Stats analysis: Sunil Gavaskar

The perfect opener

Sunil Gavaskar achieved outstanding numbers as an opener during a period when fast-bowling resources around the world were plentiful

S Rajesh

September 20, 2010

Comments: 24 | Text size: A | A

Sunil Gavaskar drives down the ground, England v India, 1st Test, Lord's, 3rd day, June 12, 1982
Sunil Gavaskar was one of only six batsmen with a Test average of more than 50 during the two decades when he played international cricket © PA Photos
Related Links
Players/Officials: Sunil Gavaskar
Teams: India

Apart from his physical appearance, everything about Sunil Gavaskar was immense, especially the statistical milestones he achieved over his 17-year international career. At a time when fast bowling around the world was strong and healthy, Gavaskar's technical purity and balance, his impeccable judgement of length and line, his insurmountable powers of concentration, and his range of strokeplay have all left such an indelible mark that he remains one of the foremost opening batsmen of all time. For India he was a blessing, giving the team a resilience that it had sorely lacked in the past. There had been other top-class Indian batsmen before him, but none who sustained the run-scoring excellence as relentlessly as Gavaskar did.

He started his Ranji Trophy career with a fifth-ball duck against Mysore, but hundreds in each of his next three Ranji matches confirmed the potential. Even so, none would have anticipated the stunning manner in which he announced his arrival on the world stage.

Picked in the squad to tour the West Indies in 1971, Gavaskar justified the move in the most emphatic manner possible, amassing 774 runs in four matches, a tally that remains a record for the most prolific series by a batsman on debut. A couple of his half-centuries helped India to their first win against West Indies, in Port-of-Spain, a venue that remained his favourite throughout his career. That kicked off an amazing sequence of scores, with centuries in each of the next two Tests, and he signed off quite majestically, scoring 124 and 220 in the last Test - again in Port-of-Spain - to become only the second batsman in Test history to score a hundred and a double in the same match.

The start was almost too good to be true, and it was inevitable that those lofty standards wouldn't be sustained, even for a batsman as focused and gifted as Gavaskar: in his next 26 innings, he scored fewer runs than he had in his first eight, and managed just one century, 101 in a losing cause at Old Trafford in 1974.

That brief lean spell, though, was the precursor to Gavaskar's best sustained period in international cricket: in the five years between 1975 and 1979, he averaged nearly 60 and had a fantastic rate of converting fifties into hundreds. Arguably his best innings - the 221 against England at The Oval - came during this phase. In the 10 series he played in these five years, he averaged 50 or more in eight, and over 75 in three.

The next five years were considerably less successful - in 11 series during the early- and mid-1980s his average exceeded 50 only three times. This was also the period when he played his worst series - against the touring England side in 1984, Gavaskar totalled 140 runs in eight innings at a miserable average of 17.50.

The clamours for his retirement grew during this period, but Gavaskar ensured that when he did leave, he did so on his own terms, averaging more than 58 in his last 16 Tests, and scoring an unforgettable 96 in his final innings.

Sunil Gavaskar's Test career
Period Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Debut series 4 774 154.80 4/ 3
July 1971 to Jan 1975 13 693 27.72 1/ 6
Feb 1975 to Jan 1980 45 4434 59.91 18/ 16
Feb 1980 to Sep 1985 47 2939 40.81 7/ 14
Oct 1985 onwards 16 1282 58.27 4/ 6
Career 125 10,122 51.12 34/ 45

Despite having played during a period when run-scoring was considerably more difficult than it is today, Gavaskar achieved some incredible numbers, becoming the first to get to 10,000 Test runs and 30 centuries. During the two decades in which he played, only six batsmen scored more than 4000 runs at a 50-plus average.

Top batsmen between Jan 1970 and Dec 1989 (Qual: 4000 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Javed Miandad 101 7701 57.04 22/ 36
Greg Chappell 87 7110 53.86 24/ 31
Allan Border 111 8488 53.38 23/ 46
Viv Richards 108 7849 51.98 24/ 37
Sunil Gavaskar 125 10,122 51.12 34/ 45
Geoff Boycott 67 5505 50.50 16/ 29

One of the most remarkable aspects of Gavaskar's career was the success he achieved against West Indies, the best team of the 1980s. He scored 13 centuries against them, which is the second-highest for a batsman against one opposition; only Don Bradman, with 19 against England, has more. Bradman's overall rate of scoring hundreds was obviously much better than Gavaskar's, but in this case the rates were comparable: Bradman's 19 came in 37 Tests, while Gavaskar needed 27 matches for his 13 hundreds.

