April 29, 2013

Who'd have thunk it?

Some Test series that didn't end up quite as they were expected to
23

England v Australia, 1882
Perhaps it's pushing it a bit to call this one-off Test a series, but then again it did spawn the greatest ongoing sporting soap opera of them all - the Ashes. England were considered - in England at least - to be far too strong for the upstart Australians: it was generally thought to be inconceivable that the full might of the mother country could be beaten at home. And when England went in at The Oval needing only 85 to win, the normal order of things seemed likely to continue. But with the "Demon" Spofforth on top form - he ended up with 7 for 44, making for match figures of 14 for 90 - England, after being 66 for 4, were skittled for 77. During the tense climax one spectator died of heart failure, and another apparently chewed through the handle of his umbrella. And afterwards someone wrote a mock obituary of English cricket and joked that the ashes would be taken to Australia.

Australia v England, 1936-37
It wasn't quite how Don Bradman had envisaged his first stab at captaincy: two Tests, two ducks, two defeats. Australia had suffered with the weather, in those days of uncovered pitches, and the Don set about rectifying the situation: he scored 270 in the third Test, 212 in the fourth, and 169 in the fifth. Australia won all three matches, becoming the first (and still only) team to win a Test series after being 2-0 down.

England v Pakistan, 1954
An innings victory in the second Test persuaded the home selectors they could afford to extemporise for the fourth and final match of Pakistan's first tour of England. An experimental team was chosen, with more than half an eye on the upcoming Ashes tour. The Oval served up a pitch ideal for Alec Bedser... only, Bedser was one of those being given a rest. Fazal Mahmood, Pakistan's Bedserish seamer, took full advantage with 12 wickets for 99, and England slid to an embarrassing defeat, which gave the newcomers a share of the series.

Australia v England, 1958-59
Apart from the odd blip (like the Pakistan series mentioned above) England ruled the roost during the 1950s, winning Ashes series in 1953, 1954-55 and 1956. By the time of the next Ashes encounter, England had walloped West Indies and New Zealand at home (and whitewashed India 5-0 in 1959). A team packed with legendary names - May, Cowdrey, Bailey, Graveney, Evans, Laker, Lock, Trueman, Statham - journeyed Down Under... and Australia, under a new captain in Richie Benaud, won 4-0.

West Indies v England, 1973-74
Had this been a boxing match, it would probably have been stopped by the referee after the third round - West Indies won the first Test by seven wickets, and were so on top that they had reeled off successive first-innings leads of 261, 230 and 201. The fourth Test was a rain-affected draw - and then England somehow squared the series with a narrow victory in the final Test, in which Geoff Boycott made 99 and 112, and Tony Greig took 13 wickets with brisk offcutters.

New Zealand v West Indies, 1979-80
Hardened by their experience in Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, West Indies had just walloped Australia - but the trip across the Tasman seemed to scramble the wiring. Set 104 to win the first Test, New Zealand crept over the line when the No. 11 padded away a leg-bye, and an already fractious series got worse from there. The West Indians threatened to go home more than once, Colin Croft barged into an umpire, and even the usually aloof Michael Holding kicked a stump out of the ground after an appeal was denied. Two draws gave New Zealand their first-ever series victory at home, 50 years after their first one.

Sri Lanka v India, 1985-86
Four and a half years after their baptism Sri Lanka still hadn't won a Test, and India - with the bulk of their 1983 World Cup-winning side still on board - were expected to prolong that record. But the Sri Lankans pulled off a decisive victory in the second Test, and held on calmly in the third to add a maiden series victory too.

England v South Africa, 1998
After a big victory at Lord's, South Africa seemed to be sailing home in the third Test, at Old Trafford when England followed on 369 behind. A valiant 164 from Alec Stewart staved off embarrassment, then the tail somehow hung on to force a draw (the scores ended up level, although England lost 19 wickets to South Africa's five). The tide had turned: England did well to win at Trent Bridge, then Darren Gough and Angus Fraser shared 17 wickets in a series-clinching victory at Headingley.

