Australia v England, 2nd Test, Adelaide

England face up to rebuilding phase

Months of planning go into each Ashes series yet, ahead of this Test, England are in the uncomfortable position of having doubts over at least three positions in their side

George Dobell

December 3, 2013

Comments: 50 | Text size: A | A
'England believe they can turn it around'

Like the Adelaide ground in which they will seek to recover from 1-0 down in the series, the England side finds itself in a rebuilding phase on the eve of the second Ashes Test. Just as England still have the likes of Alastair Cook, Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell, Adelaide Oval still has green and lush grass banks and offers a view - just about - of the spire of St Peter's Cathedral. But for both ground and team much has changed and the fact is that neither will be the finished article heading into this game.

Months of planning go into each Ashes series yet, ahead of this Test, England are in the uncomfortable position of having doubts over at least three positions in their side. They require a new No. 3, are likely to have a debutant at No. 6 and have a decision to make about the fourth member of their bowling attack. It is far from ideal for a team that prides itself on continuity. Even after their defeats in the UAE and Ahmedabad, England had fewer selection dilemmas and a settled spine to their side.

It might have been even worse. Bell has become the latest player to be struck in the nets by a ball thrown by Graham Gooch's 'dog thrower' device but, after treatment on his shoulder, he has been cleared to play. It seems likely that his desire to bat at No. 3 will be denied, though, with Joe Root more likely to be promoted.

It is not an ideal solution. Not only has Root struggled to convince against the harder, newer ball to date in his Test career - he was undone by bounce in both innings in Alice Springs - it will also mean that two of England's top three have much to prove at the top of the order. It was not meant to be this way.

But England - and Andy Flower, in particular - have great faith in Root. In the longer term, they still aspire to him opening the batting. He has shown an admirable temperament and decent technique and, on the slower pitch anticipated in Adelaide, might find life more comfortable.

The Adelaide curator, Damian Hough, admits he cannot predict exactly how his first drop-in Test pitch will behave. But, made as it is of the same soil and grass varieties as previous Adelaide tracks, he anticipates it will have "all the characteristics of a typical Adelaide pitch."

"It will definitely not be as quick as the Gabba," Hough told ESPNcricinfo. "Hopefully there will be a little bit for the quicks early on, but then it will be a very good batting track. It might start reversing and it should deteriorate and take some spin, but it will be a good batting track."

With that in mind, there is an outside chance that England could play two spinners. It is true that Monty Panesar's left-arm spin might prove more effective against Australia's army of right-hand batsmen, but his form last season was modest and the addition of his limited batting and fielding would be a risk in a line-up that batted so poorly in Brisbane.

Instead, the final bowling place will probably be contested by Tim Bresnan and Chris Tremlett. Bresnan said he was "definitely ready to play in this Test" and he might also add some depth to the batting. It is worth noting, however, that Bresnan has only once scored more than 30 in an innings when England have not made more than 400.


Gary Ballance was given a chance at No. 3 and made 55, Cricket Australia Chairman's XI v England XI, Tour Match, Alice Springs, November, 29, 2013
Gary Ballance impressed the most in Alice Springs, and it is his role as a specialist batsman that England are likely to favour © Getty Images
Enlarge

It is England's failure to make 400 in any of their previous 17 Test innings - a run that stretches back to Wellington in March - that remains at the heart of their difficulties. Perhaps because of mental weariness - a key issue in forcing Jonathan Trott home - there have been diminishing returns from England's top seven for some time. Maybe it is the schedule, maybe it is the intensity of the England environment, but batsmen who have proved themselves proficient at this level are struggling to rediscover the form that took England to the top of the Test rankings.

It is possible, however, that the manner of defeat in Brisbane has exaggerated the magnitude of their problem. England looked rattled by Mitchell Johnson and co. in the first Test and there is no doubt that bowlers of such uncommon pace present difficulties.

But it is also likely that, in the second innings at least, the England dressing room was not the calm and stable place it might have been in normal circumstances. As the extent of Trott's torment became known - and it appears it was following his second-innings dismissal that it became most apparent - it is only natural that his team-mates were distracted and unsettled. They will have an opportunity to show their batting timidity was an aberration when this Test starts on Thursday.

Certainly all the talk coming from the England camp is encouraging. Bresnan was in Churchillian mood when talking of the side's "mental fortitude" in adversity and insisted that England were "a group of guys that, especially when our backs are against the wall, come out fighting." Such talk is all well and good and, up to a point, England have a fine record in that regard. But Bresnan could be expected to say little else and it is actions, not talk, which will decide this series.

There are, in theory, three men in contention for the No. 6 position: Jonny Bairstow, Ben Stokes and Gary Ballance. It appears likely that Ballance is in pole position at present though, if Panesar is included as a bowler, it is possible Stokes' all-round skills will win him a place. With Matt Prior in a slump with the bat, however, and Ballance having impressed most in Alice Springs, it is his role as a specialist batsman that England are likely to favour.

