IPL 2014 May 1, 2014

Failing openers, and flourishing quicks

Bishen Jeswant
Stats highlights from the UAE leg of IPL 2014

The UAE leg of the IPL is done, with each team having played five matches. Fortunes of the teams have varied, with one team having won all five games and another hurtling towards the wooden spoon after having lost all five. Here is a look at some of the stand-out numbers from the 20 matches in the UAE.

International Indian tournament

The IPL, essentially a domestic tournament, has now been held outside India twice in its seven-year history. Both foreign venues, South Africa and the United Arab Emirates, have contrasting playing conditions, with the pitches and weather in both countries throwing up wholly different sets of challenges. The batsmen had the toughest time in South Africa, scoring only 23.41 runs per wicket - the worst for any IPL season. Despite conditions in UAE being not so dissimilar to India, the season so far has seen the worst runs-per-wicket stat for any IPL season (24.67) since the South African edition. These two editions of the IPL have also seen the lowest run-rates as well as the highest balls-per-boundary ratio in the tournament's history.

Last year, for instance, teams averaged 24.79 per wicket and 7.67 per over, while scoring a boundary every 6.48 balls. All of those numbers have been more in favour of the bowling team this time.

One would expect more boundaries to be hit in UAE as compared to South Africa, but the balls-per-boundary in UAE and South Africa have been about the same. Clearly, the batsmen have a better time when the tournament is played on Indian shores.

Comparing IPL seasons played outside India
Season Matches Runs per Wicket Runs per Over Balls per Boundary
2008 58 26.03 8.30 5.60
2009 57 23.41 7.48 7.22
2010 60 26.20 8.12 6.09
2011 73 26.01 7.72 6.46
2012 75 26.19 7.82 6.53
2013 76 24.79 7.67 6.48
2014 20 24.67 7.55 7.23

Bowling not so thankless

In 20-over cricket, batsmen often walk away with all the awards and honours despite the bowlers putting in a lot of hard work. However, this time around, the bowlers have done enough to bag the Man-of-the-Match award in eight out of 20 matches. At a similar stage in last year's tournament, only four bowling performances had won the MoM award. Even in the 2012 edition, only six bowling performances were considered worthy of MoM awards after 20 matches (excluding a couple of all-round shows by Ravindra Jadeja and Keiron Pollard).

India shining

The Indian fast bowlers have shone brightly in this edition of the IPL. Even bowlers like Varun Aaron, who have historically been expensive, have shown far greater control and consistency. Four of the top five fast bowlers, in terms of wickets taken, are Indians - Lasith Malinga is the only non-Indian. The table below (of Indian bowlers who have bowled at least five overs and taken at least two wickets) will show that many of the Indian bowlers have gone for less than seven runs per over. Even bowlers like L Balaji and Jaidev Unadkat, who have conceded more than seven, have compensated by taking wickets. Vinay Kumar hasn't taken too many wickets, but he bowled that high-pressure last over against the Royal Challenger Bangalore. Sandeep Sharma deserves a special mention because he has taken wickets and been economical while dismissing big players at crucial junctures and has deservedly won two MoM awards.

Indian Fast Bowlers in IPL 2014
Bowler Overs Wickets BBI Average Economy Strike Rate
Sandeep Sharma 11.0 7 3/15 8.85 5.63 9.4
VR Aaron 14.5 8 3/16 10.50 5.66 11.1
STR Binny 5.0 2 1/1 14.50 5.80 15.0
IC Pandey 15.0 3 2/23 29.33 5.86 30.0
B Kumar 19.3 8 3/19 15.00 6.15 14.6
R Dhawan 13.2 4 2/14 20.50 6.15 20.0
Z Khan 18.5 5 2/21 23.60 6.26 22.6
MM Sharma 15.5 8 4/14 13.25 6.69 11.8
R Bhatia 16.0 6 2/13 18.16 6.81 16.0
AB Dinda 17.0 2 1/14 59.00 6.94 51.0
L Balaji 19.0 8 4/13 17.50 7.36 14.2
R Vinay Kumar 14.0 4 2/26 26.50 7.57 21.0
JD Unadkat 16.0 6 3/32 21.50 8.06 16.0
I Sharma 8.0 3 2/37 22.00 8.25 16.0
DS Kulkarni 11.0 3 2/23 30.33 8.27 22.0
M Shami 20.0 3 1/30 60.00 9.00 40.0
P Awana 7.0 2 1/35 37.50 10.71 21.0

Conspicuously low on this table are India regulars Mohammed Shami and Ishant Sharma. Both of them have taken only three wickets each while conceding more than eight runs per over.