Pakistan v Zimbabwe, 1998-99
A stunning Pakistan collapse in the first Test in Peshawar - Henry Olonga took four wickets and Pommie Mbangwa three - handed Zimbabwe their maiden Test victory, at their 15th attempt, in six years of trying. Home hopes of a comeback were stymied by heavy fog, which affected each day of the second Test and caused the third one to be abandoned entirely.

India v Australia, 2000-01
It looked like business as usual as the Australian "mean machine" swatted India aside by ten wickets in Mumbai, for a record 16th successive Test victory. A 17th looked a formality when India followed on 274 behind in the second Test, in Kolkata. But VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid had other ideas, batting for more than 100 overs and adding 376 runs. As every Indian schoolboy knows, Laxman made 281 and Dravid 180 - and India finished up 383 in front. In the end it wasn't even close: Harbhajan Singh took six wickets (making 13 in the match) as Australia were all out for 212. And Harbhajan was at it again in the third Test, in Chennai, taking 15 wickets and hitting the series-winning runs as India (155 for 8) made heavy weather of their chase.

India v England, 2012-13
India winning the first Test of a home series is usually curtains for their opponents: prior to 2012, only David Gower's England team, in 1984-85, had come from behind to win a series there. In 1981-82, India's first-Test win was the signal for five bland pitches - and five bland draws, as a boring six-Test series was secured 1-0. So it was ominous for Alastair Cook when India won in Ahmedabad. But in a stunning turnaround, Cook led from the front with centuries as England won comfortably in Mumbai and Kolkata, then held on in the fourth Test, in Nagpur, for the draw that clinched the series. For once England's spinners outbowled India's on helpful surfaces: Graeme Swann and Monty Panesar took 37 wickets between them, at a combined average of 25.70, compared to 34 at 39.82 by Pragyan Ojha and R Ashwin.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2013

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • cloudmess on April 30, 2013, 0:24 GMT

    Interesting one or two people are mentioning the 1989 Ashes. England got used to drubbings by Australian over the next 2 decades, but the '89 series was in some ways still the worst for being so unexpected. This was the first cricket series I ever followed. England were hopeless, and the scoreline would have been an unprecedented 6-0 but for the weather. It remains one of the most one-sided Ashes battles in history - moreso even than 2006-7 - with England never once threatening to get on top. And yet, the nucleus of both teams - Gooch, Gower, Gatting, Lamb, Botham, Emburey, Dilley v Marsh, Boon, Jones, Border, Waugh, Hughes, Lawson, Alderman - had played each other several times over the 80s, with England usually coming off better - which somehow makes the result even more freakish.

  • mk49_van on April 29, 2013, 17:51 GMT

    Surely should include India vs. West India '70-'71? And India vs. England '71 was at least as unlikely as India vs. England 2012?

  • JG2704 on April 29, 2013, 17:48 GMT

    Yes I suppose the Pak/Eng series should have been in there. Eng had just beaten number 1 side India 4-0 (which again could have fallen into that category). Maybe neither were seen as hugely surprising results - more surprising margins. I think the India series (in India) is included not just because it was a win in that fortress but even more because Eng were annihilated in the 1st test and while most England fans felt that adding Monty would close the gap I don't think many realistically envisaged such a huge swing to happen on just one line up change. Also , despite India not being as great as they were a few years ago they since beat Aus 4-0. Maybe Eng are just timing when they play India in tests well. Maybe the recent NZ/Eng series deserves a mention as there was talk of Eng needing to win by WW and it turned out NZ got the better of Eng in 2 of the 3 tests. Would also add the Ashes 2005 , not just because we beat a great Aus side but as with Ind came from behind to do so.

  • CricketingStargazer on April 29, 2013, 17:38 GMT

    Someone must already have commented this, but in the 5th Test of the 1973/74 Caribbean series Tony Grieg bowled brisk medium paceonly to open the bowling and then switched to off-spin as soon as the shine was off. He did not take his 13 wickets with off-cutters!!! Curiously, England played three front-line spinners plus Grieg in that Test.

