September 4, 2013

Anatomy of a maverick

How Pietersen's unique batting style makes him one of the most difficult batsmen to bowl to

If a cricket aficionado were to pay to watch a contemporary player bat, Kevin Pietersen would likely be at the top of his wishlist.

Pietersen might have looked vulnerable against some left-arm spinners in the past, but when he gets going he's simply unstoppable. In an age when not many batsmen can instil fear in a bowler's mind, Pietersen's stocks are rising by the day.

In the second innings of the Oval Test, Pietersen was, once again, in his element and dominated the Australian attack. He not only scored runs but also established his supremacy in a manner that made the bowlers look helpless.

His charge down the track accentuates his big frame; his audacity in moving around the crease makes bowlers revise their plans in the middle of their run-up; and then he tops it with an unparalleled ability to find holes in the field.

His style makes him one of the most difficult batsmen to bowl at. He's quick to use his feet to the spinners, to get to the pitch of the ball, and to use his height to get on top of the bounce when the fast bowlers dig it in short. And he's never shy of playing unorthodox shots or taking the aerial route.

Let's start with his slightly unusual stance, where his feet are wider apart than for most modern-day batsmen. While this stance provides more stability, there is the danger of sacrificing mobility, for most players, but Pietersen's brilliance lies in how he has found a way around it - his forward-press is quite predominant, to the extent that he often walks towards the bowler, but he is seldom hurried by quick short-pitched stuff. Most bowlers dig it in short when they see a batsman charge towards them, but Pietersen seems to have all the time in the world even when the distance between him and the bowler reduces.

While some of it has to do with his natural ability to pick the line and length a shade earlier than the rest, a lot of it is about him putting in the hours to practise playing everything on the front front, even against the quickest bowlers. Once he has lunged forward, he doesn't try to get onto the back foot, even if the bowler has pitched it short, and that ensures he doesn't get into odd positions. That's when his height comes to his rescue too, for he manages to stay on top of the bounce on most occasions in spite of having a long front-foot stride.

His style of playing attacking shots - off the front foot to fast bowlers - helps him hit balls in areas that have been left unprotected. For instance, in an earlier Ashes match, Mitchell Starc had a midwicket and a square leg for the whip off the front foot - if he bowled fuller - and off the back foot if he went a little short. But Pietersen played a short ball off the front foot a lot earlier than he would have played it off the back foot, and managed to hit it between the two fielders. Placing the ball is all about the point of impact, and if you can change it effectively, you will hit the gaps often: that's exactly what Pietersen does on either side of the pitch.

Pietersen has natural ability to pick the line and length a shade earlier than the rest, but a lot of it is about him putting in the hours to practise playing everything on the front front, even against the quickest bowlers

He also walks across the stumps, almost taunting the bowlers to bowl straight and hit the pads. Little do the bowlers who walk into his trap know that he seldom misses the ball. And even when he does, he has come so far across that the impact is invariably outside off stump. Here too, his regulation shots go into the gap and not to the fielders. For example, if the ball is full and slightly outside off, most batsmen would hit an off-drive towards mid-off but Pietersen will probably walk across and play an on-drive. And since his on-drive is played from outside off, it goes between the bowler and mid-on.

While Pietersen is always lunging forward to fast bowlers, he's a completely different package against spinners. He latches on to every opportunity to dance down the track, at times even when the ball isn't flighted, for he wants to make his intentions known. His stepping out, thanks to his height, is a little different from that of others - he covers more ground than most. As a result, he not only forces the bowler to radically cut down on flight but also finds gaps because he is playing so far down the pitch. The moment the bowler errs and pitches short, expecting the batsman to step out, Pietersen goes deep in the crease to hit powerful shots off the back foot.

He is one of those batsmen who encourages a lot of kids to pick up the bat and learn the craft, but they would be wiser if they didn't try to emulate him, for his brand of cricket comes with a disclaimer "Try it at your own peril."

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. His website is here and his Twitter feed here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • mondotv on September 9, 2013, 4:53 GMT

    It is a good point about KPs lunge forward. I like watching him bat and his height does save him but it may get him into problems on bouncier tracks with genuine pace. Not too many of those tracks or bowlers around at the moment.

