Rob Steen
Rob Steen Rob SteenRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton

The icing on the season's cake

Test cricket is in roaring health and there has been no proof more ringing than the enthralling South Africa v Australia series

Rob Steen

March 5, 2014

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A

David Warner: walks it like he talks it © Getty Images

How wondrous that all the best news the old game has given us lately - bar the cockle-grilling rise of Afghanistan - has surrounded its most anachronistic and least popular incarnation. First there was the decision to allow the Associates to challenge for Test status - for which the ICC, however justly we rail against its inadequacies, deserves our thanks and mazeltovs. Then came Brendon McCullum's astounding heroics against India, affirming New Zealand's improbable renaissance. Now we have one of the most hypnotic series in recent memory to savour.

From Centurion to Cape Town via Port Elizabeth it has propelled us, from one breath-snatching inner duel to the next. All that thrusting and parrying and plotting and scheming lost little by comparison with the concurrent big attraction on Netflix, the American rendition of that political thriller supreme, House of Cards; for savagery and icy ruthlessness, His Mitchness has been Kevin Spacey's equal, as Dale Steyn's skull will testify. Shoving Graeme Smith into retirement, moreover, was a coup to match Kevin's ejection of the US president.

So enthralling has all this Afro-Australian blood-and-thundering been, it is tempting to wonder whether we were too swift to condemn the recent Ashes double header as the inevitable price of gluttony. Granted, once competitiveness has dissolved, quantity only serves to heighten disappointment, yet had this latest square-off spanned five Tests instead of that paltry ration of three, it still wouldn't have been enough to sate the connoisseur.

If I ruled the world, every day would be the first day of spring, and Australia and South Africa would go at it every week. More than India v Pakistan, more than the Ashes, this is the contest that habitually does most to stimulate the neck hairs. Since South Africa's readmission, nine of the 13 series have been shared or decided by a single win.

Over those 39 Tests, mind, no one can deny where the edge lies. While Australia have twice strung together streaks of five wins and one of three, only twice have South Africa won two on the bounce; not once have they managed three. At the end of the Port Elizabeth Test, Australia led with 20 wins to South Africa's 10, yet the past five series underline how keenly matched the teams have become: in the 11 games prior to Newlands, Australia lead 5-4, with two stalemates. In defiance of the wider trend, furthermore, only three times in the previous 12 series had the hosts prevailed, and not once in the last five.

Out of form by a distance, Australia's captain soldiered on to stumps, by when his body looked as if it had gone ten rounds with at least one Klitschko

Within those surprising subversions of the norm lay abrupt power shifts between fixtures, even sessions. True, there had only been seven draws and not too many close finishes - three victories by two wickets, one by four, one by five; aside from Sydney 1994 (5 runs) the smallest run margin has been 103.

The roller coaster ride began at the Adelaide Oval in 1994, when Australia recovered from that stunning reversal at the SCG to share the series. In 2011 they revived from an eight-wicket loss in the first Test to sneak the second by two wickets, squaring that rubber.

South Africa, though, have been even quicker to turn their fortunes around. In Port Elizabeth they took nine wickets in a session and levelled the series; hustled out for 225 on day one in the decisive third Test in Perth 15 months ago, they rebounded to eject Australia for 163 next day, then muscled their way to 230 for 2 by stumps at six an over; on an even more extraordinary day at Newlands a year earlier, they lost their last nine wickets for 47, subsiding for 96 to trail by 188, then steamrollered Australia for 47 to set up another success. Signs of congested times or a tribute to extreme competitiveness and mutual loathing? Probably all three.

No one, therefore, should have been taken aback by Australia's fightback this week. For one thing, the three previous Tests against these opponents had seen them lurch from a 309-run drubbing to a 281-run romp then back to a 231-run swoon. For another, no national side appears to exert such a mental grip as Australia do over South Africa. Nothing proclaims this louder than David Warner's belligerent overture on Saturday and Michael Clarke's ensuing masterclass in grit and polish. Fighter and boxer; pounder and jabber. If His Mitchness is Australia's Mike Tyson, it hardly hurts having Joe Frazier and Muhammad Ali on tap as well.

Warner walks it like he talks it - and he never minds walking on the wild side. In 16 innings since the start of the Ashes, he has made 1066 runs at 71.06; all three of his centuries prior to the current match paved the way for victory, so the pattern is plain; even more remarkably, in six of the eight knocks in that time where his strike rate has been better than 80 he has thrashed 66, 70 and four hundreds. If the need to adapt is clear (he averages just over 25 in his limited engagements beyond Australasia and Africa) his value on pitches offering pace and bounce is galvanic. If he's not the new Sehwag (not yet), the new Roy Fredericks is ample to be getting on with. Fortune favours the fearless.

