October 17, 2013

The Fantastic Four

Remembering the glorious summer of 2005, when Hoggy, Harmy, Jonah, and Fred carried England to a rare state of euphoria
  shares 16

There is a small cupboard in the corner of the living room at home. Here, old newspapers gather dust and sepia. It is a cupboard of reminiscence. And here it was, upon the retirements of Matthew Hoggard and Steve Harmison, that I searched for the story of early September 2005.

It was a broadsheet that I came to first, with the front page of the sports section dedicated to a remarkable scene at Trafalgar Square less than 24 hours after the Ashes had been won by England for the first time in 16 years. Michael Vaughan has formed a line with the men who brought the urn home - "Hoggy", "Harmy", "Jonah" and "Fred" are there, worse for wear. This was a pace quartet without compare in the storytelling of English cricket and it had drunk deep from the cup of joy.

In a tabloid hidden beneath the broadsheet page, Andrew Flintoff ("Fred") looks rather worse than worse for wear. Simon Jones ("Jonah") looks little better. The tales of dusk till dawn get taller with time - no sleep (of course), a lad's wife hurriedly dressing a limp body for the start of the open-top bus tour, a crate or two of beer on the roads around the centre of London, a wee in the garden at No. 10 (it's not new, then), calling the PM a knob for asking a daft question and so on. And that's just these four. Do not assume that Ashley Giles, Kevin Pietersen or Vaughan himself were angels at the christening.

Because this is what those exaggerated celebrations were about, the rebirth of English cricket. The huge crowd knew it, perhaps better than the players knew it. The drubbings had worn thin. The Ashes had lost its magic. But when the umpires called time at The Oval, the reality of beating a fine Australian team with a fine team of England's own began to permeate across the land. So Trafalgar Square was full to the brim. Four huge sculptured lions kept a careful eye on some 20,000 people who cheered their heroes beneath the sweet summer sun. Above them one colossus of a man, Horatio Nelson, kept watch on another, Freddie Flintoff, whose series it had been.

There are newspapers in this cupboard that show Andrew Strauss raising the replica urn to the sky at The Oval in 2009, and again at the Sydney Cricket Ground in 2011. Soon Alastair Cook's moment will be logged there too. But 2005 was different altogether, in part because it was unexpected and in part because of the wonderful cricket that led to it. Three of the matches were among the greatest ever played and the other two had heart-stopping moments within. The thrill, tension and turmoil were matched by a combination of fear and fun. When they come together, as with pain and pleasure, a rare state of euphoria can be achieved.

So much so that the Queen was moved to write a note to the captain that evening. It said, "My warmest congratulations to you, the England team and all in the squad for the magnificent achievement of regaining the Ashes." As ever, she reflected the nirvana found by her subjects.

Vaughan admitted that it had been a long time in the planning.

"I probably lied when I said I wasn't thinking about the Ashes 18 months ago because we were planning this series a long way ahead. We were trying to get the right formula and the right personnel, and we talked in depth about how to play Australia. We needed the right body language and we needed to hit them hard early on. I talked down the T20 contest at Southampton (which England won at a canter in front of a boisterous, nationalistic crowd) but I knew how important it was that we hadn't let ourselves be bullied. I always felt that a young team with no scars would be a key factor, so even when we went one down at Lord's, we didn't think 'here we go again', we just continued to believe in ourselves and what we had been achieving."

And in a nutshell, that is it. Self-belief and planning driven by an outstanding captain who got the most from a talented group of cricketers. In the previous year, England had played especially well to smash West Indies at home and beat South Africa away. This run of form had parallels with the rugby team at Martin Johnson's command that won the World Cup in Sydney in 2003. Their form prior to the tournament had been spectacular, to the point of beating New Zealand on their own turf. In both cases, intelligent yet uncompromising leaders allowed talismanic players a long rein, while coaches with an eye for detail - Duncan Fletcher and Clive Woodward - took care of the kind of minutiae that separates one team from another.

