South Africa v Australia, 1st Test, Centurion

Battle of fast bowlers in pace-friendly venue

Australia are the hot team at the moment, but they'll be up against a strong South African side who have an imposing record in Centurion, the venue for the first Test

S Rajesh

February 11, 2014

Comments: 13 | Text size: A | A

Mitchell Johnson claimed two more wickets, Australia v England, 3rd Test, Perth, 3rd day, December 15, 2013
Mitchell Johnson has a mixed record in Tests in South Africa: in 2009 he took 16 wickets at 25, but in 2011-12, his three wickets cost him 85 runs each © Getty Images
Enlarge

They are currently the first and third-ranked teams in the ICC ratings, but recent results suggest they are the two best sides. South Africa are clearly the best team at the moment - they have won eight and drawn six of their last 14 series - but Australia are coming off a fearful hammering of England at home, and have been far more impressive than India, who are currently second in the ICC rankings. However, Australia will take that spot from India if they win the series by any margin; even a drawn series will suffice if India don't win the second Test against New Zealand and level the series. Moreover, Australia were the last team to win a series against South Africa, when they won 2-1 in South Africa in 2008-09.

The fact that the series is in South Africa makes it even spicier, given that Tests between the two countries in South Africa are rarely ever drawn. Since their readmission into international cricket, South Africa have played 17 Tests against Australia at home, of which only one has been drawn; on the other hand, six out of 18 Tests between these two teams have been drawn in Australia. The only drawn Test between these two teams during this period in South Africa was in 1994, which means the last 14 Tests here have all produced results.

No matter where they've played, though, Australia have had the upper hand, winning roughly two matches for every Test they've lost. Their batsmen have averaged almost 35 runs per wicket, and scored 19 centuries in 17 matches. South Africa have averaged 28.77 runs per wicket with the bat at home against Australia, and scored 11 hundreds; they've done better with the bat in Australia, averaging 32.92 runs per wicket.

South Africa v Australia Tests
  Tests Aus won SA won Aus bat ave/ 100s SA bat ave/ 100s
Overall, since 1992 35 19 9 37.44/ 46 30.87/ 26
In South Africa, since 1992 17 11 5 34.87/ 19 28.77/ 11

If it's a contest between these two sides, then the focus is always on the pace attacks, for that's always been the strength for both teams. Michael Clarke has announced that he feels Australia have the best pace attack in the world, but South Africa don't have a bad line-up either: Vernon Philander and Dale Steyn are the top two ranked bowlers, with Morne Morkel at No. 13. Australia have Ryan Harris at No. 3, Peter Siddle at No. 5 and Mitchell Johnson at No. 9. In the last three years, South Africa's fast bowlers have averaged 24.39 runs per wicket, compared to Australia's 26.70. Those are the two best averages among all teams, and the numbers indicate too that there's little to choose between the pace attacks of the two sides.

Moreover, these fast bowlers will have the added incentive of bowling in South Africa, where conditions have always favoured pace. In all Tests since the beginning of 2006, fast bowlers have averaged 28.87 in South Africa, the only country where they've averaged less than 30.

The best countries for pace bowling, in Tests since Jan 2006
Host country Tests Wickets Average Strike rate
South Africa 41 1048 28.87 53.7
New Zealand 34 782 31.38 57.3
Australia 45 1089 31.94 59.0
England 56 1312 32.22 59.4
West Indies 31 578 32.37 63.8

Australia's quick bowlers have usually enjoyed the conditions here. In the last series between the two teams here - in 2011-12 - South Africa's pace attack, led by Philander and Steyn, outdid Australia's, but in the series before that, Australia's fast bowlers were clearly dominant. In 2008-09, Australia's pace attack averaged 30.80 to South Africa's 36.46, and in 2005-06, led by Stuart Clark, they were even more dominant, averaging 21.68 to South Africa's 34.35.