Equally - but no more - critical was Clarke's refusal to buckle under Morne Morkel's barrage. Out of form by a distance, heartened by Dale Steyn's rebellious hamstring, only to discover that the extra responsibility aroused the nastiest from the rangy hurler from Vereeniging, Australia's captain soldiered on to stumps, by when his body looked as if it had gone ten rounds with at least one Klitschko. Next morning he faced down another immense threat as Kyle Abbott offered nothing but line, length and McGrath-ian rigour, but he came through that too, then loosened up and flourished with that supple elegance few can even countenance. Patience can seldom have been so virtuous.

If it wasn't quite up there with Steve Waugh's double-ton at Sabina Park in 1995 - Ambrose, Walsh and the Benjamins were an even more intimidating combination - it was a similar case of mind defeating matter. Nor do the parallels stop there. In Port-of-Spain a week earlier, Australia, 1-0 up in the four-match series, had been pulverised by nine wickets, Curtly and Courtney sharing 15 scalps as neither side passed 136. What came naturally to Waugh, though, was a huge stretch for Clarke. While one can hardly accuse him of being a dilettante, never has this stylist oozed such substance.

Fanie de Villiers rides on Hansie Cronje's shoulders, Australia v South Africa, second Test, Sydney 1994
Fanie de Villiers after South Africa's stunning five-run win in Sydney in 1994 © Getty Images

Will Clarke's obduracy bring about the downfall of the Smith empire as Waugh brought down its Caribbean counterpart? Despite Smith's own sudden exit, one doubts it. The rich promise of Abbott and Quinton de Kock, JP Duminy's resurgence and the growing assurance of Dean Elgar and Faf du Plessis suggest that the biggest headache - beyond that perennial lack of quality spin - will be unearthing a solid opening duo.

But this is no time to peer ahead: let's pause, relish and wallow. How apt that this Newlands affair should offer such a vigorous climax to a fascinating and, yes, heartening 2013-14 Test season. As scarce as close contests have been (only three decided by less than 150 runs or seven wickets), the 27 previous matches have seen four defeats converted into victory in the very next assignment; now a fifth is in store. To date, only one of the season's ten completed series has been won by the tourists - Sri Lanka in Bangladesh - but there have been five individual away wins and seven draws: in other words, home sides, victors less than 56% of the time (with power to subtract), have been no more omnipotent than they are in domestic sporting leagues worldwide.

Underneath lay those yapping underdogs. For the first time since 2001, Zimbabwe beat someone other than Bangladesh; New Zealand outwitted India; Bangladesh amassed six times as many hundreds as England; only Australia exceeded New Zealand's dozen tons and 119 wickets. Nobody, not even Clarke, batted as magnificently as McCullum did in Auckland last month. No less encouragingly, the team of the season has been the most enterprising one.

And the best saved itself for last. Here, as South Africa have lunged and Australia countered, has been cricket at its most thrilling, albeit spin-free, with bowlers asking the most searching questions and batsmen less reliant on regulations than resolve. Cricket in a tux, bow-tie and topper, cane in hand, dagger in pocket: Bryan Ferry as Dracula. Utterly comfortable in its own skin, swaggeringly assured of its innate superiority, the whiff of menace constant.

Yet still, unaccountably, these intense, riveting debates lack a trophy to commemorate the passion expended. No Wisden, Worrell, D'Oliveira or Pataudi, much less a sanctified urn. Why not a pot honouring the two most prolific alumni, Shane Warne (130 wickets) and Jacques Kallis (1978 runs, 50 wickets)? Or even Australia's favourite South African, Tony Greig?

In the interests of truth and reconciliation, however, the distant past must be our guide. As a salute to the South African who suffered most cruelly for the colour of his skin, let's hear it for the Krom Hendricks Trophy.

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton. His latest book is Floodlights and Touchlines: A History of Spectator Sport

RSS Feeds: Rob Steen

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by android_user on (March 11, 2014, 7:09 GMT)

Mark, I'm not sure what planet you live on, but it sounds like a horrible place.

Posted by mamboman on (March 6, 2014, 20:19 GMT)

The series was magnificent. For all the damage don to cricket by teams running up joke records against the likes of Bangladesh, here we had the true nub, the true value of the test match.

