Miandad records statement (24 August 1999)
Lahore, 23: Former Test captain and coach Javed Miandad recorded his in-camera statement in Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum's one-man inquiry commission in his chamber in the Lahore High Court on Monday
24-Aug-1999
24 August 1999
Miandad records statement
Ilyas Beg
Lahore, 23: Former Test captain and coach Javed Miandad recorded his
in-camera statement in Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum's one-man inquiry
commission in his chamber in the Lahore High Court on Monday.
Test cricketers Ejaz Ahmad and Mushtaq Ahmad also came to the court
but their accusers failed to turn up. So, they could not cross-examine
them. Advocates, representing some of the Test cricketers, were also
present. Test paceman Ata-ur-Rahman's brother Tariq Mahmood also came
to the court. Ehtesab Bureau Director Qaiser Ali Shah came and
submitted his report to the commission. However, its contents were not
made public.
Seven Test cricketers Shahid Afridi, Salim Malik, Ejaz Ahmad, Moin
Khan, Inzamam-ul-Haq and Azhar Mahmood have been summoned by the
inquiry commission on Sept 3.
Journalist Fareshte Gati-Aslam, Test cricketers Waqar Younis, Aamir
Sohail, Aqib Javed, Mushtaq Ahmad, Ata-ur-Rahman, NBP employee Salim
Pervaiz, SSP who had handled case of father of captain Wasim Akram and
boomaker Younis have also been summoned to appear on Sept 10.
Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum warned that if Ata-ur-Rahman and Salim
Pervaiz failed to appear on the fixed date of Sept 10, their arrest
warrants would be issued.
Registrar High Court Abdul Salam Khawar told Dawn that it had been
decided to continue day-to-day hearing after Sept 10 till the
completion of inquiry.
While replying to a question Abdul Salam Khawar said that the
cricketers had been summoned by Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum after
scanning the material made available to him.
Advocate Chaudhary Muzammil was present to represent Test leg-spinner
Mushtaq Ahmad while captain Wasim Akram's advocate Khawaja Ahmad Tariq
Rahim and batsman Salim Malik's advocate Azmat Saeed were also present
in the court. However, they could not cross-examine the accusers of
their clients since they failed to come to the court on Monday.
Source :: The Dawn (www.dawn.com)