Tales from the top of the table

The stories behind the highest individual scores in Tests

Steven Lynch

April 23, 2012

Comments: 61 | Text size: A | A

Andy Sandham puts on his pads, Surrey v Glamorgan, County Championship, The Oval, April 30-May 2, 1930
Andy Sandham, Test cricket's first triple-centurion, did not play another Test after setting the record © Getty Images

Charles Bannerman, 165*
Very neatly, Australia's Bannerman made a big score in the very first Test of all - in Melbourne in March 1877 - to ensure a ringing start to this list. He faced the first ball in Test cricket (from England's Alfred Shaw), scored the first run from the second ball, and made his way to 165 before retiring hurt with an injured hand. Australia were all out for 245 not long after his departure: remarkably, Bannerman's share of the innings total (67.34%), remains a Test record to this day. John Arlott wrote of Bannerman, who was born in Kent: "Although he hit the ball extremely hard he had the contemporary reputation that he rarely made an uppish hit."

Billy Murdoch, 211
Bannerman's record for the highest Test score lasted for more than seven years, until the Oval Test of 1884, when it was broken by Australia's captain, Murdoch, an imposing man with an even more imposing moustache. Murdoch had threatened Bannerman's mark with 153 not out at The Oval in 1880, and made no mistake back there four years later. His 211 - Test cricket's first double-century - was a careful innings, lasting more than seven hours, in which he hit 24 fours. "He was essentially an off-side player, his cut and drive being equally fine," said Wisden of Murdoch's general approach, adding: "His style [left] no loophole for criticism."

Tip Foster, 287
You can't do much better than break the world record in your first match, and that's what Reginald "Tip" Foster of Worcestershire did, hammering 287 on his Test debut for England in Sydney in 1903-04. "The latter part of his innings was described on all hands as something never surpassed," enthused Wisden. Foster never touched such heights again - his highest score in seven further Tests was 51 - but he held the individual Test record for more than 26 years.

Andy Sandham, 325
Probably the least-heralded name on this list, Sandham of Surrey and England compiled Test cricket's first triple-century, in a timeless match against West Indies in Kingston in April 1930. And he did it in borrowed boots that made his feet sore: he was apparently encouraged by the umpire (the Englishman Joe Hardstaff) to keep going. Sandham, who was almost 40, carried on past 300, and ended the second day with 309 not out. He felt better on the third morning but was soon out for 325, after batting for ten hours in all. Strange as it may seem, Sandham never played another Test - and his record lasted little more than three months.

Don Bradman, 334
His name just had to appear on this list: Bradman, the greatest batsman cricket has ever seen, erased Sandham's name from the record books with a superb 334 in the third Ashes Test of 1930, at Headingley in July. The Don came to the crease in the second over, after the early loss of Archie Jackson. According to Percy Fender, "Bradman took command at once, and never lost it all day." He reached his hundred before lunch - only the third such instance in Test history (there has been only one since on the first day) - and had rolled remorselessly to 309 by the close. Bradman was finally out early the following day, having batted for 383 minutes and hit 46 fours.

Wally Hammond, 336*
Destined for much of his career to be slightly less great than Bradman, England's Hammond took out his frustrations on a callow New Zealand side after the 1932-33 Bodyline tour. He slammed ten sixes, the Test record at the time, and 34 fours in hurtling to 336 not out in 318 minutes, in what was only a three-day game (rain ruined the final day, so it was drawn). Hammond had warmed up with 227 in the first Test, in Christchurch, and finished the series with the handy average of 563.00.

Len Hutton, 364
Back in 1938 there was a general feeling that only Ashes matches really counted as Tests, so there was more fuss when Yorkshire's Hutton passed Bradman's 334 in the final Test at The Oval than when he actually broke his captain Hammond's record of 336. This was a monumental innings in what was another timeless Test: Hutton batted for almost 13 and a half hours, and collected 35 fours from 847 balls. Eddie Paynter - who was out for a duck - described his team-mate's concentration as "fanatical". The Oval pitch was so good and true that Bradman might have reclaimed the record a few days later... but he wasn't able to bat, having broken his ankle in a foothold during a rare bowl. It's said that Hammond only declared (at 903 for 7) when he was assured that Bradman couldn't go in.

