Real deal
The Toronto experience proves that cricket can open up new markets
![]() |
|
Bottom of the heap is Cape Town, with 11 matches so far. Peshawar and Bridgetown have 12, Hobart 14 and Calcutta 16. The clear winner is Toronto, with 22.
Not a lot of people know that. But then there is no shortage of ignorance about international cricket, Canadian-style. And even those who are aware of its existence are apt to look down their noses. Cricket in North America: sounds a bit Mickey Mouse, doesn't it?
Today's match is the second of three between Pakistan and West Indies, who need to win to keep the series alive. Both teams are at full strength, although Shoaib Akhtar, to general chagrin, has gone home injured, and Curtly Ambrose is missing too, under the new arrangement whereby he and Courtney Walsh take turns to put their aged feet up. Brian Lara gives Walsh the novel experience of sharing the new ball with an offspinner, the 19-year-old Chris Gayle. This provokes some Lara-bashing in the press box which is neatly silenced when Gayle bowls Saeed Anwar for 6. Pakistan are soon 80 for 4, but then they are used to that from the World Cup. Yousuf Youhana and Abdur Razzaq stop the rot, then start enjoying themselves. The last 10 overs go for 100, and the total of 222 is above average for these bowler-dominated times.
ICC rules state that an international is only official if it has the blessing of the local governing body. That blessing does not come free. In spring 1996 Wildblood flew to Montreal (`bloody cold') to meet officers of the Canadian Cricket Association, armed only with preliminary agreements from his friends at the Indian and Pakistan boards. A deal was signed whereby IMG agreed to give the CCA a minimum amount over five years. Now he just had to find somewhere to play.
The Toronto Cricket, Skating and Curling Club, despite its word order, was not the obvious choice. The club has 2500 members, only about 50 of whom play cricket. Wildblood had heard of it, but was doubtful: he walked out to the middle with a tape measure to make sure the field was big enough. `The square was turf, but it didn't look like anything on which you could let Wasim Akram loose against Sachin Tendulkar and be confident that Sachin would survive.'
This is a recurring theme - not just the air travel but the need to play proper cricket, and be seen to do so. `We had to be better than anyone else,' Wildblood says, `not only with the pitch but the way we look after the players, and the press, and the quality of the TV pictures. People are very inclined to say Toronto, cricket? What a joke, don't be absurd.'
Wildblood had not yet secured `a dollar' of income. `But you had to believe that if you had Pakistan and India, people would be interested.' It helped that there were two satellite broadcasters in India, ESPN, owned by Disney, and Star, owned by Rupert Murdoch, whose rivalry was driven by cricket. `They have since merged, somewhat inconveniently for us. But others have come along to compete with them.' ESPN bought the rights. Wildblood won't say what they paid, but he does disclose that two-thirds of the revenue usually comes from TV. The total budget is `some millions'.
In September 1996, the first Sahara Friendship Cup was duly held. You can guess what happened next. `It poured and poured and poured,' Wildblood says. `We caught the tail-end of a hurricane. I remember sitting on my brand-new covers with water running through the guttering, thinking the rain would never stop.'
The tournament was due to start with two matches over a weekend. Hurricane Fran - for it was she - wiped out both days. Finally, after lunch on the Monday, North America's first one-day international got under way, as a 33-over slog. Pakistan made 170 for 9, and Tendulkar, with 89 at a run a ball, took India to victory. To make up for lost time, the first three matches were played back-to-back, before small weekday crowds. The pitch suffered and began to turn square. But there were four full matches, and three scores over 250, and the series seesawed nicely until Pakistan, who had twice been behind, won 3-2. If the series proved one thing,' said the Wisden Almanack, `it was that the clicking turnstile is no longer the index of marketing success.'
A week later, the Indian team visited Pakistan for the first time since 1989-90, to take part in another one-day tournament. Cricket played on the shores of the Great Lakes was beginning to make ripples.
Meanwhile a shadow was passing over the face of world cricket in the form of allegations of match-fixing. Matches involving teams from the subcontinent were under greater suspicion than most. Matches held in odd places were under the greatest suspicion of all. In some quarters, it was said that all the games in Toronto were fixed. Wildblood was incensed. `I'm fairly sure,' he says, `that we've only had one game that was fixed.'
Overall, scores were lower again, and West Indies' performances were as subdued as their supporters. But the main feeling is one of relief that the tournament happened at all. The Canadian Cricket Association issues a statement expressing its gratitude to the various boards and thanking the PCB for its `unswerving commitment', which may be the first time the word unswerving has ever been used in relation to Pakistan cricket.
Those who come to the ground clearly know and love their cricket. At lunch, two Caribbean-Canadians could be heard having a heated discussion about the talents of Peter Lashley, the Barbados batsman whose international career consisted of four Tests 30 years ago.
But hang on - isn't this the team that made 45 off about 40 overs against England in the 1979 World Cup? `Yes, we got demolished by England,' Edwards admits. But I think we'll take them on pretty well in the future. We've got a bunch of guys who are fairly decent.'
This month, Canada take part in the Red Stripe Bowl, West Indies' one-day competition. Next year, if all is quite on the Kashmir front, the Sahara Cup will resume. The year after, Toronto takes another step up the global ladder by hosting the ICC Trophy, the qualifying tournament for the 2003 World Cup. `That wouldn't have happened without this event,' Geoff Edwards says. `IMG have done a wonderful job for us.'
IMG's money has enabled the CCA to develop half-a-dozen turf pitches in Toronto, and to stop relying on government handouts. It is still a modest organisation with only one fulltime employee - a coach-cum-executive in Winnipeg, three hours' flight away - but not for much longer. `We are volunteer-driven,' Edwards says, `but we have to move past that now. Our plans are to have a national secretariat and a national coach. We need that infrastructure.'
Is he dreaming of Test status? `One step at a time.'
When Andrew Wildblood talks of being `better than anyone else', he is showing a little too much parental pride. The pitches this year left something to be desired; the side batting second often found the bounce uneven. The TV coverage was indeed high-quality, with excellent close-ups and familiar commentators (Gavaskar and Cozier as well as Boycott), though it was a shame that it was available in Canada only on pay-per-view. The press were indeed well catered-for. About 50 reporters turned up - more than you would find at, say, Australia v South Africa at Melbourne- and the Toronto PR company hired by IMG supplied them with a stream of press releases, statistics, curries and cakes. Colin Croft, writing on the Cricinfo website, said he had never seen such good organisation anywhere on his cricket travels: `Very well done, guys!!'
He described the pitch, with a dry smile, as not the greatest. `The scores have reflected that. You might be in, but the ball still doesn't come on to the bat. But I've seen worse wickets. The players are comfortable, the amenities are good, they've looked after us very well.' His only criticism concerns the stands. `If you're trying to sell the game, it's time for permanent structures.'