USA news October 11, 2011

USA set for new star-studded Twenty20 league

28

A new venture to promote cricket inside the USA is to be announced shortly involving a domestic Twenty20 tournament which, it is hoped, will attract a raft of overseas players. Cynics may be forgiven for thinking they have seen many previous ventures come and go but the difference this time is that it is well-funded, professionally managed, and comes in line with the ICC's declared strategic ambition to target and grow key new markets.

The ICC and other boards have for years been eyeing the USA, potentially a massive franchise and sponsorship market that nobody has managed to come close to tapping. But now Cricket Holdings America LLC (CHA), a joint venture between New Zealand Cricket (NZC) and United States of America Cricket Association (USACA), is aiming to do just that.

There are two strands to the project. The first is to stage a four-to six-team Twenty20 competition, starting next July, with sides comprising overseas professionals supplemented by local players, much as has happened in the IPL. The second is for CHA to stage international matches inside the USA.

The idea was devised between Neil Maxwell and New Zealand Cricket CEO Justin Vaughan. Maxwell is a former first-class player who is now an agent for players such as Brett Lee and Michael Hussey. He also spent a spell as CEO of the Kings XI Punjab IPL franchise. At the same time NZC, aware of the limits of functioning in a very small market, was looking for ways to expand its boundaries and increase income. Maxwell brought NZC together with USACA and the long-term result was a joint venture between the two. Funding to date has all come from investors in CHA.

NZC's motives were borne largely out of their need to manage risk. "New Zealand Cricket needs to be less reliant on income derived out of traditional FTP cricket and seek to cultivate new income streams," Vaughan explained."Growing our financial base allows us to invest into the game at all levels, and to secure our top talent."

The deal means CHA will run a T20 tournament as well as stage potentially-lucrative international matches involving Full Member teams. "The focus is to raise capital and that will generate the licence fee to USACA to give it resources to grow the game," Maxwell said. "CHA will exploit commercial rights to deliver the annual returns."

The T20 tournament is at the heart of the plans. Several schemes, most not even half-baked, have come and gone. Then two-and-a-half years ago Don Lockerbie, at the time just appointed as USACA's first full-time chief executive, outlined a grand IPL-style plan but it ultimately floundered on a lack of investment and internal politics. Lockerbie has since departed, but Maxwell believes there are key differences between earlier attempts to tap the market and CHA's.

"In order to attract value this has to feature some of the top players in the world. This time there is a Full Member country involved and it is line with ICC's strategy. As a result, it has the ability to attract international players while the other ventures didn't. I am not critical of those people but this has the blessing of the proper authorities. NZC is the lead in this and it is in best interests of cricket in USA."

CHA plans to launch the first tournament next July or August. "The USA aligns with the English season and that's a far less congested period, so there are better opportunities then. We're not looking for huge windows ... no more than a couple of weeks in the early years. If we just waited for a gap we would get nowhere in the short term."

Asked if that could raise the hackles of other boards, Maxwell said that was unlikely. "All Full Members are aware of what we are doing and no one has stated any significant issue with it. In fact, there are lots of well-wishers hoping that this market is accessed."

While there is likely to be significant interest from a large expat community in the USA, Maxwell admitted the real challenge will be to take the game into the mainstream market. "We have to present a compelling entertainment product as opposed to a straight cricket product. We have to learn lessons from the IPL - good and bad - and we need to take the game to a broad market. This has been done spasmodically previously but we now provide a platform of credibility. To get the wider appeal we have to attract quality players - as football has done with Beckham - but we can't do that without a competition."

But does the already packed calendar need another Twenty20 competition? ""World cricket doesn't need it, but it will benefit as a result of opening the US as another cricket market. All cricket will benefit from the USA adopting the game. A new market only improves the value of broadcast rights and encourages the growth of new audiences and ultimately players."

Maxwell said international matches were also key to the venture. "CHA holds the right to stage one-day matches within the US. New Zealand is committed to a number of games each year as part of the commitment to US cricket."

Venues remain an issue. Last year a triangular series involving New Zealand, Sri Lanka and USA was undermined by poor pitches in Florida, and Maxwell admits that has to be sorted. "We have to establish venues and plans are in place to improve existing ones as well as modify other stadia. For the T20 tournament we would be prepared to use artificial pitches if needed. Not necessarily in the first year, but we are looking at options."

Maxwell is aware of USACA's current problems. "It needs some administrative help and the plus is NZC is renowned for its solid administration and governance structure. We are pushing forward on the basis USACA will be taking necessary steps to support its constitution and stakeholders. We are hoping it's a short term issue as CHA is a long-term vision."

