Tony Cozier
Tony Cozier Tony CozierRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Veteran writer and commentator on Caribbean cricket

Gibson on thin ice

West Indies' coach has proved to be quite the survivor, but he may be running out of rope

Tony Cozier

June 14, 2014

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A

West Indies coach Ottis Gibson at a training camp ahead of the World Twenty20, Barbados, September 3, 2012
Gibson's future hangs on the results, and margins, of the New Zealand Tests © West Indies Cricket
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Ottis Gibson
Series/Tournaments: New Zealand tour of West Indies
Teams: West Indies

Of all the national head coaches in place when he was appointed by West Indies in October 2010, Ottis Gibson is the only one still standing.

Australia have gone from Tim Nielsen to Mickey Arthur to Darren Lehmann. Jamie Siddons has moved on from Bangladesh, as have Mark Greatbatch from New Zealand, Corrie van Zyl from South Africa, Waqar Younis from and back to Pakistan, Gary Kirsten from India.

Alan Butcher ended his stint with Zimbabwe after the West Indies tour last year. England shifted Andy Flower from his role of team coach, where he was highly rated, to technical director of elite coaching after their recent Ashes drubbing in Australia.

So Gibson remains the exception to the global trend of a regular turnover of coaches. The well-travelled 45-year-old Barbadian allrounder had been England's bowling guru when West Indies signed him up; according to his contract, renewed last year, he is now scheduled to carry on to October 2016.

It is an astonishing permanence, given West Indies' record of 13 defeats, three victories and nine draws in 25 Tests under his watch against opponents ranked above them on the ICC's Test table; major successes (five wins, no losses and a draw) have been achieved against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe.

It is difficult to think of a chief coach in any major sport who would have continued for so long with such a damning CV. But Gibson is the great survivor.

He has been the butt of regular criticism (Michael Holding said he needed to "learn how to man-manage"; others have been more strident). He was at the core of heated, divisive controversies involving senior players. The most prominent was Gayle's standoff with the West Indies Cricket Board over harsh words exchanged at long range between the two, leading to Gayle's exclusion from the team for a year and a half until a couple of prime ministers intervened to sort it out.

Ramnaresh Sarwan accused Gibson of telling him "some negative stuff that hurt me mentally and emotionally [and] took a toll on my confidence and the way I play".

In contrast, Gibson has had the full support of the WICB, both under Sir Julian Hunte's presidency and the new dispensation of Dave Cameron. There was, as well, his close, like-minded, discipline-first relationship with captain Darren Sammy, with whom he shared the team's first 30 Tests at the helm until Sammy's recent replacement.

"Ottis has added significant value to the development of the West Indies team during his tenure," the WICB chief executive Michael Muirhead said in extending his contract. "Most notably is that he led the implementation of a system of professionalism within the team unit, and curbed the negative results which we were experiencing with some frequency".

Muirhead spoke after 2-0 series wins over Bangladesh and New Zealand and West Indies' joyous triumph in the World Twenty20 in Sri Lanka; the 2-0 pasting of Zimbabwe in the Caribbean a year ago carried the winning streak to six Tests, a sequence not achieved since the heady days of the 1980s.

The subsequent meltdown in back-to-back contests late last year in India, hastily arranged as a backdrop to Sachin Tendulkar's emotional goodbye, and in New Zealand abruptly undermined Gibson's position.

None was more devastating than the debacle at Sabina Park in Kingston last week, in Gayle's much-hyped 100th Test, on his home ground. Events in India and New Zealand were Sammy's undoing; Sabina could be the final straw for Gibson.

Still, Gibson is the great survivor and, apart from its enduring faith in him, the WICB might see a couple of pertinent factors to justify his retention. They lie in the voluminous report by the director of cricket, Richard Pybus. It recommends fundamental changes as to how regional cricket is organised. It is likely the WICB would want Gibson involved from the start.