Posted by Speng on (March 6, 2014, 18:22 GMT)

It's been a good antipodean summer for test cricket but the upcoming northern summer is barren with only 7 tests scheduled all of which are in England. The Poms are currently in the West Indies but will play less than 5 days cricket... Test cricket is in great shape when Eng, Aus, SA, India are involved especially when one's playing another but outside the Big 4 it is lean times indeed.

Posted by Prodger on (March 6, 2014, 12:31 GMT)

Stunning series, I hope the crowd figures reflected this. So many great players over the years could be recognised with a commemorative trophy, let me put forward the name of Eddie Gilbert to go alongside Krom Hendricks

Posted by vallavarayar on (March 6, 2014, 7:27 GMT)

Test cricket is best cricket. Thankfully, the BCCI doesn't rule it yet. Thereby, allowing it to survive.

Posted by ab_cricket on (March 6, 2014, 5:58 GMT)

In all profession people work to get achievements and recognition. Achievement can be measured in terms of money but recognition is one thing that comes from excellence. No matter what you achieve in T20 cricket, after a cricketer retires a test match excellence would be of more value than a T20 specialist. This can be seen among Indian cricketers as well, where people and administrators feel that T20 is the most exciting form of cricket but good cricketers look beyond money and want to get recognized as a good player especially in Tests. I can bet that if you ask Pathan/ Raina/ D. Hussey/ Cameron White etc who are T20 specialist to be a regular in Tests, they would never miss that opportunity. That is why Test Cricket will have a longer life than expected by some here.

Posted by Biggus on (March 6, 2014, 5:52 GMT)

@harshthakor:- They're not the Springboks any more, a moniker which is redolent of the apartheid era, but the Proteas mate, and we should be sensitive to the bad connotations that the Springbok name holds for so many South Africans by not using that term. It's inaccurate and insensitive to use it.

Posted by harshthakor on (March 6, 2014, 4:23 GMT)

The best test cricket in the last 2 decades in test cricket has been played by these 2 sides.Who can forget the 2 drawn series in 1993-94 ,the2 series decided by a margin of only one test in 1996-97 and again in 2008-2009.It is ironic that in just the space of 3-4 months the kangaroos reversed the result on the Springboks in 2009 in South Africa.The gap of playing series at home and away was so short in 1994 and 2009 that it was more like a combined test series played at home and away.The 2011 two test series to me was one of cricket's most enthralling battles of all time,particularly the 2nd test.

Above all the 2 teams have ressurected the dying spirit of test cricket reminding us of pat rivalry between teams like West Indies and Australia or Pakistan versus West Indies.

Posted by harshthakor on (March 6, 2014, 4:04 GMT)

Overall these 2 teams have above all won a victory for the game of test cricket.They have proved that test cricket has the intensity and range of twists and turns more than any format of the game.The clashes between the 2 titans reminds you of famous boxing bout between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier or a neck to neck fight at the finish of the Epsom Derby.In the history of the game few contests have been as intense if you asses the last 20 years with so many drawn rubbers or series won by the margin of a mere test.It was such a thriller itself that the 2 sides went to the last game of the series at 1-1.Long live S.Africa-Australasia cricket!

Posted by CustomKid on (March 6, 2014, 3:29 GMT)

Very nice piece. These two nations bring the best out in each other. The reason is that they produce wickets that are favourable to both bat and ball. There is bounce swing seam, yet a good batsman can prosper with application.

@Mark Demos on (March 6, 2014, 1:56 GMT) I seriously hope you are wrong. I'm 35 and I couldn't give a rats about T20 be it WC level, IPL, or big bash. It just has nothing on the long version of the game. I don't consider myself old but I hope the new generations continue to follow test matches.

Personally I still think there is life in test cricket. While I'm not sold on the day night test proposal, it will enable the game to capture greater audiences both at the gate & TV. For those who have to work, you can sneak down post work to catch 2 sessions of test match cricket, I believe it will also place it in a time slot where people generally sit down and relax in front of the TV after dinner capturing a larger audience. This magic game has life left in it yet

Posted by derpherp on (March 6, 2014, 3:03 GMT)

@Mark Demos: People were saying the exact same thing you're saying 30 years ago when ODI cricket was first intoduced. But guess what? Test cricket is still here. Don't be naive about this.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (March 6, 2014, 2:46 GMT)

Any trophy named for series between these two great cricketing nations is obvious. Kepler Wessels

Posted by thephill on (March 6, 2014, 2:34 GMT)

The Boucher-Gilchrist Trophy. Two greats in their own right who traded the world record, and besides the poor old wicket keepers always seemed to be forgotten when these honours come up.