CHA will be advertising internationally for an experienced chief executive and T20 league commissioner later this week, and at the end of the month there are more meetings in the USA to start planning for 2012. Given the backing this venture has, it may be that after so many false dawns, this might finally be the time when the potential for growth within the USA is finally exploited professionally.

Martin Williamson is executive editor of ESPNcricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on October 12, 2011, 23:24 GMT

    I could play good quality cricket.I need to be in this U.S.A cricket team.I am an Attacking right hand hard hitting aggressive batsman and could bowl as well.I see myself as an alrounder in cricket.Yall need to give me a chance to try out and make the cricket team.I promise if the U.S.a team acquire this young talent their chances of human flourishing in cricket will increaase and who knows maybe we will qualify to play in the 2015 world cup as a quality side capable of bringing home the world cup.

  • aamirah1 on October 12, 2011, 20:28 GMT

    It sounds like some good people are after US cricket now, I wish you guys all the best and besides staging the big tournament, my suggestion would be to have a proper domestic structure with players being paid by USACA..and the current leagues that we have, use them as club cricket which is booming right now..You'll see some wonderful talent come through..Also for the kids all these international players should go around and help educating schools(kids) about cricket with the small excersice or something..Trust me Cricket in US is going to be big

  • timmyj on October 12, 2011, 17:45 GMT

    Two million Americans playing cricket? You couldn't find 200 who are playing now. Would take a herculean effort. Is Maxwell up to the job? The red flag for me is the statement "NZ is the lead in this and it is in the best interest of cricket in the USA." Really? Neither Maxwell nor any other Kiwi has worked with so much as one American at cricket yet they seem to think they know what's "best" for American cricket! Other foreigners have taken this attitude and it's led to disaster.

  • mthw on October 12, 2011, 5:24 GMT

    Totally agree with one comment here... The US is a big country with a lot of people... Even if 2% of the American population eventually followed cricket, then that is 2 million more people than the population of NZ... It is worth it with the potential and could also inspire players in the West Indies (being so close) to take cricket seriously again... Also I wonder if this is a joint venture between NZ and US cricket if there would be time put aside for all the NZ players to play...

  • timmyj on October 11, 2011, 19:25 GMT

    Still have to see it to believe it. Maxwell didn't give any convincing answers to the same problems that have doomed ventures like this in the past. At least he recognizes that this, or any cricket venture, will NEVER, NEVER, succeed unless it attracts American interest. But that Pearls Cup flop showed this is gonna take A LOT more than just running short cricket games. What's Maxwell going to do differently? How's he gonna get Americans to come out for these matches? Americans totally ignored the Pearls Cup even though these matches had "top level" players and were played on the best cricket ground in the USA. His mention of Beckham betrays a total misunderstanding of USA sports. Americans turned out for him because soccer already has an established following with Americans. Cricket has absolutley NONE. Could bring over Tendulkar, Gayle, Pietersen, etc. Americans couldn't care less. These names are nothing to them. Waiting to see what this "announcement" will say

  • ctzeeshan on October 11, 2011, 15:55 GMT

    Living in the states for the past 17 years. i can assure you cricket in the USA has come a long ways. Domestic leagues are in abundance, specially out west (California) as well as down south (Florida) because of the warm weather year round. It's not first class cricket but its close, most leagues are part of USACA. I cant speak for most americans but people who follow cricket with passion in states are starving for international action. Its definitly a risk worth taking, and NZC shall reap the benefits in the long run.

  • ToTellUTheTruth on October 11, 2011, 15:28 GMT

    Wow. one more USACA venture? Guranteed to fail, due to internal bickering and back stabbing. USACA/USYCA....stop making tall claims. First take care of your website and respond back to inquiries submitted to your e-mail accounts. You talk about donating kits to school...can you provide a list? Also, if I want to get a kit for the school where I work, how do I go about it? Is there any info on your website? The e-mail provided, if someone cares to respond back, will see my request since last year (or before). How about your so-called coaching camps? Can you shed any light on that? Please stop making tall claims and giving the canned responses.

  • getgopi on October 11, 2011, 14:59 GMT

    Cricket in my backyard. Interesting. Finally we get to see "boundary dancers" the way they were meant to be seen ;)

  • Cric1988 on October 11, 2011, 14:52 GMT

    if hollywood makes a movie on cricket with leading american stars, then people from america would star to follow cricket :) even canada would then join in :P

  • on October 11, 2011, 14:41 GMT

    This could be... interesting

  • on October 12, 2011, 23:24 GMT

    I could play good quality cricket.I need to be in this U.S.A cricket team.I am an Attacking right hand hard hitting aggressive batsman and could bowl as well.I see myself as an alrounder in cricket.Yall need to give me a chance to try out and make the cricket team.I promise if the U.S.a team acquire this young talent their chances of human flourishing in cricket will increaase and who knows maybe we will qualify to play in the 2015 world cup as a quality side capable of bringing home the world cup.

