County news

Angry Kent members seek election

George Dobell

August 10, 2011

Comments: 3 | Text size: A | A

Azhar Mahmood crashed 91 from 64 balls to set up a mammoth target, Leicestershire v Kent, Friends Life t20, 1st Quarter Final, Grace Road
Azhar Mahmood hit 91 in the Friends Life t20 quarter-final but Kent still went out to Leicestershire © PA Photos
Enlarge
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: England Domestic Season
Teams: England | Kent

A group of disaffected Kent members, alarmed by the club's financial losses and under-performance on the field, have announced they will stand as 'reform candidates' at the next elections for the Kent general committee.

The pair, long-term Kent members Graham Holland and Nigel Williamson, are appealing for greater transparency and accountability in the management of the club. In the last three years Kent have been relegated twice from Division One of the county championship and have sustained operating losses of more than £2 million.

The club have predicted further losses of £400,000 this year and are enduring another miserable season on the pitch. Yet, despite the obvious issues, they claim there has not been a contested election for the Kent committee since 2008.

Holland said: ''I am saddened to see the club which I have supported since 1957 plumb the depths to which it has sunk currently. In over 50 years, I have never known such despondency, nor what I see as the widening gap between the committee and its members, as I do today."

In their 'reform programme' the pair are calling for a detailed independent report to be conducted by someone outside the club on the reasons for the under-performance on the field over the last two years and an overhaul of the club's commercial operation and the introduction of a range of new money-raising initiatives.

Nigel Williamson added: '' Elections are the lifeblood of democracy. By standing, we hope to enable a debate about the way forward and to offer members a decisive break with the errors of the past. This is an enormous opportunity for KCCC to open the windows, let in the air and make a fresh start, based on the principles of accountability and transparency.''

However, Kent's chief executive, Jamie Clifford, cautiously welcomed the pair's involvement. "We're a members' club, so we need and welcome members standing for election to the committee," Clifford said. "We actually believe we're doing all the things they are suggesting already, but they have every right to stand for election.

"Yes, we're all frustrated by how we've performed on the pitch. We have high expectations and we want to do better.

"But I don't know why Kent have the tag of being 'the' cash-strapped county. Sixteen of the 18 first-class clubs announced losses last year and we were one of them. We also invested £5m in our ground and have a strong sense of where we're going."

Kent have just completed phase one of a development project that will, eventually, see a new supermarket and hotel upon their site. Clifford hopes the club will return to profitability in two or three years. The next committee elections take place in March 2012.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (August 13, 2011, 8:29 GMT)

Although Jamie Clifford, the CEO, isn't a huge part of the problem at Kent, statements like "We actually believe we're doing all the things they are suggesting already" are clearly spun and are simply not true. The agenda items proposed by the Reform Group aren't happening at the moment and whilst they may be on their "wish list", financial constraints mean that with matters as they are, they are a long way from becoming a reality. One point I would take issue with is that one item on the Reform Group agenda is the reintroduction of the Supporters Forum on the Club website. On the basis that there is regular and apoplectic opposition to comments made on the independent forum, it is inconceivable that the committee would permit such a cuckoo in their own nest!

Posted by AlanHarrison on (August 11, 2011, 10:39 GMT)

It must be a frustrating time for Kent fans who remember the 1970s. Since then the county seems to have been in many finals and come close very often, but have only won a couple of trophies. Perhaps Kent are becoming the new Yorkshire: fondly remembered glory days, struggles on the pitch, and arguments off it. Particularly frustrating because they have some good players and a good captain. I'm not sure what is going wrong.

Posted by tomhedley on (August 11, 2011, 7:41 GMT)

Kent have been an absolute disgrace on the field this season, I never thought we'd be also rans in div 2 of the championship. If the team was littered with young local talent I could accept it but most of our guys have international experience and have under performed woefully. Lets hope it's a fair election, I have my doubts though!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
County Results
Somerset v Surrey at Lord's - Sep 17, 2011
Surrey won by 5 wickets (with 15 balls remaining) (D/L method)
Kent v Glamorgan at Canterbury - Sep 12-15, 2011
Glamorgan won by 8 wickets
Durham v Worcs at Chester-le-Street - Sep 12-15, 2011
Durham won by 151 runs
Hampshire v Warwickshire at Southampton - Sep 12-15, 2011
Match drawn
Leics v Middlesex at Leicester - Sep 12-15, 2011
Middlesex won by 5 wickets
Notts v Sussex at Nottingham - Sep 12-15, 2011
Sussex won by an innings and 5 runs
Somerset v Lancashire at Taunton - Sep 12-15, 2011
Lancashire won by 8 wickets
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days