To appreciate what those bowlers achieved in that series we must recall how England wallowed in the misery of those previous 16 years; how English cricketers lost the will to live when Australians touched down

Both victories were against Australia and, for better or worse, meant more because of it. England created these games before Australia adopted them and beat their backsides at them. The passion for sport in Australia remains undimmed but priorities have changed so that other pursuits share the stage. Beating the Poms still matters but these days you can go to the theatre to get over the shock of failing to do so.

Only three of the players from the summer of 2005 now remain. Pietersen and Ian Bell in England colours, Michael Clarke for Australia. To appreciate what those bowlers achieved in that series we must recall how England wallowed in the misery of those previous 16 years; how English cricketers lost the will to live when Australians touched down. Remember, Australia always won. Think hard of Matthew Hayden, Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, Shane Warne and all those 5-0 predictions by Glenn McGrath. Before Vaughan, England's finest couldn't look these extraordinary fellows in the eye.

Which is pretty much how the Tests began in 2005. Sure "Harmy" hit Ricky and hurt him at Lord's and then helped bowl them out cheap. But they came back like the Roman army - a powerful and confident talent, winning easily to put the little pretender back in his box. Same old Poms, everyone said, except Vaughan, who said "keep believing". Then Ponting won the toss at Edgbaston, chose to bowl, and his world fell apart. Sensing the flatness of the pitch and the insecurity of a first-day attack missing McGrath, England slugged for all they were worth. Four hundred in the day before the hounds were let off the leash.

Flintoff touched greatness; Harmison bowled fast and aggressive but will be best remembered for the most brilliant slower ball in history, to Clarke; Jones used the old ball like he was Waqar Younis, and Hoggard niggled away, predominantly and to best effect at Hayden, who found himself shackled, drawn and unable to give his team the barrel-chested starts to which they were accustomed. The dynamic of the series had changed beyond aspiration. With a last gasp of air, England got over the line at Edgbaston and over the hurdle that was Australian cricketers.

For six weeks of one English summer, a team and some of its players touched greatness. None of the bowlers matched it again, though Flintoff was there in 2009 to seal the Ashes with the stump-shattering run out of Ponting. But England cricket matched it again, and again, and again. Thus, Cook's team head for Australia as favourites. Thanks be to Vaughan and his warriors. Thanks be to to the four fast bowlers who took all England to heaven during the glorious summer of 2005.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY 5wombats on | October 17, 2013, 4:38 GMT

    Nice article Mark! Oh yes - praise be, THAT was a fantastic summer, and yes I was in Trafalgar Square with photos to prove it. He's right these 4 bowlers were awesome. The powerhouse that was Australian cricket ground to a halt in the face of these guys. Gripping wonderful cricket and he's right - 3 of the games were amongst the finest ever played. I was fortunate to be at the Oval to watch one of them and see Pietersen's stupendous innings. The England bowlers were brilliant - but don't forget the batsmen - who withstood Warne at his brilliant best, McGrath and Lee - who I might say was superb. Must mention Vaughan who got it spot on. He had already worked out how to play the Australians in Australia. He knew to go toe-to-toe with people like Ponting, Hayden, Warne and not flinch - that was the route to victory in 2005. The demise of Australian cricket can be traced to that series - as the Australian greats played on for revenge in 2006/7 instead of retiring and letting in new blood.

  • POSTED BY TenDonebyaShooter on | October 20, 2013, 20:38 GMT

    @ electric_loco_WAP4: I appreciate your enthusiasm for the game of cricket, but I have to disagree with you about two points, firstly, hype notwithstanding I really can't agree with the argument that the 2005 series was the greatest of all time; the Aus-WI series of 1960-1 (and even the Pak-Wi series of 1987-8, the Aus-India series of 2000-1 and the Eng-Aus series of 1981) was surely better. Secondly, I really don't think that the England team of 2005 were the best England team, and that the current England team don't even figure in that equation. I think the England team of the mid 1950s were their best, and that those of the mid 1920s and c.1968-71 were better than that of 2005; Vaughan's team had not in fact "won" everywhere around that time, having a pretty poor record against south Asian teams (and especially Sri Lanka) in particular.

