Corruption in IPL

Status quo in BCCI as Srinivasan defies doubters

Amol Karhadkar

May 25, 2013

Comments: 57 | Text size: A | A

N Srinivasan speaking at MAK Pataudi Memorial Lecture, Chennai, February 20, 2013
N Srinivasan: 'I cannot be bulldozed' © BCCI
Enlarge

N Srinivasan seems to have staved off the stiff opposition from within the board and will continue as the BCCI president, at least for now and possibly till the AGM in September. A day after the arrest of Gurunath Meiyappan - his son-in-law and a senior official of the Chennai Super Kings franchise - on charges of betting on IPL games, the momentum that seemed to have built up overnight to force a change at the top of the BCCI has apparently fizzled out.

More than half the board members attended a dinner hosted by former BCCI president Jagmohan Dalmiya in Kolkata on Saturday night - notable absentees included vice-president Arun Jaitley, Srinivasan's presumptive successor, joint secretary Anurag Thakur and treasurer Ajay Shirke - but the mood seemed to be one of preserving the status quo.

Indeed, the mood was set before the dinner began, when a senior board official indicated to ESPNcricinfo that the members 'will not demand' Srinivasan's resignation. Srinivasan and IPL chairman Rajiv Shukla had a private discussion in Kolkata before heading for the dinner, the source said, adding that the likelihood of Srinivasan stepping down before the AGM was 'very slim'.

It was in keeping with Srinivasan's defiant stand through the day. Soon after he landed in Mumbai on Saturday afternoon, he reiterated that he had no intention of resigning. "I cannot be bulldozed or railroaded into resigning by the pressure being applied," he said. "The BCCI will follow strictly all its rules. The law will take its course. Somebody wants to replace me, let him get elected."

Where N Srinivasan can go from here

  • Scenario 1: If Srinivasan steps down voluntarily
  • The BCCI has to find an interim president till the annual general meeting (AGM) is convened in the last week of September. When a president steps down before his term is over, it is usually the vice-president from the same zone as the president who takes over as the interim president. In that case, it would be Shivlal Yadav. If the vice-president refuses, then it has to be one of the eligible representatives from the same zone who takes over.
  • Scenario 2: If board members want Srinivasan ousted immediately
  • One-third of the voting members - 10 - must write in to the BCCI secretary urging him to pass a motion against the president for tarnishing the board's reputation. The secretary then has to convene a special general body meeting (SGM) at the earliest. At the SGM, if two-third of the members - 21, to be precise - vote against the president, he has to step down.
  • Scenario 3: If the board acts at the AGM
  • Srinivasan will remain as president till the AGM in September, when he will have completed two years of his term. According to the amended BCCI constitution, an office bearer's term is extendable by another year at the end of two years. If Srinivasan wants to remain in power for another year, he will have to contest an election. The winner of the election - held by secret ballot - is decided based on simple majority.
  • Scenario 4: Compromise
  • If the BCCI members agree that Srinivasan is the best person to be the BCCI's face, he will remain in charge till September 2014.

The board members know that if Srinivasan does not resign from the job, their options are both limited and complicated (see sidebar). According to the BCCI constitution, a special general body meeting can move a resolution against its president with a three-fourth majority only if the president is directly involved in a corruption case - which is not the case so far.

Should the BCCI call an emergency general body meeting, it may come down to electoral numbers. Besides the 27 affiliated units who compete in the Ranji Trophy, the Cricket Club of India, the National Cricket Club, Kolkata and All India Universities have a vote each. If the incumbent president is presiding over the AGM, he is also entitled to a separate vote, thus extending the tally to 31. The last time the BCCI had a contested election for the post of president was in 2005, when Sharad Pawar defeated Ranbir Singh Mahendra to break Jagmohan Dalmiya's monopoly over Indian cricket's administration.

There remains much internal grumbling about where this controversy around the Chennai Super Kings' official and Srinivasan has left the BCCI. A former board official said that Gurunath's arrest has "tremendously harmed the credibility of Indian cricket. And the process to restore credibility cannot even begin till he [Srinivasan] remains at the helm."

The twist in the entire saga is the Gurunath angle. Srinivasan has already constituted a one-man commission of inquiry, headed by Ravi Sawani, to investigate the spot-fixing allegations against the three Rajasthan Royals players.

If Sawani's report implicates anyone - a player or a member of support staff or management team - from Chennai Super Kings, the report will be forwarded to the disciplinary committee. With Srinivasan, in his capacity as the president, being a member of the three-member committee, there would be clear conflict of interest.

In such a case, his only option would be to recuse himself from the disciplinary committee by stepping down as the president.

Saturday night's events were an about-turn from what transpired on Friday, well before Gurunath's arrest, with several significant statements being made across the spectrum of politics and business that controls Indian cricket. Sahara chairman Subroto Roy, who had earlier this week announced his team's pullout from the IPL and his company's decision to not renew its sponsorship of Indian cricket, indicated he would be willing to reconsider the decision if there was a change of guard. He went so far as to say Sharad Pawar, a former BCCI president, was an "apt" person to head the board once again.

