Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Australia need a workout

It's been all too smooth sailing for Ponting's men so far. They need a tough match against Pakistan

Ian Chappell

March 13, 2011

Comments: 38 | Text size: A | A

Andrew Strauss watched another close match slip away, Bangladesh v England, Group B, World Cup, Chittagong, March 11, 2011
England have played their best cricket against stronger sides, so if they do qualify for the quarter-final, they could go all the way © Getty Images
Enlarge

Michael Hussey's arrival at the World Cup couldn't have been better timed for an Australian team that remains undefeated whilst enacting a group impersonation of the Invisible Man. In addition to the undoubted boost his versatility provides to the batting order, Hussey's unbridled enthusiasm will be just the right tonic for a team that has endured long waits in between matches and then experienced very little challenging cricket.

Hussey's enthusiasm is infectious. If he's not playing a match, he loves to bat and bowl in the nets and then practise fielding. Then, when the daylight disappears he's happy talking cricket. Even if he doesn't enjoy it, he's earned the nickname "Mr Cricket". His brand of enthusiasm, complemented by a couple of serial pests in the team (taking the mickey and playing practical jokes), is the right mixture to help endure long, mind-numbing breaks between matches.

The washout against Sri Lanka, when the match was so evenly poised, must have been a major disappointment to the Australians. They were relying on that game as a tough workout to tune up for the knockout stage, especially after New Zealand provided such meek opposition. To then have a week off, followed by two gentle affairs against the seriously weak Kenyans and the only slightly stronger Canadians, is not ideal for Ricky Ponting's men. Those two games will be centre-wicket sessions with the added excitement of an anthem.

This is why the officials are right to query the wisdom of the minnows' presence at the World Cup. It's like asking a CEO to prepare for a crucial board presentation by speaking to a kindergarten class.

Apart from Ireland, who have displayed a commendable competitive mentality, the performances of the rest of the minnows reads like a struggling student's report card: "Tried hard but need to do better."

The Australians must now hope the consistency-challenged Pakistan team has one of its good days when the two sides meet. Australia desperately needs a tough encounter before they play their quarter-final.

Another frustrating aspect of the tournament for all players is the Decision Review System (DRS). In some circles it's now referred to as the dubious review system.

The DRS has become entwined with the tactics of the game and is constantly being used to challenge 50-50 decisions - two things it wasn't designed to do. The DRS reads as such a complicated playing condition that the Australians could easily fill in their numerous off days scouring the document, including the quaintly named "clarification communication" from the ICC.

 
 
The DRS has become entwined with the tactics of the game and is constantly being used to challenge fifty-fifty decisions - things it wasn't designed to do
 

This arrived as a result of the controversy over the notorious "2.5 metre ruling" that reprieved Ian Bell against India. If anyone unravels the metric mystery, I'd be delighted to hear the explanation.

What I'm eagerly awaiting is the official communiqué that confirms technology is now officially ruining - sorry, a slip of the finger: running the game. The sooner the DRS is placed firmly in the hands of the off-field umpire, purely to rid the game of howlers, the better off cricket will be.

The DRS reared its ugly head again in contentious circumstances in the Ireland-West Indies contest, to snuff out any chance of another fighting Irish victory. The system is fast establishing a consistency rate that compares with the England team.

England has produced two mammoth efforts to defeat South Africa and tie with India, only to stumble like a drunken sailor when confronted by the lesser teams. Their monumental struggle to overcome Netherlands was only surpassed by their gifts to Ireland and Bangladesh.

For now, it's their confidence that needs rebuilding after they snatched defeat from the jaws of victory against Bangladesh. England have to beat West Indies to have any chance of reaching the knockout stage. The one thing in their favour is, they've played their best cricket against the stronger sides.

Should England beat West Indies and reach the quarter-finals, beware. In 1992, Pakistan were playing like drones early in the World Cup and were extremely fortunate to reach the semi-finals. They then went on to play brilliant cricket in winning the final against, you guessed it, England. Could be an omen.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (March 15, 2011, 16:15 GMT)

australia beating test would be against the bowling attack of pakistan if saeed ajmal plays against australia it would not be easy for the middle order to face the music of afridi gul and ajmal who are the match winner in their own , they have put a good show against the men in men green . pakistan team should be focus when they face heat of tait lee and johnson.

Posted by JavedButt on (March 15, 2011, 6:47 GMT)

Hi,

I have been hearing the coments of chapal on different channels he is pretendimg as australians are un beatable side well i think he is living in fools paradise if u look at there match against SL they were really lucky that the match aws washed out other wise SL would easily have won the match. secondly i dont know why he thinks that ausrailia has best bowling attack well icant see how its best with one normal bowler in Lee 2 half bowlers in Tait & Johnson who at most of times are wavered and some club level spinners in Korejza, Smith & Hussey. They were saying the same in WC T20 about this bowling line up and every one knows that what thrasing this so called attack got at the hands of Pak in WC T20 Semi Final they were luck to win as Hussey palyed an innings of his life and some stupid decision by afridi also help them to win. Well i cant see austrails go beyond QF with Bits & pieces Bowlers & out of form batting. For me there are 2 teams to beat in this WC SL & Pak. Watch out

