England v India, 5th Investec Test, The Oval, 1st day August 15, 2014

Woakes, Jordan show calibre

The performances of Chris Woakes and Chris Jordan in dismantling India suggested they could translate their county form to international level
  shares 6

Play 01:05
Woakes: Perfect day for us

It would be nice to think that this, the first day of the final Test of the Investec series, was the day when another piece of the jigsaw fell into place for England.

It would be nice to think that this was the day when one of the few clouds that had lingered on England's horizon - the effectiveness of their support seamers - was banished.

It would be nice to think that this was the day that Chris Woakes and Chris Jordan came of age as Test cricketers.

And it may prove that way, too. It may well be that the confidence gained by each claiming their best figures to date on a first-day Test pitch allows them to feel more comfortable in this environment and settle into the consistent form that has rendered them among the best seamers in the county game.

Certainly Jordan, who has looked as dangerous as anyone with the new ball in domestic cricket over the last 18 months, is looking more relaxed with each day he spends at this level.

His progress seemed to stall when he was dropped after the two Sri Lanka Tests. Upon his return, he appeared more anxious than before. He sweated profusely within a couple of balls of starting a spell. He bowled as if every game might be his last. As if he felt he was on trial. His stiff, anxious wrist resulted in a number of deliveries sprayed down the leg side and little of the swing that renders him so dangerous at county level. It is sometimes forgotten that bowlers, like batsmen, benefit from continuity of selection.

But, as England stick with him, so he looks more assured. As he realises that he is part of the future, so he is able to replicate the form he has shown for Sussex. His action - the way he positions the ball in his right hand with his left, the odd swing of his shoulders as he starts his run - will always look a little deliberate, but there is nothing in there that would be a surprise to those who know him best at Sussex. If England stick with him, he will provide pace, hostility, swing and free-hitting lower-order batting. He will repay the investment.

Here Jordan bowled with good pace, his quickest delivery was timed at 91.2mph, and generated decent swing. If he was donated at least one of his victims - Bhuvneshwar Kumar threw his hands at a wide long hop and edged to the keeper - he defeated Virat Kohli with some well-executed bowling: after setting him up with away swing, he deceived him with one that went straight.

Woakes, too, enjoyed his finest day as a Test cricketer to date. Benefitting from some extra time in the gym and greater use of his front arm, Woakes has added a little pace to his bowling over each of the last three or four seasons. His pace here, an average of 84.7mph with a peak of 87.7, compared favourably with Anderson (84.3 and 87.6) and Stuart Broad (83.4 and 87.4) and he was bowling with an older ball.

Woakes has long been an underrated cricketer. Perhaps partly because of his unassuming nature - Ashley Giles used to refer to him as "the most low-maintenance player you could imagine" - partly because England used him mainly in white-ball cricket, where his skills are less useful, and partly because his first Test was played on a lifeless surface on this ground a year ago, he has been dismissed prematurely.

He is an intelligent bowler. He uses the crease to lure batsmen into playing at his outswinger - both R Ashwin and M Vijay will feel they had to play at balls that nipped away from them - and if his length was just a fraction short to take the edge of the bat, his nagging line ensured, for the first time this summer, that there was no let-up for the batsmen once Anderson and Broad were out of the attack.

But his primary weapon will always be movement. Here he nipped the ball away sharply and moved it back just enough to create doubt in the minds of batsmen already lacking confidence in such conditions. While it would be stretching a point to say he lost little in comparison to Anderson, he at least lent the sort of support required to sustain pressure upon India and suggest that, when the day comes and Anderson moves on, England do possess similar swing-bowling resources.

He would do well to learn from Anderson, though. While Anderson conceals the ball behind his left hand until the moment of delivery, batsmen talk of the ease with which they can "line up" Woakes. From the moment he starts his run-up to the moment he releases the ball, he presents it in his right hand for all to see. He is so orthodox, so committed to the coaching manual that states bowlers should run in straight lines, that he can, in less helpful conditions, be just a touch predictable. But he has much to build on and he will be eager to learn. And, in Anderson, he could hardly ask for a better role model.

