From our readers

Cricket leagues

June 16, 2013

Time is ripe for an ODI league

Rustom Deboo, India

Ed Joyce steps out and hits over cow corner, Ireland v Pakistan, 2nd ODI, Dublin, May 26, 2013
Ireland could play Division 1 cricket alongside the full member nations in order to get more exposure and raise their overall standards © AFP
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: ICC Champions Trophy

The ongoing Champions Trophy is the seventh and last edition of this tournament, which initially started off in 1998 as a promising knockout competition to help raise funds for the global development of cricket and ultimately became a liability in the cricket calendar. Usually held every two years, the 2013 edition has instead been played after almost four years, the last being in 2009. With the rise in meaningless, yet lucrative, Twenty20 leagues throughout the world, the ICC decided that something had to give, and the scapegoat turned out to be the Champions Trophy, and probably rightly so.

The time is ripe for a meaningful one-day international league. The World Cup remains the premier 50-overs tournament, and continues to do just fine. What is harming the format is the unnecessarily high number of bilateral series being played around the world. It might be bringing in the crowds, but from a cricketing point of view, there is no meaning attached to such contests, except for a few rating points on the rankings table. In the 2013-14 season, Australia will tour India for a mind-numbing seven ODIs in November, while India will also play the same number of games against South Africa on their tour of the country later this year.

Prior to these series, a tri-nation ODI tournament involving hosts West Indies, India and Sri Lanka will be played in the Caribbean. The series was disappointingly accommodated after scrapping a two-Test series between West Indies and Sri Lanka. Similarly, two more potentially mouth-watering Test series this season (Pakistan in West Indies and South Africa in Sri Lanka) were scrapped, while the limited-overs legs were kept as per schedule.

I was of the opinion earlier that the 2019 World Cup was the last we would see of ODI cricket. But then I realised that without the 50-overs format, the progress of promising Associate nations would be thwarted, for it is this format, and not T20, which will provide a stepping stone for emerging nations who aim for Test status. Following Ireland's recent heart-warming performances in the short ODI series against Pakistan, I really felt the need for a league system in ODI cricket. The World Cup can remain as it is, but pointless bilateral series have to go. To be honest, watching an India v Sri Lanka ODI match is no longer a source of excitement, rather it is just a waste of time. Unfortunately, the cricketing powers that be think otherwise.

The league system that I am suggesting can consist of two divisions of eleven teams each, with Division 1 having the 10 Full Members and Ireland, while Division 2 can have 11 emerging Associate and Affiliate nations, based on their performances in the World Cricket League. The league can run from June to March every season, with each team playing every other team twice, once home and once away. In this way, each team will play 20 ODIs each season, and there will be no issue of one team playing more games than others. Also, with the meaning of a league standing attached to every game, fans can be expected to be hooked onto the games, which can be played on any day of the week.

It means a total of 110 matches, with 4-5 games every week, of course whenever the teams are not involved in Test cricket. Logistics can also easily be taken care of, for teams will get enough time to play Test series without the pressures of bilateral series; and, at the same time, the ODI league matches can be scheduled in the respective home seasons.

In a World Cup year, the league can be shortened or tweaked in order to maintain the relevance of the tournament. Otherwise, every March will see the table-topper of the league be crowned as the champions for that season. The format will be similar to football's highly successful English Premier League, where there is a champion every year and it keeps the audiences interested for the full length of the competition.

Every season, two teams from Division 1 will be relegated while two from Division 2 will be promoted. This will add to the excitement and also give the weaker nations a chance to play a substantial number of games against top opposition. To give an example, England can finish their ten home internationals during the four-month period between June and September, leaving enough room for them to play their ten away games any time till March. Similarly, a team like India can play in countries such as England, Ireland and Sri Lanka early in the season before moving on to their home leg.

In this manner, a team will play twenty ODIs every season - nothing more and nothing less - since bilateral series for each of the teams will only be restricted to Test cricket, and at the most five Twenty20 internationals every year. Thus, a team can easily play around a minimum of 12 to 14 Test matches in a season without any overlap with the ODI League. Having said that, the scheduling must be done meticulously by the ICC with the cooperation of and in coordination with all the boards, not like the current Future Tours Programme, which appears to only fill the coffers of the top cricketing nations.

The league divisions can also double up as the World Cup qualifiers - with ample scope for the Associates to qualify for the quadrennial event - which will further raise the relevance of the tournament. A well-contested country v country championship with a points table is what ODI cricket needs at the moment. Consequently, 50-overs cricket will be back in the public consciousness and hopefully in better health.

