The Surfer
As the Australia-India Test series resumes in Perth with everyone having taken time to chill out after the events in Sydney, Mihir Bose, the BBC Sports editor, writes in the British Daily Telegraph about the reaction to the whole Harbhajan Singh
I had got on to the story because I was intrigued that Harbhajan should have used the word 'monkey'. I grew up in India and the word had never been seen as a racial insult. The Indian word for monkey is 'bandar' and in my childhood was used a word to chastise children who were naughty. I was often myself called a bandar if I became too high spirited. What I also wanted to know was, if Harbhajan did call Symonds 'monkey', did he use the English word or the Indian word, bandar?
India's post-Sydney mix of wild threats and risible excuses - none more ridiculous than the claim that because monkeys are venerated in India, if Harbhajan had used the term it could not be racist - have lost it much respect in Australia. In the week that the Indian board announced a £500m, 10-year TV deal for rights to its new Twenty20 competition - the Indian Premier League - its lack of sober assessment has smacked not for the first time of power without responsibility.
"Wellington is supposed to be the sport's spiritual home in New Zealand," writes Tony Smith on stuff.co.nz
Robert Craddock writes in the Daily Telegraph there were sweet words of reconciliation between Australia and India ahead of the Perth Test but meanwhile the ICC was ignoring a lingering issue.
The postponing of Harbhajan Singh's appeal against a three-match ban for racial abuse until after the end of the Test series was another example of the game turning its head sideways when eyeballed by controversy. Official excuses that it would take time to assemble witnesses were rubbish. They could have all been in Perth over the last three days.
By their demeanour and deeds over the next five days, the elite cricketers of Australia and India have an opportunity to apologise en masse for one of the sorriest weeks in the game in recent memory.
Cricket is a game of skill and performance. On the tour of Australia, the most searing examination of skill and performance in the game that there is, it must be noted that the young Hindustanis who ‘give it back' have been somewhat silent on the scoreboard.
When journalists are in breach of ethical behaviour who reprimands them, asks cricket historian Boria Majumdar in the weekly magazine Outlook
Having read cricket history for a doctoral dissertation, I have read reportage on the game spanning more than a century. It is impossible to remember one comparable series where the journalists have acted with such lack of grace.
We - the fans and the pundits - will go on demanding complete commitment, we will go on criticising batsmen for getting out (it happens from time to time) and bowlers for sending down half-volleys. We will call them disgraces to their respective nations and we will make sure damn sure they do not want to fail .... We will, in other words, continue to get the game we deserve.
The sun seems to be peeking through the grey clouds hanging over the fallout from the Sydney Test, with good news for Brad Hogg among others
They are all widely travelled cosmopolitans, visit each other's countries frequently, form friendships across national divides and mostly play together in England anyway. They understand each other well enough. Whatever Harbhajan said, he meant. Whatever the Australians said to provoke him, they meant.
Sir Edmund Hillary, the famous explorer who died last week, would be intrigued if he knew he could be coming to the rescue of one of the Australian cricket team
It might seem a gentle pastime involving a bat and a ball, conducted along lines imposed by carefully written laws and sustained by honoured traditions, but scrape away the surface and it bears a close resemblance to a bare-knuckled brawl.
If "monkey" and "bastard" are considered to be insulting terms, perhaps the ICC should "compile a dictionary of words that are offensive to the modern cricketer, or his culture," questions John Benaud in his fine piece in today's Independent on
There was a time when the greatest insult to an Australian cricketer was to mention the phrase "no sheep in the top paddock". After the SCG Test the words "monkey" and "bastard" are apparently offensive. Speed and Co have a new challenge: compile a dictionary of words that are offensive to the modern cricketer, or his culture.
Mike Atherton, in the Sunday Telegraph , dissects the events of the Sydney Test last week and wonders whether the exposing of apparent racism reveals our concern in preserving cricket
Funny thing, though, race. Sometimes what is perceived as a racist issue is not really about race at all. In Sydney, race was the issue that lanced the boil, but the pus underneath had been gathering and festering for years and concerned much more fundamental cricketing issues. Like what kind of team are Australia? Can a team who play exhilarating cricket and try their damnedest to win every game actually be bad for the game? Ultimately, the aftermath of Sydney was about the kind of game we want to see preserved. What does the game stand for, if anything at all, and what kind of game would we like to see played out on the most visible arena of all? In short, what is this thing we call the 'spirit of cricket'?
Concluding an excellent series on cricket at all levels, from club to country, Peter Hanlon in the Sunday Age spends time behind the scenes with the Australians at the Boxing Day Test.
Departure for the ground is at 9am, half an hour earlier on day one to allow for pre-match services. On overseas tours they have a coach and driver, but in Australia it's rented 12-seater buses, driven by whoever is first to the keys. "Michael Clarke is normally in charge of the first bus," Hussey says. "He's down there a bit earlier, keen to get to the ground and get himself set up.” Brad Hogg, who would not have been out of place in On The Buses, is another keen driver. The journey from hotel to ground is no more than 10 minutes in any city, yet long enough to prompt some slack-jawed gazes when children in car back seats realise who they've pulled up next to at the lights.