| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 25, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Michael Clarke
| Sunil Narine
Series/Tournaments:
Indian Premier League
| Australia tour of West Indies
Teams:
Australia
| West Indies
|
|||
As he ponders an offer to take part in the IPL for the first time, Michael Clarke has cast further doubt over the young West Indian spinner Sunil Narine's availability to play in the forthcoming Test series against Australia due to contractual obligations to the Indian Twenty20 tournament.
The West Indies coach Ottis Gibson has already expressed doubts about his ability to choose Narine for the Tests, which overlap with the first half of the fifth edition of the IPL, given that he is not contracted to the West Indies board and is therefore likely to depart for Kolkata for the entirety of the event.
Australia's batsmen have struggled mightily against Narine's accurate off breaks and variations, delivered in a flat style ideally suited to the slow, low pitches of the Caribbean. However, Clarke said he was not expecting Narine to figure in the Test series, and had not committed much thought to the prospect of playing against him.
"I don't think he's playing the Test series," Clarke said prior to his departure for the West Indies. "I think he's playing in the IPL the last I heard. I heard the West Indies were going to release him to play the full time in the IPL but I've watched him on TV through this series and I've seen a little bit of him in the past.
"He's bowled very well. He's got really good control and he can not only spin his offspinner but the ball the other way so I guess that's the hardest thing about playing spin, being able to pick him. Once you pick him you still have to play (the ball) and on the wickets so far it's been quite tough.
"If he does take part in the Test series I'm sure we'll all have a real good look at him."
Narine's case is the latest instance of the WICB losing the battle to retain its best players for international duty in the face of T20 counter-offers. The most prominent casualty of the struggle has been Chris Gayle, but Narine's loss would be almost as significant given such a promising start to his time in Caribbean colours.
By contrast, Clarke has held back from taking part in the IPL since its inception so he could concentrate on his Australian duties, a commitment he was rewarded for when he attained the captaincy left vacant by Ricky Ponting. However Clarke had noted as early as 2010 that the 2012 IPL may have been an option for him, and while he stopped short of stating his intentions, there was an acknowledgement of negotiations between the Pune Warriors and Clarke's manager James Erskine.
Pune's captain Sourav Ganguly had caused a stir by stating at a Kolkata promotional function that "we're on the verge of signing Clarke", in a deal that would have him fly to India for the closing phase of the tournament following the conclusion of the Tests against the West Indies.
"That opportunity has been presented," Clarke said. "We will continue to talk about it and make a decision in due course. Right now my priority is to make sure I get back and make sure we continue our success in the Test format."
Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
@Arun Chandran Menon - that maybe true, (I'm Ozzy), but Oz cricketers are very well paid for, in terms of cricket & other sports. The fallback position for Ozzy cricketers is far higher than for a lot of other nations. Narine wasn't even considered amongst the best cricketers in the islands, no central contract, but he has nailed a life changing contract in the IPL. One season could/should set him up for life. I think you have to walk a mile in someone elses shoes before you be too critical of them. Gayle is a different kettle of fish, he could do more for the WIndies, but he has also been treated shabbily. The WICB has been run fairly poorly over the last two decades & it shows. As the WIndies is not a stand alone country, loyalties are different to other test playing nations.
Posted byI have a simple perspective on Narine issue, and it helps me a lot. The fact is Narine doesnt care much about playing for W.I as much as Clarke and fellow australians (including T20 blaster Warner) takes pride in wearing baggy green cap, period
Posted by jplterrors on (March 27, 2012, 0:45 GMT)To get the big paycheck in IPL u need to be an International "STAR" otherwise u are nbot marketable and no1 cares abt wat they do, thats why Gayle and Narine will be bak in Windies soon.
Posted by Meety on (March 27, 2012, 0:04 GMT)IMO - Narine won't be as effective in tests anyways, although his brief FC career does suggest otherwise. I would imagine Bishoo is the real danger man although maybe they could form a deadly double act. Right arm offies don't tend to trouble Oz much, not in the last 20 yrs anyways.