Stars not shining

In the same the way that Shami and Ishant haven't had great returns, some of India's superstar batsmen have also failed to turn up. While Gambhir's dismal form, including the three back-to-back ducks, has been well documented, many of the other Indian stalwarts have also had poor outings. Among the big names in the below table, only Virender Sehwag has a strike-rate of more than 120. Also, all of these batsmen, except Yuvraj Singh and M Vijay, have aggregated less than 120 runs in the tournament. The fact that Yuvraj Singh, despite his indifferent form, looks the best on paper (Runs: 121, Avg: 30.25, SR: 116.34) is testimony to the fact that the big-money Indians have performed poorly.

Failure of marquee Indian batsmen in IPL 2014
Batsman Innings Runs High Score Average Strike Rate
G Gambhir 5 46 45 9.20 74.19
RG Sharma 5 84 50 16.80 110.52
S Dhawan 5 85 38 17.00 114.86
SK Raina 5 99 56 19.80 119.27
V Kohli 5 105 49* 26.25 116.66
V Sehwag 5 120 37 24.00 126.31
M Vijay 5 121 52 24.20 112.03
Yuvraj Siingh 5 121 52* 30.25 116.34

The only Indian specialist batsmen to make some sort of mark on this tournament are Ajinkya Rahane (Runs: 182, Avg: 36.40, SR: 120.52) and Manish Pandey (Runs: 144, Avg: 28.80, SR: 121.00). Only one Indian, Rahane, finds a place among the top eight run-scorers in the tournament. The foreign batsmen have made an impact with Dwayne Smith, David Warner, Brendon McCullum, JP Duminy, Glenn Maxwell and David Miller all scoring two or more fifties. Apart from these six, Aaron Finch has also been quite consistent and finds a place among the top eight run-getters in this tournament. The only marquee Indian batsman to have done well is MS Dhoni who has an average of 30.00 after five innings at a strike rate of 152.54.

Openers yet to open up

Openers have typically scored heavily in the IPL, with seven of the top 15 run scorers (across all IPL seasons) being openers. However, apart from Smith, McCullum and, to a lesser extent, Finch, the openers have not found themselves among the runs so far in this tournament. Openers are expected to make optimal use of the Powerplay overs, but their strike rate in this edition of the tournament is an abysmal 117.13 - the lowest for any season. Also, they only averaged 24.28 in this UAE leg, which is lower than all seasons except 2009, when the tournament was held in South Africa. Openers have scored at least one hundred in every season of the IPL so far. While no opener has scored a hundred so far, the flat Indian wickets should ensure that this record remains intact.

Performance of openers in the IPL
Season Innings Average Strike Rate Hundreds Sixes
2008 232 29.46 130.42 4 196
2009 228 23.65 117.88 1 175
2010 240 29.56 130.21 3 196
2011 290 28.52 124.91 6 241
2012 296 29.62 125.95 4 264
2013 304 27.25 120.18 2 217
2014 80 24.28 117.13 0 49

Keeping with this trend, the number of sixes per innings has been the worst for any edition of the IPL - 0.61 sixes per innings. If not for the belligerence of Dwayne Smith, Brendon McCullum and Aaron Finch, who hit 29 of the 49 sixes, this stat could have made the openers look worse still.

No Powerplay spin

In the last few seasons of the IPL, spinners have played key roles in the Powerplays, but the same cannot be said of the UAE leg of this year's IPL. Spinners have bowled in the Powerplay in 27 innings but have taken only four wickets. Their average of 69.25 in the Powerplay is the worst for any season of the IPL. Their economy rate of 7.10 the worst since the inaugural season where spinners hardly bowled in the Powerplay (they bowled 30 overs in the whole season, whereas almost 40 overs have already been bowled in the 20 matches played this season) and went for 8.86 runs per over.

