Pakistan v Australia 2010

Plain name, extraordinary talent

An average 21-year-old would find it hard to deal with the hype. But there is nothing average about Steven Smith

Brydon Coverdale

July 9, 2010

Comments: 58 | Text size: A | A

Steven Smith gives the ball a rip, Australia v Pakistan, 2nd semi-final, ICC World Twenty20, St Lucia, May 14, 2010
Steven Smith is an attacking legspinner, aggressive batsman and athletic fielder © Getty Images
Enlarge

Steven Smith. The name could hardly be less remarkable. It's so common that someone with the same name has already worn the baggy green. However, this Steven Smith, who is preparing for a Test debut against Pakistan at Lord's on Tuesday, is anything but ordinary.

Steve Waugh has called him one of the most promising cricketers Australia has seen for 20 years. Ricky Ponting reckons everything he touches turns to gold. His state captain Simon Katich was blown away with the improvement in Smith's bowling last summer.

They're big statements, and the average 21-year-old would find it hard to deal with the hype. Not this young man, because the most striking feature of Smith's game is his complete confidence, whether he's taking one-handed catches on the boundary, innovating against fast bowlers or tossing up juicy legbreaks.

"I'm not really the nervous type," he says, when asked if the pressure of a Test debut at Lord's will get to him. There is no arrogance in his words; he is quietly spoken, and presents the answer as a simple statement of fact. The evidence is there for all to see.

When he made his ODI debut at the MCG in February his legspin went for 78 runs as the field stayed up and the West Indies batsmen went over the top. Ponting wanted to push men back but Smith, then 20, asked his captain, a veteran of 300-plus ODIs, to keep them in the circle; he wanted to create wicket opportunities.

In his fifth ODI, he was batting in the 50th over with his vice-captain Michael Clarke on 99 at the other end, and the opening bowler Tim Bresnan was running in to bowl. Smith tried a reverse slog. It didn't come off, but the fact he even attempted the shot says much about his self-assurance. Under Bob Simpson, such impudence from a new player would have been almost a hanging offence. The current coach, Tim Nielsen, encourages Smith to be himself, and says he brings a buzz to the group.

Nathan Hauritz's foot injury means that on Tuesday, Smith will become the eighth spinner Australia have used in Tests since his idol Shane Warne retired. He will be only the second Australian spinner to debut at Lord's, after Hugh Trumble in 1890, and the first Australian to begin his Test career there since Len Pascoe, Richie Robinson and Craig Serjeant all started together in 1977.

"It's one of the better places to make your debut ," Smith, who played an ODI at Lord's last week, says. "It's something that I will always remember. It's a pretty amazing place to play cricket. I couldn't believe how big the slope is on the field when I first got there. It's just an amazing place and if I get the chance to play out there it will be a dream come true, really."

He has already lived a dream of sorts by having one-on-one coaching with Warne, who was the reason Smith switched from seam-up to lespin at the age of 14. Warne gave Smith some advice when he was called in as cover for the Boxing Day Test last summer, and the pair have met for some extra sessions since then.

Warne has helped with some of the mechanics of bowling legspin - Smith has slowed his run-up and keeps his shoulder higher - but also the mental side of the game. A legspinner must be able to outfox his opponent and Warne was the undisputed master of the psychological battle.

Smith doesn't have the variations that Warne possessed, but remember, he is only 21. He has the legbreak, the top-spinner, the wrong'un, the backspinner and his own take on the flipper, a ball that pops out of the front of the hand. Stepping up from limited-overs cricket to the Test arena might require a change in bowling strategy, but Smith doesn't want to stray too far from his formula.


Steven Smith has been elevated to Australia's No. 1 spinner, Old Trafford, June 26, 2010
"I'm not really the nervous type" © PA Photos
Enlarge

"I don't really like to change too much," he says. "Obviously in one-day cricket you've got to try and not go for too many runs. I like to bowl different balls, like a backspinner quite a bit, to get the batsman off strike. In Test matches it's probably just my legspinner that will come out a lot more, and just about building into your spell and trying to sort the batsman out, sort out what he's doing and just being patient.

"Being a spinner, you always want to be taking wickets. The best way in any form of the game to slow the rate down is to be taking wickets and if you give yourself every opportunity to do that then everything is going to hopefully work in your favour. It's about being confident and being yourself and do what comes to you naturally. That's just the way I bowl, I guess. If I start bowling flat not much happens so I've got to keep giving the ball air."

But for all the talk of Smith being a legspinner, and that will be his primary role against Pakistan, he has a better first-class record as a batsman. Already Smith has four first-class centuries, in only 13 matches, and the brisk rate at which he scores makes him extra valuable in the lower order.

He will probably bat at No. 8 in the Tests, behind Tim Paine and ahead of Mitchell Johnson, but certainly has the potential to be a top-six player. While Warne was the man the young Smith looked to for bowling inspiration it's no surprise to find out his batting idol is a man who, like Smith, was always on the attack.

