Waqar, Wasim, Saqlain did hatchet job on England
Of the three results possible on the last day of the Old Trafford Test match, a Pakistan win looked the least likely
Omar Kureishi
07-Jun-2001
Of the three results possible on the last day of the Old Trafford Test
match, a Pakistan win looked the least likely. England needed 285 runs
with all wickets in hand and if it stepped on the gas, this was an
eminently achievable target. Or England could easily hold out for a
draw which would have won them the series. By the tea interval,
England had settled for a draw.
Pakistan seemed out of the reckoning and I started to compose this
column in my mind, I would say that Pakistan had batted far better
than they had done at Lord's but had not bowled well enough. England
had got off to a flying start in the second innings, 85 off 22 overs
and I was particularly disappointed with Wasim Akram who seemed over
charged-up and had let loose a bouncer-barrage. Was he trying to tell
his fans at Old Trafford that he was capable of generating the same
steam as of yore?
Pakistan are at their most dangerous when they see an opening and
Waqar Younis had provided that with a superb in-swinging yorker
(reverse swing) that bowled Michael Atherton and suddenly it became a
different ball game. Pakistan has played some inspired cricket in the
past but even the wildest Pakistani supporter could have hoped for
what happened. I thought of the nursery rhyme. "I'll huff and I'll
puff and I will blow your house down."
Wasim, Waqar and Saqlain Mushtaq did not huff and puff. Instead they
did a hatchet job on England. Not even the born-again England team
could withstand the pressure. Soon after Pakistan won, I got a
telephone call from my son who works in Cairo. He pointed out that in
all the excitement, one tended to overlook the superlative catch that
Imran Nazir took that dismissed the last England batsman. He had dived
to his left and was air-borne when he plucked the ball, like a
magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat. I told him that it was a part
of the team effort. But in our euphoria, one must not overlook the
tremendous crowd support that Pakistan got. Old Trafford as awash with
Pakistan flags and irrespective of the state of the game, the crowd
remained noisy, willing their team on and I must add, remained well
behaved at all times.
When Pakistan had lost, somewhat ingloriously, at Lord's there had
been great disappointment and this disappointment had been expressed
in a variety of ways including some injudicious comments that targeted
the PCB and its chairman. I hope these same people will make amend. If
a cricket board is to be held responsible for the defeat of its team,
surely by that some token, it must get all the credit when the team
wins. I hold to the view that a cricket board must not be judged by
its team's performance, whether the team loses or it wins.
Despite the magnificent win at Old Trafford, there are glaring
weaknesses in the Pakistan Test team. To start with it needs a
specialist opener to go in with Saeed Anwar. When I first read that
Pakistan was planning to send Abdur Razzaq to open to innings, I
thought it was some kind of a joke. But lo and behold, their was Abdur
Razzaq strutting out with Saeed Anwar. As mistake go, this came in the
category of stupidity.
Perhaps, the Pakistan think-tank was under the impression that, as
guests, they were obliged to gift England a wicket. And when he came
into open in the second innings as well, I was convinced that the
Pakistan think-tank was of the view that best way of learning from a
mistake was to repeat it. Why have we given up on Imran Nazir and
Mohammad Wasim as Test players? I had supported the inclusion of
Faisal Iqbal in the team but surely not at one wicket down?
Generally a team sends its best batsman in that position, not a callow
youth. Inzamamul-Haq is Pakistan's best batsman and if he is
comfortable at number four, Yousuf Youhana should be coming one wicket
down. With Razzaq opening and Faisal Iqbal coming one-down, Pakistan
was effectively gifting two wickets. This may seem like carping when
one should be praising Inzamam and Younis Khan and Rashid Latif but
just as one learns from failures, we should also learn from success. I
think that the umpiring in both the Test matches was poor and since it
was the Pakistan batsmen who were victims of "errors of judgement" it
makes the umpiring suspect. When an England team next visits South
Asia, I hope its players and media will remember that their own
umpires are capable of making mistakes, or, put more unkindly, of
being patriotic.
The decision to take the team to Blackpool a day before the start of
the Test was a stroke of genius. A team needs to come to a Test match
prepared but it also needs to come to a Test match relaxed. An outing
of this sort adds to the bonding. It didn't seem to have done Inzamam
any harm. In 1974 when I managed the Pakistan team, I asked the driver
of the team coach to divert to Whipsnade Zoo on our way to Leeds.
There were howls of protests from the players but once we got to the
Zoo, we all had a great time. A team can get too intense. It needs to
unwind. I get the impression that this is a happy team.