Spinners in the Powerplay - comparing seasons
Season Inninngs Run Rate Wickets Average
2008 24 8.86 8 33.25
2009 48 6.88 19 26.73
2010 77 6.98 33 28.36
2011 100 6.81 53 25.69
2012 109 6.90 35 41.65
2013 79 6.53 29 33.89
2014 27 7.10 4 69.25

Bishen Jeswant is a stats sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Nampally on May 1, 2014, 21:23 GMT

    Some of the stats. for the fast bowlers reveal their economy rates for T20 are not too dissimilar to their figures in ODI's. Ishant Sharma & Shami have been uneconomical on ODI's too. Sandeep Sharma definitely wins this race both in economy & 7 wickets taken in just 11 overs. B.Kumar, Aaron, Mohit & Balaji have each taken 8 wkts. as the highest count amongst Indian pace bowlers. On this basis Sandeep Sharma needs to be considered as ahead of others in pace bowlers. All the opening batsmen apart from Vijay & Rahane have failed badly - average <30.Rahane & to some extent Sanju Samson have been the 2 batsmen who lived up to their expectations. Rahul & Surya kumar Yadev are the other promising youngsters who need to be watched. With these stars back in India for the second leg, I expect some of the figures will improve for most Indian batsmen & bowlers more so than for foreign players. Maxwell & Miller may not be as great on Indian pitches.I expect the Indian spinners will shine once more!

  • Mr.CricketJKNotHussey on May 3, 2014, 7:26 GMT

    @Nampally I agree that there is talent there, what I meant was that we should at least wait till the entire tournament is over before seeing who has done the best. Mohit Sharma showed similar promise last year and is doing well this year too, but he has had a pretty poor outing in international cricket. Bhuvi has evolved a lot and proven himself at the international level. Aaron's accuracy is a really good sign and he is currently the best 140+ bowler in India. These two will almost certainly travel to England. I am just stating that the selectors need to wait on the others a bit.

  • on May 3, 2014, 6:12 GMT

    surprised with yuvraj being best Indian batsman. .

  • S_Hazra1982 on May 2, 2014, 14:12 GMT

    openers' strike rates are below 120 in 2009 and 2014 (outside india) but better at home. Does it really mean indian tracks are flat?

  • on May 2, 2014, 13:27 GMT

    didnt expect to see rajat bhatia in the fast bowlers list..:P

  • Nampally on May 2, 2014, 13:25 GMT

    @Mr.CricketJKNotHussey: Sandeep Sharma played with Indian U-19 which won the WC about 3 years back under U.Chand's captaincy. Sandeep was swinging the ball prodigiously & actually bowled a batsman round his legs. I was very impressed watching him on the internet. His only limitation is pace- which is around 130 KPH. But he is an accurate new ball bowler who can swing/swerve/Seam the ball & in English conditions, he will be an ideal foil for B.Kumar. Aaron is the fastest of the Indian bowlers who has topped 150 KPH. His only problem was accuracy. He showed that improvement in the UAE leg of IPL. I will single out these 2 as the best prospective pace bowlers for the England Tour in 2 months time. As for their ages, look a the Aussie Pacemen who all played tests at a very young age albeit marred by injuries. As long as they can bowl good line. length & direction consistently, age should not be the elephant in the room!

  • Naresh28 on May 2, 2014, 12:27 GMT

    Sandeep Sharma did so well in a past U19 WC and has largely been ignored. His first step to the Indian team should be via the India A side games. While Aaron is excelling where has Umesh Yadav gone? The IPL has given the selectors a broader spectrum when choosing players and this will help India in the future.

  • Mr.CricketJKNotHussey on May 2, 2014, 5:40 GMT

    I disagree with the article that Yuvraj Singh looks the best in that list. He scored one scratchy 50 and then struggled in the rest of the matches. Sehwag on the other hand has scored 3 30s, been more consistent, provided good starts and even held up one end. His innings have all come when the team needed them and he looks way more comfortable at the crease than Yuvraj. Also, he has been the fastest scorer in that list. These figures will definitely improve back in India as that is where the Indian batsmen thrive but hopefully, the Indian bowlers take this form back home too. @Nampally I agree with your bowler analysis, but a lot of these bowlers are too young to be thrust into the side. It is important to keep the grounded so they don't get ahead of themselves. That said, the signs are encouraging and if the bowlers continue, India can hope for a good England tour.