  • aamirah1 on October 12, 2011, 20:28 GMT

    It sounds like some good people are after US cricket now, I wish you guys all the best and besides staging the big tournament, my suggestion would be to have a proper domestic structure with players being paid by USACA..and the current leagues that we have, use them as club cricket which is booming right now..You'll see some wonderful talent come through..Also for the kids all these international players should go around and help educating schools(kids) about cricket with the small excersice or something..Trust me Cricket in US is going to be big

  • timmyj on October 12, 2011, 17:45 GMT

    Two million Americans playing cricket? You couldn't find 200 who are playing now. Would take a herculean effort. Is Maxwell up to the job? The red flag for me is the statement "NZ is the lead in this and it is in the best interest of cricket in the USA." Really? Neither Maxwell nor any other Kiwi has worked with so much as one American at cricket yet they seem to think they know what's "best" for American cricket! Other foreigners have taken this attitude and it's led to disaster.

  • mthw on October 12, 2011, 5:24 GMT

    Totally agree with one comment here... The US is a big country with a lot of people... Even if 2% of the American population eventually followed cricket, then that is 2 million more people than the population of NZ... It is worth it with the potential and could also inspire players in the West Indies (being so close) to take cricket seriously again... Also I wonder if this is a joint venture between NZ and US cricket if there would be time put aside for all the NZ players to play...

  • timmyj on October 11, 2011, 19:25 GMT

    Still have to see it to believe it. Maxwell didn't give any convincing answers to the same problems that have doomed ventures like this in the past. At least he recognizes that this, or any cricket venture, will NEVER, NEVER, succeed unless it attracts American interest. But that Pearls Cup flop showed this is gonna take A LOT more than just running short cricket games. What's Maxwell going to do differently? How's he gonna get Americans to come out for these matches? Americans totally ignored the Pearls Cup even though these matches had "top level" players and were played on the best cricket ground in the USA. His mention of Beckham betrays a total misunderstanding of USA sports. Americans turned out for him because soccer already has an established following with Americans. Cricket has absolutley NONE. Could bring over Tendulkar, Gayle, Pietersen, etc. Americans couldn't care less. These names are nothing to them. Waiting to see what this "announcement" will say

  • ctzeeshan on October 11, 2011, 15:55 GMT

    Living in the states for the past 17 years. i can assure you cricket in the USA has come a long ways. Domestic leagues are in abundance, specially out west (California) as well as down south (Florida) because of the warm weather year round. It's not first class cricket but its close, most leagues are part of USACA. I cant speak for most americans but people who follow cricket with passion in states are starving for international action. Its definitly a risk worth taking, and NZC shall reap the benefits in the long run.

  • ToTellUTheTruth on October 11, 2011, 15:28 GMT

    Wow. one more USACA venture? Guranteed to fail, due to internal bickering and back stabbing. USACA/USYCA....stop making tall claims. First take care of your website and respond back to inquiries submitted to your e-mail accounts. You talk about donating kits to school...can you provide a list? Also, if I want to get a kit for the school where I work, how do I go about it? Is there any info on your website? The e-mail provided, if someone cares to respond back, will see my request since last year (or before). How about your so-called coaching camps? Can you shed any light on that? Please stop making tall claims and giving the canned responses.

  • getgopi on October 11, 2011, 14:59 GMT

    Cricket in my backyard. Interesting. Finally we get to see "boundary dancers" the way they were meant to be seen ;)

  • Cric1988 on October 11, 2011, 14:52 GMT

    if hollywood makes a movie on cricket with leading american stars, then people from america would star to follow cricket :) even canada would then join in :P

  • on October 11, 2011, 14:41 GMT

    This could be... interesting

  • RohanMarkJay on October 11, 2011, 14:16 GMT

    I don't know why they are trying to promote a game that has already been given the thumbs down by the Americans over the last 100 years. Americans as a whole like their own sports, because it appeals to their patriotism. Cricket is a fine game Test and one day cricket that is (not 20/20). It will never catch on yes America is huge market and cash cow no doubt Indian entrepreneurs would salivate at the prospect, but it will never catch on in the States sorry, not being pessimistic but that just the way it is there, Cricket doesn't appeal very well to the American psyche, there may be a market for 20/20 but I doubt it would make any great impact. Also there are problems with cricket being more popular these days in places like the West Indies maybe they should invest their energies there. Cricket also has major problems to deal with these days in Cricket playing nations. They should fix these problems first before pushing the game to new frontiers.