Garry Sobers, 365*
Hutton's record stood for nearly 20 years before the great West Indian left-hander Sobers broke it, extending his overdue maiden century into an innings of 365 not out. Pakistan were short of bowling options - Mahmood Hussain broke down with a thigh injury in the first over, and slow left-armer Nasim-ul-Ghani broke his thumb early in the match. Captain AH Kardar had gone into the game with a broken finger, so he was soon left with two fit bowlers (although he did manage to send down 37 overs himself): Fazal Mahmood, who finished with 2 for 247 from 85.2 overs, and Khan Mohammad, who ended up with 0 for 259, still a record for a wicketless innings in a Test. Sobers, 21, took full advantage, gliding to 365 in 614 minutes, with 38 fours. West Indies declared at 790 for 3, and not surprisingly won by an innings. "Pandemonium broke out," announced the Jamaica Gleaner newspaper, when Sobers broke Hutton's record.

Brian Lara, 375
Sobers was there when his record was broken, 36 years later, by another West Indian left-hander. Brian Lara, just short of his 25th birthday, carved England to shreds in Antigua, batting for 766 minutes and hitting no fewer than 45 fours. About the nearest he came to a dismissal was when he almost trod on his stumps in collecting the runs that took him past Sobers' mark - and triggered a parade (and a raised-bat salute) on the ground. "It had to go someday," said Sobers sportingly, "and who better to do it than this guy? No one can bat like him. He does not play with his pad, he plays with his bat."

Garry Sobers and Brian Lara share a laugh , West Indies v England, St John's, Antigua, 3rd day, April 18, 1994
Garry and Brian: record-holders and among cricket's finest batsmen © PA Photos

Matthew Hayden, 380
Big Matt Hayden made a habit of bullying opposing attacks, and few were riper for that than the overmatched Zimbabweans who arrived in Australia late in 2003. In the first Test, in Perth in October, Hayden slammed 380, overshadowing Adam Gilchrist's century in 84 balls on the second day. Hayden blitzed 38 fours and 11 sixes from 437 balls: "At his most destructive, during the 35 minutes and 32 balls it took him to speed from 100 to 150, he was perfectly still in his stance but swift and brutal when he wielded his bat," pronounced Wisden. Zimbabwe succumbed to their expected innings defeat, and Hayden had the record... for six months.

Brian Lara, 400*
The only man to reclaim this record, Lara gave a repeat performance against the same team (England) at the same ground (Antigua) as his 375 ten years previously. The circumstances were different, though: this time West Indies had lost the first three Tests of the series and were staring at an embarrassing whitewash. The chances of that, though, receded far into the distance as, on another supreme St John's batting surface ("the best road in Antigua," according to some), Lara kept going. "He was ridiculously good," wrote Colin Bateman in the Express. But, like the 375, even Test cricket's first quadruple-century couldn't bring victory: the pitch was just too good, and England escaped with a draw. The only man who fielded through both Lara's record innings was Graham Thorpe (while Darrell Hair umpired both games).

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2012.

RSS Feeds: Steven Lynch

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by JG2704 on (April 26, 2012, 17:58 GMT)

@ PROSYNINC on (April 26 2012, 15:30 PM GMT) - maybe do that on a related thread

Posted by PROSYNINC on (April 26, 2012, 15:30 GMT)

i think what need to be done is to set up a system to resolve the who is the greatest by averaging out all batters to a hundred test. for example if sachin play 100 test he would only score 8151 runs with 27 hundreds avg would remain the same. with this he looks ordinary. i think the current schedule allows for players to play more test than in the old days. for example look at Micheal clarke he has played 80 test to date and he is a relative new comer to the game. but i believe that when graham smith is finished playing he would have played more test, have the most hundred and most runs based on his age. but to conclude sachin is a great player but he is just another one of many. he is not the greatest.