  • Udendra on May 2, 2014, 5:23 GMT

    Isn't this obvious? UAE has livelier wickets than the flat tracks in India. It also confirms Indian batters' weakness against quick stuff.

  • Nampally on May 1, 2014, 21:23 GMT

    Some of the stats. for the fast bowlers reveal their economy rates for T20 are not too dissimilar to their figures in ODI's. Ishant Sharma & Shami have been uneconomical on ODI's too. Sandeep Sharma definitely wins this race both in economy & 7 wickets taken in just 11 overs. B.Kumar, Aaron, Mohit & Balaji have each taken 8 wkts. as the highest count amongst Indian pace bowlers. On this basis Sandeep Sharma needs to be considered as ahead of others in pace bowlers. All the opening batsmen apart from Vijay & Rahane have failed badly - average <30.Rahane & to some extent Sanju Samson have been the 2 batsmen who lived up to their expectations. Rahul & Surya kumar Yadev are the other promising youngsters who need to be watched. With these stars back in India for the second leg, I expect some of the figures will improve for most Indian batsmen & bowlers more so than for foreign players. Maxwell & Miller may not be as great on Indian pitches.I expect the Indian spinners will shine once more!

  • Mr.CricketJKNotHussey on May 3, 2014, 7:26 GMT

    @Nampally I agree that there is talent there, what I meant was that we should at least wait till the entire tournament is over before seeing who has done the best. Mohit Sharma showed similar promise last year and is doing well this year too, but he has had a pretty poor outing in international cricket. Bhuvi has evolved a lot and proven himself at the international level. Aaron's accuracy is a really good sign and he is currently the best 140+ bowler in India. These two will almost certainly travel to England. I am just stating that the selectors need to wait on the others a bit.

  • on May 3, 2014, 6:12 GMT

    surprised with yuvraj being best Indian batsman. .

  • S_Hazra1982 on May 2, 2014, 14:12 GMT

    openers' strike rates are below 120 in 2009 and 2014 (outside india) but better at home. Does it really mean indian tracks are flat?

  • on May 2, 2014, 13:27 GMT

    didnt expect to see rajat bhatia in the fast bowlers list..:P

  • Nampally on May 2, 2014, 13:25 GMT

    @Mr.CricketJKNotHussey: Sandeep Sharma played with Indian U-19 which won the WC about 3 years back under U.Chand's captaincy. Sandeep was swinging the ball prodigiously & actually bowled a batsman round his legs. I was very impressed watching him on the internet. His only limitation is pace- which is around 130 KPH. But he is an accurate new ball bowler who can swing/swerve/Seam the ball & in English conditions, he will be an ideal foil for B.Kumar. Aaron is the fastest of the Indian bowlers who has topped 150 KPH. His only problem was accuracy. He showed that improvement in the UAE leg of IPL. I will single out these 2 as the best prospective pace bowlers for the England Tour in 2 months time. As for their ages, look a the Aussie Pacemen who all played tests at a very young age albeit marred by injuries. As long as they can bowl good line. length & direction consistently, age should not be the elephant in the room!

  • Naresh28 on May 2, 2014, 12:27 GMT

    Sandeep Sharma did so well in a past U19 WC and has largely been ignored. His first step to the Indian team should be via the India A side games. While Aaron is excelling where has Umesh Yadav gone? The IPL has given the selectors a broader spectrum when choosing players and this will help India in the future.

  • Mr.CricketJKNotHussey on May 2, 2014, 5:40 GMT

    I disagree with the article that Yuvraj Singh looks the best in that list. He scored one scratchy 50 and then struggled in the rest of the matches. Sehwag on the other hand has scored 3 30s, been more consistent, provided good starts and even held up one end. His innings have all come when the team needed them and he looks way more comfortable at the crease than Yuvraj. Also, he has been the fastest scorer in that list. These figures will definitely improve back in India as that is where the Indian batsmen thrive but hopefully, the Indian bowlers take this form back home too. @Nampally I agree with your bowler analysis, but a lot of these bowlers are too young to be thrust into the side. It is important to keep the grounded so they don't get ahead of themselves. That said, the signs are encouraging and if the bowlers continue, India can hope for a good England tour.

  • Udendra on May 2, 2014, 5:23 GMT

    Isn't this obvious? UAE has livelier wickets than the flat tracks in India. It also confirms Indian batters' weakness against quick stuff.

