Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Quicks throw open the tournament

The surprisingly positive response of the Sri Lankan pitches to fast bowling has given nearly every top team a chance at the World Twenty20

Ian Chappell

September 23, 2012

Comments: 42 | Text size: A | A

Dale Steyn had Samit Patel caught behind, England v South Africa, 5th NatWest ODI, Trent Bridge, September, 5, 2012
South Africa's bowling combination is perfect to win them this World Twenty20, but only if the players keep their heads © PA Photos

The first week of the World Twenty20 has resembled a couple of young lovers on a getting-to-know-you date - a lot of foreplay but not much action. Despite this, two points have been clearly made: the ICC has to rethink it's "minnow match" strategy, and fast bowlers are going to play a bigger part in deciding the champion than was originally thought.

The ICC regularly works on clearing the minnows early, but it makes for a slow start to any tournament. It doesn't send the message to the viewing public that this tournament is a vibrant and competitive affair. It's okay to open the tournament with the hosts playing a minnow - the last thing you want is the locals feeling their team is on the way to a quick exit - but the ICC needs to programme at least a couple of marquee match-ups in the first half a dozen games. It has taken a few days for the tournament to gain a feel of anything but a series of lopsided matches.

The pitches at the Premadasa and in Pallekele have shown some life and bounce, suggesting this won't just become a battle of the teams that bowl and play spin best. The good spinners will definitely play a role, but it's more likely to be complementary rather than starring.

This is not necessarily good news for India, who are struggling to unearth quality quick bowlers. They still have an explosive batting line-up that can destroy anything less than the best bowling, but how they cope with short-pitched deliveries is more likely to determine their progress in the tournament. The former top-class West Indies fast bowler Andy Roberts once summed up the destructive powers of their four quicks by saying: "Whatever the opposition bowl us out for, we'll bowl them out for less." India might have to adopt the opposite approach in this tournament: "No matter how many runs the opposition make, we'll score more."

For South Africa, who have retained two prongs of their menacing three-headed Test pace attack, the sight of bouncy pitches must be as welcome as the first glint of gold in a Transvaal mining shaft. Add Jacques Kallis, who is another pace option, and the cagey spin of Johan Botha and Robin Peterson, plus an aggressive batting line-up, and you have the recipe for attaining precious silverware.

But this is South Africa, the team that misread a Duckworth-Lewis target sheet, the team that forgot to run when a simple single would have got them into a Cup final, the team that seems to lose any match where the word "final" closely follows either "quarter" or "semi". South Africa now have a big chance to erase all those forlorn memories. However, they'll have to do it in a country where the tourist attraction of leopard sightings hasn't yet unearthed one without the familiar spots.

England are another side that will have welcomed the sight of bounce in the pitches. They have some quality pace bowlers and a high-class spinner, and it's just a matter of whether they score enough runs post-Kevin Pietersen to stretch the other contenders.

Australia will also have heaved a sigh of relief after an outing at the Premadasa. Their struggles when facing deceptive spin bowling have been well documented, but these are less likely to be exposed in the prevailing conditions. Nevertheless, they are handicapping themselves as long as they don't include the ultra-aggressive David Hussey in the batting line-up.

West Indies are a highly dangerous combination. Their batting is as explosive as a triggered landmine, and Sunil Narine's spin bowling provides wicket-taking opportunities. In the end they may rue not including the pace-bowling aggression of Kemar Roach on these pitches.

And Pakistan can't be discounted with the destructive pace-spin combination of Umar Gul and Saeed Ajmal, but their batting is probably too inconsistent to consistently provide enough runs.

It's shaping up to be one of the most open and intriguing prestige tournaments the ICC has held. It's just a pity it took so long to reach anything resembling a climax.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by kharidra on (September 26, 2012, 13:19 GMT)

As a keen student of the gameChappelli - your Views and Contributions to the game have been immense - Many Happy Returns of the day (Sep-26-2012).

Posted by vimalkm on (September 26, 2012, 11:02 GMT)

Ok been a while since i sent a comment here.

The reason why cricket is exiting and countries that play well away from there country is regarded as a good team is cause of varying condition's. I do not understand why pitch should bounce in SL and not spin? Its every time there is a tournament in sub continent this topic comes up! how come you don't hear this when playing in Aus or Eng? I am not saying Eng should have turners jus that THIS is what makes cricket good ... different conditions and home advantage.