But it would be disingenuous to assess this performance without some mention of the opposition and the conditions. These were the damp, overcast and sultry conditions of which England seamers dream and like which they will rarely, if ever, find in most of the rest of the world. They exploited them expertly but it would be naive to expect Woakes and Jordan to enjoy as much success in Asia.

Perhaps there might be a slight concern at the struggle to finish off the tail, too. Not for the first time this summer, England struggled to end a tenth-wicket stand. A lack of extreme pace, a lack of mystery spin, a lack of fear factor in their attack remains a weakness.

Most pertinently, a nagging doubt remains that this India team has, since Southampton, presented feeble competition. Lacking confidence and ill-prepared for such challenges they were, for the fourth successive time, dismissed for under 200. Such batting might flatter any attack.

They will go on lacking confidence and looking ill-prepared, too, while the BCCI's reluctance to let them play in domestic competitions continues. What the likes of Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara and Vijay and Ajinkya Rahane are crying out for is a season or two of county cricket. A season or two where they can learn how to cope with such conditions and the moving ball. Such an apprenticeship served Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar well. India will always place themselves at a disadvantage while the current thinking pervades.

So, in terms of looking ahead at series against Australia and South Africa, both of which loom for England in 2015, this was like preparing to wrestle a tiger by petting a kitten. But it was another step forward, another day when the new-look England team took shape. These remain early days in the rebuilding operation, but so long as it continues to progress, it is unreasonable to expect more.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY Roshan_P on | August 16, 2014, 17:11 GMT

    It's nice to see Jordan and Woakes doing well. However Jordan wasn't fantastic and was a little lucky for one of his wickets. Woakes is a good bowling allrounder, but personally I prefer Ben Stokes to him as he has got something about him and he is a wicket taker. He has taken 3 more wickets than Woakes this series despite playing fewer Tests, one of them being on that awful Trent Bridge pitch. I also believe we can choose a specialist bowler instead of Woakes if we are playing Ali in the all-rounder role, preferably with a pace quartet of Anderson, Broad, Finn and Plunkett. That attack would be deadly in most conditions, providing they are bowling well. If not, Stokes can be played as the all-rounder (although it is unlikely that Moeen will get dropped any time soon) and a specialist spinner can be chosen.

    England have now got options in all departments which is fantastic (how many teams have 3 talented, young all-rounders competing for a place?)..

  • POSTED BY ydoethur on | August 16, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    Having railed against counties for poaching cricketers from 2nd Division counties on a thread about a different all-rounder, it has to be admitted that Jordan's move from Surrey to Sussex has been massively beneficial to everyone, especially him. That said, the appalling way he was managed at Surrey meant such a move was not only understandable but praiseworthy. I don't understand how Surrey had him pigeonholed as a top-order batsman who could a bowl a few overs. What were their coaches thinking? Credit to Mark Robinson and the coaching staff at Hove for putting it right.

    So what is the solution to allow struggling cricketers like Rafiq, or Foakes, or Jordan, or indeed Will Gidman at Durham a few years back to move counties to get opportunities and stop rich counties snapping them up and blocking the progress of their own academy products if they do well? Or do we just have to accept that there are some counties out there who don't care about England and only about themselves?

  • POSTED BY android_user on | August 16, 2014, 9:44 GMT

    it's not they got in calibre, but India played them badly, due to the pressure created by andson and broad, same applies to Ali. .finn, bresnan are better. .plunkett fit makes bowling strong..after anderson retirement question arises..broad lacks fitness..but England bowlers yet grow their standards for competing with teams like rsa, aus.. eng odi looks pathetic losing to sl, aus ..I bet India will come good in odi's and gain series..

  • POSTED BY stuckwithcricket on | August 16, 2014, 6:00 GMT

    With Plunkett, Stokes,Onions on the sidelines, England has got Talent. If they work out their mind issues I bet this team in the Semi-finals at WC Australia than anything can happen.

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | August 16, 2014, 0:07 GMT

    It was very gratifying to see that Jordan and Woakes were retained and that both bowled better than in the previous two games. Jordan was a bit wild although dangerous, but I thought Woakes bowled beautifully. He dropped his pace just a fraction and improved his line, length and, most importantly, movement. He beat the bat numerous times and induced 4 or 5 edges which on a pitch with more carry would have been catches.

