The Surfer
With the New Zealand tour still a short way off, the English press have focussed their efforts on the fracas in Australia that is being dubbed Bollyline
During his often stormy four-year tenure as chairman of the England and Wales Cricket Board, David Morgan earned a reputation as a conciliator. In the wake of the rancorous events in Sydney this week it could be precisely the quality the Welshman needs as he prepares to step into his new role as president of the International Cricket Council.
If the International Cricket Council had placed Steve Bucknor's head on a silver platter, put an apple in his mouth, and made a formal presentation to the chief mogul of rupee-laden Indian cricket, Sharad Pawar, they would have only been underlining a dispiriting point. It is that however strenuously principle still attempts to walk in cricket, it is money that talks, relentlessly and without shame.
Jonathan Agnew , the BBC’s cricket correspondent, has used his blog to give some forthright views on the current mess in Australia
What a shame it is that the legacy of this fine team will be so tarnished by the ugly and offensive manner in which it plays the game – and has done for at least three years.
The theatrics have continued at the SCG, where Brett Lee and Michael Hussey have been involved in filming for a Bollywood movie
And, after some tricky, line-ball decisions by the top umpire Rod Tucker, India dramatically beats Australia in the Test ... "No surprises whose victory," Lee joked.
"No sooner does India protest some gross inequity, than some bloke ..
Here is the situation: An allegation has been made. The only available, credible evidence is the word of the man making the allegation on one side, the word of the person against whom the allegation was made on the other, and the word of Tendulkar in the balance. In India, such a case would have been dismissed out of hand - on the grounds that there is no evidence to prove the charge. Explain to us, if you will, what the principles of justice are in Australia - do you condemn first, and make up the reasons as you go along ... Can you, or anyone at all, explain how a judgment can be made against Harbhajan in this case?
Mike Marqusee writes in the Guardian that as per the laws of cricket today, racist abuse is of special magnitude and if Harbhajan Singh did call Symonds a monkey, then it was absolutely neccessary for Ricky Ponting to lodge a formal complaint
Racist insults poison the game for players and spectators alike. They demean not only the opponent but an entire branch of the human family. Crucially, they have repercussions beyond the playing field. When one player abuses another's racial or ethnic origins, he both expresses and legitimises one of the most potent anti-social toxins at work in the modern world.
If Cricket Australia cares a fig for the tattered reputation of our national team in our national sport, it will not for a moment longer tolerate the sort of arrogant and abrasive conduct seen from the captain and his senior players over the past few days. Beyond comparison it was the ugliest performance put up by an Australian side for 20 years.
The initial fallout to the shenanigans at the SCG has started with Peter Roebuck firing the first shots
It was a match that will have been relished only by rabid nationalists and others for whom victory and vengeance are the sole reasons for playing sport. Truth to tell, the last day was as bad as the first. It was a rotten contest that singularly failed to elevate the spirit.