Posted by   on (September 26, 2012, 0:32 GMT)

The T20 format is so unpredictable against the top teams. Look at England's drubbing against India, and 2 days before India nearly had a scare against the Afghans. On the day a T20 depends on which player has the "luck" of playing better than they did...say 2 days ago ( Gautam )

On paper, India should win the T20 but like I said again, it depends which player can do a remarkable change that takes the game away from the opposition. EXAMPLE, Jos Bulter's day or even Chawla's.

I fancy Australia to win the T20 because the Big Bash has helped them understand the game a lot better than the Indian's who's blowers tend to just leak runs thinking they'll be ok because they have posted a total of 190

Posted by KarachiKid on (September 25, 2012, 12:59 GMT)

Fully agree with his assessment of Pakistani batting line up. In fact he is being a bit nice. It down right pathetic.

Posted by Udendra on (September 25, 2012, 4:44 GMT)

By preparing seamer-friendly pitches, SLC has taken away the 'home' advantage of Sri Lanka and other sub-continent teams. But do we get turning wickets in ENG or AUS or SA?

Posted by Meety on (September 25, 2012, 3:01 GMT)

@Shashi Punchihewa - SHOULD SL prepare more bouncier & faster pitches, I would expect SL's overseas record to improve EVERYWHERE, not just in Oz. Looking forward to the SL series coming up Kumar Sangakkarra is my favourite non-ozzy cricketer. @anton1234 on (September 24 2012, 02:32 AM GMT) - at the moment it technically is 15 overs a day. They just don't enforce it that often. Over rates are under a bit of pressure due to UDRS reviews.

Posted by   on (September 24, 2012, 20:30 GMT)

Mr Chappell, I'm surprised the word you used "surprisingly". It is a out come of our cricketing planes(pitches). in future you may see SL thrashing AUSSIES in their home soil. Looking foward to the SL tour of Australia. Be ready to have it in your home country.

Posted by Thamara on (September 24, 2012, 19:08 GMT)

You may have written this article before England vs India game started. But I have to say that England looked terribly bad against spinners. Their yougsters may not have played spinners as good as Harbajan singh and Piyush Chawla in county games. I also think that South Africa is the strongest team in the competition. But we should not write australia off because they know how to win tournaments. Although India bowled well against inexperienced england batting line-up, I still think that Indian bowling attack is not very strong. They haven't been tested yet against a good team. Their fast bowlers look average to me. Other most competiive team in this tournament is west indies which is full of big hitters. WI batting line-up can tear apart any bowling line-up in the tournament. If they play to their potential, nobody can stop them from winning this world cup. And their bowling is not bad either. With the inclusion of Fidel Edwards, WI bowling looks strong.

Posted by baggar on (September 24, 2012, 17:50 GMT)

Do not write off WI ...... and proven best performer of T20 Pakistan .....

Posted by Selassie-I on (September 24, 2012, 15:57 GMT)

Not the first time I've seen a Chappell article be immidiatley disproved (By the Eng/India game). There is a bit of bouce and movement but spin will still be king and it will become more prominent throughout the tournament. @Jonsey2 - have you ever seen Philander bowl? he's pretty good mate, i've seen him in the flesh from behind his arm. Morne is good but has always been inconsistent, but he may well have matured to have that consstency after bowling well all summer. I remember Jim Anderson never looked like he was going to get in the team fully many years ago and he's matured into one of the most accurate and dangerous bowlers in the world now.

Posted by jonesy2 on (September 24, 2012, 9:57 GMT)

even chappell overrates the south african bowlers. after steyn there is nothing, as much as i like the morkel boys

Posted by S.h.a.d.a.b on (September 24, 2012, 9:12 GMT)

one match performance is not a performance indicator. champion has to win few more matches. pitches r unpredictible and i hope the most unpredictible team will win.

Posted by kharidra on (September 24, 2012, 5:00 GMT)

If Bounce swing pace impact any team in general these have impacted all teams. There are some players who have shown that these factors impact them in the longer versions of the game but no so much in the shortest form of the game. In fact these factors have also contributed to providing additional runs in the form of wides, no balls, byes, leg byes.... On the other hand spin cannot be discounted and the spinners have reveled in much the similar conditions. No sooner did this print appear than the performance of the spinners came to the fore that very evening, and a discarded world class spinners performance came into limelight.

