbrella. And afterwards someone wrote a mock obituary of English cricket and joked that the ashes would be taken to Australia.

Australia v England, 1936-37
It wasn't quite how Don Bradman had envisaged his first stab at captaincy: two Tests, two ducks, two defeats. Australia had suffered with the weather, in those days of uncovered pitches, and the Don set about rectifying the situation: he scored 270 in the third Test, 212 in the fourth, and 169 in the fifth. Australia won all three matches, becoming the first (and still only) team to win a Test series after being 2-0 down.

England v Pakistan, 1954
An innings victory in the second Test persuaded the home selectors they could afford to extemporise for the fourth and final match of Pakistan's first tour of England. An experimental team was chosen, with more than half an eye on the upcoming Ashes tour. The Oval served up a pitch ideal for Alec Bedser... only, Bedser was one of those being given a rest. Fazal Mahmood, Pakistan's Bedserish seamer, took full advantage with 12 wickets for 99, and England slid to an embarrassing defeat, which gave the newcomers a share of the series.

Australia v England, 1958-59
Apart from the odd blip (like the Pakistan series mentioned above) England ruled the roost during the 1950s, winning Ashes series in 1953, 1954-55 and 1956. By the time of the next Ashes encounter, England had walloped West Indies and New Zealand at home (and whitewashed India 5-0 in 1959). A team packed with legendary names - May, Cowdrey, Bailey, Graveney, Evans, Laker, Lock, Trueman, Statham - journeyed Down Under... and Australia, under a new captain in Richie Benaud, won 4-0.

West Indies v England, 1973-74
Had this been a boxing match, it would probably have been stopped by the referee after the third round - West Indies won the first Test by seven wickets, and were so on top that they had reeled off successive first-innings leads of 261, 230 and 201. The fourth Test was a rain-affected draw - and then England somehow squared the series with a narrow victory in the final Test, in which Geoff Boycott made 99 and 112, and Tony Greig took 13 wickets with brisk offcutters.

New Zealand v West Indies, 1979-80
Hardened by their experience in Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, West Indies had just walloped Australia - but the trip across the Tasman seemed to scramble the wiring. Set 104 to win the first Test, New Zealand crept over the line when the No. 11 padded away a leg-bye, and an already fractious series got worse from there. The West Indians threatened to go home more than once, Colin Croft barged into an umpire, and even the usually aloof Michael Holding kicked a stump out of the ground after an appeal was denied. Two draws gave New Zealand their first-ever series victory at home, 50 years after their first one.

Sri Lanka v India, 1985-86
Four and a half years after their baptism Sri Lanka still hadn't won a Test, and India - with the bulk of their 1983 World Cup-winning side still on board - were expected to prolong that record. But the Sri Lankans pulled off a decisive victory in the second Test, and held on calmly in the third to add a maiden series victory too.

England v South Africa, 1998
After a big victory at Lord's, South Africa seemed to be sailing home in the third Test, at Old Trafford when England followed on 369 behind. A valiant 164 from Alec Stewart staved off embarrassment, then the tail somehow hung on to force a draw (the scores ended up level, although England lost 19 wickets to South Africa's five). The tide had turned: England did well to win at Trent Bridge, then Darren Gough and Angus Fraser shared 17 wickets in a series-clinching victory at Headingley.

Alastair Cook leaps as the winning runs are scored, India v England, 2nd Test, Mumbai, 4th day, November 26, 2012
Alastair Cook led England to their first Test series win in India in 28 years © BCCI

Pakistan v Zimbabwe, 1998-99
A stunning Pakistan collapse in the first Test in Peshawar - Henry Olonga took four wickets and Pommie Mbangwa three - handed Zimbabwe their maiden Test victory, at their 15th attempt, in six years of trying. Home hopes of a comeback were stymied by heavy fog, which affected each day of the second Test and caused the third one to be abandoned entirely.

India v Australia, 2000-01
It looked like business as usual as the Australian "mean machine" swatted India aside by ten wickets in Mumbai, for a record 16th successive Test victory. A 17th looked a formality when India followed on 274 behind in the second Test, in Kolkata. But VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid had other ideas, batting for more than 100 overs and adding 376 runs. As every Indian schoolboy knows, Laxman made 281 and Dravid 180 - and India finished up 383 in front. In the end it wasn't even close: Harbhajan Singh took six wickets (making 13 in the match) as Australia were all out for 212. And Harbhajan was at it again in the third Test, in Chennai, taking 15 wickets and hitting the series-winning runs as India (155 for 8) made heavy weather of their chase.

India v England, 2012-13
India winning the first Test of a home series is usually curtains for their opponents: prior to 2012, only David Gower's England team, in 1984-85, had come from behind to win a series there. In 1981-82, India's first-Test win was the signal for five bland pitches - and five bland draws, as a boring six-Test series was secured 1-0. So it was ominous for Alastair Cook when India won in Ahmedabad. But in a stunning turnaround, Cook led from the front with centuries as England won comfortably in Mumbai and Kolkata, then held on in the fourth Test, in Nagpur, for the draw that clinched the series. For once England's spinners outbowled India's on helpful surfaces: Graeme Swann and Monty Panesar took 37 wickets between them, at a combined average of 25.70, compared to 34 at 39.82 by Pragyan Ojha and R Ashwin.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2013

RSS Feeds: Steven Lynch

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by cloudmess on (April 30, 2013, 0:24 GMT)

Interesting one or two people are mentioning the 1989 Ashes. England got used to drubbings by Australian over the next 2 decades, but the '89 series was in some ways still the worst for being so unexpected. This was the first cricket series I ever followed. England were hopeless, and the scoreline would have been an unprecedented 6-0 but for the weather. It remains one of the most one-sided Ashes battles in history - moreso even than 2006-7 - with England never once threatening to get on top. And yet, the nucleus of both teams - Gooch, Gower, Gatting, Lamb, Botham, Emburey, Dilley v Marsh, Boon, Jones, Border, Waugh, Hughes, Lawson, Alderman - had played each other several times over the 80s, with England usually coming off better - which somehow makes the result even more freakish.