Series-wise stats for fast bowlers in series between SA and Aus in SA
    Australia South Africa
Season Tests Wickets Average Strike rate Wickets Average Strike rate
2011-12 2 24 32.62 54.4 34 22.11 38.2
2008-09 3 41 30.80 69.2 39 36.46 62.1
2005-06 3 44 21.68 43.0 37 34.35 63.0
2001-02 3 30 32.03 60.9 31 45.06 64.0
1996-97 3 29 23.10 51.1 37 27.51 65.2
1993-94 3 27 36.40 86.5 43 35.09 77.5

The three South African fast bowlers in the current first-choice line-up all have excellent home records, with Philander, especially, being outstanding in his first ten home Tests. Australia's spearhead, Johnson, has had a mixed time in South Africa: in 2009 he was on top of his game, taking 16 wickets at 25, but he had a terrible tour in 2011-12, taking three wickets at 85 each.

South Africa's fast bowlers in home Tests
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Dale Steyn 37 202 21.09 39.6 14/ 3
Morne Morkel 23 84 27.47 52.9 2/ 0
Vernon Philander 10 62 15.24 33.7 6/ 1

The batting comparison
The battle for pace-bowling supremacy is a closely contested one, with little to differentiate the two teams, but what could separate the two teams is the batting, and in that aspect South Africa look more solid, even without Jacques Kallis. In the last three years, South Africa's overall batting average of 39.03 is well clear of the other teams. Australia are in second place, just like in the pace-bowling department, but their average of 33.33 is significantly below South Africa's, who have scored 36 centuries in 24 Tests, compared to 39 in 35 Tests by Australia. Graeme Smith, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers and Faf du Plessis have formed a solid core for South Africa, while Michael Clarke has scored the bulk of the runs for Australia.

SA and Aus batsmen in Tests since Jan 2011
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Michael Clarke 34 3322 59.32 12/ 7
AB de Villiers 24 2125 62.50 6/ 11
Hashim Amla 23 2120 60.57 8/ 9
David Warner 27 1924 40.93 5/ 10
Graeme Smith 24 1798 47.31 5/ 9
Alviro Petersen 20 1296 40.50 4/ 4
Brad Haddin 23 1138 31.61 1/ 9
Steven Smith 13 905 41.13 3/ 4
Chris Rogers 10 830 43.68 3/ 5
Faf du Plessis 11 782 60.15 3/ 2

South Africa seem to have the more dependable batting line-up, but even they've had problems against Australia at home. Kallis averaged 41.22 in 29 Tests against Australia, but in 14 home Tests against them, he averaged only 33.62, with two centuries in 26 innings.

Among the batsmen in the current squad, Graeme Smith has had more problems against Australia at home than in Australia, with his average dropping by about five runs at home. Similarly, Amla's home average against Australia drops to 42.88 - which is still fairly healthy - from 51.10 in Australia.

Australia's best batsman has also had far more success against South Africa in home conditions: in six home Tests against them he averages 106.55; in five away Tests, he averages 34.11, though that also includes a fantastic 151 in Cape Town in 2011.

South African batsmen in Tests v Australia
  Overall in South Africa
Batsman Tests/ Runs Average 100s/ 50s Tests/ Runs Average 100s/ 50s
AB de Villiers 17/ 1300 46.62 4/ 8 8/ 629 48.38 2/ 4
Graeme Smith 17/ 1181 39.36 3/ 5 8/ 445 34.23 1/ 2
Hashim Amla 11/ 1022 51.10 4/ 4 5/ 386 42.88 2/ 1
JP Duminy 7/ 389 48.62 1/ 2 3/ 143 35.75 0/ 1
Faf du Plessis 2/ 293 146.50 1/ 2 - - -
Alviro Petersen 3/ 200 33.33 0/ 2 - - -

A venue for pace
To make matters worse for the batsmen, the first Test of the series will be played in Centurion, a venue which has been quite fast-bowler friendly in the last few years. Since the beginning of 2006, fast bowlers have averaged 28.88 here, and have taken 202 wickets at a strike rate of 50.7. Among venues which have hosted at least four Tests during this period, there are only five grounds where fast bowlers have a better average. On the other hand, spinners have averaged 44.65 here during this period, taking 38 wickets in eight Tests.

The list of leading wicket-takers in Centurion is filled with fast bowlers, and most of them have superb averages. Steyn has 36 wickets from six Tests at 17.61, Morkel's 17 wickets here have come at 23.41, while Philander has 12 at an average of 13.66.