Posted by BG4cricket on (September 24, 2012, 2:50 GMT)

Great article from Chappelli and couldn't agree more. Interesting the imbalance in the groups based on form - one pool will be AUS, PAK, IND & SA which looks very tough, and then ENG, WI, NZ & SL. For mine SA and AUS/IND progress while in the other WI and ENG/NZ/SL

Posted by anton1234 on (September 24, 2012, 2:32 GMT)

I would like to see bowlers show more urgency in getting back to their mark after a delivery. The leisurely way they get back to their mark is not on. They have to show enthusiasm, if not, why should fans in supporting the game? CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL THE ICC TO INCREASE THE OVER RATE TO A MINIMUM 15 OVERS AN HOUR. The turnaround between deliveries has to be speeded up. There has to be a greater flow to the game.

Posted by CKfrombrisbane on (September 24, 2012, 1:43 GMT)

Hah... Have you ever seen SA won a tournament? They can't play in a pressured situation. Everybody knows it.

Posted by Meety on (September 24, 2012, 0:48 GMT)

Cannot believe the WIndies didn't select Roach - massive blunder IMO.

Posted by   on (September 23, 2012, 20:09 GMT)

Any good bowling attach can destroy any batting side and any good batting side can destroy any bowling attack on their given days - this is how t20 cricket works. The team who wins this cup will be the one who could hold their nerves under pressure situations and come out to be on top!

Posted by mav_nitb on (September 23, 2012, 18:36 GMT)

Today's performance by England , even taking their chronic disability against spin over the years into the account, tells a far different story. Especially against a much weaker touted Indian bowling side.

Posted by tuluguroshan on (September 23, 2012, 17:35 GMT)

hi sidvs ...i think u have not watched the todays match..if u watched it u will not say than india is a weaker team///or indias bowling is weak..how can be a team is weaker when it beats a defending champions by 90 runs and bowl them out with in 15 overs.india is the much stronger team when compared to the original full squad of eng..remember today eng have played their full squal and india going to play with out their frontline bowlers-aswin,zak and their all time opener shewag....>>>>

Posted by   on (September 23, 2012, 16:31 GMT)

How come kemar Roach is not there!WI. dont know even what their strenth is!

Posted by Ind_Rsa on (September 23, 2012, 15:42 GMT)

My t20 11:gayle,watson,kohli,AB,m.hussey,MS,Albie,steyn,s.naraine,ajmal,malinga.Can you come with a better one?

Posted by Ind_Rsa on (September 23, 2012, 15:31 GMT)

Group of death:ind,Rsa,aus and pak in same group.Hope ind and rsa qualifies for semis.

Posted by Uruloki on (September 23, 2012, 13:54 GMT)

@travis thomas: mate, u need to have a good look at MSD's T20I record. He has a strike rate of 109, lower than any other Indian batsman. and MS D particularly is highly consistent and destructive??? the guy doesn't even have a 50!!!

The only thing he is consistent is in coming up the order ahead of better batsmen hen the team is in a good position!!!

Posted by sidvs on (September 23, 2012, 13:32 GMT)

I can say one thing for sure looking at these pitches...India isnt going to win, we would have to bat out of our skin to reach the semis with such a pathetic bowling attack. lol :)

Posted by abdulashikkhan.m on (September 23, 2012, 13:10 GMT)

@ Travis Thomas.. AUSSIE bowling conceds 191 runs. PAK bowling gives away 186 against INDIA. WI bowling smashed to all parks, 100 in 9 ovrs. SL bowling carted by AB. So called heavy weight bowling line ups struggling & still they say INDIA has weak & fragile bowling attack. LOL to them.

Posted by electric_loco_WAP4 on (September 23, 2012, 13:06 GMT)

Wow,this can't at all be good news for teams likely to run into the Aussies later in the comp.One can only imagine what damage the electrifying young pace attack (easily the best set of young pacemen in the world going atm) of Aus are going to cause especially at the business end.Add to that the ominously broad looking bat of Shane Watson and the sheer class of the Hussey bros,Aus are the one side the other sides will most look to avoid as possible.With Davy Warner looking threatening without really going on to the big scores and due for something very soon,the signs are ominous as far the other teams are concerned.Only thing for Aus is to drop non-entity Bailey and get in Dave Huss in to the middle order and also the captaincy so as cut out the one major Achilees heel of the Aussies the others sides were looking at.Sadly the Poms have a problem too many mediocre and hopeless passengers to be a real threat any more than super8s ain,t it?

Posted by shaantanu on (September 23, 2012, 9:58 GMT)

In a T20 tournament its easier to predict who wouldnt win than who would.....its easy to predict that Ireland,Afganistan,Zimbabwe,Bangladesh wouldnt win.From the rest anybody can be a winner though India is least likely to do so......Its all abt momentum and the body language of the players.n body language of the Indians are pretty negative at the moment.