"I always liked watching Michael Slater," Smith says. "He went pretty hard at the ball and with the big West Indian quicks bowling at 150kph he was just slashing at them. It's the same way I play."

Smith was a talented junior tennis player and there remains the hint of a forehand smash in some of his cricket strokes. The reverse-sweep might even make an appearance in his first Test innings. "If there's an opportunity, maybe, I wouldn't write it off," he says. "I think I am batting quite low if I am going to play. You never know what's going to happen."

That last sentence sums up Smith as a cricketer. We'll soon see what Smith can bring to Test cricket, but you can bet it won't be boring.

Brydon Coverdale is a staff writer at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Andrew_S on (July 13, 2010, 14:48 GMT)

What concerns me as an Australian, is that the selectors in their attempts to shoehorn Smith into becoming the next Shane Warne, they could be destroying the next Adam Gilchrist (at least as a batsman). So far in his first class career Smith has shown the potential to be a destructive hitter coming in at no 5 or 6 in the order, but will the attempt to focus on his bowling and have him coming in so low in the order in international cricket (4 hundreds in 13 first class matches ave of 56 to Paine's 1 hundred in about 40 ave 31 and Smith is projected to bat below Paine and even in ODI's and 20-20 he has been batting behind the likes of James Hopes) be detrimental to his progress as a batsman.

Posted by   on (July 12, 2010, 8:06 GMT)

excessively overrated, hardly will come upto the expectations i guess, a few matches and ppl claim him to be next warney, ah man! his run up, action seems too hard to get the ball on the desired spot batsmen fear, well, lets see what happens to this extremely hyped aussie wiz kid

Posted by longrun on (July 11, 2010, 11:09 GMT)

i hope steve smith does well. if he can live up to the hype he will be good for cricket. has shown glimpses in limited over formats, but test cricket is where it's at. some blokes are better test bowlers than first class bowlers. i think the selectors hand being forced with the hauritz injury may be a blessing in disguise. throw him in the deep end and see if he can swim. can't go too over the top too early though, look at warne's debut, and look at kreja (spell check), vastly different returns for vastly different careers. c'arn steve

Posted by   on (July 11, 2010, 9:09 GMT)

i have seen smith in couple of matches if pak batting plays average , smith might get no wicket, best of luck smith, pak are not best side to debut against , there was a number crunching article on cricinfo as well

Posted by fartarse09 on (July 11, 2010, 8:43 GMT)

I also think the caption to the photo above is amusing - 'Steven Smith is an attacking legspinner, aggressive batsman and athletic fielder'. Well, so am I, and I've only got 26 less first class wickets than Smith. Maybe I should prepare an application?

Posted by fartarse09 on (July 11, 2010, 8:41 GMT)

I cannot believe the hype over this guy and his bowling. He had one day out against the perpetual Shield wooden spooners - take that day out of his record, his average is over 60. With that innings in, his average is still 48 or something. If his name wasn't Steven Smith, would we be choosing him on that record? Of course not. What a load of rubbish saying that there's nothing ordinary about him. His first class record leading into his test debut is possibly the most ordinary there's been. ODI form doesn't automatically transfer into test cricket. Just ask Simon Davis, Simon O'Donnell, Brad Hogg, Paul Wilson, etc. Consider Smith's bowling summer last year in comparison to a Jason Krejza. Is he really that exciting? Not to this little black duck.

Posted by   on (July 11, 2010, 6:50 GMT)

He's a batting allrounder not a bowling one. Shouldn't be the main spinner. Should be spin support. Cam White all over again. Should have gotten Steve O'keefe or Xavier Doherty as the spinner and get Smith as North's backup.

Posted by   on (July 11, 2010, 5:28 GMT)

Steve is a lot better batsman than a bowler. it merely adds more pressure to u bcuz people expect from u to take wickets and also score runs. keep things simple, do the job that u r assigned and then ur batting is a bonus. ans wish the best...coz u'll be the target of every Paki batsman as we saw in T20.

Posted by   on (July 11, 2010, 5:28 GMT)

Steve is a lot better batsman than a bowler. it merely adds more pressure to u bcuz people expect from u to take wickets and also score runs. keep things simple, do the job that u r assigned and then ur batting is a bonus. ans wish the best...coz u'll be the target of every Paki batsman as we saw in T20.

Posted by insightfulcricketer on (July 10, 2010, 22:08 GMT)

Good luck mate! Always there is nervous excitement in the air for a true cricket lover when a fast bowler or a leg spinner of any team makes his debut. Steve has shown heart in 20/20s by throwing the ball up even when the more experienced bowlers like bhajji fires them in. So godspeed to you Steve - Indians will be lurking in their dens come October so the more experienced you are by then the more exciting the contest will be then.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days