Pybus calls for a "West Indies First" selection policy that ties contracted players to availability for domestic tournaments, the first-class version of which is to be expanded from one to two rounds.

The WICB has already confirmed that it means business on this one, with Sunil Narine's exclusion from the current New Zealand series because of his late arrival from the IPL (by a couple of days) for the pre-series training camp.

One of the points in the proposal is that the time allowed for playing, training and recovery by West Indies selectees would be controlled by the head coach and the chief selector.

Another envisages an overall manager "to oversee and implement coaching programmes regionally". There has previously been no such coordination, leading to players raised on assorted coaching methods joining West Indies teams, causing confusion for the head coach.

Close attention to the quality of the pitches that produce substandard cricket and, as a consequence, substandard cricketers, is also a Pybus requirement. Gibson and others before him have repeatedly found themselves trying to make silk purses from sow's ears.

In the circumstances, Gibson's frustration has been increasingly evident. After the innings loss in three days last December in Wellington, he revealed to the media that harsh words, like "embarrassed" and "lack of fight", were spoken in the dressing room; he famously called on his players to "man up". He later chastised reserve players for not taking the opportunities offerd by the absence of some of the main players.

After Sabina he again went public, this time with his censure of the batting. It was, he redundantly noted, "bitterly disappointing". He presented as an example to his charges the way New Zealand went about it, "making runs, starts, getting yourself in first, assessing the conditions, assessing the bowlers, scoring areas".

These are forthright comments, justified as they are, that belong in the dressing room, not in front of microphones and before television cameras.

In the end, the decision on Gibson's future is likely to hang on nothing more complicated than the direction of the last two Tests of the current contest.

The words of Sammy during the bad times in New Zealand - "we cannot continue like this" - keep repeating themselves. He prophetically listed himself among those whose careers were on the line when they returned to the Caribbean.

Gibson cannot afford two more performances like Kingston - or like Mumbai, Kolkata, Wellington and Hamilton last year. Otherwise he could suffer Sammy's fate.

Tony Cozier has written about and commentated on cricket in the Caribbean for 50 years

RSS Feeds: Tony Cozier

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Beck61 on (June 18, 2014, 13:08 GMT)

The discussions around captain, selectors, coach and team will not serve to move WI cricket forward. At best they address symptoms of the problem and not the root causes. At worst they prolong the current state. If you take the 50 best players in the WI, I can guarantee that no combination from that group will be able to beat Australia, England, SA, India, Pakistan or SL in a 5 test series. If we accept the above statement as true then the discussion about who should be captain, coach or on the selection panel is irrelevant. The focus and discussion should be on how do we create a system that will produce the next Richards, Greenidge, Marshall, Holding, Lara, Ambrose, etc.. I concede that it will make a difference to an individual cricketer whether they are selected or not or named captain, but in the overall scheme of things it is not that important. We were fortunate in the past that through county cricket and Kerry Packer that our natural talents were honed to become world beaters.

Posted by   on (June 17, 2014, 12:48 GMT)

Cricket and our progress in this realm starts in the mind! Many of our players see themselves as stars of the short version and so even in tests, they perform in that mode. You cannot reinvent something by replicating it! For us to develop test cricket, we cannot do it with people who cannot be shaken from their old mould, hence, inculcate it in our youth, move away from the 3/4 days version of first class cricket to the real deal 5 days, so the dashing culture of bat-man-ship, will fall away and guys will develop stickability and value their overall performance especially their time at the crease. Give the bowlers also the opportunity to increase their strength and endurance thus enhancing their performance. Let the mindset be, I must bat at least 200 overs, make provision for bad weather and bowl out the opposition twice. This must be a constant bench mark! To often WI get rolled over within 50 overs. Developing this culture of excellence is urgent and can only take root in our youth

Posted by   on (June 17, 2014, 1:31 GMT)

Gibson needs to go. They West Indies player need leadership and they are not getting it from Gibson, send him back to England.

