County Championship Division One 2009 | Live Score, Schedule, News

WOR

356 & 410/7

DUR

634/8d

Match drawn

RESULT

Nottingham, September 23 - 26, 2009, County Championship Division One

NOT

328 & 286

SUS

(T:372) 243 & 336

Notts won by 35 runs

RESULT

Leeds, September 23 - 26, 2009, County Championship Division One

HAM

351 & 284/3d

YOR

348

Match drawn

RESULT

Manchester, September 23 - 25, 2009, County Championship Division One

WAR

148 & 244

LAN

(T:4) 389 & 4/0

Lancashire won by 10 wickets

RESULT

Taunton, September 16 - 19, 2009, County Championship Division One

WOR

571

SOM

(fo) 280 & 523/8

Match drawn

RESULT

Hove, September 16 - 19, 2009, County Championship Division One

YOR

403 & 284

SUS

(T:240) 448 & 83

Yorkshire won by 156 runs

RESULT

Southampton, September 15 - 18, 2009, County Championship Division One

DUR

439 & 8/0

HAM

384

Match drawn

RESULT

Hove, September 09 - 12, 2009, County Championship Division One

SUS

254 & 172

WAR

428

Warwickshire won by an innings and 2 runs

RESULT

Taunton, September 09 - 12, 2009, County Championship Division One

LAN

344 & 314/2

SOM

557/8d

Match drawn

RESULT

Worcester, September 09 - 11, 2009, County Championship Division One

HAM

(T:4) 383 & 7/0

WOR

(fo) 159 & 227

Hampshire won by 10 wickets

View All Results

Stats & Records

County Championship Division One 2009See All

Overall County Championship Division One records

Winner

Durham

Sussex lose, but still win title

Sussex retained their Pro40 title despite a heavy defeat to Worcestershire thanks to Durham's narrow victory against Somerset

Drab end shows need for change

Lancashire's victory over Warwickshire yesterday meant that neither side had any prize-money to play for

Worcestershire save some pride

It may have been a miserable season, but Worcestershire at least restored a little pride after earning a draw against the champions

Nottinghamshire take second place

Nottinghamshire took second place, and a handsome prize, after victory over Sussex on the final day of the Championship season

Chanderpaul epic sets up Durham

A double-century from Shivnarine Chanderpaul ensured Durham will end the season as the only unbeaten side in the English first-class season

Nottinghamshire close in on second spot

So far as Sussex were concerned, only pride was at stake. For Nottinghamshire, there was the not inconsiderable matter of £225,000 to be won as runners-up to Durham

Bairstow enlivens drifting match

Bad light, which wiped out the final 24 overs of the third day's play, almost certainly ended the already slight hopes of a definite result in this match

Sussex condemned to relegation

Despite the best efforts of their leading run-scorer, Chris Nash, Sussex found themselves consigned to relegation at about five to five on day two

Yorkshire secure Division One berth for 2010

Yorkshire have earned the right, almost at the last minute, to remain in the first division of the championship in 2010, and that was their main objective of this match

Northants left to watch and wait

Northamptonshire completed a crushing win over Leicestershire to move into second place in Division Two, but now have to wait for the result at Derby

County Championship Division One 2009 Points Table

Team	M	W	L	D	PT
DUR	16	8	0	8	240
NOT	16	4	2	10	193
SOM	16	3	1	12	182
LAN	16	4	2	10	175
WAR	16	3	3	10	174
HAM	16	3	3	10	169
YOR	16	2	2	12	166
SUS	16	2	6	8	143
WOR	16	0	10	6	94

Full Table

County Championship Division One 2009 Top Wicket Takers

Charl Willoughby

SOM, Lfm

Innings: 26Average: 30.03

Imran Tahir

HAM, Lbg

Innings: 19Average: 32.90

Steve Harmison

DUR, Rfm

Innings: 24Average: 22.62

View full list

County Championship Division One 2009 Top Run Scorers

Marcus Trescothick

SOM, Lhb

1817

Innings: 26Average: 75.70

Michael Di Venuto

DUR, Lhb

1601

Innings: 26Average: 80.05

Jacques Rudolph

YOR, Lhb

1334

Innings: 27Average: 51.30

View full list

Instant answers to T20 questions

Ask a question

Team	M	W	L	D	PT
DUR	16	8	0	8	240
NOT	16	4	2	10	193
SOM	16	3	1	12	182
LAN	16	4	2	10	175
WAR	16	3	3	10	174
HAM	16	3	3	10	169
YOR	16	2	2	12	166
SUS	16	2	6	8	143
WOR	16	0	10	6	94

Team	M	W	L	D	PT
DUR	16	8	0	8	240
NOT	16	4	2	10	193
SOM	16	3	1	12	182
LAN	16	4	2	10	175
WAR	16	3	3	10	174
HAM	16	3	3	10	169
YOR	16	2	2	12	166
SUS	16	2	6	8	143
WOR	16	0	10	6	94

Team	M	W	L	D	PT
DUR	16	8	0	8	240
NOT	16	4	2	10	193
SOM	16	3	1	12	182
LAN	16	4	2	10	175
WAR	16	3	3	10	174
HAM	16	3	3	10	169
YOR	16	2	2	12	166
SUS	16	2	6	8	143
WOR	16	0	10	6	94