Matches (13)
IPL (2)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
Women's One-Day Cup (1)
PSL (2)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
Stats Analysis

Teams from the subcontinent start favourites

A statistical preview to the ICC World Twenty20

Going by past record alone, Pakistan are the firm favourites to lift the ICC World Twenty20 (if there can be anything called favourites in a format as fickle as this). They won the tournament last year, were the finalist in 2007, and have a much better overall record in 20-over cricket than any other side.
South Africa come closest to them, and in fact have a better win-loss ratio in the World Twenty20, but they've lost out in crucial games - to India in 2007, and to Pakistan in the 2009 edition. Australia, on the other hand, have a good record overall but a very poor one in World Cups. India, after a closely fought win over Pakistan in the 2007 final, have not had a very good time in the Twenty20 format. They have won just five and lost seven of the 12 games played since their victory. Sri Lanka, the finalists in 2009, are the only other team with a win-loss ratio of more than two in World Cups.
Performance of teams in T20 matches and ICC Twenty20 World cup matches
Team T20 Matches played Matches won Matches lost win-loss ratio T20 World Cup matches played Matches won Matches lost Win-loss ratio
Pakistan 30 22 7 3.14 14 10 3 3.33
South Africa 26 17 9 1.88 11 9 2 4.50
Australia 29 15 12 1.25 8 3 5 0.60
Sri Lanka 25 15 10 1.50 12 9 3 3.00
New Zealand 33 13 17 0.76 11 5 6 0.83
England 25 10 14 0.71 10 3 7 0.42
India 20 10 8 1.25 12 6 4 1.50
West Indies 21 8 11 0.72 8 3 5 0.60
Bangladesh 14 3 11 0.27 7 1 6 0.16
ZImbabwe 8 3 4 0.75 2 1 1 1.00
In a tournament which has been dominated by teams from the subcontinent, it's hardly surprising that players from India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka have been the most successful. Among the top eight run-scorers in World Twenty20s so far, only two are from non-subcontinent teams.
Gautam Gambhir and Mahela Jayawardene are entering the tournament after fine performances in the IPL, while Yuvraj Singh needs to lift his game considerably to regain the form that made him a top batsman in this format. Chris Gayle didn't do much in the IPL, but he has been extremely dangerous batsman in this format and home conditions lend him an even greater advantage. Yuvraj and Gayle are also the top two six-hitters in World Twenty20 matches: Yuvraj has struck 21 sixes, while Gayle has 18.
Top batsmen in ICC World Twenty20
Batsman Matches Runs Scored Average Strike rate 100 50
Tillakaratne Dilshan 12 382 42.44 140.44 0 3
Gautam Gambhir 12 375 34.09 120.96 0 4
Kevin Pietersen 9 332 36.88 157.34 0 2
Sanath Jayasuriya 12 331 27.58 132.93 0 3
Mahela Jayawardene 12 313 31.30 136.08 0 2
Chris Gayle 7 310 51.66 151.96 1 2
Yuvraj Singh 11 301 33.44 172.00 0 3
Misbah-Ul-Haq 14 300 42.85 132.74 0 2
The bowlers from the subcontinent have been the most successful in this tournament so far. Shahid Afridi and Lasith Malinga are among the top wicket-takers, but the most successful bowler in the competition will be missed: Umar Gul has 26 wickets at a superb average of 12.03, but is out of the World Cup due to a shoulder injury.
Spinners have proved to be far more effective at curtailing the scoring rate in Twenty20 internationals, and they're likely to be even more in demand in the West Indies, where pitches are likely to be slow. The tables below summarises the performance of fast bowlers and spinners in the Twenty20 World Cup and in all Twenty20 internationals so far.
Performance of fast bowlers and spinners in ICC World Twenty20