  • POSTED BY Hash_Tag on | October 18, 2013, 19:28 GMT

    @Swombats sweetly put. Yes what a tremendous series. Australia in those days, my god what a tough side to beat!? What a pity that the England team up to and including the side at Trent Bridge in the 4th Test never played together again. Who knows what they might have achieved had they managed to stay fit, especially Simon Jones and Micheal Vaughan. You have a clear passion for the greatest game sir! Applause from India!

  • POSTED BY electric_loco_WAP4 on | October 18, 2013, 13:42 GMT

    Yeah,that was a fantastic spectacle of a series ,no doubt. I think the greatest series of all .Also would rank as 1 of biggest upsets in history as none less than mighty Aus ,greatest team of all time conquered in the most closely fought contests by the smallest margins - series scoreline as close as it gets,but the tests by its results were the margins of win/loss were minimal. That was by far the best Eng team of all time if not at least 1 of best having '1' everywhere vs all teams and was no.2 ranked only behind Aus .Current Eng bunch won't hold a candle to the 05' side .They also were lucky to confront an unusually rusty Aus side which also had some injury/loss of form issues and the home advtge . W/o doubt they had huge amt. of luck re,- 1 of the worst series pre DRS as umpiring -on field- stds. go .Aus had lot of crucial howlers and crucial 1s. But as true champs,with hurt egos,they had the last say a year after with the famed 5-0 w/wash rising like 'Phoenix from Ashes' !

  • POSTED BY browners76 on | October 17, 2013, 23:30 GMT

    OsullivJ. I think we had more than just one quick bowler and a few mediocre seamers in the 70's and 80's!. There was John Snow a superb genuine quick, Bob Willis who was world class. Ian Botham was more than handy! Then you have the likes of Old, Lever and Dilley to name a few. 2005 was a great sporting event, up there with the RWC 2003 and Italia 1990. It will live long in the memory for the brilliance and high standard of cricket by both sides. The greatest performance in that series was arguably by an Australian, 40 wickets and very nearly a test century. Amazing stuff that brought the country to a standstill.

  • POSTED BY tjsimonsen on | October 17, 2013, 20:00 GMT

    @cloudmess: Agree with your assessment. But don't forget Tresco among the mavericks in 2005. I feel his contribution is often forgotten. But although he didn't score a single century, he was the second highest runscorer from either side, and he was a main reason why England often got their noses in front - not least because of the 90 he scored off 100-odd balls on the first day at Edgebaston.

  • POSTED BY KarachiKid on | October 17, 2013, 19:31 GMT

    The ultimate series. I was glued to television and watched all the matches. It was a sweat feeling seeing Aussies eventually lose the series as they had bulldozed all the sides all over the world. Loved Vaughan's cool, Trescothic's belligerence upfront and Peiterson's arrival on the cricket scene. Cant forget Hoggy's sublime drive when England needed it most. If that shot had not worked right, the result of ashes might have been different. It was a shame Flintoff, Hoggard and Harmison faded away for one reason or the other.

  • POSTED BY on | October 17, 2013, 16:19 GMT

    MARK--the all time best commentrator

  • POSTED BY pragmatist on | October 17, 2013, 14:59 GMT

    One of the big reasons that 2005 captured the public's imagination was that it was on free-to-air TV. The last major series on Channel 4. Key moments towards the end of days - like Harmison's slower ball to Clarke - were at peak viewing time in the evenings. Other significant passages of play were at weekends and so available to everyone. Administrators might prefer the lucrative, exclusive pay-TV deals; but the game as a national event has disappeared since that glorious summer.

  • POSTED BY Selassie-I on | October 17, 2013, 14:17 GMT

    I remember using all of my remaining annual leave for the year to watch the first 3 tests, then promptly resigning from my job to be able to watch the last 2! The job market was a lot better in those days though!

