IPL 2013 news

Franchises fear Chennai no longer level playing field

Nagraj Gollapudi

March 27, 2013

Comments: 108 | Text size: A | A

Chennai celebrate a wicket, Kolkata Knight Riders v Chennai Super Kings, IPL 2012, final, Chennai, May 27, 2012
Some franchises have questioned why matches were not moved out of Chennai due to the latest agitation. © Associated Press
Enlarge

The IPL governing council's decision to exclude Sri Lankan players from matches in Chennai has been met with some disappointment and concern by the other franchises. They are disappointed at being excluded from the decision-making process, and that the decision taken did not follow precedent. In addition, they are concerned over the possible consequence - that Chennai Super Kings may have an added advantage in their home games.

While Super Kings' Sri Lankan players are not crucial to their plans, several of their compatriots are vital members of their respective teams. Those teams will not be fielding their first XI when playing in Chennai - both in the league stage and in the knockout stage, in which two matches are scheduled to be staged in Chennai.

Officials of the eight other franchises were not willing to go on record and said they were unlikely to raise this formally within the IPL. However, they wonder why the precedent set in 2010 - when the matches were shifted out of Bangalore after the twin bomb blasts, and not a single game was held in Hyderabad because of the Telengana agitation - was not followed this time.

"Why did the IPL not call for a meeting with the franchises? They could have had a consensus by asking all the franchises, which they did during the Telengana crisis," one franchise official said. "It is a similar situation now, just as when Deccan Chargers games were moved out of Hyderabad due to the Telengana debate."

The Hyderabad situation was precipitated by a movement, that turned violent, in Andhra Pradesh for a separate Telengana state, the IPL initially decided to move all seven home games of Deccan Chargers, the then local franchise, out of the state. Eventually, the Chargers played two matches in Cuttack, a catchment area, two in Mumbai, and three in Nagpur.

Two months later, there were two low-intensity bomb blasts outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bangalore, minutes before a league match between Royal Challengers Bangalore and Mumbai Indians. The match went ahead after officials guaranteed safety, but the IPL moved the semi-finals out of Bangalore to Mumbai.

Citing those two incidents, the franchises are now asking why the IPL could not move the home games of Chennai Super Kings elsewhere. "To me the rule is, if you can't manage a team inside your state then move the game (outside)," a team official said.

However, IPL franchises don't always have a say in decision-making and a BCCI official contacted by ESPNcricinfo echoed that line. "It is not mandatory for the IPL authorities to consult the franchises," he said on condition of anonymity. "The franchises are taken into confidence more or less on every issue [but] we cannot speak in public about a particular issue."

The IPL's latest decision leaves Chennai Super Kings without two players - Nuwan Kulasekara and Akhila Dhananjaya - who, it can reasonably be said, would not have been regular starters. Kulasekara was bought by Super Kings in 2011 and has featured in six matches - including one match last season. Dhananjaya, 19, was bought at the player auction in February and was always likely to be on the bench given the team's strong overseas contingent - including Albie Morkel and Francois du Plessis (both South Africa), Dwayne Bravo (West Indies) and fast bowlers Ben Hilfenhaus and Dirk Nannes (both Australia).

In contrast, Sri Lankan players feature prominently on several of the other teams. Mahela Jayawardene captains Delhi Daredevils and is their key batsman; Kumar Sangakkara will captain Sunrisers Hyderabad and also keep wicket; Lasith Malinga is the strike bowler for Mumbai Indians; Angelo Matthews is the go-to allrounder for Pune Warriors; Tillakaratne Dilshan plays a triple role, as batsman, bowler, and a top fielder for Royal Challengers, and Muttiah Muralitharan is their lead spinner. All these teams will have to play Super Kings in Chennai without their first XI, while the home franchise could notionally field their strongest side.

Sri Lankan players are a significant part of franchises' planning because of their familiarity with conditions and their availability through the tournament. This year, too, various franchises recruited a few Lankan players to suit specific game-plans. Kolkata Knight Riders' sole buy at the auction was Sachithra Senanayake, a $625,000 alternative to the West Indiaes spinner Sunil Narine. Pune Warriors India bid aggressively to bag Mathews and Ajantha Mendis, who, in the absence of Michael Clarke, are likely to play an important role in the team's strategies. Thisara Perera, who once played for Super Kings, was bought by the Sunrisers, while Rajasthan Royals purchased wicket-keeper batsman Kusal Perera.

