| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
February 19, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Shane Watson
Matches:
India A v Australians at Chennai
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of India
Teams:
Australia
|
|||
Shane Watson has confirmed that he will bat at No.4 in the first Test against India in Chennai if, as expected, David Warner is fit to play. Watson opened in the warm-up match against India A and scored 84 and 60, but his presence at the top was only due to Warner's ongoing recovery from a fractured thumb, and he will move down the order to allow Warner and Ed Cowan to resume their opening combination.
It would have been a big call to split the successful Warner-Cowan partnership, especially given that Watson is hoping to be able to bowl during the Ashes later this year. Part of the reason for shifting him down the order was to allow him to balance his batting and bowling workloads and while that is not an issue on this trip, where Watson will play only as a batsman, if all goes well it will again be a factor during the Ashes.
"If everyone is fit, it's looking like that's most probably going to be the way the selectors and Michael [Clarke] and Mickey [Arthur] go," Watson said in Chennai on Tuesday. "With the continuity of what's happened over the last 12 months especially, I can definitely see why they want to go that way.
"I've got as much experience as anyone, whether batting in the middle order or at the top of the order. Myself and Michael are going to be very important parts in this series for us as a batting unit in that middle order because it can be very difficult to start. But we're as well equipped as anyone to be able to get through it."
It means that with Warner, Cowan and Phillip Hughes occupying the top three spots, Australia's two most experienced batsmen will come in at Nos.4 and 5, likely to be followed by Matthew Wade at No.6 and an allrounder, either Moises Henriques or Glenn Maxwell. The middle-order role means Watson will have plenty of work to do against India's spin attack, which could feature three men on a turning pitch in Chennai.
But England's success against Pragyan Ojha, R Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja and Harbhajan Singh late last year has highlighted that the spinners are not infallible in their home conditions. Coming in against spin on a turning pitch is one of the toughest challenges for a Test batsman, but Watson said it was important to take note of the way England's batsmen made use of their starts in the recent series.
"England certainly showed that. The guys who got runs got very big runs as well to make it easier for the guys coming in," Watson said. "In India it's a very hard place to start your innings, so if you do get a start, it's very important to be able to go on and get those very big scores like England did, so you've got plenty of runs to play with throughout the rest of the Test match.
"India's spinners are very highly skilled, especially in these conditions. We certainly can have success over here. There's no reason why we can't. But we are going to have to be at our best because they certainly know how to make the most of the turning conditions."
Success in India would not only show that Watson can handle a variety of roles, he also hopes it can prove to his doubters that he deserves to be part of Australia's top six even if he is not bowling. Clarke has noted on several occasions that Watson is competing with a much greater pool of players as a pure batsman rather than an allrounder, and this series will give some indication as to where he sits in that group.
"There has been a lot that's been mentioned over the last six months on whether I warrant a position in the side as a batsman, if I'm not bowling," Watson said. "I'm playing as a batsman [in India]. [I want] to be able to prove to the selectors and to the people who at times maybe don't think that I'm one of the top six batsman in Australia, to prove that I am that, that I can get picked as a batsman. And then my bowling is just a bonus thing to be able to add to the team."
Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Watson has to be opening so we are just delaying the inevitable. There is a good reason why Waugh, Lee, Chappell, Boon and others are stating the same, lets hope we rectify this by the ashes as opening is where Watson shines and where he belongs. Also not having Khawaja in the lineup is delaying the inevitable as he belongs in test cricket and its shame that he seems to be the one who will miss out. What i dont' want to see is him playing as injurty cover for 1 game and then expecting him to get 200 in that one game, not fair on the young fellow. And I am expecting Clarke to dominate, he is a talent that has had a great recent run but he has been riding his luck a little of late but that happens in Cricket. I really like the way he plays he seems to play in the same way regardless of situation. He seems to be the perfect combination of the 2 Waugh boys. He can be gritty like Steve but when he relaxes his shots look like Mark not technically but the way he makes it look so easy.