The sense remains that England are playing not just a team but a nation. The latest front page story to greet England's arrival in a new town suggested that two of their players were out late drinking. That they barely drink alcohol and were quite entitled to be out late hardly warranted a mention.

The England camp received the 'news' with amusement and even pleasure. The players involved - Pietersen and Stuart Broad - have not always been the closest of friends and the sight of them enjoying social time together might be perceived as encouraging. This series is assuredly not lacking in propaganda and spin.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: George Dobell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by satkaru1 on (December 9, 2013, 3:19 GMT)

I believe.. England will turn it around... The good part now is that.. All their batsman had a chance to make at-least a half century..

I mean all of them.. including Matt Prior... So that is really great news.. all of them had time in the middle and that will make a huge difference going forward...

They need to go with 4 pacers in Adelaide.. dump Swann & Panesar...

Posted by   on (December 8, 2013, 17:36 GMT)

I think the problems that the media are portraying about media is exaggerated, but so is everything in the news. I do however, think that there needs to be some changes in the England team.

1) England need a consistent number 6, the last number six I think think that England had that would be a regular face on the england teamsheet would be Andrew Flintoff.

2) The big players for England, need to step up, and this gets chucked around a lot, but its simple, the big players that get a great deal of attention NEED to make runs, in particular Cook and Pietersen. If Michael Clarke can do it, surely the english batsmen can, it's not like the pitch was to blame in both matches.

3) I think England are also lacking a bowler like Mitchell Johnson, a bowler with real pace through the air, it makes such a difference, I wish Steven Finn was the bowler that we were expecting from him by now, because he's the perfect fit. Personally I would play him anyway because he's a genuine wicket taker.

Posted by xylo on (December 5, 2013, 5:16 GMT)

between the two sides, i would tag the aussies as a side that is rebuilding, not england.

Posted by hhillbumper on (December 4, 2013, 21:29 GMT)

to be fair we could rebuild for the next six years and still have had a better run then recent aussie teams.

@ paul Mcallister. There are actually rules to play for England which unlike Aus are not that flexible. We have an unusual position being the only European test playing nation and eu Rules. But indeed we seem to love a saffer even when that means we have nonentities like Dernbach foisted on us. There is plenty of young English talent but will it get chosen.

Posted by   on (December 4, 2013, 3:51 GMT)

The Team they should select for the test is

Cook Carberry Bell Pietersen Root Prior Bresnan Broad Swann Anderson Panesar/Finn

Posted by   on (December 4, 2013, 3:50 GMT)

@Jim, Broad is definitely NOT an allrounder, bresnan is much better batsman but broad is a bowler who can bat a bit, the common rule of thumb is to say that to be an allrounder your bowling average should be lower than your batting average and broads is nowhere near that, an allrounder is someone who can bag 5 wickets and score a hundred, not a bowler who takes 5 wickets and adds the odd 20/30 runs lol, their is very few allrounders in the modern game today definitely Kallis maybe Johnson/Ashwin at a stretch.

Posted by jimbond on (December 4, 2013, 2:58 GMT)

Comparing Anderson and Swann to McGrath and Warne is stretching it too much- McGrath and Warne were much better bowlers and their best continued for a long time. More than anything else, England needs to shed its defensive mindset (at least now that they are 1 behind in the series) and go with their best five bowlers- (yes they should play five bowlers). If Panesar is among the best five bowlers, he should be played, irrespective of his batting abilities, and the same applies for Finn. Anderson, Broad and Swann would obviously take the first three bowling slots.In shedding its defensive mindset, England should also have faith in Prior's batting to allow him to play at 6; Broad is good enough to play at 7, and Swann is capable at 8. Unless England thrust more batting responsibilities on Prior and Broad, they will not excel as allrounders- which they are.

Posted by cricket_ahan on (December 4, 2013, 0:59 GMT)

Ballance's recent county form, as well as his performance in the recent tour game, should earn him a spot at no. 6. Jonny Bairstow is not technically great, and given the barrage MJ and co. threw at England at the Gabba, they would be wise to chose a more skillful player who has the added bonus of having scored a lot of recent runs. Bowling wise, Bresnan could be key in this match, as he fulfills much the same role as Siddle by giving his captain a large quantity of overs. He is also roaring to get back into the team, so his attitude will also be a plus given Tremlett may not be on the greatest morale high after Brisbane. England are not in as bad a shape as they think - but I think they need to bat first to get the advantage in Adelaide. Can't wait!

Posted by sillymidcover on (December 3, 2013, 22:36 GMT)

Very foolish not to have taken Compton on this tour: too late now?

Posted by couchpundit on (December 3, 2013, 22:19 GMT)

@EnglishFan - MasterClass!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
George DobellClose
Tour Results
Australia v England at Sydney - Feb 2, 2014
Australia won by 84 runs
Australia v England at Melbourne - Jan 31, 2014
Australia won by 8 wickets (with 31 balls remaining)
Australia v England at Hobart - Jan 29, 2014
Australia won by 13 runs
Australia v England at Adelaide - Jan 26, 2014
Australia won by 5 runs
Australia v England at Perth - Jan 24, 2014
England won by 57 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days