|
|

Andrew Strauss scored two of England's three centuries in Chennai but his team still lost
© AFP
|
|
|
When England were getting hammered by India during the recent one-day series, Kevin Pietersen called upon his batsmen to convert their starts into substantial scores. He wanted more centuries. Well, he got three in the first Test in Chennai, while India had none until the final ball of the match, and England still lost. This week's List is about teams that won matches despite scoring fewer hundreds or half-centuries than the opposition.
Had Sachin Tendulkar not reached his 41st century on Monday, India would have become only the second team to win a Test despite scoring three fewer centuries than their opponents. Instead, they became one of nine winners with two fewer hundreds than the losers.
The only match in which the winning team scored three fewer centuries than their opponents was the Australia-Sri Lanka Test at the SSC in 1992. Ian Healy's 66 was the top score in Australia's 256 in the first innings, after which Asanka Gurusinha, Arjuna Ranatunga and the debutant Romesh Kaluwitharna weighed in with hundreds to give Sri Lanka a lead of 291. There were no centurions in Australia's second innings either, but all 11 players got into double figures, and four batsmen scored half-centuries, to set the hosts a target of 181. There were no fifties in the run-chase, and Sri Lanka collapsed from 127 for 2 to 164 all out.
Winning a Test despite scoring fewer hundreds than the opposition
Team |
100 |
HS |
Opposition |
100 |
HS |
Diff |
|
Ground |
Start Date |
Scorecard |
Australia |
0 |
68 |
v Sri Lanka |
3 |
137 |
-3 |
|
Colombo (SSC) |
Aug 17, 1992 |
Test 1194 |
England |
0 |
94 |
v Australia |
2 |
143 |
-2 |
|
Lord's |
Jun 22, 1896 |
Test 50 |
England |
2 |
200 |
v Australia |
4 |
112 |
-2 |
|
Melbourne |
Dec 29, 1928 |
Test 178 |
England |
0 |
75 |
v Australia |
2 |
129 |
-2 |
|
Brisbane |
Dec 1, 1978 |
Test 834 |
Australia |
0 |
85 |
v Pakistan |
2 |
134* |
-2 |
|
Perth |
Mar 24, 1979 |
Test 850 |
Australia |
0 |
92 |
v England |
2 |
143 |
-2 |
|
Manchester |
Jul 27, 1989 |
Test 1124 |
New Zealand |
0 |
89* |
v India |
2 |
113 |
-2 |
|
Wellington |
Dec 26, 1998 |
Test 1435 |
New Zealand |
0 |
72 |
v West Indies |
2 |
170 |
-2 |
|
Hamilton |
Dec 16, 1999 |
Test 1477 |
Pakistan |
1 |
114 |
v England |
3 |
138 |
-2 |
|
Manchester |
May 31, 2001 |
Test 1547 |
India |
1 |
103* |
v England |
3 |
123 |
-2 |
|
Chennai |
Dec 11, 2008 |
Test 1898 |
There have been only two instances of a team winning despite scoring four fewer 50-plus scores than the opposition, and coincidentally they both involve Australia, South Africa, the Adelaide Oval and double-centuries.
The first was the timeless match in 1932. South Africa had three half-centuries in their first-innings total of 308 but were overwhelmed by Don Bradman's unbeaten 299 and Bill Woodfull's 82. Three more half-centuries helped the visitors wipe out the deficit of 205 but set Australia only 70 to win; a target the hosts achieved with ten wickets intact.
The second time was in 1964, when Australia's batsmen scored four half-centuries in the first innings to reach 345 but were overshadowed by Eddie Barlow and Graeme Pollock, who made 201 and 175 respectively to lead South Africa to 595. Norm O'Neill and Barry Shepherd scored 66 and 78 to help Australia avoid an innings defeat, but South Africa chased the target of 82 with all their wickets in hand.
Winning a Test despite scoring fewer fifties than the opposition
Team |
50 |
HS |
Opposition |
50 |
HS |
Diff |
|
Ground |
Start Date |
Scorecard |
Australia |
2 |
299* |
v South Africa |
6 |
95 |
-4 |
|
Adelaide |
Jan 29, 1932 |
Test 215 |
South Africa |
2 |
201 |
v Australia |
6 |
91 |
-4 |
|
Adelaide |
Jan 24, 1964 |
Test 553 |
England |
3 |
126 |
v Australia |
6 |
77 |
-3 |
|
Melbourne |
Jan 1, 1908 |
Test 97 |
South Africa |
0 |
49* |
v England |
3 |
69 |
-3 |
|
Cape Town |
Mar 7, 1910 |
Test 109 |
England |
2 |
191 |
v South Africa |
5 |
115 |
-3 |
|
Manchester |
Jul 5, 1947 |
Test 287 |
England |
1 |
136* |
v South Africa |
4 |
125 |
-3 |
|
Port Elizabeth |
Mar 5, 1949 |
Test 313 |
Australia |
3 |
132 |
v West Indies |
6 |
76 |
-3 |
|
Sydney |
Nov 30, 1951 |
Test 341 |
Pakistan |
2 |
209 |
v New Zealand |
5 |
111 |
-3 |
|
Lahore |
Oct 26, 1955 |
Test 414 |
Australia |
1 |
111 |
v New Zealand |
4 |
65 |
-3 |
|
Brisbane |
Nov 28, 1980 |
Test 887 |
Pakistan |
2 |
280* |
v India |
5 |
71 |
-3 |
|
Hyderabad (Sind) |
Jan 14, 1983 |
Test 946 |
Pakistan |
3 |
150 |
v West Indies |
6 |
68 |
-3 |
|
Sharjah |
Jan 31, 2002 |
Test 1587 |
Sri Lanka |
2 |
374 |
v South Africa |
5 |
90 |
-3 |
|
Colombo (SSC) |
Jul 27, 2006 |
Test 1810 |
The two Tests with the
largest difference between high scores on opposing sides, in which the team with the lower high score has won, also involve South Africa and Australia. Victor Trumper scored his career-best 214 not out at the Adelaide Oval
in 1911, but Australia were beaten by 38 runs even though South Africa's highest score was Billy Zulch's 105.