  • on October 11, 2011, 13:54 GMT

    Hold my breath I shall not! However, the best of luck From my vantage point Twenty/20 is the only form of cricket that may succeed in North America.

  • on October 11, 2011, 13:26 GMT

    awesome. Someone will buy malinga for 10 million dollars. forget international games, lets play domestic leagues. money money money thats whay matters after all.

  • on October 11, 2011, 13:07 GMT

    it wont work americans will just scratch there heads at cricket,we have 40+ associate members who want cricket n who have real passion 4 our game,put simply waste of monet n time.

  • on October 11, 2011, 12:46 GMT

    The thing about the IPL model of a mix of overseas stars and local talent is that in India they have a decent first class structure and local talent that are, mostly, up to the job. The Americans simply don't have this talent pool, are the local players capable of bowling to Chris Gayle or batting against Brett Lee? I seriously doubt it, their national team is not even close to the top of the associate nations. If the gap between the overseas players and the locals is too big, its going to be a farce!

  • on October 11, 2011, 12:26 GMT

    Balldinho - Baseball wasnt invented by the Americans. Cricket is played in more countries around the world than Baseball. Baseball's origins come from cricket...T20 should be entertaining enough for the Americans attention span.

  • on October 11, 2011, 12:16 GMT

    @YorkshirePudding: "...the key to its success in america is in getting kids in schools playing, much like they did with soccer..."

    It's already happening.

    In the past year, USYCA has donated over 700 cricket sets to schools in the United States, and because of the USYCA Schools Program, cricket will be played this fall by hundreds of thousands of American schoolchildren. USYCA has also begun the process of creating introductory youth cricket programs, under the auspices of established community sports organizations, for the Summer of 2012.

    In 2012, USYCA plans on placing cricket sets in an additional 1,000 American schools through its ICC award-winning Schools Program and launching dozens of new community youth cricket programs. USYCA will also be sponsoring and conducting coach training sessions across the United States, such as the sold-out ICC Level I course scheduled for later this month in Maryland.

  • S.S.Sagar on October 11, 2011, 11:33 GMT

    Great. Eagerly Waiting.........

  • YorkshirePudding on October 11, 2011, 11:29 GMT

    In the past people have tried to establish 4 day cricket, ODI experiments dint work, but T20 might just, 3.5 hours is short enough to appease the american market. I would be interesting to see the 'stars' that it attracts, the key to its success in america is in getting kids in schools playing, much like they did with soccer, then offering cricket scholarships in colleges.

  • ashwintheking on October 11, 2011, 10:48 GMT

    Time difference between USA and India is 12 Hours (give or take 2 hours)... IF the matches are played at night there, Subcontinent viewers won't watch them.. If the matches are played during their day time, the game will not appeal to American audiences..

    Should be interesting to see how it turns out.. Best of luck to the US :)

  • BeatTheChamps on October 11, 2011, 10:26 GMT

    The tournament will have close to zero TV audience since the majority of them live on the opposite side of the globe.

  • on October 11, 2011, 10:24 GMT

    the USA is filled with all kinda of different ppl from different countries, dont say cricket won't work there, at least u gotta try. we all cant be as negative as u are @Alex Spurge.....goodluck USA if it works this would be anice spark for the game i love.

  • Balldinho on October 11, 2011, 10:23 GMT

    the USA created Baseball, baseball players are the highest paid athletes in World Sports, Baseball has spread throughout the World to Oriental-Asia, Latin America and parts of Europe and have a successful run tournament in the *WORLD BASEBALL CLASSIC* (Which unlike the Cricket world cup is represented by the WORLD and not the Commonwealth +1). There is NO way Cricket will ever be embraced there so why waste the money. There are plenty associate nations who have Cricket as their *National Sport*, focus on them!

  • Kumar_NJ_USA on October 11, 2011, 10:21 GMT

    Can't agree with WTEH more!! It's about time we got cricket in the USA. Unfortunately with the infrastructure available, this will be focussed in the New York/New Jersey and California areas. Wish there was a way of getting it to states like Ohio/Kentucky/WV where there is a significant presence of people from India/Pak/SL

  • Masking_Tape on October 11, 2011, 9:17 GMT

    Please! Make it happen. If this tournament goes past 3 seasons, I will call it a job nicely done (And I'm not saying it should close out after 3 season). Like the report says, we have seen many movement like this come and go. So if you are gonna do something, you gotta do it BIG in America. And it has to be very professional.

    Attracting crowd, and Entertainment should be the first goal. Cricket 2nd. That's a cold hard fact.