Posted by skkh on (September 23, 2012, 9:43 GMT)

"Himad"..mate did you get to read the same article that I did? I wouldn't know why the cricketing world loves to spew hate on us Australians, but honestly I do not care.

Posted by   on (September 23, 2012, 9:15 GMT)

Yes,agreed will Chappell, but may be the wickets will slow down towards the super 8 stage of the tournament. And the spinning giants may take the advantage,or may be the weather will have the last laugh, who knows... But with 2 finals and a almost final reaching team performance and with the most caps in T20 internationals,Pakistan seem to be the favourites apart from the destructive W Indies.

Posted by India.is.best on (September 23, 2012, 9:11 GMT)

Guys how could you forget the south african pitches, they are more bouncy then srilankan's. wait n watch Indian team definitely going to win this cup again.

Posted by BrisVegan on (September 23, 2012, 8:33 GMT)

@Himad Yes.. of course.. when Ian writes "It's shaping up to be one of the most open and intriguing prestige tournaments" he MUST be implying that Australia will win. Comprehension fail.

Posted by   on (September 23, 2012, 8:30 GMT)

@shaantanu, you're spot on in saying India is one of the more boring teams, with a toothless attack, but their batting is highly dangerous. In Kholi and MS Dhoni, they have two performers who can finish a game in 5 overs, and MS D particularly is highly consistent and destructive. Recently, Murali labelled him as one of the main players to watch out for. Add the other batters and Pathan, and you never know ....

Posted by Chris_P on (September 23, 2012, 8:28 GMT)

@Himad. Really? He is trying to suggest that? So all the other teams he mentioned, you either chose to ignore or they just don't exist? Interesting take on this excellent column.

Posted by Sinhabahu on (September 23, 2012, 7:40 GMT)

It's good that Sri Lankan pitches are starting to get some bounce and bite. That'll provide for far more competitive cricket than any highways.

Posted by shaantanu on (September 23, 2012, 7:21 GMT)

What makes a cricket match interesting is a good balance between bat n ball.stumps being rattled by a fast bowler is as great to watch as a batsman hit the ball for a resounding six......in my opinion India is probably the most boring team among the top teams mainly because their bowling is so one dimensional......it goes without saying i m a frustrated indin supporter

Posted by   on (September 23, 2012, 6:29 GMT)

"The surprisingly positive response of the Sri Lankan pitches to fast bowling has given nearly every top team a chance at the World Twenty20". This of course does not apply to India.

Posted by   on (September 23, 2012, 6:24 GMT)

I agree sir, it indeed is that way, too many one sided affairs.

Posted by urprashant on (September 23, 2012, 5:20 GMT)

As always Ian is spot on! No Asian country will be able to win this world cup, Thanks to Sri Lanka! There is something called 'Home Advantage', which it seems Sri Lankans have forgotten completely.Australia, England, South Africa,New Zealand will never ever provide Asian teams with spinning tracks but Sri Lankans have really big hearts and they are providing these teams exactly what they dream of, even if they will loose the chance to win the World Cup themselves!!!!

Posted by youfoundme on (September 23, 2012, 4:12 GMT)

I'm looking forward to New Zealand winning the final, just so I can have a quiet snicker to myself about all the "columnists" and critics that have failed to acknowledge them as a chance.

Posted by Himad on (September 23, 2012, 3:53 GMT)

What Ian is trying to suggest here is that Australia is going to be the champs. This guy never stops to make me laugh.

Posted by Biggus on (September 23, 2012, 3:22 GMT)

The Sri Lankan pitches have been excellent, and their board and curators deserve to be congratulated on delivering pitches so well suited to the format. If these new pitches can last five days they'd work well for tests as well, and of course would encourage the development of pace bowling there. Positive steps for SL, well done.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

    'We did not drop a single catch in 1971'

Couch Talk: Former India captain Ajit Wadekar recalls the dream tours of West Indies and England, and coaching India

Sachin to bat for life, Lara for the joy of batting

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss the impact of Lara's batting

    Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Ricky Ponting: Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane

    Why punish the WI players when the administration is to blame?

Michael Holding: As ever, the WICB has refused to recognise its own incompetence

What cricket can take from darts

Jon Hotten: It's simple, it's TV-friendly and it has a promoter who can tailor the product for its audience

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

India's attack: rare intensity before regular inanity

For the first hour on day three, despite the heat and the largely unhelpful pitch, India's fast bowlers showed a level of intensity and penetration rarely seen from them; in the second hour, things mostly reverted to type

News | Features Last 7 days