Posted by JG2704 on (April 26, 2012, 14:35 GMT)

@ chapathishot on (April 26 2012, 12:20 PM GMT) Boycott was once dropped I believe after scoring big because he was too slow.I think the it's self explanitory why it is the faster scorers who are at the top. Basically for the slower scorers to score 3-400 they'd also need the other batsmen to stay with them for so much longer

Posted by chapathishot on (April 26, 2012, 12:20 GMT)

If you look at the scores seriously ,it is the really aggressive batsmen ,Like Shewag,Lara,Bradman,Hayden etc have made more 300s than players who are more technically perfect like Sachin,Dravid,Boycott etc.I think carefree attitude with skills will only give big scores than cautious approach ,However if we take the mean deviation (Std deviation) players like sachin ,Kallis (took long time to score even 200)dravid and boycotts will score higher than most of the above except Don that is why he is number one all the time

Posted by YorkshirePudding on (April 26, 2012, 6:50 GMT)

A nice article it good to see how the highest score record has been moved, and it seems that the records tend to fall in clusters of scores, 3 records in the 1930's, and the same happened again in between 1994/5 and 2004/5. I dont think that anyone of the current batsmen will break Lara's record unless they get a flat pitch.....you got to love the Sachin Fan-boys putting in a mention for thier man, especially the one asking about how many average more than SRT, well, theres quite a few (qual 30+ innings), Bradman, Pollack, Headley, Sutcliffe, Paynter, Barrington, Weekes, Hammond, Sobers, Hobbs, Kallis, Walcott, and Hutton, who average more than SRT.

Posted by JG2704 on (April 25, 2012, 11:27 GMT)

@anantbio on (April 23 2012, 12:09 PM GMT) You're probably correct , if you give him about 20-30 inns to do so I'm sure he would

Posted by karthik_raja on (April 25, 2012, 8:52 GMT)

@Shan156. Yep Murali said so. Bt, ask Warne. He will give another name. Point is. Lara and Sachin r gems of games. Instead of pushing other down, why cant v hail them both. Indeed they played like "One Man Team" for most of their career.

Posted by Philter_Kaapi on (April 25, 2012, 6:21 GMT)

Actually Sachin was brought in by the first guy just as a joke..its the rest who took it quite seriously :P

Posted by SouthPaw on (April 25, 2012, 2:03 GMT)

all you Sachin fans: This article is called "Top of the Table" and let me explain this to you because going by your comments, you obviously don't understand what it means! This is a list of people who have scored the highest individual score progressively over the years, not a list of "Top batsmen of all Times" or some such thing. So, now go figure if you still want Sachin in it :)

Posted by Keepa-batsman on (April 25, 2012, 1:08 GMT)

sachins average of 55 is exceptional especially as he has played so many test. but he has played 111 of his tests on the pitches that he knows best-sub continent roads. for the zillionth time this is the progressive list of high scores thus explaining why he is not on the list, unless his highest score of 248* against BANGLADESH was made before 1902 then he can't be on the list.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Steven LynchClose
Steven Lynch Steven Lynch won the Wisden Cricket Monthly Christmas Quiz three years running before the then-editor said "I can't let you win it again, but would you like a job?" That lasted for 15 years, before he moved across to the Wisden website when that was set up in 2000. Following the merger of the two sites early in 2003 he was appointed as the global editor of Wisden Cricinfo. In June 2005 he became the deputy editor of Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. He continues to contribute the popular weekly "Ask Steven" question-and-answer column on ESPNcricinfo, and edits the Wisden Guide to International Cricket.

Late highs fail to mask wretched year

2014 in review: Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, 2014 was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh

    Enough with the on-field chatter

Ian Chappell: One of these days there's going to be an ugly altercation between players on the field

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Could McCullum win the Nobel Peace Prize?

The Beige Brigade salivate over B Mac's incredible feats and sixes, and the deliciousness that is Hagley Park

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Rudderless Shami proves too costly

Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days