Posted by   on (June 17, 2014, 1:06 GMT)

The West Indies cannot figure out how to pick in form players, Lendl Simmons, Dwayne Bravo, should be plying in this test. Cotrell and Gabriel need 2 years more before they should have played a test match. Its time for Gayle to go, his foot movement have gotten worse, he is now a bunny for away swing bowlers. The coaching is not the problem yet, its the selection committee. Johnson and and blackwood are good choices to be bled into the side, its not like it can get any worse.

Posted by shemozzle on (June 16, 2014, 23:06 GMT)

i dont think getting rid of gibson is the key! i think doing a full clean out of the wicb and selectors would be a better start! if you ask me i think there is way to much going on behind the scenes as to why the best players arnt getting selected! i beleive the domestic format in the west indies is terrible as proven! west indies first class cricketers need to play in other domestic competitions around the world just to get a bit better understanding of what cricket has to offer! regardless of whatever reason ! you select the best players you have at all times ! i am sick of all the crap that is going on! give ottis the chance to coach well

Posted by   on (June 16, 2014, 19:34 GMT)

I feel very sad to see West Indies in such disarray. Whether Gibson is on the firing line or not, I guess fresh ideas need to be brought in every 4 years i.e. from World cup to World cup. In a way, West Indies is similar to India ... they don't win overseas. However, I'm really sad to see that they can't win at home. Meanwhile, New Zealand is not a bad team at all. While I see it as an encouraging sign that bowlers like Kemar Roach and Jerome Taylor are on a comeback trail, I would like to see some new young fast bowlers who bowl at 145+ kmph. Indians are not built for speed, and West Indians are not made for spin. Agreed Sunil Narine is a fantastic wicket taker, but how effective he will be in tests remains to be seen. There is huge talent - Dwayne Smith, Keiron Pollard, Dwayne Bravo, Kevon Cooper ... these people can do very well. Encourage them to build test cricket, no just call them T20 specialists and export them to IPL franchises. Also build fast and bouncy wickets.

Posted by   on (June 16, 2014, 12:35 GMT)

It's easy to target the Captain and Coach, for me there needs to be a clean sweep of the personnel right at the top. The WICB and Selectors need refreshing, as well as Gibson. This whole debacle involving Narine, was the last straw of many poor decisions beforehand. The only positive is the introduction of more youngsters in recent times, instead of recycling the tried and tested failures. There doesn't seem to be any thought-process regarding the balance of the squad itself. The pitches in the Caribbean look more like sub-continental dustbowls, which completely discourage any up and coming fast-bowlers. We need some fresh ideas to inspire and educate the players of today and the future, instead of the same old methodical, predictable, one-dimentional thinking, that has left us 20 years behind everybody else. Even going back to the mid-90s, individual world class performers like Ambrose, Walsh and Lara couldn't cover the multiple flaws, our teams have always had as a collective unit.

Posted by westindiesupporter on (June 16, 2014, 6:24 GMT)

people are forgetting his achievements. He was the coach who led our team to the t20 world cup in 2012 and also a very successful t20 world cup last year. Let us also not forgot the other things he has done for the welfare of the team. He even led us to no. 5 in the test rankings during his tenure.

Posted by symester on (June 16, 2014, 1:25 GMT)

It is sad that this article took so long to come out as any other coach around the world would have been sack 2 years ago and to add insult to injury he was offered a extention. WI is the only side that gives perference to the coach over the player as if the coach is going out there to play. Coaches main job is man management and in this Gibson as not only fail but push WI cricket back a further 5 years. Where all our best talented cricketers are suppose to be in the pick form of there careers they are all trying to make a come back. Gayle 2 years out of cricket, Taylor 4 years, Shiv 2-3 years from ODI and batting to low in test also the main damage to WI this era is the Sarwan ordeal. To add to that the over use of Sammy as test captain that render Bravo's test selection and the treatment of Ediel Edwards. The only good thing i saw was the re-introduction of a inform Marlon Samaul which lead to the victory in the t20 and New Zealand test

