Sussex v Australians, Tour match, Hove, 3rd day July 28, 2013

Starc keen for Taylor second look

Mitchell Starc has said Australia's attack would like another chance to bowl at James Taylor in the Old Trafford Test, despite Taylor's unbeaten century against them during the tour match in Hove.

Taylor finished on 121 not out when the Sussex innings ended on the final day of the game but he was dropped twice along the way, once at slip on 23 and again when he miscued a lofted drive on 90, and he conceded that it wasn't his most fluent innings. Still, Taylor will head to Old Trafford with some confidence after the innings against an attack made up of Starc, Jackson Bird, James Faulkner, Nathan Lyon and Ashton Agar.

"Probably, yes," Starc said when asked if he would like to bowl at Taylor in Manchester. "He's a good player. He's scored a few runs and has played Test cricket before. He's another player who, if he does get the chance to play, we'll assess again, but it's nice to have a look at him and how he's going at the moment in this game.

"I've played against him before. He's someone who likes to cut and pull. He's only a very small guy so we want to make sure we've got him driving. He played well. It's a good batting wicket, but he did play well."

Starc took 2 for 43 in Sussex's only innings and although his economy was good, he was occasionally wayward and appeared at times to struggle to control the swing of the ball. Jackson Bird also collected two wickets and was the pick of the bowlers, while Faulkner battled to find the right line to challenge the batsmen. One of the three fast men might be called up for Old Trafford to replace the injured James Pattinson, although a dual spin attack is also a possibility if the pitch is dry.

"We certainly weren't taking it as a bowl-off; it was just to go out there and perform, and take thought of pushing for selection out of the picture and just try to take wickets," Starc said. "We were actually surprised with how much it did swing here for Birdy and myself, and even for James Faulkner.

"It definitely swung more here than the last few times we've had the Dukes. It was a little bit tougher to control but once you get a few overs of that under your belts and adjust your lines, you should be hitting that target. It was nice to have that ball swinging for the hundred overs and keeping the ball in nice condition. That's a positive for us."

Starc said he was pleased with his efforts against Sussex and felt he had bowled well on the whole tour so far, despite being dropped for the Lord's Test to make room for Ryan Harris. It was the second time in seven months Starc had been left out of a marquee Test, having been rested for the Boxing Day Test against Sri Lanka last summer.

"You never want to miss a game at all," he said. "It's always a little bit disappointing to miss out on any game of cricket but it was my turn to miss out I guess. I just have to do everything I can to get myself ready."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Montague_Withnail on July 29, 2013, 10:14 GMT

    How embarrassing can things get for the Aussie? In the old days they earned the right to trash opposition players in the media. It wasn't very pleasant, but you couldn't argue with it.

    Now, they are trashing a player who is not even first choice for England, and probably won't even play a test, but who has anyway scored an unbeaten century against them the only innings he played, and who outscored all the Aussie batsmen even though he was facing a supposedly international-quality attack while they were facing a county reserve attack.

    Honestly, we England fans know all about watching our side get embarrassed in Ashes cricket, but thank goodness we didn't have to put up with this kind of additional humiliation from our own players.

    Feeling nothing but pity for Aussie fans right now - never thought I'd say that.

  • John-Price on July 29, 2013, 9:17 GMT

    @OhhhhhMattyMatty - I do agree; they seem to take it for granted that poor players will take centuries off them. Their strategy must be to hope they don't come against any good players.

  • ReverseSweepIndia on July 29, 2013, 2:53 GMT

    Harris & Siddle sure on XI, I think 3rd pacer have to be anyone between Bird, Starc & Faulkner. Bird has great control (not seen him bowl yet personally), Faulkner can give added advantage with bat (especially when its failing big). Starc in bowling is like a Pak batsman, when he is brilliant (far & few) 100 of 40-45 balls and on other days just less than ordinary. Same way when he bowls well, once in a while, he can gets you a 5-for, but on other days he will leek runs in plenty.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on July 28, 2013, 23:10 GMT

    Interesting that the Aussies don't seem to rate a bloke who just hit them for 121*. Safe to say that if Taylor was Australian, he'd probably have 35+ Test caps already and would be hailed as their saviour!

  • on July 28, 2013, 23:07 GMT

    And I'm sure Taylor is equally keen to have another go at the overrated Aussie bowling.

  • on July 28, 2013, 23:07 GMT

    Starc took 5@27 in the first test how is was that worthy of being dropped in the first place?

    Also Starc doesn't know much about his new team mate if he thinks Faulkner has trouble swinging it...

