What with one thing then another, no West Indies team could
have entered a Test series less properly prepared than Carl
Hooper's when it takes the field against Sri Lanka in the
southern town of Galle tomorrow morning.
It required the persuasive powers of Wes Hall, the new
president of the board, and the kind of security assurances
otherwise reserved for heads of state to convince the
players that they should venture into Sri Lanka in the first
place.
Until a few days before they departed, it wasn't certain
whether Brian Lara, the key batsman, was fit enough to make
it.
No sooner than he told the selectors that he was, Shivnarine
Chanderpaul, no less essential to the middle order,
developed serious back problems and had to drop out.
Wavell Hinds, not in the original squad but summoned as
cover for Lara, found himself substituting for Chanderpaul
instead, only to promptly have his nose broken in a festival
knockabout in Kingston.
Doctors, and selectors, deemed him fit enough to join the
tour all the same, even if a week late. Be advised that he
shouldn't be placed too near to the bat when fielding.
Once on the ground, the West Indies have found their welcome
most inhospitable, not from their cricketing hosts, the
disruptive rebel Tamil Tigers guerillas or the rival
factions campaigning for the December 5 elections but from
the weather. It's the closing weeks of the monsoon season.
Hooper, Lara and coach Roger Harper were on the last West
Indies team to tour Sri Lanka, over the first three weeks of
December eight years ago, when three days of the solitary
Test were washed out, just 106 overs bowled in the one
first-class match and only one of the three One-Day
Internationals ran its course.
Assigned a mere two three-day matches prior to the three
back-to-back Tests this time, they have had to pass more
time slapping dominoes, listening to Shaggy or Shadow on
their walkmans or simply watching the rain fall than getting
in any meaningful cricket.
Come tomorrow morning and they would have had roughly twoand-a-half days match play as groundwork.
At least Hooper himself, Chris Gayle, whose appetite for
runs continues to be insatiable, Lara, Marlon Samuels,
Ridley Jacobs and Daren Ganga have each had valuable time in
the middle. And those bowlers lucky enough to be chosen for
the match that ended yesterday had the workout of one
innings.
But, whichever way you look at it, it is all patently
insufficient, especially against opponents with home
advantage who have played four Tests as recently as late
August and mid-September and who have just returned from a
triangular One-Day series in Sharjah.
It is a test for the motivational skills of Hooper, Harper
and manager Ricky Skerritt, the proficiency of trainer
Ronald Rogers and the resilience of the players themselves.
The most recent evidence is encouraging. The spate of
injuries that decimated the team in Zimbabwe back in June
with Lara departing before the tour started and Merv Dillon,
Cameron Cuffy and Dinanath Ramnarine going before the Tests
seemed to strengthen the resolve of those who remained.
Gayle, Ganga and Hooper set the platform for the first Test
victory with a 500-plus total. Colin Stuart and Neil
McGarrell, who would probably not have been in the XI
otherwise, finished off the job by an innings.
Sri Lanka, it is true, are not Zimbabwe. They are a strong,
well-balanced, confident team with a recent record that
places them fourth of ten on the ICC's current Test league
table.
But they are not Australia or South Africa either. They will
bow to the pressure of a sizeable total and consistent
bowling, supported by alert catching and sharp fielding.
Such attributes have been in short supply in West Indies'
teams of late and, given the present circumstances, it may
be too much to except them to suddenly materialise as if by
magic.
Hooper and Lara, as the two classiest and most experienced
batsmen, carry the task of giving the undeniably limited
bowling attack the leeway it needs. The West Indies' abysmal
away record 18 losses against one win and one draw in 20
Tests prior to Zimbabwe was caused by several things. High
on the list was a collective lack of heart and commitment.
If ever they were needed, it is now.