Reviews ReviewsRSS FeedFeeds

Cricket Cauldron

Notes from a Pakistani golden age

Shahryar Khan's memoir recalls the Inzamam-Woolmer heyday, and the nadir of the Oval, 2006

Tim Wigmore

June 29, 2013

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

The cover image of <i>Cricket Cauldron: the turbulent politics of sport in Pakistan</I>
Enlarge
Related Links

There's no shortage of people who have analysed the problems of Pakistan's cricket from afar. Inevitably this lends itself to half-truths, stereotypes and generalisations. Aided by his three years as chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board, Shaharyar Khan avoids these traps.

As a former foreign secretary, Shaharyar was well placed to straddle the meshing of sport and politics that characterises cricket in Pakistan. Most of his three-year reign was successful: he restored cricketing ties with India and organised the Friendship Tour of 2004, recruited Bob Woolmer as coach, and presided over a stirring on-field rejuvenation. But Shaharyar's tenure was marred at the end by the debacle of the Oval Test of 2006.

Shaharyar was desperate to avoid the forfeiture. Indeed, he was instrumental in convincing the Pakistan side to return to the field after tea, only for the umpires to leave the field just as the players were taking their first steps.

While the match referee, Mike Procter, is described as "passive and weak", the obstinate Darrell Hair is Shaharyar's villain: given his history of altercations with Pakistan, he was a "time bomb". There is nothing surprising in that, although Shaharyar's criticism of the ICC is astute. Why was Hair given four Pakistan series in 18 months, when the ICC had taken a very different attitude in the wake of Sri Lanka's complaints about him, at one stage giving him no Sri Lankan series for eight years? And what of Steve Bucknor being removed by the ICC after wrongly giving Sachin Tendulkar out? Shaharyar's contention that some ICC members are more equal than others seems hard to dispute.

Inzamam-ul-Haq also comes under heavy scrutiny. His reluctance to play in the ODIs following the Oval Test is put down to "base instincts and crass stupidity". Inzamam's stubbornness amounted to "player power at its worst with a leader who seemed to be guided by a self-destructive urge", Shaharyar writes.

Inzamam is criticised for his "excessive religiosity" as captain. During his reign, no answer from a player would be complete without an "inshallah"; several players grew traditionally Islamic beards; and prayers seemed the main facet of team bonding. While Shaharyar concludes that the benefits to team unity outweighed the difficulties, we hear of Woolmer at one point complaining about "the constant and lengthy prayer sessions that the team held, which gave him no time to strategise or advise the players". And, as Shaharyar observes, there seemed a particularly noticeable increase in the religiosity of fringe players keen to win Inzamam's favour.

Since Inzamam's resignation, ostentatious religion has faded from view in the Pakistan side, returning to the "middle Pakistan" attitudes of before. This bears out Shaharyar's central thesis: that Pakistan's cricket team reflects its wider politics and society: "Its lack of accountability [is] evident, as are its insecurities and patronage structures." Perhaps nowhere does the point hold truer than in regard to corruption, with Shaharyar contending that a lack of strong role models in the side has allowed it to linger. Few, sadly, would dispute his view of the spot-fixing scandal of 2010 as being only the tip of the iceberg.

Unfortunately the book occasionally slips from insightful, providing largely redundant summaries of matches. "Sehwag, Laxman and Ganguly played steady knocks and Yuvraj seemed to take the game away from Pakistan with a quick-fire 78, leading to a respectable total of 292" is padding of the most banal sort. This is a book that would have benefited from sharper editing, as the factual inaccuracies highlight: Pakistan won the World Cup in 1992, not 1996, while the World Test Championship did not take place this year.

Shaharyar himself emerges as a sympathetic figure who is outward-looking and rides above the factionalism cricket boards are so prone to. If there is a hero of his book it is his friend Woolmer, who Shaharyar appointed to replace Javed Miandad, despite considerable opposition. He writes that Woolmer "proved that with a sensitive approach, a foreign coach could overcome the cultural and language gap".

Like Woolmer, Shaharyar has a grasp of the wider good cricket can do. He was instrumental in Mohammad Ali Jinnah's daughter returning to Pakistan for the first time since her father's death to watch the series against India in 2004, and writes of an "extremely warm and gracious" foreign leader netting with local schoolchildren - George W Bush.

Shaharyar also has interesting ideas for the future of cricket in Pakistan. His suggestion of building five-star hotels on Test grounds (so negating the need for daily travel to the stadiums) is relevant to the country's hopes of hosting internationals once more.