  • on April 29, 2013, 17:05 GMT

    What about Last Pak Vs Eng series when the Eng was No.1 team in the world?

  • Jonathan_E on April 29, 2013, 16:58 GMT

    The 1989 Ashes series counts. England, although they'd been drubbed 4-0 by the Windies the previous summer, still had largely the same players that had soundly won the 1985 and 1986-7 Ashes series, only Botham was past it: Australia were none too different either. In 1986-7, Australia's top order included Marsh, Boon, Jones, Border and Steve Waugh plus the two Gregs, Matthews and Ritchie - the only significant difference the addition of Mark Taylor, and *his* only moment of fame was the case of mistaken identity for the Sydney Test of 1987 when everybody thought he had been picked to bolster the batting, but instead it was Peter Taylor picked as second spinner...

    And their bowling was not really different either. McDermott, Lawson and Hughes were regarded as good, but not world-beating: Alderman had been brilliant in 1981, but no great shakes since then, the ever-promising Bruce Reid was injured (again), and they had no spinner worth a bean. Oh, and Healy had come in as keeper.

  • DeckChairand6pack on April 29, 2013, 16:27 GMT

    Some wonderful games and memories. I still have nightmares about the Proteas tour to England of 1998. How we lost that I still don't know, but there you go, that's Test Cricket. The Green Machine's tour of Australia in 2008/9 was easily the best I have ever seen, for the pure quality of cricket and the constant ebb and flow. Neither team seemed on top for long. The return tour in South Africa was also a good one, sadly we couldn't get the result, well done Aus on that occasion.

  • on April 29, 2013, 13:05 GMT

    Think you also have to put England Vs WI during the series England got bowled out for 52.

  • EVH316 on April 29, 2013, 12:37 GMT

    @Rajiv Radhakrishnan - trust me, England did not leave for India full of confidence! We were in psychological tatters with parliamentary questions asked about selection, and most of the public so annoyed by the missing Gower and Jack Russell that there was an element of schadenfreude about the crushing defeat, even from an Englishman`s point of view.

  • Mary_786 on April 29, 2013, 12:26 GMT

    What about Sri Lanka vs NZ in 2009, one of the closest matches I have seen and a game where we saw some great skill with both bat and bowl.

  • cloudmess on April 30, 2013, 0:24 GMT

    Interesting one or two people are mentioning the 1989 Ashes. England got used to drubbings by Australian over the next 2 decades, but the '89 series was in some ways still the worst for being so unexpected. This was the first cricket series I ever followed. England were hopeless, and the scoreline would have been an unprecedented 6-0 but for the weather. It remains one of the most one-sided Ashes battles in history - moreso even than 2006-7 - with England never once threatening to get on top. And yet, the nucleus of both teams - Gooch, Gower, Gatting, Lamb, Botham, Emburey, Dilley v Marsh, Boon, Jones, Border, Waugh, Hughes, Lawson, Alderman - had played each other several times over the 80s, with England usually coming off better - which somehow makes the result even more freakish.

  • mk49_van on April 29, 2013, 17:51 GMT

    Surely should include India vs. West India '70-'71? And India vs. England '71 was at least as unlikely as India vs. England 2012?

  • JG2704 on April 29, 2013, 17:48 GMT

    Yes I suppose the Pak/Eng series should have been in there. Eng had just beaten number 1 side India 4-0 (which again could have fallen into that category). Maybe neither were seen as hugely surprising results - more surprising margins. I think the India series (in India) is included not just because it was a win in that fortress but even more because Eng were annihilated in the 1st test and while most England fans felt that adding Monty would close the gap I don't think many realistically envisaged such a huge swing to happen on just one line up change. Also , despite India not being as great as they were a few years ago they since beat Aus 4-0. Maybe Eng are just timing when they play India in tests well. Maybe the recent NZ/Eng series deserves a mention as there was talk of Eng needing to win by WW and it turned out NZ got the better of Eng in 2 of the 3 tests. Would also add the Ashes 2005 , not just because we beat a great Aus side but as with Ind came from behind to do so.

