Tudor's absence adds to the agony of my broken finger (25 July 1999)
This Test has demonstrated graphically to me many of the frustrations that go with being England captain
25-Jul-1999
25 July 1999
Tudor's absence adds to the agony of my broken finger
Nasser Hussain
This Test has demonstrated graphically to me many of the frustrations
that go with being England captain. First there was the case of the
fate that has befallen two of our leading fast bowlers. Then,
yesterday, came the huge personal blow of fracturing the top joint on
the middle finger of my right hand, an injury that will probably keep
me out of the Old Trafford Test.
The absence at Lord's of Darren Gough and Alex Tudor has again
demonstrated the potential for clashes of interests that exists in
our cricket between the counties and England. I am not blaming
anybody. I just want to make sure the ludicrous situation which
developed here last Wednesday is never allowed to happen again. For
if ever there was a case which illustrates the difficulties of
reconciling county and country interests then this is it. The result
has been confusion as to who is in charge of a player's welfare and
who makes the decisions over his fitness. The only losers are England
and the players concerned.
To take the Gough position first. As I said last week, I was a bit
concerned to hear that Darren appeared to be rushing back quickly
after injury to play for Yorkshire against Warwickshire. Now it seems
he definitely did come back too quickly. Of course Darren will want
to play whenever possible - that is natural and commendable. But
maybe someone, somewhere should have urged caution because we may now
be without him for the rest of the series.
The Tudor situation is a very different one. When I left the press
conference I undertook with Alex, our man-of-the-match and England's
new hero, after our victory at Edgbaston, he was definitely not going
to play for Surrey at Derby the next day. Only when I saw his name on
the scorecard in the papers did I realise that he did play straight
after our win and he has been playing for Surrey ever since.
Then the next thing we know he's unavailable to play for England in
the Lord's Test. The whole country wanted to see Alex Tudor in this
match, not just me and the England players and officials. His picture
was on the front of the programme and all the television advertising
boards in the lead up to the Test and 30,000 people turned up here on
Thursday morning expecting to watch him. His absence was a huge
disappointment and there must be a better system to make sure our
leading players are not in the situation where they are regularly
playing for their counties and then not their country.
The whole affair certainly lends credence to the central contracting
of England players because it might give us all a clue as to who is
answerable to whom and it may give us a set procedure that we can all
follow.
The first I heard about Alex's problem was at 9pm on Wednesday when
he came back from his scan. My reaction was one of utter surprise and
annoyance with the system. I certainly did not know he was going for
a scan and, as far as I'm aware, no one from England knew either. But
I was not unduly upset.
That is because if there was one bowler I would like to be able to
call up in those circumstances it would be Dean Headley. He was
unlucky not to play at Edgbaston and it was not an easy decision to
leave him out of the proposed team this time. Now I had to go down to
the hotel bar, drag Dean out, tell him to put down his Guinness and
get ready to play.
Then we had to put our minds to a replacement in the 12, a search
which eventually led us to asking poor old Angus Fraser to drive all
the way up from Taunton and back again. Chris Silverwood was
mentioned, as was Ed Giddins, but I eventually decided there was
nothing better than an annoyed Angus Fraser, so he had to be the man.
The thought of him driving up to Chiswick and having to turn round
and go back to Taunton does, I have to admit, make me smile.
Actually, it made sense on all levels. Silverwood was in Scarborough
and had been on the field for Yorkshire at all times. Gus had not
done too much bowling at Taunton, so was relatively fresh and, as I
saw at first hand at Southend last week, is bowling very well at the
moment. Add the fact that the match was at his home ground and his
sheer reliability and Angus gained the nod for what proved to be a
wasted but necessary journey.
The match itself soon wiped the smile from my face. The forecast on
Thursday was for a cloudy morning followed by a sunny afternoon. I
looked at the pitch and it looked flat with a few cracks and the
possibility of it becoming uneven, as Lord's tends to do. So it was a
fairly simple decision to bat upon winning the toss and at 100 for
two we looked on course for the sort of score we required. But the
clouds stayed, the light was just about good enough for play, New
Zealand bowled well, there was big swing and again we didn't bat
nearly as well as we have to do if we are to compete successfully as
a Test nation.
Yesterday increased the agony. My finger was hurt as I attempted to
stop an Adam Parore cut in the gully as we strived for the important
breakthroughs. The disappointment is overwhelming, particularly as I
have been in good form all season and consider my first-innings 61 to
be among the best Test knocks I have played in recent times. For the
time being we must think solely of England's fate in this Test match.
Then I will turn my attention to getting fit as quickly as possible.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)