  • Udendra on May 2, 2014, 5:23 GMT

    Isn't this obvious? UAE has livelier wickets than the flat tracks in India. It also confirms Indian batters' weakness against quick stuff.

  • Mr.CricketJKNotHussey on May 2, 2014, 5:40 GMT

    I disagree with the article that Yuvraj Singh looks the best in that list. He scored one scratchy 50 and then struggled in the rest of the matches. Sehwag on the other hand has scored 3 30s, been more consistent, provided good starts and even held up one end. His innings have all come when the team needed them and he looks way more comfortable at the crease than Yuvraj. Also, he has been the fastest scorer in that list. These figures will definitely improve back in India as that is where the Indian batsmen thrive but hopefully, the Indian bowlers take this form back home too. @Nampally I agree with your bowler analysis, but a lot of these bowlers are too young to be thrust into the side. It is important to keep the grounded so they don't get ahead of themselves. That said, the signs are encouraging and if the bowlers continue, India can hope for a good England tour.

  • Naresh28 on May 2, 2014, 12:27 GMT

    Sandeep Sharma did so well in a past U19 WC and has largely been ignored. His first step to the Indian team should be via the India A side games. While Aaron is excelling where has Umesh Yadav gone? The IPL has given the selectors a broader spectrum when choosing players and this will help India in the future.

  • Nampally on May 2, 2014, 13:25 GMT

    @Mr.CricketJKNotHussey: Sandeep Sharma played with Indian U-19 which won the WC about 3 years back under U.Chand's captaincy. Sandeep was swinging the ball prodigiously & actually bowled a batsman round his legs. I was very impressed watching him on the internet. His only limitation is pace- which is around 130 KPH. But he is an accurate new ball bowler who can swing/swerve/Seam the ball & in English conditions, he will be an ideal foil for B.Kumar. Aaron is the fastest of the Indian bowlers who has topped 150 KPH. His only problem was accuracy. He showed that improvement in the UAE leg of IPL. I will single out these 2 as the best prospective pace bowlers for the England Tour in 2 months time. As for their ages, look a the Aussie Pacemen who all played tests at a very young age albeit marred by injuries. As long as they can bowl good line. length & direction consistently, age should not be the elephant in the room!

  • on May 2, 2014, 13:27 GMT

    didnt expect to see rajat bhatia in the fast bowlers list..:P

  • S_Hazra1982 on May 2, 2014, 14:12 GMT

    openers' strike rates are below 120 in 2009 and 2014 (outside india) but better at home. Does it really mean indian tracks are flat?

  • on May 3, 2014, 6:12 GMT

    surprised with yuvraj being best Indian batsman. .

  • Mr.CricketJKNotHussey on May 3, 2014, 7:26 GMT

    @Nampally I agree that there is talent there, what I meant was that we should at least wait till the entire tournament is over before seeing who has done the best. Mohit Sharma showed similar promise last year and is doing well this year too, but he has had a pretty poor outing in international cricket. Bhuvi has evolved a lot and proven himself at the international level. Aaron's accuracy is a really good sign and he is currently the best 140+ bowler in India. These two will almost certainly travel to England. I am just stating that the selectors need to wait on the others a bit.

  • Nampally on May 1, 2014, 21:23 GMT

    Some of the stats. for the fast bowlers reveal their economy rates for T20 are not too dissimilar to their figures in ODI's. Ishant Sharma & Shami have been uneconomical on ODI's too. Sandeep Sharma definitely wins this race both in economy & 7 wickets taken in just 11 overs. B.Kumar, Aaron, Mohit & Balaji have each taken 8 wkts. as the highest count amongst Indian pace bowlers. On this basis Sandeep Sharma needs to be considered as ahead of others in pace bowlers. All the opening batsmen apart from Vijay & Rahane have failed badly - average <30.Rahane & to some extent Sanju Samson have been the 2 batsmen who lived up to their expectations. Rahul & Surya kumar Yadev are the other promising youngsters who need to be watched. With these stars back in India for the second leg, I expect some of the figures will improve for most Indian batsmen & bowlers more so than for foreign players. Maxwell & Miller may not be as great on Indian pitches.I expect the Indian spinners will shine once more!