  • jackiethepen on September 7, 2013, 9:10 GMT

    Kev is a dynamic t20 player and IPL megastar so no surprises for praising an innings which used all those t20 skills. I wish more of our England stars had the opportunity to play t20 - in their own season never mind India's. But nevertheless in Test match cricket other skills are paramount and without them teams founder. Indian articles on Cricinfo are becoming more slanted towards t20 style batting and less appreciative of a Test innings which sets up a game. What a pity. Indian fans don't necessarily take that line. In the Series Kev averaged 38, not exactly stellar. Pitches throughout the Ashes helped the bowlers who kept scoring down and the bowling was much better than the batting. The exception was Bell who was streets above any batsman in the sides, including Clarke. Bell kept saving his side, Clarke failed to do that. An appreciation of Bell's serene Test batting is what is missing. At the Riverside he came in at 49-3 (familiar territory) and outclassed KP.

  • Vinod_Fab on September 5, 2013, 6:26 GMT

    A much rare delight for the article writers too....!!.. I would like KP to play 2015 WC and win it for them.. Just a silverware which is missing in ENG cabinet... KP will be the man.. Charismatic player KP is..!!!...

  • Vinod_Fab on September 5, 2013, 6:21 GMT

    Above all,add his breathtaking batting under pressure and taking the game away from opposition.. One against SA in 2nd test(both innings) and another one recently against AUS in oval.. Absolutely Maveric when comes to pressure and winning games... I like the man straight talking and his overview of cricket as analyst. And de one's who all were talking about his sportsmanship and all other stuffs, remember his captainship tenure when he led ENGLISH men just after the mumbai attack.. He instilled confidence in each and every player and said to everyone that we will play cricket and the match will be dedicated to victims of that attack and to the fearless individuals who loves the sport..So stop bashing the rare talent and keep appreciating him when he destroys de likes of steyn, morkel, and other bowlers of same calibre.. With his 100th test at gabba this year,i would rate him on par with sir viv and KP just left an tremendous impact on ENG cricket which would be hard to replace.. Cheers

  • supacricfan on September 4, 2013, 19:49 GMT

    wish maverick akash chopra batted at least 50 percent of what kp does..Lol

  • gsingh7 on September 4, 2013, 19:05 GMT

    @leg breaker-- sehwag was ordinary??? how many triple tons kp scored in his career? if test cricket is the real marker, tell me who have better average and sr ? its sehwag bro. luck has no part in sehwag rise to stardom, its his dedication skill and maverick style.

  • nickythetoon on September 4, 2013, 18:38 GMT

    Unitil Pietersen came along I wouldn't have it that there has ever been a better batsman who played for England in my time than David Gower.Pietersen though has taken over the mantle. As Sir Ivor has already said,Gower was a special player.The man had a sublime talent,an absolute artist who made the game look incredibly easy.Like Pietersen,he too received an awful lot of criticism usually moaning about his wafting outside off stump and nicking to slip.I preferred to focus on the effortless cuts to the boundary which were far more frequent. Pietersen's treatment of bowlers is often brutal and dismissive but he also scores heavily with innings that change and,very often, win matches.Forget the barbed comments,the fans who pay money love Pietersen. Just listen to the reception he received going out to bat at the Oval the other week when England needed to charge for an unlikely victory. Let's enjoy him while he's still around as players like him don't come around very often.

  • dummy4fb on September 4, 2013, 18:12 GMT

    A lot of people often describe Chris Gayle as being big and huge. KP is exactly the same size as Chris Gayle but more athletic and mobile. While Chris Gayle is more of stand and deliver type, KP is of the move and deliver type. It is players like KP, Ab De Villiers and even Dhoni who can pull in the crowds due to their unorthodox style. After a point method does become boring. May their tribe increase.

  • neo-galactico on September 4, 2013, 15:56 GMT

    I think AB is just as destructive, when he gets going he manufactures those audacious shots. Ask Lyon who was hit with 3 different reverse sweeps on his way to a ton.

  • BRUTALANALYST on September 4, 2013, 15:54 GMT

    Will be interesting to see how he goes v Australia in the coming ODI series hopefully Carberry gets going as well the prospect of these 2 aggressors batting together could create some amazing viewing.