Posted by   on (March 6, 2014, 1:56 GMT)

No matter how exciting test cricket is between 3-4 countries, it is on life support. I love Test cricket. The truth is no money is made by Test cricket and the audience for Test cricket is dying fast. Test cricket is not now nor can it become the aspiration for young players. In 5 years Test cricket will be all but flat-lined. There is only one form of cricket that will be alive in 5-10 years and that is T20. Nostalgia, reverence for the "highest" form of the game will mean nothing. The great blips on the screen such as the SA/Aus series will be no more than the death throws. Sad but mark my words, Test cricket is a dodo bird and will be remembered fondly. The great heros will stand tall in the pantheon of the halls of memory and the great battles will be written about but also soon forgotten by the new T20 audience.

Posted by redneck on (March 6, 2014, 1:02 GMT)

ha you will never see australia houner a former english captain by naming a trophy after him!!!(we have too many of our own greats to houner!!!) and warnie already has his name on the aus v sri lanka trophy. if anything keppler wessels would have more of a claim!!! nice article overall there mr steen. no other test sides match the fight south africa and australia dish out to eachother when they go head to head. sure ashes cricket is the pinnicle in some ways and indian tours are the final fronteer but for sheer quality and fight aus v the saffers will always be no. 1!!! quick shout out to the kiwis aswell, their putting together a quality team! boult is only ever improving and southee is a quality bowler too, if vettori can be convinced to put on the test whites again thats a quality bowling attack. i actually think the kiwis are the next best team behind aus and sa now.

Posted by   on (March 6, 2014, 0:13 GMT)

Not happy bout the House of Cards spoiler !

Posted by 45runs on (March 5, 2014, 22:13 GMT)

God I love Test cricket.

Brilliant article, Rob. How on earth can these two teams not play a 5 Test series?

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 19:49 GMT)

All three series that author mentioned are excellent. Pakistan vs. India hasn't been played enough, but it's always great when it is. The Ashes go without saying, and so do these Australia-south Africa series as weel.

I disagree with those that feel that Pakistan plays defensive cricket. Aren't they the ones that just chased down 325 in Dubai against the sri Lankans in 57 overs? Their run rate in a chase was never higher, in fact no one's has ever been higher.

The fact that Pakistan is a bowling team should be acknowledged and realized. That is how they win games. You shouldn't have to produce 300 runs an innings to be considered thrillers in Test cricket.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 18:32 GMT)

The fact that I would rather watch Aus / SA than my own team Vs WI - precisely because of the thrills that a test match provides that ODI's very rarely do. An entire day of high level tension and real quality play. Brilliant. And quite true. Test matches are doing better than they have in decades.

Posted by BradmanBestEver on (March 5, 2014, 17:27 GMT)

That Australia is the new cricketing powerhouse is obvious when it forces the early retirement of Swann, KP and now Smith. These guys saw the writing on the wall - they could not handle the mew-found pressure exerted by this Aussie unit.

We are back in town. Normal service has resumed.

Posted by Sportz_Freak on (March 5, 2014, 16:02 GMT)

Terrific article. One suggestion though on the trophy name. Warne already is part of the Warne-Muralitharan trophy. Would like to nominate Waugh-Pollock for the trophy name. Both Waughs have been involved in some of the best moments in Aus - SA games from Steve's many hundreds (and key wickets) to the dropped-the-world-cup and the 120* (albeit in an ODI), not to forget, Mark's game saving 100 in Aus and the game winning one in SA. Pollocks - all of them have been prominently involved as well from Graeme's 100 to Sean's 10 wickets in the same Adelaide test

Another option would be the Gilchrist Boucher trophy honoring two of the all time great WKs.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 14:04 GMT)

Great article and heartfelt opinion Rob. Just goes to show, Test cricket is where a man's head has to come into play. None of the other formats offers the same intellectual stimulation : which roller to use, when to make a bowling change, when to bring the field up, how's the forecast... In fact, I'd say no other game offers this level of involvement. Longer term, I think we need more Test nations but the challenge is how to make this happen. It won't happen if all the big nations look after themselves alone.

Posted by Little_Aussie_Battler on (March 5, 2014, 9:21 GMT)

Now the pink ball Sheffield Shield experiment looks to be a roaring success, test match cricket's future is secured.

The balls are highly visible to all players and the spectators.

It will mean evening and night time sessions to ensure maximum tv audiences midweek, and allow fans to get along after work knockoff time.