Now those teams will have to play Super Kings, twice winners of the IPL and of the Champions League Twenty20, at Chepauk with a tweaked game-plan and without their best side.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by hayagriva on (March 30, 2013, 15:11 GMT)

If Franchices feel that this is the reason for Advantage CSK, then they must surely be mistaken. CSK already has an advantage as it has the top scorer of IPL (Raina), one of the best finishers (Dhoni), leading run scorer of the current IND-AUS series (Murali Vijay), find bowler of the series (Jadeja).... and to add to this one of the leading wicket takers of the ILP (Morkel) and one of the best middle order batsmen who the Aussies desparately wanted to call back (Hussey)... what better Advantage does CSK need?

Posted by Mitesh_Bachate on (March 30, 2013, 11:59 GMT)

DD ,Hyderabad and Pune will be missing their captains when they play in Chennai.. How will it be fair when Chennai is led by their 1st Choice captian MSD and these teams will be lead by their 2nd Choice....

Posted by Cricketsince1985 on (March 30, 2013, 11:06 GMT)

We all should support the decision of IPL and tamil nadu government, Since its a very serious issue with very less information to the public. This made an awarness about the issue world wide.

Posted by   on (March 30, 2013, 9:41 GMT)

I'm from Sri Lanka,its disappointing to see situations like these handled in this manner, i mean what if it happened to the south africans?

would CSK not play morkel and du plesis on their home grounds? i dont think so, since its highly disadvantageous, they will surely move matches out of their state and play with best Xi.

i mean, indians responsible for these actions, and decisions should be ashamed of themselves. what they're doing is scraping the advantage of external entities for their own benefits, against other states and franchises of the same nation.

i dont think its that difficult for them to change venues, how many grounds with international standards does india own.

bottom line, for Sri Lankans,as i see it will make no contrasting difference, anyway our players are getting paid, but for the indian community, isn't it obvious that another state, just like all the other states,is using unfair advantages over other states?

what happened to sportsmanship?

Posted by moulics on (March 30, 2013, 8:59 GMT)

owners pride, neighbbours envy. This has nothing to do with Srinivasan. it is politics and there will always be some one who will be impacted y any decision.

Posted by SL_rockz on (March 30, 2013, 8:58 GMT)

Two knock out games are in chennai and i m sure one or 2 will feature chennai ...Then what will happen ???? FULL CHENNAI TEAM VS Teams who cannot feature their top 11 ....Is it fair ??? DD ,MI,Sun risers all have key SL players and if they become opponents to chennai in one eliminator it will be a huge disadvantage for their franchises .... It is really fair if games can be moved outside chennai so that eventhough fans cannot ride out to stadium and cannot see the match they could visualize a balanced cmpetitive match on their TV even...IN live or in TV if u are watching an unfair unbalanced match it is not worthy watching ....

Posted by   on (March 30, 2013, 8:31 GMT)

Yes, As Sirinivasan is the CSK owner and also the BCCI President he should balance the matter by not playing Dhoni in all Games against Mahela, Sanga and Mathews's teams in Chennai. He also should not play Ashwin for Chennai game against Mumbai as Malinga cannot play. Siriniwasan come on be fair man.

Posted by homezweethome on (March 30, 2013, 7:23 GMT)

From this decision, CSK gets to lose a lot..here is how...CSK totally play 8 matches in its ground without 2 of its SL players......But all other franchisees need to compromise for just 1 match when it comes to chennai without SL players....Hence this decision only leaves CSk in a tight spot than other Teams.....

Posted by   on (March 30, 2013, 6:30 GMT)

There is no wrong in the BCCI decision. Current situation is same as we banned Pak players from IPL seasons..

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose
Tournament Results
Super Kings v Mum Indians at Kolkata - May 26, 2013
Mum Indians won by 23 runs
Mum Indians v Royals at Kolkata - May 24, 2013
Mum Indians won by 4 wickets (with 1 ball remaining)
Royals v Sunrisers at Delhi - May 22, 2013
Royals won by 4 wickets (with 4 balls remaining)
Super Kings v Mum Indians at Delhi - May 21, 2013
Super Kings won by 48 runs
Sunrisers v KKR at Hyderabad (Deccan) - May 19, 2013
Sunrisers won by 5 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
Warriors v Daredevils at Pune - May 19, 2013
Warriors won by 38 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!