Some of his runs against West Indies were scored when the attacks weren't quite as fearsome - in his first series, in 1970-71, West Indies had a spin-heavy attack, while in 1978-79 the best bowlers were away playing in World Series Cricket, but even in the other series Gavaskar had some memorable battles against the West Indies' fast bowlers. Fittingly, some of his most memorable landmarks came against them: in the 1983-84 series in India, he made his 29th hundred, to equal Bradman's record, and then went past it in Chennai. Both were special innings - the first one, in Delhi, came off a mere 94 balls, while the second was a marathon that lasted more than 10 hours and ended a run-drought of 36 runs from his previous five innings.

Of the 2749 runs Gavaskar scored against West Indies, almost 30% came at a single venue - the Queen's Park Oval in Port-of-Spain. He played five Tests there, and only once did he fail, scoring 1 and 32 in the 1983 series. Despite that, he was the Bradman of Port-of-Spain, averaging 99.12 at the ground. He is also one of only four batsmen to score more than 750 Test runs at an overseas venue, and remains the only one to do it since 1950. Among the grounds he played in, only at two venues did he score more runs - the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai and the MA Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai.

Best batsmen against West Indies between 1970 and 1990 (Qual: 750 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Dennis Amiss 9 1113 74.20 4/ 2
Sunil Gavaskar 27 2749 65.45 13/ 7
Wasim Raja 11 919 57.43 2/ 7
Greg Chappell 17 1400 56.00 5/ 7
Gundappa Viswanath 18 1455 53.88 4/ 7
Ian Chappell 12 997 52.47 3/ 4
Ian Redpath 11 956 47.80 3/ 5
Geoff Boycott 17 1286 44.34 2/ 9
Dilip Vengsarkar 25 1596 44.33 6/ 7
Allan Border 21 1479 42.25 2/ 11

Opening the innings was a tough job in an era when there were plenty of top-class fast bowlers around, but Gavaskar handled the pressures superbly. Apart from the West Indies attack, he played 18 Tests against Imran Khan and 14 against Ian Botham. While both are among the five bowlers who dismissed him most often, Gavaskar had more than his fair share of success against them. He scored four centuries in the 18 Tests he played against Imran - including in each innings of the Karachi Test in 1978, and a memorable unbeaten 127, when he carried the bat through the innings against a rampant Imran in Faisalabad in 1983. (In fact, Gavaskar is one of only two batsmen to score centuries in each innings of a Test three times; Ricky Ponting is the other.) Botham dismissed him eight times, but mostly after he had made reasonable contributions. The bowler who dismissed him cheaply most often was Malcolm Marshall, who too nailed him on eight occasions, seven of them before he touched 25. Of course, the fact that Gavaskar usually faced the first ball of an innings also meant the bowlers had the opportunity to dismiss him off the first ball of the match - this fate befell him three times, with Geoff Arnold, Imran and Marshall the successful bowlers. Bangladesh's Hannan Sarkar is the only batsman to share this record with Gavaskar.

Till the turn of the century Gavaskar was one of only six openers to have scored more than 3000 runs at a 50-plus average. (Three batsmen - Matthew Hayden, Graeme Smith and Virender Sehwag - have joined the club since then, which is another stat to suggest that opening the innings has become comparatively easier in the last decade.)

Highest averages among openers till 2000 (Qual: 3000 runs)
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Herbert Sutcliffe 83 4522 61.10 16/ 23
Len Hutton 131 6721 56.47 19/ 31
Jack Hobbs 97 5130 56.37 14/ 27
Bob Simpson 70 3664 55.51 8/ 19
Dennis Amiss 69 3276 53.70 11/ 9
Sunil Gavaskar 203 9607 50.29 33/ 42
Geoff Boycott 191 8091 48.16 22/ 42
Saeed Anwar 70 3271 48.10 9/ 21

With Chetan Chauhan, Gavaskar formed a formidable opening combination. The two scored runs in all conditions and finished with a highly creditable average of 53.75. Of the 59 times they opened, on 20 occasions they put together a partnership of at least 50.

