West Indies in New Zealand 2013-14 December 23, 2013

New Zealand find their 'core four'

The commanding performances of Ross Taylor, Kane Williamson, Trent Boult and Tim Southee against West Indies, with a little support from their team-mates, meant a dominant New Zealand showing. They'll need more of the same when India arrive

New Zealand's performance in the three-Test series against West Indies illustrated the value of a "core four", who, with support from their team-mates, can reignite the country's prowess in the longer format.

The 2-0 series win is difficult to place into context given the calibre of a West Indies side missing Chris Gayle and a host of bowling options, one of whom, Shane Shillingford, was banned for an illegal action during the series.

However, Ross Taylor, Trent Boult, Tim Southee and Kane Williamson demonstrated New Zealand's capabilities. At the very least, it has heightened anticipation for February's series against India, given India's parity against South Africa in their Johannesburg draw.

The reassuring thud of Taylor's bat against West Indian deliveries will be the series' abiding memory.

He became the second New Zealand player to score centuries in three consecutive Tests. Mark Burgess is the only other to achieve the feat. Burgess did it over 27 months (November 1969-February 1972) against three countries (Pakistan, England, West Indies); Taylor achieved the feat in 19 days against one and finished with a series average of 247.50.

Taylor achieved a scroll of statistical accolades. His average of 47.51 is the country's best for those who have played more than 20 innings. He joined Nathan Astle on 11 Test centuries with only Martin Crowe (17) and John Wright (12) ahead of him. His 495 runs are the second-most by a New Zealand batsman in a three-Test series (Andrew Jones made 513 against Sri Lanka in 1991). Taylor's 866 runs in a calendar year (from 16 innings at an average of 72.16) are the second-most by a New Zealand batsman (John R Reid made 871 across 24 innings in 1965).

His consistency enabled New Zealand to negotiate a green pitch in Wellington and repel the troublesome spin of Sunil Narine in Hamilton. Add his highest Test score (217 not out) in Dunedin and seven slips catches; it represents the best series of his career.

Williamson missed the opening Test due to a hand injury but completed innings of 45, 58 and 56 on return. Add 114, 74 and 62 from the series in Bangladesh and you have 409 runs at an 81.80 average since his productive county stint with Yorkshire.

He anchored the final innings chase for 122 with surety of footwork and a high left elbow in defence. It minimised anxious moments for New Zealand fans.

Boult and Southee headed the bowling operation. Evidence suggests the pair is capable of scything through talented batting line-ups. India - particularly Virat Kohli, Cheteshwar Pujara and Rohit Sharma - could provide their steepest test. Throw in green tracks and it will be an absorbing contest.

Boult's 20 wickets at 15.40 and Southee's 18 wickets at 18.11 in this series showed they have taken up the mantle of Chris Martin. Boult's swing, movement, pace and accuracy, including his 10-wicket bag in Wellington, meant the 24-year-old rocketed into third for wickets taken this year (46 in 12 Tests) behind Stuart Broad (59) and James Anderson (48) who have played one more Test.

Southee completed the year as the 12th New Zealand player to take 100 Test wickets. He took three wickets in his final over to finish with a tally of 101.

Like in the 1980s era, with Sir Richard Hadlee and Martin Crowe, the core four need backing. It was present against West Indies but becomes paramount with the arrival of India, the world's second-ranked Test side.

How do their team-mates stack up?

  • Brendon McCullum produced a seventh Test century in Dunedin and 37 to support Taylor in Wellington. He appears to lead the team well but his form can't afford to dip against India with Jesse Ryder accumulating three centuries and two 80s in five Plunket Shield matches.

  • Corey Anderson is perhaps most vulnerable to Ryder's resurgence but with a Test average of 37 in five matches and 11 wickets at 19.36, he has achieved. It would be a cruel and inconsistent twist to the selection policy to remove him from a winning side.

  • Likewise Ish Sodhi has shown enough promise to be retained. It could depend on Daniel Vettori's fitness but McCullum's statement that Sodhi's "looking forward to the India series" hints he'll get picked. The only problem might lie with India's accomplished techniques against spin. Sodhi's skills will come under scrutiny, especially trying to stymie the boundary balls dished up in a legspinner's search for control.

  • Neil Wagner looks steady as the third pace bowler. He doesn't get the glory of Boult and Southee but always does his fair share of grunt work in unfavourable conditions.

  • BJ Watling keeps progressing as the wicketkeeper-batsman. His batting (average 42) impressed in three outings at No. 7, as did his keeping. Watling gave away six byes during a series where West Indies faced 2863 deliveries. The only 'work-on' (to use the modern parlance) might be up to the stumps against Sodhi's legspin.

One area which could face selection scrutiny is the opening combination of Peter Fulton and Hamish Rutherford. They look competent on relatively flat pitches but have struggled technically (Fulton) or with discipline (Rutherford) when it comes to knuckling down on the seaming surfaces of England or Wellington. They had an opening stand of 95 in the first innings against West Indies in Dunedin but followed up with partnerships of 3, 14, 18 and 33 (series average 32.6). Rutherford's 48 not out to see the team home in Hamilton earned him kudos.