    They are both very useful cricketers and given time will become valuable test players. Both field well and bat well (Woakes is a genuine all-rounder with a FC average of 38 and 8 centuries) and both seem to be good guys in the dressing room.

    The new England is beginning to take shape.

  • POSTED BY R_U_4_REAL_NICK on | August 15, 2014, 20:49 GMT

    Nice to finally see the support bowlers pitch in amongst the wickets. Plunkett unfortunate to pick up an injury mid-series, but perhaps the most disgruntled fringe-player should be Stokes. Bowled well at Lords (well, much better than his figures suggest) but without luck, and didn't seem to get another look in. Would like to see Finn-knee back at some stage; too risky to bring back for this final crunch game it seems. Hopefully the door isn't closed on Bresnan either; keep him out of the short formats by all means, but I still think he can be very useful in certain tests. Sad to see Onions injured again... his time may have slipped. Anyone notice England have no frontline spinner...

  • POSTED BY Roshan_P on | August 16, 2014, 17:11 GMT

    It's nice to see Jordan and Woakes doing well. However Jordan wasn't fantastic and was a little lucky for one of his wickets. Woakes is a good bowling allrounder, but personally I prefer Ben Stokes to him as he has got something about him and he is a wicket taker. He has taken 3 more wickets than Woakes this series despite playing fewer Tests, one of them being on that awful Trent Bridge pitch. I also believe we can choose a specialist bowler instead of Woakes if we are playing Ali in the all-rounder role, preferably with a pace quartet of Anderson, Broad, Finn and Plunkett. That attack would be deadly in most conditions, providing they are bowling well. If not, Stokes can be played as the all-rounder (although it is unlikely that Moeen will get dropped any time soon) and a specialist spinner can be chosen.

    England have now got options in all departments which is fantastic (how many teams have 3 talented, young all-rounders competing for a place?)..

  • POSTED BY ydoethur on | August 16, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    Having railed against counties for poaching cricketers from 2nd Division counties on a thread about a different all-rounder, it has to be admitted that Jordan's move from Surrey to Sussex has been massively beneficial to everyone, especially him. That said, the appalling way he was managed at Surrey meant such a move was not only understandable but praiseworthy. I don't understand how Surrey had him pigeonholed as a top-order batsman who could a bowl a few overs. What were their coaches thinking? Credit to Mark Robinson and the coaching staff at Hove for putting it right.

    So what is the solution to allow struggling cricketers like Rafiq, or Foakes, or Jordan, or indeed Will Gidman at Durham a few years back to move counties to get opportunities and stop rich counties snapping them up and blocking the progress of their own academy products if they do well? Or do we just have to accept that there are some counties out there who don't care about England and only about themselves?

  • POSTED BY android_user on | August 16, 2014, 9:44 GMT

    it's not they got in calibre, but India played them badly, due to the pressure created by andson and broad, same applies to Ali. .finn, bresnan are better. .plunkett fit makes bowling strong..after anderson retirement question arises..broad lacks fitness..but England bowlers yet grow their standards for competing with teams like rsa, aus.. eng odi looks pathetic losing to sl, aus ..I bet India will come good in odi's and gain series..

  • POSTED BY stuckwithcricket on | August 16, 2014, 6:00 GMT

    With Plunkett, Stokes,Onions on the sidelines, England has got Talent. If they work out their mind issues I bet this team in the Semi-finals at WC Australia than anything can happen.

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | August 16, 2014, 0:07 GMT

    It was very gratifying to see that Jordan and Woakes were retained and that both bowled better than in the previous two games. Jordan was a bit wild although dangerous, but I thought Woakes bowled beautifully. He dropped his pace just a fraction and improved his line, length and, most importantly, movement. He beat the bat numerous times and induced 4 or 5 edges which on a pitch with more carry would have been catches.

    They are both very useful cricketers and given time will become valuable test players. Both field well and bat well (Woakes is a genuine all-rounder with a FC average of 38 and 8 centuries) and both seem to be good guys in the dressing room.

    The new England is beginning to take shape.