Posted by   on (June 16, 2014, 0:27 GMT)

He should have gone long time ago

Posted by mrhamilton on (June 15, 2014, 20:00 GMT)

What does cozier mean Gibson shouldn't be saying the batting was "bitterly disappointing" in public.the Windies public and media deserved a response from the coach.sacking Sammy will confine Windies test cricket to the Dark ages there is no other leader on the pitch.chanderpauls batting is for himself and it seldom if ever affects the result.if he can t be bothered to bat at 3 dump him. People forget Sammy made Windies semi competitive in 2011/2012 v India and Australia that time he sent himself in at number 3 and started smashing his way to the target at a time he was under constant pressure

Posted by   on (June 15, 2014, 18:47 GMT)

I really don't what the all the excitement is about. We change captains, same result, we change the coach same result. We have some really poor test cricketers at the this moment, but players who are so rich rom playing the IPL that i dot know what will turn this team around. A change in coach is not going to get any better results. People are upset that he dropped their favourite players. We chop and change and really expect better results? We need to commit to using some young players who we can develop for the future. We have not found ant replacements for Chanderpaul and Gayle etc. Gibson cant help that neither can a new coach. Our players are just weak mentally. Look look how the young KIWI batsmen approached their game. I have not seen that from out batsmen in years apart from Chanderpaul. Glad that Samuels is gone now. We need back Bravo in the team.

Posted by Outswinging on (June 15, 2014, 16:06 GMT)

Gibson, should have been long gone. Where was Cozier all this time? West Indies cricket has to be managed based on merit and this should hold true for managers, coaches and players. Let Gibson go back to England. Let him leave now.

Posted by   on (June 15, 2014, 13:06 GMT)

I won't be too quick to axe Gibson. I think West Indies administration needs to look at the bigger picture. They need to add more overseas players in the regional 4 day games. They need to get livelier pitches. The domestic cricket must be exposed to a quality that mixes in good International players in the longer format.

Posted by   on (June 15, 2014, 12:06 GMT)

Why blame the coach? While I am no fan of Gibson, is Gibson out there batting in the middle? When Gayle or Samuels or any of them gets out for lack of footwork or poor shot selection- is Gibson playing that shot? We have senior players who are stuck in their ways and deserve the criticism they receive, maybe the drop of Samuels will wake them up to perform better in second test...rally windies as usual...

Posted by   on (June 15, 2014, 9:14 GMT)

It's a tough job and of course he's made an effort but it hasn't worked. In fact I'd go so far as to say please get the new coach in quickly before Gibson gets his hands on Johnson and Blackwood :) Bennett of Jamaica, a no nonsense legend like Grenidge Phil Simmons, Robin Singh, Tom Moody, Michael Slater...anyone. Robin Singh with all his experience would be my pick.

Posted by tutorial on (June 14, 2014, 19:00 GMT)

When a coach is doing his job effectively the players takes that with them on the field every time for every second they're playing. No excuses for the LOUSY JOB, its time for strategies not wish full thinking.

Posted by aclarity on (June 14, 2014, 18:54 GMT)

Tony I think Gibson is on solid ground. Added to your article is the fact that no young player improved under his watch. He is still there because the WICB cannot make decisions even when the evidence is glaring. Let me suggest that Coach Bennett of Jamaica will make an excellent replacement surrounded by Larry Gomes at batting coach and Ambrose as bowling coach. We need to employ people with winning perspectives. Send Stuart Williams to coach high school.