I'm not in love with the idea of Watson at 4, but as all our English and Saffer well wishers consistently point out, it's not as though we've got a lot of choice. One of our 3 openers has to bat down the order and Watson is probably the best equipped to do that. .. one of the biggest problems is that Warner is similar to Watto in that he likes to feel that brand new cherry on his bat. I can't really see him in the middle order whereas Watson might be able to get away with it. ... as much as I hate to say it it might not matter that much anyway. What I mean is that with Warner & Hughes in the top three, Watto might be coming in before the ball is more than a few overs old anyway. .. I hope to hell I'm wrong but it is a distinct possibility.
This is great news! Don't tinker with a successful opening combination is the right thing to do. Ed Cowan is a ROCK SOLID Opener, he has played well in the warm -up games,and gives stability to the foundation of a huge opening partnership. At the other end is David warner who can smash the Indian attack to pieces and send them scurrying for cover. Shane Watson has been playing well in the warm -up games too. He is a senior pro now, and at the CRITICAL position of No.4,he can bring solidity to the batting and a huge score. I am quite happy with the batting line -up upto number 5. I would have brought in Usman Khawaja at Number 6,then Wade at Number 7. 3 quicks and Nathan Lyon. I don't think we need to worry so much about Indian spin conditions. England showed why. Besides, the Indian batting line-up has ONLY Tendulkar and Sehwag who are experienced, The rest are novices.Our quicks can demolish their fragile batting.Nathan Lyon has plenty to offer as a spinner.Clarke and Warner too.
My aussie team for the first test: Watson, Cowan, Hughes, Warner, Clarke, Doherty, Wade, JOhnson, Siddle/Bird, Lyon, Smith. Smith, Lyon, Doherty area viable spin options keeping in view the indian batsmen including Pujara struggled during the england series. Watson, Cowan, Hughes, Warner, Clarke, Wade, Smith provide strong batting lineup with plenty of options. Johnson, Siddle/Bird are good fast bwoling options. Bird did not allow any width during warmups and can take care of Sehwag/Tendulkar. Also main target is going to be Pujara who seems to be the answe of all Indian batting wows. Pujara got out to spinners 4 times thrice to Swann and once to Panesar. I dont think Siddle can leave that impression as English fast bowlers who are more capable then aussies left on India. Drying up runs with fast bowliing and then getting wickets using spin will be the formula to win in India as the norm set by England. Ashwin can pose threat with the bat so three prong spin attack should be good.
The inclusion of Watson in the Aussie test side proves how poor their batting line up is, in 40 games he averages mid 30s scoring only 2 hundreds,
Posted by Front-Foot-Lunge on (February 20, 2013, 21:30 GMT)@RandyOZ: "After dealing with England and South Africa, Watto is ready for India."
Thinking logically now, how does getting Whitewashed and Ashes bested by England get classed as success? Are these modern Australian cricketing standards? Nothing to see here, move along... ;)
Posted byWatson is good enough - he has spent enough time opening against class test attacks. His recent opening innings on international return (regardless of being a ODI) was awesome. That coupled with expert catching and senior leadership skills Watson is an X factor player I would want in my international 2013 XI. He can bat anywhere..
Posted by satishchandar on (February 20, 2013, 10:10 GMT)I dont have much reservations in moving Watson from opening position but have some when he is at 4. Watson is at his best at 6 as of me. He can either bat at 6 or open the innings. No.4 looks a bit odd for him. I would have preferred Khawaja at 4 and Watson at 6 followed by Wade and bowlers. Clarke's back injury probably played a big role in picking of Henriques as all rounder. Though the conditions would have tempted them to include Maxwell at 7 as spinning all rounder, form and performance in the warmups gave Henriques the chance to don the whites. Good luck Australia. With the number of lefties in the lineup, the offie of Indian team(Whether it is Bhajji or Ashwin) need to be tight in line and look to attack with sliders.
Posted by sachinkhairnar5983 on (February 20, 2013, 7:58 GMT)Sorry but Australia made a mistake by slecting a four pace attack and only one spinner, they have already given this match to India. Didnt they saw the India-England series, if you want to beat India in India you have to play with the same team composition as India does.
Posted by joseyesu on (February 20, 2013, 6:01 GMT)I would have prefered Watson to play, what Cook has done it for Eng. Maybe after the first match Aus may place him again to the opener slot.