  • POSTED BY 5wombats on | October 17, 2013, 4:38 GMT

    Nice article Mark! Oh yes - praise be, THAT was a fantastic summer, and yes I was in Trafalgar Square with photos to prove it. He's right these 4 bowlers were awesome. The powerhouse that was Australian cricket ground to a halt in the face of these guys. Gripping wonderful cricket and he's right - 3 of the games were amongst the finest ever played. I was fortunate to be at the Oval to watch one of them and see Pietersen's stupendous innings. The England bowlers were brilliant - but don't forget the batsmen - who withstood Warne at his brilliant best, McGrath and Lee - who I might say was superb. Must mention Vaughan who got it spot on. He had already worked out how to play the Australians in Australia. He knew to go toe-to-toe with people like Ponting, Hayden, Warne and not flinch - that was the route to victory in 2005. The demise of Australian cricket can be traced to that series - as the Australian greats played on for revenge in 2006/7 instead of retiring and letting in new blood.

  • POSTED BY TenDonebyaShooter on | October 20, 2013, 20:38 GMT

    @ electric_loco_WAP4: I appreciate your enthusiasm for the game of cricket, but I have to disagree with you about two points, firstly, hype notwithstanding I really can't agree with the argument that the 2005 series was the greatest of all time; the Aus-WI series of 1960-1 (and even the Pak-Wi series of 1987-8, the Aus-India series of 2000-1 and the Eng-Aus series of 1981) was surely better. Secondly, I really don't think that the England team of 2005 were the best England team, and that the current England team don't even figure in that equation. I think the England team of the mid 1950s were their best, and that those of the mid 1920s and c.1968-71 were better than that of 2005; Vaughan's team had not in fact "won" everywhere around that time, having a pretty poor record against south Asian teams (and especially Sri Lanka) in particular.

  • POSTED BY Hash_Tag on | October 18, 2013, 19:28 GMT

    @Swombats sweetly put. Yes what a tremendous series. Australia in those days, my god what a tough side to beat!? What a pity that the England team up to and including the side at Trent Bridge in the 4th Test never played together again. Who knows what they might have achieved had they managed to stay fit, especially Simon Jones and Micheal Vaughan. You have a clear passion for the greatest game sir! Applause from India!

  • POSTED BY electric_loco_WAP4 on | October 18, 2013, 13:42 GMT

    Yeah,that was a fantastic spectacle of a series ,no doubt. I think the greatest series of all .Also would rank as 1 of biggest upsets in history as none less than mighty Aus ,greatest team of all time conquered in the most closely fought contests by the smallest margins - series scoreline as close as it gets,but the tests by its results were the margins of win/loss were minimal. That was by far the best Eng team of all time if not at least 1 of best having '1' everywhere vs all teams and was no.2 ranked only behind Aus .Current Eng bunch won't hold a candle to the 05' side .They also were lucky to confront an unusually rusty Aus side which also had some injury/loss of form issues and the home advtge . W/o doubt they had huge amt. of luck re,- 1 of the worst series pre DRS as umpiring -on field- stds. go .Aus had lot of crucial howlers and crucial 1s. But as true champs,with hurt egos,they had the last say a year after with the famed 5-0 w/wash rising like 'Phoenix from Ashes' !

  • POSTED BY browners76 on | October 17, 2013, 23:30 GMT

    OsullivJ. I think we had more than just one quick bowler and a few mediocre seamers in the 70's and 80's!. There was John Snow a superb genuine quick, Bob Willis who was world class. Ian Botham was more than handy! Then you have the likes of Old, Lever and Dilley to name a few. 2005 was a great sporting event, up there with the RWC 2003 and Italia 1990. It will live long in the memory for the brilliance and high standard of cricket by both sides. The greatest performance in that series was arguably by an Australian, 40 wickets and very nearly a test century. Amazing stuff that brought the country to a standstill.

  • POSTED BY tjsimonsen on | October 17, 2013, 20:00 GMT

    @cloudmess: Agree with your assessment. But don't forget Tresco among the mavericks in 2005. I feel his contribution is often forgotten. But although he didn't score a single century, he was the second highest runscorer from either side, and he was a main reason why England often got their noses in front - not least because of the 90 he scored off 100-odd balls on the first day at Edgebaston.

  • POSTED BY KarachiKid on | October 17, 2013, 19:31 GMT

    The ultimate series. I was glued to television and watched all the matches. It was a sweat feeling seeing Aussies eventually lose the series as they had bulldozed all the sides all over the world. Loved Vaughan's cool, Trescothic's belligerence upfront and Peiterson's arrival on the cricket scene. Cant forget Hoggy's sublime drive when England needed it most. If that shot had not worked right, the result of ashes might have been different. It was a shame Flintoff, Hoggard and Harmison faded away for one reason or the other.