  • POSTED BY R_U_4_REAL_NICK on | August 15, 2014, 20:49 GMT

    Nice to finally see the support bowlers pitch in amongst the wickets. Plunkett unfortunate to pick up an injury mid-series, but perhaps the most disgruntled fringe-player should be Stokes. Bowled well at Lords (well, much better than his figures suggest) but without luck, and didn't seem to get another look in. Would like to see Finn-knee back at some stage; too risky to bring back for this final crunch game it seems. Hopefully the door isn't closed on Bresnan either; keep him out of the short formats by all means, but I still think he can be very useful in certain tests. Sad to see Onions injured again... his time may have slipped. Anyone notice England have no frontline spinner...

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY R_U_4_REAL_NICK on | August 15, 2014, 20:49 GMT

    Nice to finally see the support bowlers pitch in amongst the wickets. Plunkett unfortunate to pick up an injury mid-series, but perhaps the most disgruntled fringe-player should be Stokes. Bowled well at Lords (well, much better than his figures suggest) but without luck, and didn't seem to get another look in. Would like to see Finn-knee back at some stage; too risky to bring back for this final crunch game it seems. Hopefully the door isn't closed on Bresnan either; keep him out of the short formats by all means, but I still think he can be very useful in certain tests. Sad to see Onions injured again... his time may have slipped. Anyone notice England have no frontline spinner...

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | August 16, 2014, 0:07 GMT

    It was very gratifying to see that Jordan and Woakes were retained and that both bowled better than in the previous two games. Jordan was a bit wild although dangerous, but I thought Woakes bowled beautifully. He dropped his pace just a fraction and improved his line, length and, most importantly, movement. He beat the bat numerous times and induced 4 or 5 edges which on a pitch with more carry would have been catches.

    They are both very useful cricketers and given time will become valuable test players. Both field well and bat well (Woakes is a genuine all-rounder with a FC average of 38 and 8 centuries) and both seem to be good guys in the dressing room.

    The new England is beginning to take shape.

  • POSTED BY stuckwithcricket on | August 16, 2014, 6:00 GMT

    With Plunkett, Stokes,Onions on the sidelines, England has got Talent. If they work out their mind issues I bet this team in the Semi-finals at WC Australia than anything can happen.

  • POSTED BY android_user on | August 16, 2014, 9:44 GMT

    it's not they got in calibre, but India played them badly, due to the pressure created by andson and broad, same applies to Ali. .finn, bresnan are better. .plunkett fit makes bowling strong..after anderson retirement question arises..broad lacks fitness..but England bowlers yet grow their standards for competing with teams like rsa, aus.. eng odi looks pathetic losing to sl, aus ..I bet India will come good in odi's and gain series..

  • POSTED BY ydoethur on | August 16, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    Having railed against counties for poaching cricketers from 2nd Division counties on a thread about a different all-rounder, it has to be admitted that Jordan's move from Surrey to Sussex has been massively beneficial to everyone, especially him. That said, the appalling way he was managed at Surrey meant such a move was not only understandable but praiseworthy. I don't understand how Surrey had him pigeonholed as a top-order batsman who could a bowl a few overs. What were their coaches thinking? Credit to Mark Robinson and the coaching staff at Hove for putting it right.

    So what is the solution to allow struggling cricketers like Rafiq, or Foakes, or Jordan, or indeed Will Gidman at Durham a few years back to move counties to get opportunities and stop rich counties snapping them up and blocking the progress of their own academy products if they do well? Or do we just have to accept that there are some counties out there who don't care about England and only about themselves?

  • POSTED BY Roshan_P on | August 16, 2014, 17:11 GMT

    It's nice to see Jordan and Woakes doing well. However Jordan wasn't fantastic and was a little lucky for one of his wickets. Woakes is a good bowling allrounder, but personally I prefer Ben Stokes to him as he has got something about him and he is a wicket taker. He has taken 3 more wickets than Woakes this series despite playing fewer Tests, one of them being on that awful Trent Bridge pitch. I also believe we can choose a specialist bowler instead of Woakes if we are playing Ali in the all-rounder role, preferably with a pace quartet of Anderson, Broad, Finn and Plunkett. That attack would be deadly in most conditions, providing they are bowling well. If not, Stokes can be played as the all-rounder (although it is unlikely that Moeen will get dropped any time soon) and a specialist spinner can be chosen.

    England have now got options in all departments which is fantastic (how many teams have 3 talented, young all-rounders competing for a place?)..