  • CricketingStargazer on April 29, 2013, 17:38 GMT

    Someone must already have commented this, but in the 5th Test of the 1973/74 Caribbean series Tony Grieg bowled brisk medium paceonly to open the bowling and then switched to off-spin as soon as the shine was off. He did not take his 13 wickets with off-cutters!!! Curiously, England played three front-line spinners plus Grieg in that Test.

  • on April 29, 2013, 17:05 GMT

    What about Last Pak Vs Eng series when the Eng was No.1 team in the world?

  • Jonathan_E on April 29, 2013, 16:58 GMT

    The 1989 Ashes series counts. England, although they'd been drubbed 4-0 by the Windies the previous summer, still had largely the same players that had soundly won the 1985 and 1986-7 Ashes series, only Botham was past it: Australia were none too different either. In 1986-7, Australia's top order included Marsh, Boon, Jones, Border and Steve Waugh plus the two Gregs, Matthews and Ritchie - the only significant difference the addition of Mark Taylor, and *his* only moment of fame was the case of mistaken identity for the Sydney Test of 1987 when everybody thought he had been picked to bolster the batting, but instead it was Peter Taylor picked as second spinner...

    And their bowling was not really different either. McDermott, Lawson and Hughes were regarded as good, but not world-beating: Alderman had been brilliant in 1981, but no great shakes since then, the ever-promising Bruce Reid was injured (again), and they had no spinner worth a bean. Oh, and Healy had come in as keeper.

  • DeckChairand6pack on April 29, 2013, 16:27 GMT

    Some wonderful games and memories. I still have nightmares about the Proteas tour to England of 1998. How we lost that I still don't know, but there you go, that's Test Cricket. The Green Machine's tour of Australia in 2008/9 was easily the best I have ever seen, for the pure quality of cricket and the constant ebb and flow. Neither team seemed on top for long. The return tour in South Africa was also a good one, sadly we couldn't get the result, well done Aus on that occasion.

  • on April 29, 2013, 13:05 GMT

    Think you also have to put England Vs WI during the series England got bowled out for 52.

  • EVH316 on April 29, 2013, 12:37 GMT

    @Rajiv Radhakrishnan - trust me, England did not leave for India full of confidence! We were in psychological tatters with parliamentary questions asked about selection, and most of the public so annoyed by the missing Gower and Jack Russell that there was an element of schadenfreude about the crushing defeat, even from an Englishman`s point of view.

  • Mary_786 on April 29, 2013, 12:26 GMT

    What about Sri Lanka vs NZ in 2009, one of the closest matches I have seen and a game where we saw some great skill with both bat and bowl.

  • on April 29, 2013, 12:25 GMT

    Australia in England 1989 might be worth a mention here. Before the tour, the UK press touted the tourists as the weakest Australian team in living memory, before losing to them 0-4.

  • CricketPissek on April 29, 2013, 12:25 GMT

    Nasser Hussain's apparently mediocre team of 2000/01 had an unexpectedly successful tour of South Asia as well. Beating Pakistan and Sri Lanka away from home. Although, the SL tour had some horrendous umpiring - the home team suffered from diabolically bad home umpires! - it was still a strong show of character by the Poms.

  • Selassie-I on April 29, 2013, 11:50 GMT

    To be honest, India in England in 2011 was a shocker too, no one expected that India - test No.1 at the time and recent world cup winners - would have not won a single game in any format.

  • on April 29, 2013, 11:15 GMT

    I can't help but think about the 2006/7 Ashes - built up as the most exciting series since bodyline, but turned into a one sided massacre. Not to mention the return series 4 years later, which everyone expected to be really close, and yet England did it easily, winning 3-1 (although it felt like 5-0)

  • on April 29, 2013, 9:49 GMT

    What about the 1981 Ashes Series? Half-way through the third Test, England were dead and buried....and we all know what happened next!

