The Surfer
Suresh Menon, writing in Daily News and Analysis , laments the attitude of the Indian spectator, who he says has imbibed the arrogance of the board that runs the game in the country.
Peter Roebuck, in the Hindu , says the World Cup thus far has, barring some of the games involving the minnows, been a fair battle between bat and ball and not the one-way traffic expected before the tournament
By and large it has made for sharper cricket. Few things are more tedious that the sight of a front foot bully belting the ball around on a pitch as scary as an Enid Blyton story. At least these slightly unreliable surfaces have forced batsmen to think. Shot election and placements have been important, and these count amongst the game's hidden delights.
Vijay Lokapally, in the Hindu , writes of the ordeal the Indian spectator is put through across cricket stadiums in the country, starting from the difficulty in procuring a ticket.
The ordeal begins from trying to procure a ticket. Typically, the queue at the counter begins to take shape with the first spectator reporting at 5 in the morning — at some places, people even camp overnight.
As protests in Libya intensify, responded by a brutal crackdown from the state, Murtaza Rizvi writes of how Pakistan's most well-known cricket stadium got its name
It was Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, as the prime minister, who embarked on the policy of looking west to the Arab world for bonding and the obvious financial benefits that would accrue to Pakistan by being a player in the petrodollar economy of the Arab states, even if they were run by despotic autocrats. In 1974, Bhutto hosted the heads of Muslim states in Lahore for the Organisation of Islamic Conference summit, which included such adversaries as the reigning sheikhs of the oil-rich Gulf and Arab revolutionaries like Gaddafi and Yasser Arafat. The occasion was chosen to elicit support for Pakistan’s nuclear programme, as India was all set to go nuclear, and Gaddafi fitted the bill. In a grand ceremony at the Lahore Stadium, Bhutto announced the renaming of the cricket ground after the man whom he came to call one of his best friends.
In the New Zealand Herald Nathan Astle reckons that Friday's game against Australia in Nagpur could possibly be New Zealand's best chance to beat them on the World Cup stage
The Aussies are still in a rebuilding phase and are there for the taking. It's not the Australian team of a few years ago when they were the best team in the world by a long way. They've come back to the pack now. Sure they still have some world class players, and have only lost to New Zealand twice at the World Cup, but the Black Caps should have all the confidence in the world to beat them.
Dominic Cork, writing in the Independent , says England are capable of beating India in their own backyard, and their tendency to play better against the more fancied teams should help them.
If Ireland, say, were next on the agenda for Strauss's men then the weight of expectation would be on them again. As it is, most people are going to make them long-odds second favourites against India on Sunday and, in many ways, they will have nothing to lose as they try to convince everyone that their efforts during the first half of the Netherlands game were not a true reflection of their ability.
In the Guardian Mike Selvey writes that Netherlands showing against England proves the importance of underdogs
Perhaps it is overstating the case to say that associate and affiliate nations at large have any ambition to play beyond T20. For the majority T20 could well be the right way to go. But since their first World Cup participation, each of Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe and Bangladesh have achieved Test match status and Ireland aim to join them. And in the future, do you think that China, a nation that receives all the cricket transmission offered by the Star TV footprint, and which is said to be gaining a rapid interest in developing the game, would be content not to join them?
The World Cup is the only event where non-Test countries can rub shoulders with the best in the business. And they have repeatedly dreamed of that one shot at worldwide recognition, of replacing the “minnow” label with one saying “giant-slayers”.
Richard Hinds in the Sydney Morning Herald takes a look at (and tries to recreate) Ricky Ponting's tetchy outburst in the game against Zimbabwe that earned him a reprimand from the ICC.
In the Indian Express , Shailaja Bajpai looks at how the various TV channels in India are doing their best to whip up mass hysteria in the Indian public, driving expectations on how this could be India's World Cup.
Indian TV news channels and crazed cricket fans will drink from that cup of good cheer if only Dhoni’s Devils (moving on from Kapil’s) realise Sachin Tendulkar’s dream of bringing home the World Cup. If they don’t, it’s going to take more than a cuppa to calm them down.
A few — Tony Cozier, Sanjay Manjrekar, Nasser Hussain, Michael Atherton — are very good. But to listen to the majority, however, is to be subjected to the banal, sterile witterings of imbecilic ex-players whose foremost achievement since retiring from the game has been managing to avoid eating their microphones.
The World Cup will lose far more than it gains from the ICC's planned culling of Associate nations in 2015, writes Andy Bull in the Guardian , arguing that the fascinating stories of men like Rizwan Cheema, Balaji Rao, Steve Tikolo and Ashish
And for all the crowing about the longevity of the likes of Muttiah Muralitharan, Ricky Ponting and Sachin Tendulkar, what about the indestructible Steve Tikolo? He was persuaded to come out of retirement at the age of 40 to play in this, his fifth World Cup. Tikolo looked "too old for this shit" way back in 2007. His is the most creaky-kneed comeback since Danny Glover did Lethal Weapon 4.