Best opening pairs before 2000 (Qual: 2000 partnership runs)
Pair Innings Runs Average p'ship 100/ 50 stands
Jack Hobbs-Herbert Sutcliffe 38 3249 87.81 15/ 10
Jack Hobbs-Wilfred Rhodes 36 2146 61.31 8/ 5
Bill Lawry-Bob Simpson 62 3596 60.94 9/ 18
Len Hutton-Cyril Washbrook 51 2880 60.00 8/ 13
Michael Atherton-Graham Gooch 44 2501 56.84 7/ 12
Chetan Chauhan-Sunil Gavaskar 59 3010 53.75 10/ 10
Michael Slater-Mark Taylor 78 3887 51.14 10/ 16
Gordon Greenidge-Desmond Haynes 148 6482 47.31 16/ 26

The other aspect of Gavaskar's career that stood out was his ability to play for long periods, especially in the fourth innings of Tests. Several other top-class batsmen have performed below potential in the last innings of Tests, with Tendulkar being the prime example: in 47 such innings he averages less than 38. But Gavaskar had no such problems, averaging 58.25 in 33 innings, which is second only to Boycott among batsmen who scored at least 1000 fourth-innings runs.

One of the features of Gavaskar's batting - and that of India during the period he played in - was the ability to bat many overs in the last innings. When he scored that 221 at The Oval, India batted 150.5 overs, and there were several other instances when the team batted more than 100 overs. (Click here for a Numbers Game column from July 2007 that compares Gavaskar and Tendulkar in fourth innings; while Gavaskar averaged more than 56 in meaningful fourth innings, Tendulkar only managed an average of less than 27.)

Best Test averages in fourth innings (Qual: 1000 runs)
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Geoff Boycott 34 1234 58.76 3/ 7
Sunil Gavaskar 33 1398 58.25 4/ 8
Graeme Smith 30 1285 53.54 3/ 8
Gordon Greenidge 38 1383 53.19 3/ 6
Ricky Ponting 38 1311 52.44 4/ 4
Matthew Hayden 39 1287 49.50 1/ 9
Jacques Kallis 41 1212 44.88 1/ 10
Graham Gooch 29 1121 44.84 3/ 5

In fact, Gavaskar was at his most prolific in matches that ended in draws. In the 23 Tests he played that India won, his average was only 43.97, and he scored six hundreds. On the other hand, 22 of his 34 hundreds came in draws, and his average shot up to more than 65 in those matches. Gavaskar remains the only batsman to have scored more than 6000 runs in drawn Tests, with Tendulkar more than 400 runs short of the mark.

Most runs in drawn Tests
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Sunil Gavaskar 67 6039 65.64 22/ 25
Sachin Tendulkar 67 5563 67.02 19/ 25
Allan Border 59 5084 68.70 16/ 27
Rahul Dravid 53 4979 68.20 16/ 26
Javed Miandad 62 4570 61.75 12/ 23

Compared to his Test exploits, Gavaskar's ODI achievements will probably remain a footnote, especially given the manner in which the game - and hence batting stats - have changed over the last decade. His unbeaten 36 in a 60-over game against England in the 1975 World Cup will probably remain his single most talked-about ODI "exploit", but towards the second half of his career, his ODI skills improved exponentially. In his first 52 ODIs he averaged 25.28, with only seven half-centuries; in his next 56 games, his average increased by more than 20 runs, and he also scored 21 scores of 50-plus, including his only ODI century, an outstanding 88-ball unbeaten 103 against New Zealand in the 1987 World Cup.

Gavaskar's ODI career
Period Matches Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Till 1984 52 1138 25.28 56.72 0/ 7
1985 onwards 56 1954 45.44 66.01 1/ 20
Career 108 3092 35.13 62.26 1/ 27

In Tests, Gavaskar's fourth-innings stats were superb; similarly, in ODIs he was much better when batting with a target in front of him: when batting first he averaged a mediocre 24.22; in run-chases that average doubled to 48.84. Of his 28 scores of 50-plus in ODIs, 19 came when India batted second.