Type of bowler Runs Conceded Economy rate Wickets taken Average
Pace 10462 7.86 405 25.22
Spin 4508 7.08 204 21.65
Performance of fast bowlers and spinners in Twenty20 internationals
Type of bowler Runs Conceded Economy rate Wickets taken Average
Pace 26659 7.57 1093 24.39
Spin 10446 6.75 517 20.20
One of the key aspects in the tournament will be the ability of batsmen to limit the number of dot balls they play. In the Twenty20 World Cup matches so far Afridi leads the way while Kevin Pietersen and MS Dhoni also have extremely low dot ball percentages. On the other end of the table, though, are the big hitters like Gayle and Sanath Jayasuriya, who prefer the big shots to the singles. The fact that they're openers, and hence bat when field restrictions are on, also increases the number of dots.
Batsmen with the Lowest dot ball percentage (min balls faced 150)
Batsman Balls faced Dot balls Percentage of dot balls
Shahid Afridi 267 52 30.40
Kevin Pietersen 332 65 30.80
MS Dhoni 240 67 32.05
Misbah-Ul-Haq 300 79 34.95
Jacques Kallis 238 66 35.10
Tillakaratne Dilshan 382 99 36.39
AB de Villiers 236 62 37.12
Yuvraj Singh 175 65 37.13
Brendon McCullum 246 92 37.39
Mahela Jayawardene 313 90 39.13
Rohit Sharma 219 67 39.88
Gautam Gambhir 375 129 41.61
Kumar Sangakkara 281 111 42.36
Owais Shah 209 79 44.13
Kamran Akmal 232 86 45.50
Herschelle Gibbs 224 79 46.47
Sanath Jayasuriya 331 122 48.99
Chris Gayle 310 101 49.50
Graeme Smith 243 108 50.23
(Only includes batsmen who are in the squads for the 2010 tournament.)
As you'd expect, the ones with the high dot balls are also the ones who score a majority of their runs in boundaries. Gayle and Jayasuriya top the table with close to 70% of their runs in boundaries. Dhoni, on the other hand, scores just 38% of his runs in boundaries, which, coupled with an extremely low dot-ball percentage of 32.05, gives ample illustration of his batting style.
Batsmen with highest percentage of runs in boundaries (min runs scored 200)
Batsman Total Runs Runs in boundaries Percentage of runs in boundaries
Chris Gayle 310 220 70.96
Sanath Jayasuriya 331 228 68.88
Yuvraj Singh 301 202 67.10
Herschelle Gibbs 224 144 64.28
Graeme Smith 243 156 64.19
Kevin Pietersen 332 204 61.44
Tillakaratne Dilshan 382 234 61.25
Brendon McCullum 246 144 58.53
Rohit Sharma 219 126 57.53
Jacques Kallis 238 136 57.14
Gautam Gambhir 375 208 55.46
AB de Villiers 236 130 55.08
Mahela Jayawardene 313 172 54.95
Kamran Akmal 232 126 54.31
Shahid Afridi 267 142 53.18
Owais Shah 209 108 51.67
Misbah-Ul-Haq 300 154 51.33
Kumar Sangakkara 281 130 46.26
MS Dhoni 240 92 38.33
(Only includes batsmen who are in the squads for the 2010 tournament.)
The inaugural edition of the tournament witnessed plenty of high scores, but the totals came down when the competition shifted to England, with a significant drop in the number of 200 plus scores. The West Indies have hosted only four Twenty20 internationals so far, and if the scores in those games are anything to go by, the average score in his edition will be even lower. The average runs per over in these four games has been 6.44, which is far lower than the corresponding figures of 7.99 and 7.62 for the tournaments in 2007 and 2009.
Highest team totals in ICC World Twenty20 2007
Team Score Opposition Venue
Sri Lanka 260/6 Kenya Johannesburg
India 218/4 England Durban
South Africa 208/2 West Indies Johannesburg
West Indies 205/6 South Africa Johannesburg
England 200/6 India Durban
Highest team totals in ICC World Twenty20 2009
Team Score Opposition Venue
South Africa 211/5 Scotland The Oval
New Zealand 198/5 Ireland Nottingham
Sri Lanka 192/5 West Indies Nottingham
England 185/5 Pakistan The Oval
South Africa 183/7 West Indies The Oval