The pair might be under observation but an average opening partnership of 38.41 in 17 innings reads strongly. Compare that to the average of 31.82 in 56 innings between John Wright and Bruce Edgar, often cited as New Zealand's best. However, in Wright and Edgar's defence, they frequently faced West Indian and Australian attacks which, in the early 1980s, contained some of history's quickest and most accurate bowlers. In contrast, Fulton and Rutherford have padded up against England, Bangladesh and the weaker West Indies of the modern era.

Andrew Alderson is cricket writer at New Zealand's Herald on Sunday

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Geoff on December 26, 2013, 18:16 GMT

    I think we need our feet on the ground here. Kane Williamson yes - probably the best batting potential we've had since Martin Crowe, but prone to playing the out shot when we least expect it. Ross Taylor - so happy that he's finally learned how to be a test batsman. Now he needs to do it against the better attacks. The bowling? We need a core 4 member who either consistently gets it through at 140+ or bamboozles the lower order with spin. I think Hamish Rutherford has the goods to be able to join your elite group. I hope he's persevered with. He won't be lacking for advice from the rest of his family that's for sure.

  • Apa on December 24, 2013, 18:31 GMT

    Typical negative comments. Just let them play. 2 wins is great compared to what's been happening in the last few years. I'm happy we won a few games. We're such a small country and we can compete at times. But it's not enough for some people. They are getting better and starting to form as a unit. I'm stoked India are coming (fine bunch of players). I'll be at the Basin to see the awesome Kohli and co.

  • john on December 24, 2013, 6:02 GMT

    @snowbadger, there is no way in this world that mike hesson will ever drop his good mate as test captain...no way!!!...as long as bmac is there so is hesson.He has the final say...but like mr edgar said"thats the way he plays"!.. So get used to having a specialist captain..merry christmas nz.

  • William on December 24, 2013, 4:56 GMT

    @kiwicricketnut brilliant comment, Sodhi must do something reasonably well with the ball against India as their mighty line up will target him and Wagner thus releasing the pressure that Southee and Boult build. Even Anderson would be a better third seamer than Wagner as Anderson is very economical and takes big wickets for a relatively low cost. Dropping Anderson will be really stupid as it would badly ruin his confidence and be hypocritical as Anderson is performing well unlike McCullum. While I watched the ashes test, there was a Michael Clarke interview with him stating he knows he will be dropped if he does not score runs. This should apply to Baz especially with the rise of Anderson and ryders return. If our pitches are anything like the Hamilton pitch, we will highly lose both tests by an innings and lose the India series 2 nil. But green decks will result in our chances being much higher.

  • subhasish on December 24, 2013, 3:38 GMT

    gud win for nz but w.l test side is not a great side every team is play well aganist team nz need to beat top test side to call them selves a gud test team.

  • Jon on December 24, 2013, 3:12 GMT

    This NZL side is finally developing into a formidable challenge, especially for touring sides. England couldn't win here. The West Indies didn't even get close, and I'm expecting India will find it tough too. Would love to see Ryder and Vettori back in the squad, but its hard to see how they would slot into a playing XI.

  • Dummy4 on December 24, 2013, 2:44 GMT

    Is it too much to ask for professional cricket writers stop spouting such nonsense as this: "His average of 47.51 is the country's best for those who have played more than 20 innings."

    It is not valid to compare a player at the peak of his career with players who have retired. Most players experience a dip in their average in the last couple of years before they retire - that is how they know it is time to retire! Ross Taylor is not even 30 yet, and has not experienced this dip. One can hope that his average will rise still higher in the future, and if he retires with an average of 47.51, then that will indeed have surpassed Crowe's final average of 45.36.

    But if we want to compare apples with apples, we should note that by the end of the 1992 series against Zimbabwe, Crowe had played 62 tests and scored 4454 runs at an average of 48.41. Taylor might well surpass this mark, but has not done so yet!

  • Patrick on December 24, 2013, 2:07 GMT

    If we don't go with Latham and Ryder from the first test I feel we will lose the series against India. Fulton is terrible against spin, Ryder is probably even more consistent than Taylor. But the problem is the man you have to drop to get Ryder is also our captain. Dropping Anderson would be a mistake, but not putting Ryder in the team will also be mistake. For the benefit of the team McCullum should quit test cricket he has already said he has back problems. I think at 32 he probably will in the next two years or so lets hope Andersons test ability or Ryder's drive for test cricket hasn't been lost by then. Also if Vettori is not picked for Indian series we will struggle to bowl India out as the NZ weather is a lot drier from January onwards meaning batter friendly wickets.

  • ESPN on December 23, 2013, 23:31 GMT

    What madness is this ? How can you go into a test match with 3 frontline bowlers ? one fast bowler and 2 spinners . And 7 batsmen making 103 runs . You need to have 4 frontline bowlers and a allrounder and 6 frontline batsmen . Oh by the way , you also need a good captain.

  • ESPN on December 23, 2013, 23:31 GMT

    What madness is this ? How can you go into a test match with 3 frontline bowlers ? one fast bowler and 2 spinners . And 7 batsmen making 103 runs . You need to have 4 frontline bowlers and a allrounder and 6 frontline batsmen . Oh by the way , you also need a good captain.

  • No featured comments at the moment.