Highest ODI averages in run-chases till Dec 1989 (Qual: 1000 runs)
Batsman ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Gordon Greenidge 67 2798 50.87 66.36 7/ 15
Sunil Gavaskar 53 1905 48.84 61.45 1/ 18
Viv Richards 97 2840 46.55 86.82 3/ 20
Allan Lamb 46 1558 45.82 75.12 2/ 8
Javed Miandad 66 2090 44.46 70.53 1/ 16

Apart from his considerable batting skills, Gavaskar also brought plenty to the table with his astute captaincy. He was often criticised for being too defensive, and while that criticism was probably justified at times, it needs to be remembered that the Indian bowling attack - apart from Kapil Dev - was pretty thin during that period. Only Sourav Ganguly has led India in more Tests than Gavaskar's 47, and only three captains - Ganguly, Mohammad Azharuddin and MS Dhoni - have led them to more wins than Gavaskar's nine. In ODIs, his win percentage as captain was only 27.57 (14 wins in 37 matches) but that also included India's most accomplished performance on the world stage, when they crushed all opposition on the way to a famous triumph at the World Championship of Cricket in Australia in 1985. Add all those achievements up, and it's easy to see why Sunil Gavaskar is easily one of the greatest cricketers the game has seen.

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by SiZam on (September 22, 2010, 3:48 GMT)

Yes, definitely a great batsman, but probably one of the worst team players in the history of Indian cricket. 36 n.o. in '75 WC and declaring second innings of final Test match against England in 1984-85 (at Kanpur) to avoid Azharuddin getting his fourth century in 3 matches, to say the least.

Check the scorecard :

Posted by   on (September 21, 2010, 18:53 GMT)

@AhmedSaleem yes who can forget Haneef. I may not have been born in his time but have heard several stories from dad about that 4th innings he played against the West Indies on an unplayable pitch. Had it been the aussies they would have straight away thrown the toys out of the pram and start criticizing the pitch. Anyway Haneef, Gavaskar and Tendulkar will go down for me as the fab 3. Wonder who will be the next one? On a side note I also sometimes wonder why their off springs turned out to be such disappointments? Shoaib did start promisingly but then just fell off the rails and Rohan also had a decent career with Bengal but just could not make the next transition.

Posted by SaifQazi on (September 21, 2010, 17:07 GMT)

bein a Pakistani, i aint goin to get into this pity mudslingin bish bashin job of who was gr8 n who not. bein a purist, a true cricket lover i wud say that Sunny Gavaskar was truly a GREAT batsman. the one thin, outta so many of this achievements, that stands out for me is the number of centuries he has scored against the Windies n that matters. no small feat. its such a big feat that had he scored no runs at all except all those scored against Windies itself, wud had been enough for me to label him as a GREAT batsman. i've ma disagreements with him on opinions bt the moment he puts the pads on n takes a bat in his hands, there isnt much that i can (or ne1 for that matter shud) say. its a shame that i cudnt c him bat against sum of the best bowlers in the world. cricket is sucha faaaaaar cry than wat it use to be in 70s, 80s n 90s:(

Posted by AhmadSaleem on (September 21, 2010, 11:18 GMT)

NISH67, You are forgetting Hanif Mohammad, the original little master and childhood hero of Sunny.

Posted by BillyCC on (September 20, 2010, 22:20 GMT)

Ankit Jain, totally agree, and I would have written part of what you said, but I decided to keep my post shorter. Another stat which I always like to see for an opener is their average in fourth innings and Gavaskar is right at the top in this situation. If the openers go quickly in a fourth innings, then the rest of the team more often than not, collapse as well. This is one area that an opener like Sehwag needs to improve to move further up the ranks of greatest opener.

Posted by zxaar on (September 20, 2010, 21:57 GMT)

@ prasoonsharma" I analyzed Miandad's ODI performance and his record against all opponents, in all countries in the world indicate his greatness." ------------- first of all Tests performance is most important thing and that is what i was talking about. Now explain this: At home venues miandad averages 61-62 and at outside home he averages 45. Surely a sign of home town bully. Why is that?? If he was so great why he does not average 50+ outside of home (gavaskar does and so does sachin). Plus i do remember that six of kiron more i watched it live. But i can assure you he can not repeat that fluke. That ball was lollypop full toss and probably a yorker went wrong.

Posted by NISH67 on (September 20, 2010, 21:52 GMT)

Gavaskar was the first great batsman from Asia and one of the greatest of all time . Some of those who didn't see him bat may belittle his exploits but it would be apt to remember that the 1978 West Indies side against whom Gavaskar scored 4 centuries in the series had 2 of the fastest bowlers ever to play the game - Malcolm Marshall and Sylvester Clarke -albeit that they were in the early part of their careers . To those who can't sleep without dragging Tendulkar into every article that's discussed on this site , you need to give yourself a break as the Cricket world certainly doesn't revolve around him .