Posted byWhat sense does it make to sign Clark only as a batsman? He will definitely will not be a captain as Ganguly is made out to be an important part of Pune team. Captain and Mentor. No one is going to throw him out of 'this' side. Plus, Clark does not play T20 international for Australia (not sure he plays for any other franchise). So he is definitely not used to this format. Also, they are calling him to play just for a few matches in the end, where an in form batsman who has played a lot during the tournament would be a good option. One more point is that Clark is going to be very expensive. Also, I dont think Clark is someone like Pollard or Gayle who can change the match on their own. I think a better option would be sign someone from the players not picked by anyone so far. I am sure there are many such good hitting batsmen still left out. They can save a lot of money too.
Posted by delboy on (March 26, 2012, 12:57 GMT)@Rahul_78 Dwayne may have his time only if you are WI. He is only offered a stint in the WI squad to stop him being snapped up by another English county this summer. He would also be available to an IPL franchise otherwise. He has made a lot more money FOR HIMSELF in the last four seasons not being a regular part of the WI set up. It is a great opportunity for him therefore to have one last LOYAL stand then return to the land of the EMANCIPATED cricketer.
Posted by blackie on (March 26, 2012, 11:15 GMT)In commenting on the IPL/Gayle issue about 8 months ago, i said that the time will come when WIBC would have to make serious decisions to keep its players playing for Windies when the IPL is offering these huge sums. The board HAS to accept that things are not the same as there were before when the players were at the mercy of the board/selectors. The players now have options and it would be in Windies cricket's best interest to 1. change how it operates, 2. stop scheduling international cricket when the IPL is on 3. and move quicker when problems come up instead of letting every situation drag on. All now, Narine should have been approached about a contract and an attractive counter offer. Hasnt the board been watching cricket over the last year and seen how difficult he is for batsmen to play and that we could use him.stupse.
Posted by ChrisH on (March 26, 2012, 7:13 GMT)@AussieGreek You can't be serious. You do realize most series involving all full member teams were planned LONG before the IPL was even thought of right (the future tours programme)? And when would you suggest that WI schedule all their matches? Between June and November during the hurricane?rainy season? What I can't understand is why the BCCI doesn't adopt the EPL model for the IPL and simply stretch the IPL out between October and May. That way players can still play in the IPL and international cricket (probably only missing a few international matches as they woul now have far more time betwwen IPL matches which would also reduce the risk of injury) and the IPL can make even more money off fans and advertisers over a longer season (they could probably even double the amount of games easily without causing too many scheduling conflicts with international cricket.
Posted by ARad on (March 26, 2012, 6:18 GMT)To those who are asking for an IPL window and complaining about the WICB's scheduling, there are two problems: the schedule depends on many factors such as the local weather, local season and the availability of touring teams. WICB couldn't have planned the Australian tour last month because Australia were playing their own ODI series, for example. Similarly, if IPL should get a window, why not also give a window for Big Bash, BPL and any future LOCAL cricket tournament? Why should all countries stop playing their international cricket when that's the MAJOR SOURCE OF INCOME for the boards of these countries which is then invested to create and showcase the NEXT GENERATION OF NARINES? If cricket gets big in USA or China and if they create a tournament which promises more wealth for cricketers than IPL, should BCCI cancel all its international matches to create a window for this tournament and lose income that will be invested in the future stars of India?
Posted by ARad on (March 26, 2012, 6:03 GMT)To the commenter who may questions the abilities of Gibson and Sammy based on their playing records: you may not like Gibson or Sammy but captaincy and coaching are different skills from having the athletic skills or mental toughness to be a great batsman, bowler or fielder. Ganguly, Atapattu and Dhoni have had superior players playing under them, for example. Wright, Kirsten, Buchanan or Woolmer as players were not in the same class as many of the players they have coached. You can argue Gibson is not a good coach. You can argue that Sammy may not deserve a place in the team as a player. I also wish that Gayle would be able to play for the WI team but the logic you are using against Gibson and Sammy is problematic.