Allen Stanford January 11, 2016

Stanford says English cricket embarrassment 'breaks his heart'

ESPNcricinfo staff

Allen Stanford arrives at Lord's in 2008, flanked by Giles Clarke, the then-ECB chairman, and Julian Hunte © Getty Images

Allen Stanford has claimed that it "breaks his heart" to hear of the embarrassment that his notorious partnership with the ECB caused to English cricket.

Speaking to the BBC in his first interview since 2009, when he was indicted for the second-largest investment fraud in US history and ultimately sentenced to 110 years in prison, Stanford continued to protest his innocence of the charges, and vowed that he would walk out of the doors of the maximum-security Coleman II prison in Florida "a free man".

However, his name will forever be synonyous with his brief but ill-fated involvement with English cricket in 2008, which began when he landed his helicopter on the Nursery Ground at Lord's and challenged the England team to a $20 million winner-takes-all contest on his private ground in Antigua.

England duly lost the first of what was meant to be a series of five such matches against their West Indian opponents, the Stanford Superstars, but soon afterwards the ECB severed all ties as the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Stanford with a $7bn fraud.

The fiasco was a huge embarrassment to the ECB, in particular the then-chairman, Giles Clarke, who brokered the deal in a bid to head off the financial threat posed by the nascent Indian Premier League, and David Collier, the then-chief executive. Both men survived in their jobs, however, with Clarke last year stepping up to the role of ECB president.

"It makes me very, very sad. I'm very sorry," Stanford said of the embarrassment caused to the ECB. "It breaks my heart and there's nothing I can say other than that was not caused by Allen Stanford. That was caused by the wrongful prosecution ... an over zealous and a wrongful prosecution.

"I'm not sure if Giles Clarke is still the head person now, but he and I got along well," he added. "And I think the world of David Collier.

"My dealings with the ECB was one of professionalism and one of mutual respect and I love cricket."

The so-called Stanford 20/20 for 20 had been the culmination of an involvement in cricket that had begun with his inter-island Caribbean competition, the Stanford 20/20, in 2006.

That tournament, underpinned by a million-dollar prize pool, had been credited with a genuine revival in interest in cricket in the Caribbean. His second staging of the competition, in 2008, was watched by a reported global audience of 300 million.

Stanford agreed with the assertion that he had been trying to exploit the game of cricket for his own interests, but maintains that his involvement in the sport had created significant spin-off benefits for the Caribbean.

"I was trying to grow the Stanford brand globally," he said. "I spent about $30-odd million on cricket in the West Indies in addition to what I spent on the 20/20 for 20 tournament. But I certainly did want a return on that investment in terms of a business sense. But what nobody understood is that I anticipated this new generation of players that we were going to uncover.

"In the West Indies we have the greatest physical athletic talent for cricket anywhere in the world. They were just being diverted into other sports, whether it's basketball or soccer. There just wasn't that real incentive for them to stay and play in a sport that had not kept track with the 21st Century and the modernisation of the sport."

Stanford admitted that he had had little opportunity to stay in touch with the sport since his conviction. "Cricket is not a very big sport in prison," he said.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Cricinfouser on January 12, 2016, 21:23 GMT

    @ARIF_KHAN : The average poster here does little research. Their minds are usually made up and they are not going to let stuff like facts get in the way.

  • wpbus13 on January 12, 2016, 20:58 GMT

    Like him or not, he revolutionized the game of cricket in the Caribbean. I genuinely believe he truly loved the game and was trying to help it's development at the time. He makes no qualms about the fact that he expected ROI like any sensible businessman would. It was a new day for some cricketers, finally they were able to earn a descent wage from playing the game they love. With respect to his other illegal dealings (safe to say because he has been convicted), I will remain neutral because I have not looked at the facts of the case.

  • Arif_Khan_Bangladeshi on January 12, 2016, 16:10 GMT

    You guys defending him need some perspective. Sure, he did few things which helped revitalise cricket in the WI but that is irrelevant when you think about how much money he managed to swindle from thousands of investors. Listen to the BBC interview and do some research online. Many people lost their live savings because of him and had to return to the work force at an old age. Yet, despite all this he refuses to apologize.

  • Kronik600 on January 12, 2016, 14:22 GMT

    He was the reason for cricket's revival in the WI, and also why 20/20 became so popular there, also why we were able to unearth so many T20 players...agree that there was some greed on his part, but which businessman does not have greed....he would have made cricket more popular than it is today....but so many if's now....one can only wonder

  • rightarmfilth on January 12, 2016, 14:00 GMT

    He will need to twist his thigh pad 90 degrees if he drops the soap in the showers

  • robheinen on January 12, 2016, 13:07 GMT

    Every man deserves another chance at life. His will be in 2120....or thereabouts.

  • liaqathussain on January 12, 2016, 11:15 GMT

    I believe his involvement kept west Indies crochet alive.. and he could have been the key to the door to the us market... he was good for cricket that's a hard fact.

  • Cricinfouser on January 12, 2016, 10:40 GMT

    He sounds genuine, and probably could have been our generation's Packer. It's unfortunate that he was indicted just as he was bringing about a revival of cricket in the Caribbean.

  • mrhamilton on January 12, 2016, 1:06 GMT

    Ive studied his case in detail and i beleive him to be innocent.stanford was a man who benefited west indian cricket tremendously.i beleive if he hadnt been indicted this man would have single handedly turned around the windies poor pitches,administration,and grass roots facilities.he likely would have done more to spread the game to the usa than anyone.

  • No featured comments at the moment.