Posted by prasoonsharma on (September 20, 2010, 18:40 GMT)

@zxaar - I don't agree with your comment re: Miandad. You said - "He (Miandad) was not great outside of pakistan where he was helped by home umpires. Not a true great. Miadad's case states lie due to favour from umpires.".

I analyzed Miandad's ODI performance and his record against all opponents, in all countries in the world indicate his greatness. My analysis is posted on

FYI, I'm an Indian cricket fan and vividly remember his last ball six against India, as well as his "Kiran More imitation". I wanted him out every time he played against us but, he was a champion, although from another team.

Posted by waspsting on (September 20, 2010, 17:32 GMT)

re - Miandad he was targeted by umpires outside Pakistan as surely as he was favored by them at home. He was a great batsman. Gavaskar, they say, was also protected by home umpires (its true about everybody but the English, maybe of that generation) @UltimateCricExpert - i'd add Dravid to that list - his record in wins is stupendous re - 96 innings - from all acounts i've heard, it was a wonderful innings on a terrible pitch. HOWEVER, i believe he was out caught at short leg, when the silly point ran across the pitch to take a great catch, and given not out (not sure what score that was on) @TheOnlyEmperor - sure man, the runs he scored in 71 and 78 were great achievements (if it were easy, everyone would have done it, right?). BUT... its not as impressive as scoring runs against the Holding, roberts, garner, croft, marshall combos. don't you agree?

Posted by Pathiyal on (September 20, 2010, 12:25 GMT)

sunny batting against the greatest bowlers of all times - was a treat to watch. during those days, there were sensible bowlers who bowled with great pace, amazingly swinging. cricket was not about 'you throw, i hit' unlike in recent times. this was one batsman who brought respect to the game. of course, i would say javed miandad was another. i do not think anyone can under rate javed's contributions to the world cricket.

Posted by AhmadSaleem on (September 20, 2010, 11:46 GMT)

@zxaar, first of all I must say that umpires used to be patriotic every where around in that period. Therefore Imran put forward the idea of neutral umpires since home umpires cost us a series win in Windies(1987) and the result which would have been 2-0 ended in1-1. And as far as stats goes, Javed's average in Oceania is more than 50, its 47 in England and 57 in Asia. His record in Windies isn't good and he averages 33 there but it was also around 40 before 1990. He had a bad series in Windies after 1990 which made his avge drop there. Well, the article was about Sunny and we should focus on the genius of him rather than criticizing others.

Posted by Navillus on (September 20, 2010, 11:13 GMT)

Taking nothing away from his achievements, the period 1980-85 was significant because that was the period everyy side was bowling full strength. WI, Aus, Eng, Pak, NZ ... and Gavaskar did not average quite a lot ... in fact just over 40. And that is beefed up to an extent by a big century against SL (their first test versus India), some meaningless thrid innings century against Pak etc. During this time, by the figures, he was not the best batsman of India ... at home and England it was Dilip Vengsarkar and in WI it was Amarnath. Port of Spain statistic is also significant, because that is a non caaribbean pitch in the WI, which favours spin. The WI spin in 1971, @TheOnlyEmperor - consisted of Noreiga, Holford and an aging Sobers ... hardly great. In 1979, WI attack was pretty ordinary with all the best bowlers in packer series.

Posted by   on (September 20, 2010, 8:36 GMT)

@BillyCC - If you ask me, average in matches won means Jack, for 3 reasons. One, result of match (unlike quality of opposition, type of venue etc) is not a condition that applies during the match and therefore cannot make the it any more or less hard to perform. Two, matches won filter biases the sample in the wrong way. Any team wins more matches against weaker teams and at favourable venues. Three, if you are the only star player in your team your team will not win much without your contribution and you will have an inflated average in matches won (Andy Flower has a better average than Viv Richards, and Kumble better than Warne in matches won). So, average in matches won is an utterly meaningless statistic that keeps coming all the time. If you force me to choose, I will choose average in matches not won to judge a cricketers quality! Best is of course to filter by oppositions and venues.

Posted by BillyCC on (September 20, 2010, 8:35 GMT)

UltimateCricExpert, openers do not need to be match winners, in fact, it is crucial that they be match savers first and foremost. An opener's role is and always will be to survive the new ball and then bat for as long as possible, setting up the innings. It is up to the other batsman to score the quick runs and post the big score once the innings has been set up. So your argument about Gavaskar not being a match winner is irrelevant, in fact, it adds to his greatness.