We just need sides like the ultra defensive Asians to play the game in the right spirit entertaining and cricket will thrive in the longer format again. The Indias, Pakistans and Sri Lankas of the world are notorious for their negative play.

Posted by jw76 on (March 5, 2014, 8:29 GMT)

Yes, if I were the ruler of the cricket world, among many other things I would decree that Australia and South Africa should play in five-Test series in future, and that all five-Test series should be spread over at least two months to keep the players as fresh as possible. Graeme Smith's retirement at 33 shows the killing effect hectic modern cricket schedules can have on a man even as tough as he.

Posted by ab_cricket on (March 5, 2014, 7:40 GMT)

@Indianinneredge: completely agree with you and as a matter of fact any true fan of test cricket would be naive to not agree with Rob Steen's article here. As an Indian I could only wish that some day we might have good bowlers to compete the way Australia and South Africa compete. Mind you this has nothing to do with the pitches etc, there can be epic roller coaster test matches in India too but for that we need good bowlers. Period.

Posted by PrasPunter on (March 5, 2014, 7:37 GMT)

@IndianInnerEdge , really one of the finest pieces from an indian fan in recent times. I was actually preparing to respond to @Ramesh but I couldn't have said it better than you. Good to see fans like you who put things to perspective.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 7:31 GMT)

@IndianInnerEdge : Spoken like a sage for world peace :) i got the author's point alright - he doesn't mention about the cricket quality, blah's just about the so called "hair tingling in the neck" moments

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 7:30 GMT)

ind v/s pak on neutral grounds like lords melbourne joburg barbodos the fast and bouncy wickets and every thing will go standstill but still aus v/s sf it worth anything ill not miss a single moment of it

Posted by IndianInnerEdge on (March 5, 2014, 6:14 GMT)

Fab article by Rob steen, yes this is the world championship of test cricket between the 2 best sides in the world, pity that this is only a 3 test series & played at the seasons end. Most times when these two sides have fought it out, it always was compelling viewing with heaps of skill on display. @ Ramesh Bala....dude - the author is referring to the quality of skill on offer, your ref to road being empty is more to do with the fact that the fanatic supporters of both countries want each to win, there is more an emotional content and less weigtage given to the skill usual a comment like urs is likely to set off the 'lets bag india' brigade into over drive.....Being indian i frankly cannot understand the tendency of my country men to bring india into every blog and thus de-generate the blog into a free-for all....why dont we appreciate something for what it is is- @ face value...? I doubt cricinfo will be publishing my post..if they do...hope it is taken in right spirit.

Posted by HenryPorter on (March 5, 2014, 6:04 GMT)

Have to share Kerry O'Keefe's gold-winning suggestion of a good trophy name for series between South Africa & Australia: the "We-Didn't-Try-To-Play-For-England" trophy. Miss you already, Skull.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 5:36 GMT)

agree JohnDLynch makes total sense, i didnt initially think of it, but i think the authors kicking himself for not thinking it.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 5:34 GMT)

I am sick and tired of seeing high scoring matches on dead pitches. I want some real fire and excitement and nothing can even touch test cricket in that aspect. Test cricket on fast pitches is live and kicking, on subcontinent pitches, its a distant dying relative.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 5:29 GMT)

//More than India v Pakistan, more than the Ashes, this is the contest that habitually does most to stimulate the neck hairs. LOL. what an absolute joke. The combined total number cricket fans of both these countries would be lesser than that of Mumbai or Kolkata alone. You have to roam the streets of Mumbai or Lahore at match time to really see what Ind vs Pak means. The entire countries came to standstill and busy roads were empty during WC'11 SF. Even for waxing eloquent, there could be some truth.

Posted by JohnDLynch on (March 5, 2014, 3:30 GMT)

I think the trophy played for by Aust. and SA should have elements of both countries, and thus the logical choice would be the Kepler Vessel.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Rob SteenClose
Rob Steen Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton, whose books include biographies of Desmond Haynes and David Gower (Cricket Society Literary Award winner) and 500-1 - The Miracle of Headingley '81. His investigation for the Wisden Cricketer, "Whatever Happened to the Black Cricketer?", won the UK section of the 2005 EU Journalism Award "For diversity, against discrimination"
Related Links

Late highs fail to mask wretched year

2014 in review: Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, 2014 was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh

    Enough with the on-field chatter

Ian Chappell: One of these days there's going to be an ugly altercation between players on the field

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Could McCullum win the Nobel Peace Prize?

The Beige Brigade salivate over B Mac's incredible feats and sixes, and the deliciousness that is Hagley Park

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Rudderless Shami proves too costly

Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days