Report

India lose first round of the battle

The last day's play in the first Test in Mumbai raised an intriguing question

Anand Vasu
Anand Vasu
26-Feb-2000
The last day's play in the first Test in Mumbai raised an intriguing question. Did South Africa win this game or did India lose it? If one looked carefully at the way the game progressed, the opinion would have to be that India lost the match.
The first battle was lost while selecting the team. The inclusion of Ajay Jadeja at No 6 meant straightaway that India were playing with one player short. Jadeja's record in Test cricket is unimpressive. Moreover, in the Board President's XI game against South Africa, he made scores of 2 and 3. Hardly the kind of scores that warrants Test selection. The non-inclusion of Nikhil Chopra might also have had a bearing on the game as India were clearly one spinner short in the final innings.
India began well, winning the toss. And with that India's good run ended. Batting first, India made just 225 on a track that looked good for batting. The South African pacemen were too hot for everyone in the team save Tendulkar. The captain made a brave 97 but was not backed up by any of his teammates. In response, India did well to restrict the South Africans to 176. Apart from the openers, none of the visitors made runs.
A lead of 49 was quite handy, and far more than the Indians would have hoped for after South Africa were 90 for no loss. What they needed was a solid second innings performance. If they had put between 150 and 170 on the board they could have given South Africa a run for their money. Instead, they collapsed inexplicably. Doing far worse than their first innings, India folded up for just 113 runs. In an all too familiar script, the openers failed, the middle order collapsed and the tail refused to wag. A couple of twitches of the tail came late in the innings when Mongia, batting at No 11, made 19 off just 10 balls. In the middle of all this, the man we knew as Rahul `The Wall' Dravid stuttered and stumbled, making a painful 37 in over three hours. He was totally unable to either score freely or make runs with the tail and one wondered what happened to the young man who made centuries in tough conditions in both New Zealand and South Africa.
Full post
The absence of a third spinner was felt

Hansie Cronje, the South African captain, was not exactly on top of the world when he arrived in India

Woorkheri Raman
26-Feb-2000
Hansie Cronje, the South African captain, was not exactly on top of the world when he arrived in India. He has not been among runs in recent times and added to that there is some uncertainty hanging over his future both as a captain and a player. But not one to be deterred by his ordinary personal form, he was determined to make this trip memorable. One way of making an Indian tour memorable for any visiting captain is by winning the series. Cronje would probably not hesitate to swap a few of his achievements for a victory in the Test series in India. The victory at the Wankhede is bound to relieve Cronje a lot, which might result in him batting better at Bangalore.
Cronje's determination apart, he is supported by his team members to a great extent. The attitude of the entire team is positive and everyone is keen to assume responsibility when it matters. In comparison, Tendulkar does not have many options to look at for support. I had mentioned that the absence of a third spinner would be felt in the fourth innings and it has turned out to be true. Apparently it took the collective wisdom of seven people (five selectors plus the captain and the coach) to pick the final eleven and yet the balance of the team was ignored. Six batsmen along with a keeper and four bowlers is not the ideal combination to win a Test match. Because of the fact that it has failed time and again, adherence to the same formula is inexplicable.
On the other hand, the presence of six batsmen has not made a major difference to the totals put up by the Indians, be it Mumbai or Melbourne. It is unanimously agreed that there are not that many all-rounders available, but potential all-rounders like Nikhil Chopra have to be encouraged. He can bat a bit and is a steady spinner with a very good attitude. At an age when he should be playing, there is no point in keeping him as a reserve on pitches that assist spinners. In contrast, Cronje, reading the track well, played two spinners, though he would not have expected them to run through the Indian batting line up. I am not suggesting the Indians ape the visiting captain but the term "horses for courses" comes to mind.
The South Africans won the Test at the Wankhede through sheer mental strength. Gibbs once again provided a good start along with Kirsten, which in retrospect proved to be very crucial. Kallis, the superb cricketer that he is, showed great patience and maturity to stay till the end. Boucher, just a few seasons old in international cricket, has the distinction of having many records under his belt. That sweet little innings of his proved that with a positive attitude, one could overwhelm any pressure situation.
Full post
Rajasthan take first innings lead over Bengal

Rajasthan placed themselves in a commanding position by obtaining a first innings lead of 93 runs against Bengal in their Ranji Trophy Super League Group A encounter at the Eden Gardens on Saturday

Sakyasen Mittra
26-Feb-2000
Rajasthan placed themselves in a commanding position by obtaining a first innings lead of 93 runs against Bengal in their Ranji Trophy Super League Group A encounter at the Eden Gardens on Saturday. In the process they also guaranteed themselves of five points. Bengal were all out for 284 replying to Rajasthan's first innings score of 377. In their second innings at close of play on the third day, Rajasthan were 72 for three wickets at stumps.
Much depended on Devang Gandhi. But the former Indian player disappointed getting out in the fourth over of the day. Trying to cut off spinner Rahul Kanwath, Gandhi nicked a catch to wicketkeeper R. Jahalani. It was a stroke that could have been avoided as the ball was too full for the cut shot. It was then a matter of time before the Bengal innings ended. The only person who waged a single handed battle was Srikanth Kalyani. He fought on gamely and remained unbeaten on 83 with the help of seven boundaries when the innings ended. He played each ball on its merit and was severe on anything that was pitched short.
However, other than Wrichik Mazumdar, nobody was there to support Kalyani's cause. Mazumdar (25 with three boundaries) added 46 for the seventh wicket. But then he fell to good catch at silly point of the bowling of R. Jaykumar, Nikhil Doru anticipating the sharp bat-pad chance to his right.
Left arm spinner Devinder Pal Singh was the most successful bowler scalping three wickets. He bowled a restrictive line forcing the batsman into errors. Anshu Jain, Jaykumar and Kanwath picked up a couple apiece. However, Bengal came back strongly in the match in the second innings. They had both the Rajasthan openers back in the pavilion with only 20 runs on the board. Lakshmi Ratan Shukla dismissed skipper Gagan Khoda and Utpal Chatterjee, bowling with the new ball, trapped Anhsu Jain leg before. However Kanwath and Nikhil Doru steadied the innings. Kanwath fell two overs before close to Chatterjee but by then the two had probably thwarted Bengal's hopes of a victory.
Full post
Australia win again in record style

Australia settled the issue of Trans-Tasman cricket supremacy in style in Christchurch, producing a record score of 349 to bury New Zealand hopes with the third win in as many matches in what has become a five-match series

Chris Rosie
26-Feb-2000
Australia settled the issue of Trans-Tasman cricket supremacy in style in Christchurch, producing a record score of 349 to bury New Zealand hopes with the third win in as many matches in what has become a five-match series.
The toss was taken under heavy overcast producing very fine drizzle, Stephen Fleming calling correctly again and inviting Australia to bat on a pitch renowned for its high-scoring potential. New Zealand brought in the test debut double centurion against the West Indies, Mathew Sinclair, for the under-performing Craig Spearman and Australia recalled Shane Lee for Glenn McGrath and introduced Ian Harvey for Mathew Hayden. Steve Waugh survived an ankle injury scare from the mid-week match and took his place in the team.
Mark Waugh and Adam Gilchrist versus Chris Cairns and Warren Wisneski: the opening stanza had the same players as Carisbrook - and the result was the same. The New Zealand opening attack provided a variation in line and length from which the Australian pair took due toll.
The 50 came up off 50 balls. Medium-pacer Scott Styris, on for Cairns in the ninth over, put a short break on the scoring, his first two overs producing just four runs. That did not last long, his third going for nine as Gilchrist got the scoring rate back on track.
Full post

Showing 41131 - 41140 of 41800