In 1953, Neil Harvey made 205 at the MCG, but South Africa won by six wickets even though their best was John Watkins' 92.
There have been six instances of teams winning one-day internationals despite scoring two hundreds fewer than their opponents, and India have been part of four of them. Ravi Shastri and Sanjay Manjrekar scored centuries to lead India to 287 against South Africa in Delhi in 1991. South Africa's response was strong, and although no one hit a hundred, three batsmen made half-centuries to complete their first victory in one-day internationals
The NatWest series final between England and India in 2002 is third on the list. Marcus Trescothick scored 109 and Nasser Hussen his only ODI hundred, to lead England to 325. India were down and out at 146 for 5, with only Sourav Ganguly having made a half-century, but Yuvraj Singh and Mohammad Kaif got together to pull off one of the famous one-day heists.
Winning an ODI despite scoring fewer hundreds than the opposition (excluding adjusted-target matches)
Team |
100 |
HS |
Opposition |
100 |
HS |
Diff |
|
Ground |
Start Date |
Scorecard |
South Africa |
0 |
90 |
v India |
2 |
109 |
-2 |
|
New Delhi |
Nov 14, 1991 |
ODI 688 |
India |
0 |
92 |
v South Africa |
2 |
115 |
-2 |
|
Kochi |
Mar 9, 2000 |
ODI 1572 |
India |
0 |
87* |
v England |
2 |
115 |
-2 |
|
Lord's |
Jul 13, 2002 |
ODI 1856 |
Sri Lanka |
0 |
81* |
v India |
2 |
103* |
-2 |
|
Ahmedabad |
Nov 6, 2005 |
ODI 2294 |
England |
0 |
90* |
v West Indies |
2 |
112* |
-2 |
|
Ahmedabad |
Oct 28, 2006 |
ODI 2439 |
Kenya |
0 |
66 |
v Ireland |
2 |
142 |
-2 |
|
Nairobi (Ruaraka) |
Feb 2, 2007 |
ODI 2499 |
Andy Flower scored 142 off 128 balls and steered Zimbabwe to 261 against England at the Harare Sports Club in 2001. Several England batsmen got starts during their run-chase but Mark Ramprakash's 47 was their highest score. England, however, completed a four-wicket win in the 48th over. The difference between Ramprakash's 47 and Flower's century was the largest between high scores on opposing sides in matches where the team with the lower high score won.
Winning an ODI despite the largest negative difference of high scores (excluding adjusted target matches)
Team |
HS |
Opposition |
HS |
Diff |
Ground |
Start Date |
Scorecard |
England |
47 |
v Zimbabwe |
142* |
-95 |
Harare |
Oct 7, 2001 |
ODI 1754 |
Kenya |
66 |
v Ireland |
142 |
-76 |
Nairobi (Ruaraka) |
Feb 2, 2007 |
ODI 2499 |
New Zealand |
72 |
v Zimbabwe |
142 |
-70 |
Hyderabad (Decc) |
Oct 10, 1987 |
ODI 454 |
Zimbabwe |
77 |
v India |
146 |
-69 |
Jodhpur |
Dec 8, 2000 |
ODI 1658 |
New Zealand |
55 |
v England |
122 |
-67 |
Melbourne |
Jan 13, 1983 |
ODI 167 |
New Zealand |
50 |
v Sri Lanka |
117* |
-67 |
Sharjah |
Apr 18, 1994 |
ODI 909 |
Scotland |
70 |
v Canada |
137* |
-67 |
Nairobi (Ruaraka) |
Jan 31, 2007 |
ODI 2495 |
Pakistan |
61 |
v England |
125* |
-64 |
Nottingham |
Sep 1, 1996 |
ODI 1111 |
New Zealand |
117 |
v Australia |
181* |
-64 |
Hamilton |
Feb 20, 2007 |
ODI 2527 |
Asia XI |
66 |
v Africa XI |
130 |
-64 |
Bangalore |
Jun 6, 2007 |
ODI 2587 |
West Indies |
37 |
v England |
100* |
-63 |
Nottingham |
Jul 20, 2000 |
ODI 1618 |
Sri Lanka |
52 |
v Zimbabwe |
111 |
-59 |
Colombo (RPS) |
Jan 24, 1998 |
ODI 1284 |
Sri Lanka |
79 |
v India |
137 |
-58 |
Delhi |
Mar 2, 1996 |
ODI 1070 |
Pakistan |
65 |
v India |
123 |
-58 |
Ahmedabad |
Apr 12, 2005 |
ODI 2238 |
Pakistan |
66 |
v West Indies |
124 |
-58 |
Gros Islet |
May 22, 2005 |
ODI 2248 |
Click here for the full tables. If there's a particular List that you would like to see, email us with your comments and suggestions. George Binoy is a senior sub-editor at Cricinfo