  • POSTED BY on | October 17, 2013, 16:19 GMT

    MARK--the all time best commentrator

  • POSTED BY pragmatist on | October 17, 2013, 14:59 GMT

    One of the big reasons that 2005 captured the public's imagination was that it was on free-to-air TV. The last major series on Channel 4. Key moments towards the end of days - like Harmison's slower ball to Clarke - were at peak viewing time in the evenings. Other significant passages of play were at weekends and so available to everyone. Administrators might prefer the lucrative, exclusive pay-TV deals; but the game as a national event has disappeared since that glorious summer.

  • POSTED BY Selassie-I on | October 17, 2013, 14:17 GMT

    I remember using all of my remaining annual leave for the year to watch the first 3 tests, then promptly resigning from my job to be able to watch the last 2! The job market was a lot better in those days though!

  • POSTED BY SirWilliam on | October 17, 2013, 13:07 GMT

    Yes it was a great series, second only to 1981, but isn't it time we stopped romanticising about the incredible loyalty of the crowd in turning out to witness the bus tour. Let's face it, if you had the choice of sitting in an office or going out onto the streets for a few beers, what would you do?

  • POSTED BY osullivj on | October 17, 2013, 12:10 GMT

    I was at Edgbaston on the final morning. 2005 is up there with 1981. The 2005 bowling line up is the best I've ever seen for England. Through the 70s and 80s we only ever had one genuine quick bowler, and two or three mediocre swing/seamers. In 2005 we had 3 genuine quicks and one quality swing bowler. And the 3 quicks were all different too! On the batting, I'm always amazed to recall the debate over Thorpe vs KP before the series started...

  • POSTED BY cloudmess on | October 17, 2013, 11:59 GMT

    The current England side is a very fine team, but the 2005 side was somehow less regimented, with more room for mavericks - the likes of Harmison, Flintoff, Jones (S) and Pietersen all flourised under the Vaughan/Fletcher regime. Such positive man-management allowed the 2005 side to play with real flair - something occasionally missing from the current England set-up.

  • POSTED BY hhillbumper on | October 17, 2013, 9:34 GMT

    That was a great bowling attack and people forget that England played great cricket all that year and before. 7 tests were won,we beat South Africa and then took the most amazing series I have ever seen.We were expecting our first child and nearly gave birth twice watching those tests! It was a great summer and if England had Swann in his present from instead of Giles it would have one down as an all time great England attack.It was a shame what injury and other factors caused. Great summer though

  • POSTED BY arun_39 on | October 17, 2013, 7:01 GMT

    Good article. One more on similar lines following Harmison retiring. Though elsewhere drawing comparisons with the famed WI quartet(s) drew criticism. Just checked a few stats. This English quartet actually played together in 16 tests and won many of them against quality opposition like SA, Aus. On the other hand Roberts/Holding/Garner/Croft played together only 11 times, while Marshall/Ambrose/Walsh/Bishop played together only 6 times. I'm not saying they were in the same class as the WI quartet, but its surprising to note that they played together for that many tests given Jones' short career of 18 tests

  • POSTED BY AdityaMookerjee on | October 17, 2013, 5:49 GMT

    What really made the mind boggle, was that Hoggard was a swing bowler. I think, in the British perspective, he was the perfect bowler, who hogged the runs the batsman was supposed to accumulate, by preventing the batsman from being a hoarder, and he took wickets too, in the period. I mean, he was made to bowl, when the situation was both dire and precious. The situation might have been dire, because of the slow accumulation of hoarded runs, and precious because the bowler who took the wicket was pretty precious. He was given spells of about 5-7 overs, even in Test Matches, or perhaps I overdo on my enthusiasm, and am very immoderate in my moderation of the counting of overs.

