Monday April 8 1996
`Rat race` too much for Titmus
By Charles Randall
FRED TITMUS yesterday withdrew from the nine-man England selectors contest, saying it had developed into a "rat race" which the
counties had not thought through.
Titmus, who was standing for re-election in the postal ballot,
telephoned his decision to Ray Illingworth, chairman of selectors, when he learnt that the final list of candidates for the
two vacancies had grown to one of the longest on record.
There could have been 10 candidates as Peter Willey`s name was
apparently forwarded and then withdrawn due to his umpiring commitments.
Titmus, 63, who played 53 Tests for England, said: "I`m a little
upset at the rat-race it has developed into. With these late nominations I`m sure a lot of the counties haven`t quite thought out
what this entails.
"It was almost as though they were nominating people for the sake
of nomination. I think the job is more important than that, and
I don`t want to be involved in something that is done on that
basis."
Although Illingworth`s selectors did a satisfactory job in the
home West Indies series last year, it became apparent this week
that Titmus would fall victim to calls for younger selectors
after England`s poor World Cup showing. Titmus said: "I`m quite
happy to compete against anybody but this leaves a nasty taste in
the mouth."
Illingworth said: "I`m disappointed because, whatever is said
about older men, you can tell a good cricketer when you see one."
The eight remaining candidates were David Graveney, Titmus`s
panel colleague for the past year, Brian Bolus, John Edrich, Geoff Miller, Ian Botham, Chris Cowdrey and current players Graham
Gooch and Kim Barnett.
The Test and County Cricket Board this week reminded counties
that, to elect a full-time media man as a selector, went against
a "principle" set last year by the executive committee. The
Lord`s authorities denied yesterday that the TCCB letter was
aimed specifically at Botham. The ballot result is expected on
April 18.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (http.//www.telegraph.co.uk)