Among the leading run-scorers here, Amla (678 runs at 84.75) and de Villiers (866 runs at 61.85) have impressive stats, but South Africa will miss Kallis, who is the leading run-getter here with 1267 runs at 70.38.

And apart from all these stats is South Africa's daunting record in Centurion: in 18 Tests they've won 14 and lost one, against England in 2000, in a Test in which both teams forfeited an innings each. Since then, South Africa have won 11 and drawn two in 13 games. No team has such an imposing record at any venue in Test history: with a 12-Test cut-off, the next-best is Pakistan in Karachi, where they've won 21 and lost two. Since 1990, the next-best win-loss ratio by any team is South Africa's record in Cape Town - the venue of the third Test - where they've won 18 times and lost thrice.

Australia have played only once in Centurion - way back in 1997 - and lost by eight wickets. That, however, was a dead rubber, as Australia had already won the first two Tests of the three-match series. When play begins at Supersport Park on Wednesday, there'll be plenty at stake for both teams.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (February 12, 2014, 4:30 GMT)

It will be a fantastic combat. SA will have an edge because of their pacers. Aussie's batting line is weak. Amla and AB de'villers will come up strongly. Let us watch without any prejudice.

Posted by siddhartha87 on (February 12, 2014, 4:14 GMT)

Should be a great contest. Not sure who will be the winners at the end but i am pretty sure this is easily gonna be the best series of 2014.South African pacers has amazing record at home but they have not beat Australia so far in their home. Really cant wait for the first ball to be bowled

Posted by US_Indian on (February 12, 2014, 3:39 GMT)

This will be great contest what ever the results are and my belief is Aussies are not going to find it as easy as they did against England and I still feel on two counts SA will hold a upper hand that is fielding and batting, in bowling they are pretty much evenly matched and let us hope the weather does not play spoil sport other than that paying public will get their money's worth.

Posted by aa61761 on (February 12, 2014, 3:02 GMT)

Next member of the "Big 3" getting ready for the thrashing. The Big One of the "Big 3" has already tasted the dirt.

Posted by   on (February 12, 2014, 1:33 GMT)

actually; it will be the battle of batsmen; because both have good bowlers in any case.

Posted by   on (February 11, 2014, 23:25 GMT)

This is going to be an amazing series. It's difficult to predict who's going to win. Both teams are unpredictable. I'm still surprised Aussies whitewashed England. South Africa will not be like England. Both teams are full of confidence

Posted by MinusZero on (February 11, 2014, 22:32 GMT)

I just hope SA win for nothing more than to bring down some inflated Aussie egos. Beating up on a declining England doesn't prove anything. In fact, Australia failing in most first innings in the Ashes says more than winning 5-0. Not everything is rosy.

Posted by   on (February 11, 2014, 20:51 GMT)

SouthAfrica edge out Australia because of their batting. Australian top 6 are not stable,slips will be in contentionthe whole series.

Posted by   on (February 11, 2014, 20:06 GMT)

why bother with trashtalk when u have real belief in your boys????? I guess they are confused themselves as how they gonna repeat their act of thrashing england...i see a very feeble batting setup of australia trying to hide themselves by talking mitch and co. up...(dont think mitch would b luving the talk so much,coz he would b burdened by now to win a match all by himself)

Posted by   on (February 11, 2014, 18:24 GMT)

I really dont understand these stats comparisons. What is the point of going back 20 years to see who's been "the best team"? It is completely skewed....for a period of more than a decade the Aussies murdered every single team in the world, obviously they will have a great record when you go back to the days of mcgrath, warne, gilchrist etc - it's not relevant anymore.

SA can trash Australia in the next 3 series and still the records will show the Aussies have the upperhand - ridiculous comparison this.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
Tour Results
South Africa v Australia at Centurion - Mar 14, 2014
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 30 balls remaining)
South Africa v Australia at Durban - Mar 12, 2014
Australia won by 5 wickets (with 2 balls remaining)
South Africa v Australia at Port Elizabeth - Mar 9, 2014
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
South Africa v Australia at Cape Town - Mar 1-5, 2014
Australia won by 245 runs
South Africa v Australia at Port Elizabeth - Feb 20-23, 2014
South Africa won by 231 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days