Posted by mk49_van on (April 29, 2013, 17:51 GMT)

Surely should include India vs. West India '70-'71? And India vs. England '71 was at least as unlikely as India vs. England 2012?

Posted by JG2704 on (April 29, 2013, 17:48 GMT)

Yes I suppose the Pak/Eng series should have been in there. Eng had just beaten number 1 side India 4-0 (which again could have fallen into that category). Maybe neither were seen as hugely surprising results - more surprising margins. I think the India series (in India) is included not just because it was a win in that fortress but even more because Eng were annihilated in the 1st test and while most England fans felt that adding Monty would close the gap I don't think many realistically envisaged such a huge swing to happen on just one line up change. Also , despite India not being as great as they were a few years ago they since beat Aus 4-0. Maybe Eng are just timing when they play India in tests well. Maybe the recent NZ/Eng series deserves a mention as there was talk of Eng needing to win by WW and it turned out NZ got the better of Eng in 2 of the 3 tests. Would also add the Ashes 2005 , not just because we beat a great Aus side but as with Ind came from behind to do so.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (April 29, 2013, 17:38 GMT)

Someone must already have commented this, but in the 5th Test of the 1973/74 Caribbean series Tony Grieg bowled brisk medium paceonly to open the bowling and then switched to off-spin as soon as the shine was off. He did not take his 13 wickets with off-cutters!!! Curiously, England played three front-line spinners plus Grieg in that Test.

Posted by   on (April 29, 2013, 17:05 GMT)

What about Last Pak Vs Eng series when the Eng was No.1 team in the world?

Posted by Jonathan_E on (April 29, 2013, 16:58 GMT)

The 1989 Ashes series counts. England, although they'd been drubbed 4-0 by the Windies the previous summer, still had largely the same players that had soundly won the 1985 and 1986-7 Ashes series, only Botham was past it: Australia were none too different either. In 1986-7, Australia's top order included Marsh, Boon, Jones, Border and Steve Waugh plus the two Gregs, Matthews and Ritchie - the only significant difference the addition of Mark Taylor, and *his* only moment of fame was the case of mistaken identity for the Sydney Test of 1987 when everybody thought he had been picked to bolster the batting, but instead it was Peter Taylor picked as second spinner...

And their bowling was not really different either. McDermott, Lawson and Hughes were regarded as good, but not world-beating: Alderman had been brilliant in 1981, but no great shakes since then, the ever-promising Bruce Reid was injured (again), and they had no spinner worth a bean. Oh, and Healy had come in as keeper.

Posted by DeckChairand6pack on (April 29, 2013, 16:27 GMT)

Some wonderful games and memories. I still have nightmares about the Proteas tour to England of 1998. How we lost that I still don't know, but there you go, that's Test Cricket. The Green Machine's tour of Australia in 2008/9 was easily the best I have ever seen, for the pure quality of cricket and the constant ebb and flow. Neither team seemed on top for long. The return tour in South Africa was also a good one, sadly we couldn't get the result, well done Aus on that occasion.

Posted by   on (April 29, 2013, 13:05 GMT)

Think you also have to put England Vs WI during the series England got bowled out for 52.

Posted by EVH316 on (April 29, 2013, 12:37 GMT)

@Rajiv Radhakrishnan - trust me, England did not leave for India full of confidence! We were in psychological tatters with parliamentary questions asked about selection, and most of the public so annoyed by the missing Gower and Jack Russell that there was an element of schadenfreude about the crushing defeat, even from an Englishman`s point of view.

Posted by Mary_786 on (April 29, 2013, 12:26 GMT)

What about Sri Lanka vs NZ in 2009, one of the closest matches I have seen and a game where we saw some great skill with both bat and bowl.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Steven LynchClose
Steven Lynch Steven Lynch won the Wisden Cricket Monthly Christmas Quiz three years running before the then-editor said "I can't let you win it again, but would you like a job?" That lasted for 15 years, before he moved across to the Wisden website when that was set up in 2000. Following the merger of the two sites early in 2003 he was appointed as the global editor of Wisden Cricinfo. In June 2005 he became the deputy editor of Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. He continues to contribute the popular weekly "Ask Steven" question-and-answer column on ESPNcricinfo, and edits the Wisden Guide to International Cricket.

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

    'We did not drop a single catch in 1971'

Couch Talk: Former India captain Ajit Wadekar recalls the dream tours of West Indies and England, and coaching India

Sachin to bat for life, Lara for the joy of batting

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss the impact of Lara's batting

I bowled to them, look where they are now

Roger Sawh: Ever get the feeling you're sharing in the success of a top-level cricketer you may have played with growing up?

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

India's attack: rare intensity before regular inanity

For the first hour on day three, despite the heat and the largely unhelpful pitch, India's fast bowlers showed a level of intensity and penetration rarely seen from them; in the second hour, things mostly reverted to type

Bowlers in waiting

Bowlers who have been around for plenty of time but haven't played in cricket's biggest show

News | Features Last 7 days