  • 2MikeGattings on July 28, 2013, 20:32 GMT

    Maybe in the one dayers, Mitch.

  • Montague_Withnail on July 29, 2013, 10:14 GMT

    How embarrassing can things get for the Aussie? In the old days they earned the right to trash opposition players in the media. It wasn't very pleasant, but you couldn't argue with it.

    Now, they are trashing a player who is not even first choice for England, and probably won't even play a test, but who has anyway scored an unbeaten century against them the only innings he played, and who outscored all the Aussie batsmen even though he was facing a supposedly international-quality attack while they were facing a county reserve attack.

    Honestly, we England fans know all about watching our side get embarrassed in Ashes cricket, but thank goodness we didn't have to put up with this kind of additional humiliation from our own players.

    Feeling nothing but pity for Aussie fans right now - never thought I'd say that.

  • John-Price on July 29, 2013, 9:17 GMT

    @OhhhhhMattyMatty - I do agree; they seem to take it for granted that poor players will take centuries off them. Their strategy must be to hope they don't come against any good players.

  • ReverseSweepIndia on July 29, 2013, 2:53 GMT

    Harris & Siddle sure on XI, I think 3rd pacer have to be anyone between Bird, Starc & Faulkner. Bird has great control (not seen him bowl yet personally), Faulkner can give added advantage with bat (especially when its failing big). Starc in bowling is like a Pak batsman, when he is brilliant (far & few) 100 of 40-45 balls and on other days just less than ordinary. Same way when he bowls well, once in a while, he can gets you a 5-for, but on other days he will leek runs in plenty.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on July 28, 2013, 23:10 GMT

    Interesting that the Aussies don't seem to rate a bloke who just hit them for 121*. Safe to say that if Taylor was Australian, he'd probably have 35+ Test caps already and would be hailed as their saviour!

  • on July 28, 2013, 23:07 GMT

    And I'm sure Taylor is equally keen to have another go at the overrated Aussie bowling.

  • on July 28, 2013, 23:07 GMT

    Starc took 5@27 in the first test how is was that worthy of being dropped in the first place?

    Also Starc doesn't know much about his new team mate if he thinks Faulkner has trouble swinging it...

  • 2MikeGattings on July 28, 2013, 20:32 GMT

    Maybe in the one dayers, Mitch.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • 2MikeGattings on July 28, 2013, 20:32 GMT

    Maybe in the one dayers, Mitch.

  • on July 28, 2013, 23:07 GMT

    Starc took 5@27 in the first test how is was that worthy of being dropped in the first place?

    Also Starc doesn't know much about his new team mate if he thinks Faulkner has trouble swinging it...

  • on July 28, 2013, 23:07 GMT

    And I'm sure Taylor is equally keen to have another go at the overrated Aussie bowling.

  • OhhhhhMattyMatty on July 28, 2013, 23:10 GMT

    Interesting that the Aussies don't seem to rate a bloke who just hit them for 121*. Safe to say that if Taylor was Australian, he'd probably have 35+ Test caps already and would be hailed as their saviour!

  • ReverseSweepIndia on July 29, 2013, 2:53 GMT

    Harris & Siddle sure on XI, I think 3rd pacer have to be anyone between Bird, Starc & Faulkner. Bird has great control (not seen him bowl yet personally), Faulkner can give added advantage with bat (especially when its failing big). Starc in bowling is like a Pak batsman, when he is brilliant (far & few) 100 of 40-45 balls and on other days just less than ordinary. Same way when he bowls well, once in a while, he can gets you a 5-for, but on other days he will leek runs in plenty.

  • John-Price on July 29, 2013, 9:17 GMT

    @OhhhhhMattyMatty - I do agree; they seem to take it for granted that poor players will take centuries off them. Their strategy must be to hope they don't come against any good players.

  • Montague_Withnail on July 29, 2013, 10:14 GMT

    How embarrassing can things get for the Aussie? In the old days they earned the right to trash opposition players in the media. It wasn't very pleasant, but you couldn't argue with it.

    Now, they are trashing a player who is not even first choice for England, and probably won't even play a test, but who has anyway scored an unbeaten century against them the only innings he played, and who outscored all the Aussie batsmen even though he was facing a supposedly international-quality attack while they were facing a county reserve attack.

    Honestly, we England fans know all about watching our side get embarrassed in Ashes cricket, but thank goodness we didn't have to put up with this kind of additional humiliation from our own players.

    Feeling nothing but pity for Aussie fans right now - never thought I'd say that.