Seven years after Shaharyar's resignation, it remains unclear whether his aim - "to change the PCB from being a dictatorial one-man show to an institution with a corporate structure" - has been realised. But it was no coincidence that his reign coincided with perhaps the most successful period in Pakistan cricket since the days of Imran Khan.

The game needs more independent-minded cricket administrators capable of looking beyond the next pay cheque: a lesson that extends way beyond Pakistan cricket.

Cricket Cauldron: the turbulent politics of sport in Pakistan
by Shaharyar M Khan and Ali Khan
I.B. Tauris
320 pages, $26.96

RSS Feeds: Tim Wigmore

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 2, 2013, 6:18 GMT)

For successful team pak needs mix of talent as well as experienced and young talented players otherwise its not going to be good experience more importantly needs to see if there;s already talent being ignored for example Abdul Razzaq , Azhar Mahmood and so forth these are Good All-rounders and can easily play till WC2015 and young players can learn very much from these tested and proved performing players on any day. Dream Team in current crises would be in the playing batting order : 1)Afridi 2) Umar Amin 3) Fawad Alam 4) Mohammad Yusuf 5) Misbah 6) Abdul Razzaq (Captain) 7) Sarfraz/Umar 8) Hammad Azam 9)Sohail Tanvir 10)Saeed Ajmal 11) Mohammad Irfan

Player;s Part of the Squad Should be : Sharjeel Khan , Nasir Jamshed, Asad, Wahab , Junaid, Ahmed Shahzad , Mohammad Hafeez , Azhar Mehmood, Younis Khan , Gul ,Azhar Ali

This is called TEAM Selection , there's full of batting talent in this squad/team just the selection is done wrong otherwise no lack of talent there.

Posted by   on (June 30, 2013, 20:25 GMT)

I think now we have shortage of Aggressive Players. Caption should be aggressive. cricket is getting fast and faster. No need to stay cool.

Posted by US_Indian on (June 29, 2013, 15:47 GMT)

There is a lot of natural talent available even role models in Pakistan but the talent is not nurtured properly. Everyone wants to be a fast bowler and modeling themselves on so many greats who represented Pakistan as their role models which is fine too and I believe there is some glamour attached to it too. At the same time Pakistan had some of the best batsmen as well without me going too far, there was Majid Khan, Zaheer abbas, javed then Ramiz and salim malik( just ignore his fixing stuff but he was best next to Javed in terms of batting in crisis), then we had saeed anwar, aamer sohail, inzy, yousuf yohana(mohd yousuf), younus khan no one really look to them as role models. But I have no clue why they donot do so,I remember once Zaheer was asked why did he help Azharuddeen and why not any other Pakistani player, he said no one asked his help and I am ready to pass on my knowledge to anyone. the first and foremost issue is Ego, factional prejudice and illiteracy(no need for PHD's

Posted by   on (June 29, 2013, 14:02 GMT)

what an era that was.

Posted by   on (June 29, 2013, 11:29 GMT)

this was not pakistans most succesfull period since imrwns era. the late ninties and early 2000s was definatly a good period under wasims captaincy. it was probably pakistans best team ever. they got to 99 final they won the asian test championships and won countless odi tounaments like sharjah cup and pepsi cup etc. i think in that period saeed anwar was the best batsmen in the world.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tim WigmoreClose

    The man who pulled New Zealand from the precipice

Brendon McCullum's runs and leadership have rescued New Zealand cricket from its lowest ebb. By Andrew Alderson

'In front or behind the stumps, he was out there for a battle'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Adam Gilchrist's temperament

Glovemen apart

From eccentrics to game changers and now to leaders, where will - or won't - wicketkeepers go next? By Jon Hotten
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

    A rock, a hard place and the WICB

Tony Cozier: The board must deal with the striking players practically if it wants any resolution to the embarrassing crisis

Flirtations with Jesse

Beige Brigade: The boys discuss if Ryder can stay good for the summer, the West Indies pullout, and the Alternative Cricket Commentary's return

News | Features Last 7 days

The insecure kid who never grew up

Kevin Pietersen missed the point of life in the second half of his career, failed to show maturity, and has regressed to being the bitter youngster who left Natal years ago

India's other keeper stumped again

Throughout his career, Wriddhiman Saha has suffered from being in the same generation as MS Dhoni. However, those close to the player believe that Saha has never been one to take rejection personally

Kohli back to old habits

Stats highlights from the fourth ODI between India and West Indies in Dharamsala

A rock, a hard place and the WICB

The board's latest standoff with its players has had embarrassing consequences internationally, so any resolution now needs to be approached thoughtfully

Highest ODI averages, and Leap Year babies

Also, fewest boundaries in a T20 innings, most runs in a Test, England's international record-holder, and a pest named Fruitfly

News | Features Last 7 days