Posted by   on (March 15, 2011, 6:19 GMT)

Yes Australia could do with some competition and definitely before the knock out stage.They have had good games barring the Kenya game which was arguably their most tepid game yet. I think the good thing is that Hussey had a good hit and Clarke and Haddin are batting well. Ponting is still searching for that magic touch but the spinners are a cause of worry. I do believe that Smith will get wickets if persisted with, though I believe Kreja bleeds as he bowls too many loose balls. Australia are not in the peak of their form but thankfully for them India, South Africa and England are all playing patchily with touches of brilliance. It would be interesting to watch the quarters. As far as the UDRs is concerned, it is not perfect, but it certainly prevents howlers from happening.India is just being difficult as it can be on occasion . Interesting days ahead and I do hope the world cup picks up momentum and action. sridhar

Posted by jay57870 on (March 15, 2011, 0:58 GMT)

The Giant Strides of Technology: "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," Neil Armstrong famously declared upon becoming the first man to walk on the moon. We now see cricket take a "big stride forward" too with DRS: It's a useful technology that helps to make better informed decisions, especially (jokes aside) in "big stride forward" LBW situations. The ever-so-opinionated Chappell, in his usual half-baked way, calls it "dubious" because of inconsistent 2.5m rulings. But then, in the same breath, he offers a plausible solution: Place DRS "firmly in the hands of the off-field umpire." Aha! Why let the on-field umpire make the final decision, when his initial call is being challenged in the first place? Case in point: Billy Bowden in the Ian Bell review. The problem? No, not his crooked finger, but his crooked ego! Catch Billy reversing his own call! Only the off-field umpire, given all relevant information, is best placed to make an objective/final ruling. Period.

Posted by cric_follower on (March 14, 2011, 19:55 GMT)

The DRS is a brilliant system. In the worst case the number mistakes do not increase but remain the same. In most cases it gives the correct decision. I am all for it.

Posted by jay57870 on (March 14, 2011, 15:50 GMT)

As for Ian Chappell's discomfort with the "metric mystery," the only obvious and relevant question I have is why does the ICC have to throw 2.5m/40cm measured curveballs into a legendary game full of historic milestones that are forever yardsticked by wickets 66 feet apart? It's a game of inches, isn't it?

Posted by NALINWIJ on (March 14, 2011, 13:16 GMT)

Unlike rediculously marginal decisions made in tennis the UDRS is incorporating a benefit of doubt system that is appropriate for cricket where an umpires decision is reversed if the decision is incorrect beyond a reasonable doubt. I liked the system in Australia where the 3 aspects of LBW was given a green [not out], yellow[marginal] or red[out] and a bat pad was excluded. If the umpire said not out you need 3 reds to reverse or if given out there has to be a green to exonerate the batsman worked well.The 2.5 meter rule should be worked into the hawkeyes strikezone and a determination of red, orange or green should be stated automatically rather than 2 umpires trying to grapple with the 2.5 meter rule.

Posted by Meety on (March 14, 2011, 10:59 GMT)

@Duncan Munro McLeod - Ponting has actually been the only player to argue BOTH sides of the debate - but you'll believe whatever you want to believe. @JesseG - I can quite confidantly say that NO side has cruised through the games as comfortably as Oz. EVERY other side has showed vulnerability - EXCEPT Oz. All due respect to Kenya - but that was a training match!

Posted by BudhaWillSmile on (March 14, 2011, 10:24 GMT)

Ian chappel sounds too arrogant.. But I cant wish pakistan good luck against them..I wish the game is a wash out as SL one. The best thing will be both not getting match fit before the crucial QF

Posted by JesseG on (March 14, 2011, 8:23 GMT)

I would love to backhand Ian Chapell, Australia will not win this world cup...their team isn't strong enough...that was shown against Kenya...

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

    Dhawan's bouncer problem

Aakash Chopra: Why the Indian opener would be well advised to shelve the hook and pull in Australia

    The last cricket bookseller

The home of Australia's first, and possibly last, full-time dealer of his kind is a treasure trove of cricket literature amassed over 45 years. By Russell Jackson

    Bradman's strike rate, most first-class wickets in a year

Ask Steven: Also, Australia's youngest captain, and batsmen with 125 Tests or more failing to pass 250

'Effectiveness, runs and consistency'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Steve Waugh's impact

Rohit's innings a symbol of ODI batting's changing mindset

Kartikeya Date: The trend of massive individual scores owes to batsmen realising they can get a lot more out of each ball

News | Features Last 7 days

Pakistan should not welcome Amir back

The serene team culture cultivated by Misbah and his men shouldn't be allowed to be disrupted by a player with a tainted past

'I'm a bit disappointed not to get that Test average up to 50'

Mahela Jayawardene reflects on his Test career, and the need to bridge the gap between international and club cricket in Sri Lanka

November games need November prices

An early start to the international season, coupled with costly tickets, have kept the Australian public away from the cricket

A two-decade long dream

In 2011, MS Dhoni helped end a 28-year wait for India and gifted Sachin Tendulkar something he had craved throughout his career - to be called a World Cup champion

Maxwell's brittle bat, and an empty MCG

Plays of the day from the fourth ODI between Australia and South Africa at the MCG

News | Features Last 7 days