New Zealand v South Africa, 2nd Test, Hamilton, 2nd day March 16, 2012

'Felt I could get out at any time' - de Villiers

If ever a score was misleading in the way it was obtained, it was AB de Villiers' 83. De Villiers' started off at almost a run-a-ball, approached the New Zealand bowlers with the most positive of mindsets and kept attacking them, but later revealed that he actually felt tentative and anxious throughout his innings.

"I felt under pressure the whole time. I felt I could get out at any time," de Villiers said at the end of day two. "There's something there [for the bowlers] and if you get a bit loose out there you're going to lose your wicket. That's what I felt the whole time. I never really felt in. I think that sums it up really nicely. You're just never in. You can't let go of your concentration for one minute."

De Villiers occupied the crease from mid-morning to late in the South Africa innings. He was a spectator to the collapse, which resulted in them teetering on 88 for 6, and was the architect of the recovery, ushering the tail past New Zealand's total. None of that sounds particularly easy and de Villiers confirmed that it wasn't. "They bowled extremely well, especially Mark Gillespie, they just never let go," he said. "The ball was moving around nicely. Obviously, they looked after the ball well, it was swinging both ways."

Although day two was talked up as a batting day, with clear skies and fairly warm sunshine, de Villiers said there was enough in the surface and the air to assist the bowlers. "There's a bit more swing with the sun out, when it gets a bit warmer," he said. "It's weird because you say you want overcast conditions [for swing]. But it probably moves around a bit more off the seam when it's overcast and it swings a bit more when it's warmer."

He lauded the New Zealand pitches for being "really good Test wickets" and ensuring that they are "no boring sessions", but was visibly upset with the part South Africa's line-up played in maintaining the excitement. While a middle-order collapse has become an all too familiar thing this summer, de Villiers said it had a lot to do with incisive bowling. "You can never ever take it away from the bowling," he said. "I won't say that the top six have failed because it's just poor batting … that will be very unfair towards the bowlers."

When the same thing happened in Dunedin and South Africa were bowled out for under 250, Graeme Smith revealed that a stern talking to from Gary Kirsten had put the pieces back together for their second innings. While de Villiers did not say whether the same thing had happened here, he said the same mistakes that had been made at University Oval were committed by the line-up at Seddon Park. "We were very disappointed with the way we played," he said. "I'm not going to sit here and say I am very proud of that knock. I thought we did well [in the end] but all in all, we're very disappointed with the way we played out there."

Neither team has shone with the bat so far, which makes identifying a target that will be relatively simple to chase close to impossible for de Villiers. "I can't tell you what's going to be a good total to chase down here, I don't think any of us are sure at the moment," he said. But, with New Zealand not even in the lead yet and four of their best batsmen back in the change-room, South Africa will feel in control. "We'd like to get a couple of early wickets tomorrow, to make things a bit easier for us," de Villiers said.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on March 16, 2012, 22:00 GMT

    "While a middle-order collapse has become an all too familiar thing this summer, de Villiers said it had a lot to do with incisive bowling. "You can never ever take it away from the bowling," he said."

    This is what makes the South African team so much easier to respect than the Australian team, when our bowlers beat Australia the Aussie team and the media didn't send a word of praise their way. Meanwhile here we have a player who is currently one of the best middle order batsmen in the world giving fair praise to a bowling attack for a single innings. South Africa are now my second favourite team ... after the Black Caps of course (no matter how difficult that is at times).

    Lets hope Williamson and Vettori can give our bowlers a fighting chance for days 4 and 5.

  • Dummy4 on March 16, 2012, 12:40 GMT

    It's good to see NZ being more competitive with SA in the test arena, i think the win over Australia in Australia was a good thing for NZ. Some great young players there now that i think just need time and more games under their belt.

    But I think the NZ selectors need to be smarter and more ruthless, pick true wicket takers like Boult & Nethula not Arnel. Also why have they not picked Adam Milne? 150+ which we dont get alot of in NZ and they don't pick him! Its insane, it doesn't matter what he does at domestic level, just get him into the NZ team and develop him there. It is so frustrating as a kiwi to see him not being used..

    I agree with chilled_avenger, from what little i have seen so far(being a kiwi living in OZ) de Villiers looks in top form and is a great player to watch, definitely one of the worlds best at the moment and very under-rated. Mccullum n Taylor starting to hit some form also which is great..

  • Dummy4 on March 16, 2012, 11:57 GMT

    @chilled_avenger: U r absolutely right,this guy AB had an average of 27 in tests in 2008 and its been like 4 years and now it is 50 and its all been his work,200s in subcontinent conditions ,100s all over the world,he has re invented his game..Go Ab...

  • Priyashrav on March 16, 2012, 10:14 GMT

    de Villiers is even more underrated in the Test arena than in ODIs! A Test batting average touching 50 is nothing to sneeze at,particularly when he has played mostly in the bowling friendly tracks of South Africa. And in the last few years(especially since 2009) he has been amazing with the bat and is easily among the best in World currently. Still I never see people mentioning his name as one of good Batsmen nowadays! I hope he gets his due share of appreciation and praise...........Go AB! --A fan from India

  • Nick on March 16, 2012, 9:50 GMT

    If we hadn't picked Brent Arnel the chances are a wicket taker like Boult could've and we might've had a innings lead as opposed to 60 runs behind. Not only was Arnel ineffective he also was the least ecconomic of the bowlers, making his selection pointless. My only hope is that in the third test, with the inclusion of Brownlie or Flynn to boost the batting and Nethula or Boult back we might have a chance of actually winning.

  • No featured comments at the moment.