Michael learns to rock
Nasser Hussain was not flinging idle praise around when he termedMichael Vaughan's 197 one of the best innings he had ever seen fromthe blade of an English bat
Rajesh Kumar
14-Aug-2002
Nasser Hussain was not flinging idle praise around when he termed
Michael Vaughan's 197 one of the best innings he had ever seen from
the blade of an English bat. The classical opener's highest firstclass score was quite definitely an innings that would done the best
of his tribe proud.
![]() Michael Vaughan against all bowlers - England 1st innings at Trent Bridge © CricInfo |
The Yorkshireman was helped in no small measure by the Indian bowlers,
who played a significant part in the transformation of the 27-yearold, whom many had previously marked as the ideal replacement for
another Michael - the very correct and very stodgy Atherton - into a
batsman who tore the opposing attack to shreds.
Pitching short and spraying the ball everywhere, India's bowlers
helped the England opener feel at home immediately upon his arrival at
the crease. High on confidence after his hundred in the England second
innings at Lord's, Vaughan was not in the mood to miss out on such
easy pickings.
With dozens of short-of-a-length deliveries on offer, the region
between point and third man naturally proved a productive one,
yielding as many as 43 runs. Another area that provided runs by the
bucketful was mid-wicket, where Vaughan creamed as many as 44 through
fine back-foot pulls and front-foot drives. It is also telling that
only 20 runs out of 197 - a measly 10.15 % - came in the vee between
mid-off and mid-on. On that Trent Bridge wicket, India should have
been pitching the ball up much further, allowing it to swing and use
the juice in the wicket. If Vaughan had made 197 with the bowlers
sticking to the appropriate length, many more runs would have come off
straight drives.
![]() Michael Vaughan against Harbhajan Singh - England 1st innings at Trent Bridge © CricInfo |
Harbhajan also made another fundamental error, not only against
Vaughan but against the rest as well. Not once did he succeed in
flighting the ball and luring Vaughan into the expansive drive.
Ironically enough, then, it was Vaughan who, in India's second
innings, reminded everybody of the efficacy of that classic offspinner's tactic. The ball with which he brought about Sachin
Tendulkar's downfall was exactly the kind that Harbhajan himself
should been attempting.