The Heavy Ball

This, that and the other. Mostly the other

Victorious in absentia

Cases from history when excusing yourself from the game worked better than playing it

Alex Bowden

Comments: 1 | Text size: A | A
Graeme Smith at a press conference on the eve of the Test against Sri Lanka, Centurion, December 14, 2011
"What can I say? We've always helped England stay on top" © Getty Images
Related Links

England recently retained their No. 1 spot in the Test rankings because a match between New Zealand and South Africa was rained off. This is just the latest example of cricket triumph in absentia, a phenomenon that reached its pinnacle with England's 2005 Ashes victory, which was marked by a weird stump-withdrawing ceremony carried out by the umpires with neither team present. There have been other, less well-known examples, however.

Calcutta XI v England XI, 1892
Those complaining about the excessive use of substitute fielders in the modern game would do well to read the reports of this fixture. The England XI batted slowly until tea on the first day, at which point they had reached 72 for 2. The not-out batsmen, ATB Henderson and TBC Sanderson, returned to the dressing room to find that their team-mates had retired to Calcutta Polo Club for drinks. Not wanting to miss out, the pair persuaded the opposition to supply them with two stand-ins for the evening session.

Not wanting to offend their guests, the Calcutta XI provided their two finest batsmen, meaning they themselves were down to nine men. When the England XI turned up for the second day's play, they were delighted to find that they had reached 282-8 and had gained another six players. With things going so well, they headed straight to Calcutta Polo Club for a morning glass of port.

The match continued in this vein with the so-called England XI in fact comprising the best nine players from the Calcutta XI, which was now a Calcutta II. The tourists eventually triumphed by an innings and 212 runs, although news of their victory didn't reach them for another three days. It was the only match they would win all tour.

Warwickshire v Yorkshire, 1896
Following a dire first-innings batting performance, Warwickshire were left needing 321 to win. At 18 for 5, the game appeared to be up for the home side. The situation was compounded when one of the not-out batsmen, RBJ Hyde, received a telegram calling upon him to lead an expedition in Sudan. Hyde left immediately and Warwickshire quickly fell to 32 for 9.

The match could and perhaps should have ended there, but all involved felt it was unfair that Warwickshire should suffer because one of their number was such an exceptionally fine, upstanding gentleman that he was needed for higher purposes. It was agreed that Hyde could return to the crease in the form of his cap and bat, which were carefully laid in front of the stumps. Wisden shows that "RBJ Hyde" made 146 over the next two days "… playing a series of exquisite cuts and glances and scoring exclusively behind the wicket." Hyde could have been given out on hundreds of occasions, but Yorkshire felt it was poor form to appeal in his absence and so refrained.

The match ended in a Warwickshire win, but descended into acrimony when it was revealed that Hyde's batting partner, Arthur Richardson, had not in fact also been called to Sudan when 11 not out. Richardson had in fact been hiding in a cupboard in the dressing rooms while his cap and bat took advantage of the away team's kind-hearted generosity.

RSS FeedAlex Bowden blogs at King Cricket

All quotes and "facts" in this article are made up, but you knew that already, didn't you?

Tell us what you think. Send us your feedback

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 1 
Posted by   on (March 15, 2012, 10:03 GMT)

Decent stuff Alex. Keep it up. (The Barnt Green posse)

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email this page to a friend Email Feedback Feedback Print Print
More in The Heavy Ball
RSS FeedAll
  • Groovy tunes and a sunset at the SCG
    Fan Following: A sublime knock from Steven Smith, soaking in a sunset in the SCG members' pavilion and groovy music made the semi-final clash between Australia and India a memorable one
  • Come now, Mr Faulkner
    The Long Handle: The Australian allrounder would have us believe sledging is inevitable. Is it?
  • Wahab's roar, and mad Maxwell
    Fan Following: The Wahab v Watson subplot, a Geoffrey Edelsten lookalike and a clinical chase made for a great experience
  • Keeping a quarter-final streak alive
    Fan Following: Bringing a bugle out of hibernation and donning face-paint for a unique hat-trick of India's World Cup quarter-finals
  • A disappointing result, and a solemn farewell
    Fan Following: The quarter-final match between Sri Lanka and South Africa promised plenty of electric contests but turned out to be tepid. It was the last chance, however, to see two Sri Lankan greats in action for the last time in ODIs
  • How do you stop Smith?
    It is a question that has mystified teams of late, but Andy Zaltzman has the answer
  • When defeats haunt
    Nicholas Hogg: The losing team has much to ponder over the what-could-have-beens in close matches; in a one-sided game, the past is put to rest quickly
  • Wide boy
    The Cricket Monthly: Of the four men sent to prison in 2011, Mazhar Majeed's story was the one nobody heard
  • No helicopter ride to glory for Dhoni
    Jarrod Kimber: Four years ago, he took India to the title. Today, he was scratching around at barely a run a ball, almost as if he had given up himself
  • 'A lot has gone out of the game with two new balls'
    Kumar Sangakkara talks about one-day batting: technique, mindset, risk calculation, touch v power, and innovation
  • ESPN
  • ESPNF1
  • Scrum
  • Soccernet