What will really be needed is public support and a genuine keenness of the administrators to ensure the sustainability of the competition. If that is sorted, there is no reason why an ODI league cannot be a success.

If you have a submission for Inbox, send it to us here, with "Inbox" in the subject line

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Siddharth on (June 22, 2013, 20:25 GMT)

As many of you have said, the idea is good on paper but not so practically given the costs involved of travel, hotel bookings and so on. Can you also imagine someone like Bangladesh playing in the swinging conditions of the Oval, then travelling to hot and humid SL, then to the bounce of Perth and then swing and seam again in Durban, with no time to adjust to the conditions! I propose a change to this in that play the league over 3 years, with a 3 ODI "series" each time home and away...keeps the series short and allows time to get adjusted to conditions.The 4th year would be the one of the WC. No need for Champions Trophy.

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 22, 2013, 16:40 GMT)

Seems like a good idea on paper. But It would make the world cup kinda meaningless. we cant have a league style cricket & a world cup for the same format. it will be conflicting. who will be the real odi champions then/ the country winning the league or the one that wins the world cup?

Posted by Cricket on (June 22, 2013, 0:51 GMT)

Cricket will evolve into the way of Golf is today- multiple professional tours around the world but with countries still competing (in Ryder Cup and President's Cup). Just like US is has the biggest tour in terms of audience and prize money, India will have the biggest cricket tour.

Posted by Rajit on (June 21, 2013, 5:58 GMT)

Travelling for a single game will be a huge night mare & involve lot of cost...take for instance NZ travelling to WI for one ODI...ofcourse there would be an argument that WI-NZ can plan a test series during such period but that holds good for only one year...not every year..It's certainly an out of the box suggestion but might not be lucrative financially.

Posted by N on (June 21, 2013, 3:13 GMT)

Long live ODI cricket! Nice article by the way. An EPL styled format sounds tempting but strong administrative will is required to make it feasible. I have always supported the notion of a fixed number of matches per side per year.

20 is an ideal number of ODIs. Might I add that we need a fixed number of test matches as well? Say, 9 (5 at home and 4 away). Do away with the numerous T20 Internationals, we see plenty of exciting T20 action in leagues like the IPL and don't need international T20s as well (other than the T20 World Cup, which is fine).

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 21, 2013, 3:07 GMT)

ODIs should be revamped with 2 innings of 25 overs each but with only 10 wickets to fall. This will make certain that pitch and atmosphere conditions will not be a major cause of a win like yesterdays semi final where ball stopped swinging after 40 or so overs.

Posted by siva on (June 21, 2013, 2:24 GMT)

NOOOOOO !!! No more ODIs - Instead - ICC should start T-20 tests with 2 innings - just like a test match but will be done in a day - then it will definitely clicked. At least for the next 5 years, we all will enjoy this new T-C-20 matches !!!

Posted by TT on (June 21, 2013, 0:22 GMT)

As most of you have said, not a bad idea, but a logistical nightmare. Definately also need Less meaningless international matches. Every series between 2 nations should be 3 tests, 3 odi's and 3 T20's. (Except for significant series like ashes where you keep the 5 test). And overall have less series.... perhaps only 3 per year for each country. The rest of the time domestic leagues would be bolstered which in turn would help development of younger players as they would learn from the pros and have better competition.

Posted by Christopher on (June 20, 2013, 22:41 GMT)

Having a One-Day league is a good idea in theory, but getting each side to travel to each country to just to play a single one-day match every year is not cost-effective and there simply isn't any time in the schedule to do so.

I propose a slight amendment to your idea - have the league every five years instead of one year, and have a fixed series of three ODI's for each team in each league - one home and one away. Most countries play two sides at home per year anyway, and they can also play a test series while they are at it. This also adds a lot more relevance to the one-day series, and it will be so much simpler than the current ranking system we have at the moment.

Think the world needs to read your opinions on cricket? Here's your chance to be published on ESPNcricinfo.



Why you should be disappointed with Mr Pujara

Cheteshwar Pujara faced 1258 balls. Cheteshwar Pujara scored two match-winnin...

Seagulls at cow corner, Bhogle on air, and ABC to the rescue

An India fan relives the excitement of following an Adelaide Test in the earl...

It was always about your cricket, Australia

The verbal excesses and physical posturing of Australian players have always ...