  • on October 11, 2011, 9:08 GMT

    "Cynics may be forgiven for thinking they have seen many previous ventures come and go, but the difference this time is that it is well-funded, professionally managed, and comes in line with the declared strategic ambition of the ICC to target and grow key new markets." Like we haven't heard that before. Even so, I don't get why they continue to target the USA. IT'S A BASEBALL PLAYING NATION!!! If in the unlikely event this does that place, expect expats and mostly thin air to attend. The game is impossible to spread to Americans, why would they suddenly change from simple baseball to cricket with it's complicated (to a non-cricket follower) rules? All the money in the world can't make the US a cricket playing nation. Just look at the last USA team to that played and got relegated from World Cricket League Division 3. Will the ICC instead concentrate in cementing the games growth in Afghanistan, Ireland, Nepal, PNG ect.

  • WTEH on October 11, 2011, 9:01 GMT

    Great news, can't wait till quality cricket comes to this part of the world!!!!!

  • AmjadZork on October 11, 2011, 8:55 GMT

    Best of Luck to USA... & the T-20 tournament !!!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • AmjadZork on October 11, 2011, 8:55 GMT

    Best of Luck to USA... & the T-20 tournament !!!

  • WTEH on October 11, 2011, 9:01 GMT

    Great news, can't wait till quality cricket comes to this part of the world!!!!!

  • on October 11, 2011, 9:08 GMT

    "Cynics may be forgiven for thinking they have seen many previous ventures come and go, but the difference this time is that it is well-funded, professionally managed, and comes in line with the declared strategic ambition of the ICC to target and grow key new markets." Like we haven't heard that before. Even so, I don't get why they continue to target the USA. IT'S A BASEBALL PLAYING NATION!!! If in the unlikely event this does that place, expect expats and mostly thin air to attend. The game is impossible to spread to Americans, why would they suddenly change from simple baseball to cricket with it's complicated (to a non-cricket follower) rules? All the money in the world can't make the US a cricket playing nation. Just look at the last USA team to that played and got relegated from World Cricket League Division 3. Will the ICC instead concentrate in cementing the games growth in Afghanistan, Ireland, Nepal, PNG ect.

  • Masking_Tape on October 11, 2011, 9:17 GMT

    Please! Make it happen. If this tournament goes past 3 seasons, I will call it a job nicely done (And I'm not saying it should close out after 3 season). Like the report says, we have seen many movement like this come and go. So if you are gonna do something, you gotta do it BIG in America. And it has to be very professional.

    Attracting crowd, and Entertainment should be the first goal. Cricket 2nd. That's a cold hard fact.

  • Kumar_NJ_USA on October 11, 2011, 10:21 GMT

    Can't agree with WTEH more!! It's about time we got cricket in the USA. Unfortunately with the infrastructure available, this will be focussed in the New York/New Jersey and California areas. Wish there was a way of getting it to states like Ohio/Kentucky/WV where there is a significant presence of people from India/Pak/SL

  • Balldinho on October 11, 2011, 10:23 GMT

    the USA created Baseball, baseball players are the highest paid athletes in World Sports, Baseball has spread throughout the World to Oriental-Asia, Latin America and parts of Europe and have a successful run tournament in the *WORLD BASEBALL CLASSIC* (Which unlike the Cricket world cup is represented by the WORLD and not the Commonwealth +1). There is NO way Cricket will ever be embraced there so why waste the money. There are plenty associate nations who have Cricket as their *National Sport*, focus on them!

  • on October 11, 2011, 10:24 GMT

    the USA is filled with all kinda of different ppl from different countries, dont say cricket won't work there, at least u gotta try. we all cant be as negative as u are @Alex Spurge.....goodluck USA if it works this would be anice spark for the game i love.

  • BeatTheChamps on October 11, 2011, 10:26 GMT

    The tournament will have close to zero TV audience since the majority of them live on the opposite side of the globe.

  • ashwintheking on October 11, 2011, 10:48 GMT

    Time difference between USA and India is 12 Hours (give or take 2 hours)... IF the matches are played at night there, Subcontinent viewers won't watch them.. If the matches are played during their day time, the game will not appeal to American audiences..

    Should be interesting to see how it turns out.. Best of luck to the US :)

  • YorkshirePudding on October 11, 2011, 11:29 GMT

    In the past people have tried to establish 4 day cricket, ODI experiments dint work, but T20 might just, 3.5 hours is short enough to appease the american market. I would be interesting to see the 'stars' that it attracts, the key to its success in america is in getting kids in schools playing, much like they did with soccer, then offering cricket scholarships in colleges.