  • on April 29, 2013, 8:55 GMT

    1992/93 - England went to India, full of confidence, despite not taking Gower. They were crushed 3-0, by Kumble, Tendulkar, Kambli, and some prawns. In 1989, England were very positive about the Ashes, 4-0 loss!

  • sourabh.bhavsar on April 29, 2013, 8:31 GMT

    In that pic isn't Peter may resembling Andrew Strauss???

  • Vivek.Bhandari on April 29, 2013, 7:56 GMT

    I would like to add the Indian debacle (not entirely shocking though) in the 2011 English series. I remember how the 1st Test match Lord's was being billed as the BIG one, besides being the 2000th Test match; but later we saw the English stramrolling the Indians in the Tests to follow with much ease.

  • on April 29, 2013, 6:43 GMT

    where is number one team being white washed by Pakistan in UAE

  • on April 29, 2013, 6:42 GMT

    No 2005 Ashes,arguably the best test series in history??

  • on April 29, 2013, 6:32 GMT

    What about 1995 in West Indies, 4th test vs Australia? Oz had just been thrashed in the 3rd test, but turned it around to smash West Indies, the most pivotal test win for Aus in 20 years, changing the entire balance of test cricket.

  • Romanticstud on April 29, 2013, 6:24 GMT

    What about South Africa vs Australia in Australia (2008) and the reverse matches in 2009, where neither side had home advantage ... Mitchell Johnson destroyed South Africa at home and JP Duminy got the better of the Oz Bowlers at their home ...

  • on April 29, 2013, 5:46 GMT

    Steve, good list. But I think, Pakistan's 3-0 win over world #1 England in UAE 2012 was a lot more surprising than England in India in 2012.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on April 29, 2013, 5:46 GMT

    Steve, good list. But I think, Pakistan's 3-0 win over world #1 England in UAE 2012 was a lot more surprising than England in India in 2012.

  • Romanticstud on April 29, 2013, 6:24 GMT

    What about South Africa vs Australia in Australia (2008) and the reverse matches in 2009, where neither side had home advantage ... Mitchell Johnson destroyed South Africa at home and JP Duminy got the better of the Oz Bowlers at their home ...

  • on April 29, 2013, 6:32 GMT

    What about 1995 in West Indies, 4th test vs Australia? Oz had just been thrashed in the 3rd test, but turned it around to smash West Indies, the most pivotal test win for Aus in 20 years, changing the entire balance of test cricket.

  • on April 29, 2013, 6:42 GMT

    No 2005 Ashes,arguably the best test series in history??

  • on April 29, 2013, 6:43 GMT

    where is number one team being white washed by Pakistan in UAE

  • Vivek.Bhandari on April 29, 2013, 7:56 GMT

    I would like to add the Indian debacle (not entirely shocking though) in the 2011 English series. I remember how the 1st Test match Lord's was being billed as the BIG one, besides being the 2000th Test match; but later we saw the English stramrolling the Indians in the Tests to follow with much ease.

  • sourabh.bhavsar on April 29, 2013, 8:31 GMT

    In that pic isn't Peter may resembling Andrew Strauss???

  • on April 29, 2013, 8:55 GMT

    1992/93 - England went to India, full of confidence, despite not taking Gower. They were crushed 3-0, by Kumble, Tendulkar, Kambli, and some prawns. In 1989, England were very positive about the Ashes, 4-0 loss!

  • on April 29, 2013, 9:49 GMT

    What about the 1981 Ashes Series? Half-way through the third Test, England were dead and buried....and we all know what happened next!

  • on April 29, 2013, 11:15 GMT

    I can't help but think about the 2006/7 Ashes - built up as the most exciting series since bodyline, but turned into a one sided massacre. Not to mention the return series 4 years later, which everyone expected to be really close, and yet England did it easily, winning 3-1 (although it felt like 5-0)