Posted by WIFL on (June 14, 2014, 18:54 GMT)

Why wait, there is nothing Mr Gibson can do in 5 or 10 days that will make a difference afterhaving been in the position for 4 years. Gibson is unable to help our players and bring out the best in them. A question I have heard echoed by many cricket GURU's. "How can other countries take ordinary, average cricketers and transform them in good and great cricketers, and West Indies are unable to do it?". I believe something is fundamentally wrong with the way in which we manage cricket in the Caribbean. We continue to say, we don't have the quality players of the past, our Regional standard of cricket is not strong enough, our pitches are to slow, our players have no passion, and the list goes on. Most of these issues pointx to management, how long are we to continue like this before we fix West Indies cricket. To speak Mr, Copier's words WI may never make it to the TOP in his lifetime, I tend to agree.

Posted by   on (June 14, 2014, 18:19 GMT)

WI incompetent management has always been rescued by the talent of certain players and team leaders over the years. This will never change Gibson makes no difference and his long tenure is insignificant . Just let it be and it will happen again.

Posted by Ncnotorious on (June 14, 2014, 18:11 GMT)

Gibson knows nothing about batting and he has shun the good players in the past like Shiv, Sarwan, and Gayle. Its unfortunate to say that our WI batsmen learn more from the IPL and their coaches then from Gibson. There seems to be too much reliance on natural talent rather than both talent and technique. Shiv is a workhorse and knows what batting is, the younger guys need to ask him for advice, as he shows that it takes more than natural talent to consistently succeed.

Posted by wpbus13 on (June 14, 2014, 16:15 GMT)

He must deliver in the next two games otherwise he needs to go, four years is ample time!!

Posted by android_user on (June 14, 2014, 16:00 GMT)

When will we realise that what needs to change is the culture of poor mental toughness that our players in WI have? they are like a dog that sees a big piece of meat in front of him and only then will he show aggression. Do they all sit around a table with Chanderpaul and ask ' how do you think at the crease? ' Is there a culture of learning from the icons of the game? Our cricket has become corrupted by the absence of tenacity...yet we never sir to ask why we haven't had a consistent effort since Lara.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (June 14, 2014, 15:32 GMT)

WICB and mr Gibson bury their head in the sand and pretend no one is watching

Posted by   on (June 14, 2014, 15:17 GMT)

Coaches or managers do not play the game, the selectees have a responsibility to the team and their careers to perform and deliver; the nonsense of pretending that someone other than ourselves are responsible for failing is hog wash; our players must be prepared to make the sacrifices both on and off the field and give the region a reason to be proud

Posted by delboy on (June 14, 2014, 12:04 GMT)

I would appreciate Mr Cozier drawing our attention to the musical chairs called international cricket management. Some degree of correlation of how these moves has positively affected each of these teams would help to enforce the point that Gibson needs to go. Is Gibson the odd man out because he is the best the WI can afford? What is the cost of replacing him versus implementing the real ingredients which the team lacks? Change the management but make it effective, not because everyone has.

Posted by ilyas on (June 14, 2014, 12:03 GMT)

In any other country Gibson would have been sacked. After 4 years in the job nothing has improved so why keep him? So he can take control over the excellent Pybus report and mess that up too? He says the players need to man up - what about him? What has he improved? The young players have gone backwards and the pitches are dire. The one shining light has been Shiv and only cos he does it his way. It is true that WI cricket needs the shake-up that pybus recommends but who in their right mind would want a guy that has delivered nothing at all in test and odi level? Time to go Otis and let's get someone who can deliver!!!!

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (June 14, 2014, 9:47 GMT)

Powell, Edwards and Samuels not working anymore. If theses are the best we have in the WI we are serious trouble.

Posted by   on (June 14, 2014, 6:04 GMT)

K Edwards is one of our best young batsmen no less than Gavaskar has rated him as a special talent, he and Bravo are the future, let Samuels go too old too inconsistent and too tainted. Pollard/Bravo senior or C.Brathwaithe/Carter or Russel/Bonner are the options for number 6

Posted by old_chap on (June 14, 2014, 6:01 GMT)

miguel cummins,delorn johnson and jason holder should give a long run in test matches..the problem is ottis gibson blocking their way to open doors for some mediocre bowlers barring kemar roach and jerome taylor.

