
|

Hunting in pairs: 'Sreesanth's effort being backed up by a splendid opening
burst from Zaheer Khan'
© Getty Images
|
|
In many ways, Saturday's events at the Wanderers were as bizarre as the
James Buster Douglas haymaker that stripped Mike Tyson of his invincible
veneer. And though Sreesanth will deservedly get the plaudits after the
first of what will surely be many five-wicket hauls, the seeds of an
improbable upset were planted earlier in the day when VRV Singh came out
and played an innings that was as effective as it was comical to watch.
Despite Sourav Ganguly's defiance, South Africa were well on top at that
stage. But VRV Singh's manic hitting lifted far more than the run-rate. It
hit South Africa full in the face like a bucket of cold water, and you
could actually see the spirits rise in the Indian dressing room. When
Dinesh Karthik came out with some unscheduled drinks, he was laughing
uproariously at VRV Singh's back-away-and-wallop antics. By the time the
team came out to field, they were buzzing.
And they didn't just buzz either. Sreesanth and Zaheer Khan stung the
opposition early, and as early as lunch, South Africa were in supine
position to avoid further punishment. It won't have escaped Mickey
Arthur's notice that the Indians used the new ball far better than South
Africa did, pitching it fuller and hitting the seam consistently enough on
a pitch that demanded it. Things didn't improve at the second time of
asking either, with only the remarkable Shaun Pollock and Jacques Kallis
bowling the right length. If the plan was to bounce India out, it's failed
miserably on a surface where a good-length delivery hitting the seam was a
far superior option.
Andre Nel impressed in patches, but too often let adrenaline and bravado
get the better of him. As for Makhaya Ntini, the wicket of Ganguly - to an
awful shot at that - was scant consolation after one of the poorest spells
he's bowled in recent memory. By contrast, the Indians bowled superbly as
a unit, with Sreesanth's effort being backed up by a splendid opening
burst from Zaheer Khan. The pressure was relentless, and amply illustrated
the truth of that old cliché about quick bowlers hunting in pairs.
Apart from the considerable skill that he showed with the ball, Sreesanth
also showcased the kind of mongrel attitude that every winning side needs.
Mark Boucher was sledged relentlessly, and then bowled off the inside edge
to add insult to verbal injury. But for Nel showing the heart of a true
fighter, it would have been even more embarrassing. Except for him (24 balls)
and Ashwell Prince, who faced 60 deliveries, no one else lasted even three
overs. Even during the abysmal slide to 66 all out at Durban in 1996,
India had lasted 34.1 overs. South Africa bested that by a clear
nine overs.
If there was a disappointment for India, it was the failure of Virender
Sehwag to kick on after getting a start. He had already edged twice
through the slip cordon when he sliced one to point, and it was left to
Ganguly and VVS Laxman to ensure that the lead was stretched to imposing
limits. They added 58 in just 12 overs, with Laxman - who had just 2 from
the first 22 balls he faced - batting like a dream by close of play. By
then, the Indians had struck 25 fours, testament to poor bowling on a
pitch loaded in their favour.
Australia chased down 292 at the Wanderers earlier this year, but South
Africa are light years behind as a Test side. The next highest target
chased in 50 years of Test cricket here is 217. India's lead is already
311, and could swell further with Laxman and Dhoni at the crease. Sunil
Gavaskar reckons that the Oval Test victory that he was part of in 1971
remains the most significant in Indian cricket history, but if Rahul
Dravid and his brave men pull this one off, it'll come mighty close.
Dileep Premachandran is features editor of Cricinfo