Around the same time a senior member of Pawar's Nationalist Congress Party issued an unambiguous statement saying Srinivasan should go, though the party issued a clarification saying it was issued in a personal capacity and didn't reflect the party's views. On Saturday, Pawar told ESPNcricinfo that the party had no view on the matter. "I have resigned [from the BCCI] five year ago to go to the ICC and don't want to come back."

Amol Karhadkar is a correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Amol Karhadkar

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Raghzzz on (May 28, 2013, 17:42 GMT)

Guys! you all need to understand, there is sea of difference between betting and fixing. Gurunath has been arrested on Betting I believe, which is not as serious an offence as fixing.

I am not saying whether he or N Srinivasan are guilty or not, but folks should have a proper perspective in understanding the issues.

Dont crucify them or anyone for that matter until their hands are proved on fixing.

Betting can't be an offence.

Posted by   on (May 26, 2013, 12:59 GMT)

@chathapuram---------------------Fed up of csk winning every match???

Posted by chathapuram on (May 26, 2013, 8:11 GMT)

This is happening for quit some time. When IPL was played at SOUTH AFRICA lot team sectary of TNCA LOCAL club traveled to witness the match. If any one make a sincere effort to probe what is the reason and who sponsored the trip many more details will come out. I thimk Mr.Dhoni should should not play any more to CSK including todays Final

Posted by   on (May 26, 2013, 7:59 GMT)

The damage not seen nor heard about are to the young aspiring cricketers who had the hopes of becomming the next Gayle, Narine,Hussey etc. The opportunity for them to play in the future IPL is gone. Perhaps it is a good thing for cricket. This will deflate the IPL and perhaps bring attention to places like the Caribbean Professional League. I am confident that viewers and sponsors will embrace any alternative. So this could be good for cricket and the caribbean. I hope the administrators in the Caribbean make the most of this opportunity.

Posted by nayonika on (May 26, 2013, 7:55 GMT)

Last week I was at a well known Ganesha temple in Pondicherry standing in q after purchasing a special darshan ticket costing Rs.10/-. To my horror I found that some families tipped the ticket amount to the peon who was controlling the gate and allowed them ahead of us. When we protested the fellow gave a quiet smile like the smile on Ganesha's face and nobody said anything. Mind you, the CCTV cameras were on. We practice corruption in front of God and then invoke his blessings. There is no conflict of interest for the devotee. It is for the deity. Now you decide who is the temple peon, devotees,deity in this IPL/BCCI darshan. Oh, also decide who is the priest as nothing happens without his knowledge.

Posted by GRVJPR on (May 26, 2013, 7:14 GMT)

People just say for the sake of saying. No One is actually hurt, No One will actually stop watching cricket, No One actually means that Game of cricket has a black patch ---------- We all are hypocrites!

Posted by screamingeagle on (May 26, 2013, 6:20 GMT)

The way things are going, probably we will end up banning most franchises.

Posted by sahbas_s on (May 26, 2013, 5:13 GMT)

someone talked about greed a week ago...unfortunately bcz of few, this final game has lost all its thrilling and glamour and many like me won't be interested to watch!!

Posted by Raaju14 on (May 26, 2013, 5:11 GMT)

It doesn't matter whether Srinivasan stays as a President of BCCI or not, BCCi-IPL is responsible for providing clarity on this whole spot fixing issue that has damaged the reputation of the Cricket as a game in India and it has hurt the huge Cricket lovers sentiments badly. BCCi-IPL with the help of law makers must make sure such acts are punishable by the Law in the future. It doesn't make any sense to demand for the termination of CSK citing whatever the interpretation of Franchise agreements because if this was the case, RR's contract should have been terminated too. The issue should be looked at more objectively by the Media as well rather than emotionally. BCCI-IPL should spare no efforts in restoring the reputation of Indian Cricket keeping in mind the millions of Cricket lovers' sentiments and re-assure that Cricket in India will continue to be a Gentlemen's game by demonstrating absolute governance.

Posted by Romenevans on (May 26, 2013, 4:56 GMT)

CSK should be terminated and then given to Rajasthan Royals. LOL!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Amol KarhadkarClose
Tournament Results
Super Kings v Mum Indians at Kolkata - May 26, 2013
Mum Indians won by 23 runs
Mum Indians v Royals at Kolkata - May 24, 2013
Mum Indians won by 4 wickets (with 1 ball remaining)
Royals v Sunrisers at Delhi - May 22, 2013
Royals won by 4 wickets (with 4 balls remaining)
Super Kings v Mum Indians at Delhi - May 21, 2013
Super Kings won by 48 runs
Sunrisers v KKR at Hyderabad (Deccan) - May 19, 2013
Sunrisers won by 5 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
Warriors v Daredevils at Pune - May 19, 2013
Warriors won by 38 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days