  • POSTED BY AdityaMookerjee on | October 17, 2013, 5:49 GMT

    What really made the mind boggle, was that Hoggard was a swing bowler. I think, in the British perspective, he was the perfect bowler, who hogged the runs the batsman was supposed to accumulate, by preventing the batsman from being a hoarder, and he took wickets too, in the period. I mean, he was made to bowl, when the situation was both dire and precious. The situation might have been dire, because of the slow accumulation of hoarded runs, and precious because the bowler who took the wicket was pretty precious. He was given spells of about 5-7 overs, even in Test Matches, or perhaps I overdo on my enthusiasm, and am very immoderate in my moderation of the counting of overs.

  • POSTED BY arun_39 on | October 17, 2013, 7:01 GMT

    Good article. One more on similar lines following Harmison retiring. Though elsewhere drawing comparisons with the famed WI quartet(s) drew criticism. Just checked a few stats. This English quartet actually played together in 16 tests and won many of them against quality opposition like SA, Aus. On the other hand Roberts/Holding/Garner/Croft played together only 11 times, while Marshall/Ambrose/Walsh/Bishop played together only 6 times. I'm not saying they were in the same class as the WI quartet, but its surprising to note that they played together for that many tests given Jones' short career of 18 tests

  • POSTED BY hhillbumper on | October 17, 2013, 9:34 GMT

    That was a great bowling attack and people forget that England played great cricket all that year and before. 7 tests were won,we beat South Africa and then took the most amazing series I have ever seen.We were expecting our first child and nearly gave birth twice watching those tests! It was a great summer and if England had Swann in his present from instead of Giles it would have one down as an all time great England attack.It was a shame what injury and other factors caused. Great summer though

  • POSTED BY cloudmess on | October 17, 2013, 11:59 GMT

    The current England side is a very fine team, but the 2005 side was somehow less regimented, with more room for mavericks - the likes of Harmison, Flintoff, Jones (S) and Pietersen all flourised under the Vaughan/Fletcher regime. Such positive man-management allowed the 2005 side to play with real flair - something occasionally missing from the current England set-up.

  • POSTED BY osullivj on | October 17, 2013, 12:10 GMT

    I was at Edgbaston on the final morning. 2005 is up there with 1981. The 2005 bowling line up is the best I've ever seen for England. Through the 70s and 80s we only ever had one genuine quick bowler, and two or three mediocre swing/seamers. In 2005 we had 3 genuine quicks and one quality swing bowler. And the 3 quicks were all different too! On the batting, I'm always amazed to recall the debate over Thorpe vs KP before the series started...

  • POSTED BY SirWilliam on | October 17, 2013, 13:07 GMT

    Yes it was a great series, second only to 1981, but isn't it time we stopped romanticising about the incredible loyalty of the crowd in turning out to witness the bus tour. Let's face it, if you had the choice of sitting in an office or going out onto the streets for a few beers, what would you do?

  • POSTED BY Selassie-I on | October 17, 2013, 14:17 GMT

    I remember using all of my remaining annual leave for the year to watch the first 3 tests, then promptly resigning from my job to be able to watch the last 2! The job market was a lot better in those days though!

  • POSTED BY pragmatist on | October 17, 2013, 14:59 GMT

    One of the big reasons that 2005 captured the public's imagination was that it was on free-to-air TV. The last major series on Channel 4. Key moments towards the end of days - like Harmison's slower ball to Clarke - were at peak viewing time in the evenings. Other significant passages of play were at weekends and so available to everyone. Administrators might prefer the lucrative, exclusive pay-TV deals; but the game as a national event has disappeared since that glorious summer.

  • POSTED BY on | October 17, 2013, 16:19 GMT

    MARK--the all time best commentrator

  • POSTED BY KarachiKid on | October 17, 2013, 19:31 GMT

    The ultimate series. I was glued to television and watched all the matches. It was a sweat feeling seeing Aussies eventually lose the series as they had bulldozed all the sides all over the world. Loved Vaughan's cool, Trescothic's belligerence upfront and Peiterson's arrival on the cricket scene. Cant forget Hoggy's sublime drive when England needed it most. If that shot had not worked right, the result of ashes might have been different. It was a shame Flintoff, Hoggard and Harmison faded away for one reason or the other.