February 4, 2010

Who's more entertaining, Sehwag or Prince?

In the coruscating fifth episode of Andy Zaltzman’s World Cricket Podcast: ball-eating, mystery deliveries, why Andrew Strauss just had to sit out, an interview with Australian comedian Justin Hamilton, a fiendishly difficult cricket game, a run-down
53

In the coruscating fifth episode of Andy Zaltzman’s World Cricket Podcast: ball-eating, mystery deliveries, why Andrew Strauss just had to sit out, an interview with Australian comedian Justin Hamilton, a fiendishly difficult cricket game, a run-down of the great two-Test series in history, and, of course, more lies about cricketers. And you can subscribe via iTunes too. You lucky things, you.

Read the transcript

Download the podcast (mp3, right-click to save)

Andy Zaltzman is a stand-up comedian, a regular on the BBC Radio 4, and a writer

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • fanedlive on February 14, 2010, 21:17 GMT

    prince hands down.

  • fanedlive on February 10, 2010, 11:33 GMT

    Max needs a reversal of his humourectomy. But as he is obviously a better judge of what is funny than the majority of stall aficionados, I suggest that he compose something to compete with Andy. We can then have a poll and the loser has to eat Dwayne Leverock's jockstrap. That at least we would all find funny. Those who have actually answered the question of the title need to look up the word sarcasm in the dictionary.

  • fanedlive on February 7, 2010, 22:51 GMT

    Andy, it should now be patently obvious that satire is getting you nowhere. Time for an article that is devoid of humour, irony, sardony, satire and anything backhanded. A Christopher Martin-Jenkins-esque article might be just the ticket.

  • fanedlive on February 7, 2010, 21:36 GMT

    Awesome Andy! Keep it up... Satire at its best...

    "Although if his eating is like his wicketkeeping, he'll need a bib" - had me in splits...

  • fanedlive on February 6, 2010, 20:36 GMT

    Prince is better, hands down! :P

  • fanedlive on February 6, 2010, 9:12 GMT

    Are people not taking your sarcasm seriously? Prince is obviously more entertaining

  • fanedlive on February 5, 2010, 9:27 GMT

    If we compare Sehwag with Prince of Trinidad, it would yield some positive results..... Sehwag is far better than Prince(SA), comparison is not having any meaning......

  • fanedlive on February 5, 2010, 6:59 GMT

    More funnier reading the comments.

  • fanedlive on February 5, 2010, 6:51 GMT

    What a question this is? Viru is the best in modern cricket....

  • fanedlive on February 5, 2010, 6:36 GMT

    ha ha , whose more "entertaning"= sehwag, by far acutally. Prince chips away at you without you noticing it but sehwag, he's no chipper, he's a sweet timer of the 156 leather. You have to earn Princ's wicket, Sehwag makes you pay for his wicket, thats the diffrence.

  • No featured comments at the moment.