Posted by tanstell87 on (June 14, 2014, 5:32 GMT)

@scottyg - If Pollard can score an ODI century in Australia(http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/573025.html), then he can score runs in test cricket...also coming from injury he scored a first class century for his domestic side in WI before coming to IPL...

Posted by Rally_Windies on (June 14, 2014, 4:51 GMT)

@ scottyg ..

Pollard plays diffenrelty in long version cricket ....

Just like ODI chaderpaul and Test chaderpaul a 2 completely different batsmen

Pollard has SHOW ability in the longer form, in Domestic WI cricket.. and he has SHOW far MORE potential that : (1) Simmons (2) Dwayne Smith (3) Kirk Edwards (4) Kieron Powell (5) Kreg Brathwaite (6) Fuadin (7) Adrian Barath

He also has better 4-day stats than most of them ...

Gibson has put a 23 year old bajan batsman with only 11 1st class games with an average of 23. in the test Squad ... While Pollard averaging 38. at age 28 ,,, and having scored a 100 in his 1st game returning from injury ( and a 0 in the other innings) ..

Cannot get a nod....

BTW... guess who is the last WI player to score a 1st class 100 in the WI ..

why yes, it is Pollard ! ! He is in better form than Samuels, Kirk Edwards and Bravo !

so what is teh problem ?

Posted by scottyg on (June 14, 2014, 4:21 GMT)

@tanstell87, Pollard is a t20 player who cannot play the moving ball, no point bringing him into the side, southee will destroy him. Sarwan and Edwards are both old and not going to play test cricket again. Edwards especially doesn't even have a good test record. West Indies have some talented young fast bowlers (Holder, Cummins, Beaton, Johnson, Brathwaite) that they could blood instead.

Posted by tanstell87 on (June 14, 2014, 4:00 GMT)

cant understand West Indies tactics to go with Edwards at number 3....time for Windies to bring in Pollard at number 6....let that man be given atleast one crack at red ball cricket....if Pollard fires it will be great for Windies test setup...

also not playing your premier spinner Narine in your home tests is bound to affect any team...

As an Indian fan, i used to love watching Sarwan bat, but he was unceremoniously dropped not given any opportunity by Gibson & team management....

now with Sammy gone from test cricket, WI has the perfect balance to do well in test cricket...3 fast bowlers(Roach,Taylor & Fidel) & one of Benn, Narine or Shillingford...they can definitely click in test cricket..

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tony CozierClose

    Every innings is an act of courage

Simon Barnes: Phillip Hughes' death was desperately unlucky, and it came in the courageous pursuit of sporting excellence

The country kid who moved a nation

It was a matter of time before Phillip Hughes cemented his spot in the Australian Test team. Then, improbably and inconsolably, his time ran out. By Daniel Brettig

Inzamam had a lot of time to play his shots

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Inzy's technique

    'If I'd stayed captain, Bangladesh would have done better'

Habibul Bashar talks about the team's early days, landmark wins, and the current squad

Why cricket needs women's Tests

Raf Nicholson: Apart from the fact that they are exciting, intense encounters, getting rid of them will only spell doom for the format itself

News | Features Last 7 days

Phillip Hughes: Gone too soon

The cricket world reacts to the passing away of Phillip Hughes

Phillip Hughes: Country kid who moved a nation

Likeable, hard-working and skilful, it was a matter of time before Phillip Hughes cemented his spot in the Australian Test team. Then, improbably and inconsolably, his time ran out

Hope for Hughes, feel for Abbott

It is impossible to imagine how Sean Abbott must feel after sending down that bouncer to Phillip Hughes. While the cricket world hopes for Hughes' recovery, it should also ensure Abbott is supported

November games need November prices

An early start to the international season, coupled with costly tickets, have kept the Australian public away from the cricket

Phillip Hughes

News | Features Last 7 days