Champions League Twenty20 2010 news

Big jump in CLT20 television ratings

Tariq Engineer

October 7, 2010

Comments: 5 | Text size: A | A

MS Dhoni lifts the Champions League Twenty20 trophy, Warriors v Chennai, Champions League Twenty20, Johannesburg, September 26, 2010
Chennai Super Kings' presence in the CLT20 final helped double ratings over last year in India © AFP
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: Champions League Twenty20
Teams: India

The benefits of having Indian participation through a global cricket tournament have been underlined in the television ratings for the 2010 Champions League Twenty20 held in South Africa - the figures, released on Thursday, show a spike of 36% over the 2009 event in India, with the final between IPL champions Chennai Super Kings and South Africa's Warriors drawing more than double the viewership of last year's final between New South Wales and Trinidad & Tobago.

The final drew an all-India TVR (TV rating) - the average number of people who watched a particular programme - of 3.30, meaning that 3.3% of all television viewers in India watched the game. The average TVR for each game in the Champions League across ESPN, Star Sports and Star Cricket was 1.45, up from 1.06 last year, according to TAM Media Research, the leading television ratings agency in India. In total 77.7 million tuned in over the course of 16 days, an increase of 12.7 million, or 19.5%, over last year.

In the coveted category of males over 15 years of age - sports viewership in India is still predominantly a masculine pursuit - the tournament collected an average TVR of 2.05 compared to 1.52 a year ago, an increase of 35%.

The tournament was marketed aggressively in India by the broadcaster, ESPN Star Sports (ESS,), with the thrust of the campaign being to get across the message that fans cannot afford to miss it. To do that, ESS signed Bollywood legend Amitabh Bachchan as brand ambassador and added Sourav Ganguly and Andrew Symonds to the commentary panel, and featured all three in a series of advertisements.

"The tournament was of a very good standard," Rathindra Basu, senior director - Corporate Communications & Business Development, ESPN Software India Pvt Ltd, said. "The Indian teams did well, with two teams reaching the semi-finals and one winning the tournament. We spent a lot of our resources in promoting this edition. We feel all these things contributed to the impressive increase in ratings."

"I think three to four years is when you will get it [consistent ratings]. But if people believe it will get viewership like IPL, that is an unfair comment."

Hiren Pandit, Managing Partner-Entertainment, Sports and Partnerships at Group M, a prominent media buying agency, said the increased ratings reflect the viewers growing familiarity with the event, which will have "a direct impact on the ratings going into next year as people are more aware of the Champions League. They [viewers] are getting comfortable with the format and the teams and that makes a difference.

"I think three to four years is when you will get it [consistent ratings]. But if people believe it will get viewership like IPL, that is an unfair comment."

The Mumbai Indians were the tournament's biggest draw: all four of their matches had a rating of at least 2.11, significantly higher than the tournament's average. Mumbai's game against South Australia, who won with three balls to spare, had a rating of 2.66, the second highest of the event.

The semi-final between Warriors and South Australia was surprisingly more popular than the one between Royal Challengers Bangalore and Chennai , drawing a TVR of 1.63 compared to 1.04 for the game between two IPL teams. That game was delayed for over two hours by rain however, and finished after 2 a.m. in India.

League matches between non-IPL teams still struggled to attract viewers. The best of the rest was the game between the Warriors and Victoria, which drew a 0.98 rating, well below the tournament's average. Wayamba and Central Districts, teams from Sri Lanka and New Zealand, had the lowest rating of 0.33.

The poor ratings for these games highlight the risk the Champions League faces if Indian teams were to struggle, and Sridhar Ramanujam, the head of Brand-Comm, a leading Indian brand consultancy and public relations firm, thinks this dependence on Indian success will ultimately inhibit the tournament's growth. "If Victoria and the South African teams are the best teams in this format, and they play a final, I can't see too many people watching."

Tariq Engineer is a senior sub-editor at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Tariq Engineer

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by tikna on (October 8, 2010, 11:15 GMT)

I think a spike of just 36% is very poor considering that last year the ratings were very poor to begin with and the amount of money the broadcaster seems to have spent with 1) Having Amitabh, Sourav and Symonds as endorsers 2) Continous advertisements in leading channels 3) Very convienient timings for Indian viewers 4) Virtually blanking out every other programme except live matches in one of their channels 5) There werent the Big Boss and KBC shows to compete with (perhaps the most eye ball drawers in Indian small screen) and most importantly 6) Very good Cricket all through the tournament

Personally I think by showing re runs upon re runs of all matches would have hurt the ratings because the matches werent the highest priority to a lot of people to begin with and knowledge that if you miss the match there is going to be a re run of the entire match and not just highlights at almost all times doesnt help.

Posted by Cricinfo-Editorial on (October 8, 2010, 4:32 GMT)

Amitabh Bachchan was wrongly referred to as a Hollywood legend. This has now been corrected. Thanks to all the readers who pointed it out and apologies for the error.

Posted by subirxs on (October 7, 2010, 22:58 GMT)

When did Amitabh Bachchan become a Hollywood legend? "To do that, ESS signed Hollywood legend Amitabh Bachchan as brand ambassador and added Sourav Ganguly and Andrew Symonds to the commentary panel, and featured all three in a series of advertisements."

Posted by Pateln381 on (October 7, 2010, 21:46 GMT)

Nice article. but hey one mistake there. You wrote this in your article: " To do that, ESS signed Hollywood legend Amitabh Bachchan as brand ambassador" .... actually ... he is INDIAN LEGEND .. BOLLYWOOD LEGEND!!!

Posted by rshn on (October 7, 2010, 16:49 GMT)

well... what can i say? its New India for you. The whole world suffered from Recession, except for India. Any good Product that is made for India is bound to do well, cricket is just one off things. CLT20 is a global event, but as long as Indian teams are in for the running, be it in India or anywhere in the world, its gonna be a hit.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Tariq EngineerClose
Tournament Results
Warriors v Super Kings at Johannesburg - Sep 26, 2010
Super Kings won by 8 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)
Warriors v South Aust at Centurion - Sep 25, 2010
Warriors won by 30 runs
Super Kings v RCB at Durban - Sep 24, 2010
Super Kings won by 52 runs (D/L method)
Super Kings v Warriors at Port Elizabeth - Sep 22, 2010
Super Kings won by 10 runs
Central D v Wayamba at Port Elizabeth - Sep 22, 2010
Wayamba won by 74 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days