Posted by   on (September 20, 2010, 8:04 GMT)

Why can't we stop dragging Sachin Tendulkar in every article that pays tribute to any other batsman? As for Miandad, he was undoubtedly great and was ranked around 45 in the legends series. Only thing that counted against him was his record against WI.

Posted by   on (September 20, 2010, 8:01 GMT)

Why can't we stop dragging Sachin Tendulkar in every article that pays tribute to any other batsman? As for Miandad, he was undoubtedly great and was ranked around 45 in the legends series. Only thing that counted against him was his record against WI.

Posted by zxaar on (September 20, 2010, 7:45 GMT)

@ vipin.chaudhary2325 "My Papa saw the Match against pakistan, which was gavaskar last test match, and they still say that He was playing so well, don't know how he get out, and it was all over for India" ---------- still remember that match, one of the best innings i have ever seen. Still fresh in memory.

Posted by zxaar on (September 20, 2010, 7:45 GMT)

@ AhmadSaleem"You can see from these stats that Miandad is a highly under rated cricketer." ---------------- He was not great outside of pakistan where he was helped by home umpires. Not a true great. Miadad's case states lie due to favour from umpires.

Posted by zxaar on (September 20, 2010, 7:44 GMT)

@ AhmadSaleem"You can see from these stats that Miandad is a highly under rated cricketer." ---------------- He was not great outside of pakistan where he was helped by home umpires. Not a true great. Miadad's case states lie due to favour from umpires.

Posted by TheOnlyEmperor on (September 20, 2010, 7:37 GMT)

"Some of his runs against West Indies were scored when the attacks weren't quite as fearsome " - What sort of an analysis is this? Do you guys speak thus about Don? Even the WI were appreciate of Sunil's 1971 performance. WI spin was nothing to laugh about considering that Gibbs went on to break the WR for most test wickets. Clarke bowled exceptionally well in the 1978 WI series which also saw the introduction of Malcolm Marshall.

Posted by UltimateCricExpert on (September 20, 2010, 5:41 GMT)

He was only a great Match Saver but NOT a Match Winner. For me, Sehwag, Kumble & Sachin are the greatest match winners for India.

Posted by vipin.chaudhary2325 on (September 20, 2010, 5:31 GMT)

My Papa saw the Match against pakistan, which was gavaskar last test match, and they still say that He was playing so well, don't know how he get out, and it was all over for India

Posted by AhmadSaleem on (September 20, 2010, 4:28 GMT)

You can see from these stats that Miandad is a highly under rated cricketer. He should have also been included in the legends of cricket series. Sunny, Chappell, Richards, Border and Miandad were the best of their generation when run scoring wasn't so easy. All hail to the legends

Posted by BillyCC on (September 20, 2010, 4:14 GMT)

An average of 51 as an opener in that cricketing generation is an amazing achievement. The statistic that surprised me the most was his average in team wins, only 44.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Ronchi's blitz, and remarkable ODI recoveries

Ask Steven: Also, the fastest ODI 150s, and the highest Test totals without a half-century

    Penalty runs the best punishment for slow over rates

Ashley Mallett: Fines and suspensions have had no effect. Awarding the opposition runs for every over a team falls short in a Test innings will definitely bite harder

    Pietersen stars in his own muppet show

David Hopps: KP's rubbishing of many aspiring English county professionals brings to mind the belief of Miss Piggy that "there is no one in the world to compare with moi"

    How to construct an ODI chase

Michael Bevan: Focus on targets smaller than winning the match, and back your tailenders to deliver for you

The many crickets of an Indian boyhood

Sankaran Krishna: Growing up in India, you play a number of varieties of the game, each developing a certain skill

News | Features Last 7 days

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

India's batting is going the way of their bowling in Australia, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

Off-stump blues leave Dhawan flailing

The out-of-form Shikhar Dhawan still has the backing of his captain, but there's no denying his slump has arrived at an inconvenient time for India and his technical issues have to be sorted out before they attempt to defend the World Cup

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

'Teams can't have set formula' - Dravid

In the first episode of Contenders, a special ten-part buildup to the 2015 World Cup, Rahul Dravid and Graeme Smith discuss the impact of local conditions on team compositions and the issues surrounding the format of the tournament

News | Features Last 7 days