West Indies: Putting win in the sails
West Indies cricket is still reeling after yet another of the internal upheavals that have repeatedly rocked it to its very foundations
Tony Cozier
15-Mar-2000
West Indies cricket is still reeling after yet another of the internal
upheavals that have repeatedly rocked it to its very foundations.
Even as it continues to endure the inevitable aftershocks, it faces
immediate challenges from outside, from Zimbabwe and Pakistan, and has
to hastily rebuild with an entirely new team of contractors.
While Antiguans have been angrily protesting and petitioning over the
coaching post and the treatment of Sir Viv Richards, their most
celebrated son of the soil, while Trinidadians are fuming over the
absence of a single one of their own in the chosen team on their own
ground and while everyone has been concerned over the future of Brian
Lara, an intensive camp has been in progress over the past week in
Kingston to get ready for the two Tests against Zimbabwe.
Jimmy Adams, the fourth captain in four years, the two new coaches,
Roger Harper and Jeffrey Dujon, the new manager, Ricky Skerritt, the
new sports therapist/trainer, Ronald Rogers, and the reinstated
psychologist, Dr. Rudi Webster, did what they had to do to ensure
that everyone was technically, physically and mentally ready. We
anxiously await the results.
It is an apt and telling commentary on the current state of affairs.
Not so very long ago, Zimbabwe would have been seen as a chance to
expose some new, young players to Test cricket.
Elite club
They are the most recent team to be admitted to the elite club, draw
from a small pool of first-class players and have won only three of
their 39 Tests.
But the West Indies are no longer in a position to take anyone for
granted.
Lara's withdrawal has suddenly made the contest so potentially
competitive the selectors have picked both Curtly Ambrose and Courtney
Walsh whose class and experience, in the circumstances, override their
ages and their injuries and the claims of promising young fast
bowlers.
There seems to be little cause of optimism except that, in so many
cases, such adversity tends to bring the best out of sporting teams.
It was only a year ago that Lara responded to the humiliation of South
Africa, his public chiding by the WICB and an all-out 51 in front of
his home crowd at the Queen's Park Oval with those unforgettable
innings that inspired the West Indies to an unlikely share of the
series against the mighty Australians.
It revealed a steely side of his character and makes his decision to
take a break at such a critical time so disappointing.
Change is often another catalyst for renaissance and Harper, Dujon and
company, unfairly rebuked as they have been, might just get the best
out of their charges, individually and collectively.
This was the area where their predecessors failed, for it is surely
one of the principal responsibilities of captain, coach and manager to
ensure that everyone under them is performing to his potential.
It was Clive Lloyd's greatest attribute in his long and successful
term as captain but his effectiveness as manager was compromised by
his increasingly bitter relations with the WICB.
The Harper-Dujon-Skerritt combination will be judged mainly on the
win-loss column and that will depend mainly on whether they can
instill in the players the confidence, commitment and discipline that
have been patently lacking.
Those who have gone before Harper - most pointedly Andy Roberts and
Malcolm Marshall - have commented that they couldn't get their message
through, that very few were listening.
Reliable reports from New Zealand were that Sir Viv had the same
difficulty.
In that case, any coach's job is redundant. But if he can get his
points across, if he can eliminate the basic flaws that have crept
into the play of so many West Indians, if he can develop a close and
understanding relationship with his captain, he can make a quick and
significant difference.
The evidence is all around us.
Sri Lanka won the 1996 World Cup under Dav Whatmore, a native Sri
Lankan who played a few Tests during the Packer era when resident in
Australia.
They temporarily lost their way when he departed for a stint with
Lancashire but have now reeled off successive triumphs in Test and
limited-overs series over Australia, Zimbabwe and Pakistan on his
return and the change of captains from the long-serving Arjuna
Ranatunga to the fresh Sanath Jayasuriya.
New Zealand, never one of Test cricket's powerhouses, were at the
bottom of the heap when Steve Rixon, the former Australian
wicket-keeper but hardly a star name, took over as coach in 1996.
Like Whatmore, he concentrated on the basics like fielding, running
between the wickets and sticking to a game plan, made them believe in
themselves and turned their fortunes around within a year.
Bob Woolmer, another ordinary Test player for England, had much the
same effect on South Africa, using simple common-sense methods.
John Buchanan, not a Test player at all, took over as Australia's
coach last year and has since had the satisfaction of a record string
of One-Day victories and eight Test wins in a row.
One common factor in each of these has been the concentration on
running between the wickets and fielding where they all now excel.
Covering the current Sri Lanka tour of Pakistan, I was astounded by
the standard of the Sri Lankans' outcricket - their catching, their
ground fielding, the discipline of their faster bowlers especially and
by their unity.
Pakistan had more talent and, on paper, were the better balanced side
- just as the West Indies were in New Zealand. But this counts for
nothing if it is not properly applied.