Ajmal's bowling exceeds tolerance limit

After a series of exhaustive studies by a panel of experts, it has been decreed that Saeed Ajmal's bowling arm did, in fact, exceed the tolerance limit of England's abilities.

Ajmal's action had come under a cloud of suspicion following the Test matches, with some England players and Ajmal himself hinting that his bowling arm exceeded the legally allowed limit to challenge England in Tests.

"There can be no doubts about it now," said David Lloyd, who was pulled out of commentating to head the hastily convened panel, which featured other former-players-turned-commentators and current-commentators-turned-further-bores.

"We spent hours studying the footage. Once we slowed the action down with the super slow-motion camera, we could clearly make out what the naked eye can see just as plainly: the worry creases on the foreheads of England's top batsmen deepened just that extra bit as they tried not to internally combust when trying to decide whether to come forward or stay back, to play for turn this way, that way, or - what they opted for in the end - no way.

"We found it's quite clear Ajmal's bowling exceeds the ECB's stipulated tolerance limit of facing high-quality spin bowling by more than 150 degrees. We've done our work," concluded Lloyd. "The rest is up to the ICC."

England's players reacted with relief to news of the findings. Kevin Pietersen said that he was finally able to come to a degree of peace with himself, now that a reasonable explanation had been found for his poor performance in the series. "I thought it was something to do with my technique," said a visibly relieved KP.

The ECB, on the other hand, is rumoured to be incensed at having its team exposed to a situation beyond its means, and so soon after attaining the cherished world No. 1 tag at that. "The ICC has a lot to answer for," said a spokesman for the ECB. "It needs to ask itself if this is the kind of advertisement for Test cricket it's after - when your No. 1 side gets whitewashed in unfair circumstances."

The ICC, for its part, said all the England batsmen would have to be called in for corrective action, and until such time that the team will have increased its tolerance for playing spin, will have to take notions of being a true world No. 1 with a Gibraltar-sized grain of rock salt.

Latest reports indicate England's players will appeal the ICC's decision three times in quick succession to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, each time unsuccessfully, before suddenly realising they have used up their quota of appeals and will have to mosey on along with their marching orders.

In other just as sensational news, Andy Flower has admitted that some dead pitches in the subcontinent might actually be alive.

"We can't be sure yet, but there is this sneaking suspicion that what we've for decades been calling dead pitches in the subcontinent and similar are not dead at all, but in fact only pretending to be dead," said an angry Flower. "Well, I can tell you not only are they alive, but they can be so full of joie de vivre as to be downright vicious. In horror-film parlance, these pitches might be classified as undead pitches, as zombie pitches.

"I'd like the ICC to send a coroner immediately to check the health of some of these pitches, and that if there is indeed a pulse found, as I suspect will be the case, to proclaim them unsuitable for playing on."

Flower explained that teams like England and Australia should traditionally only play on bouncy or batsman-friendly pitches in the subcontinent, and not pitches so alive as to take unnecessary amounts of spin.

"Pretty soon they'll be using the words "lively" or "good" - words normally reserved for nice, juicy pitches back home - to describe spinning tracks as well," Flower mumbled nervously. "What will happen to us then?"