England v SA, World T20, Group 1, Chittagong March 29, 2014

England can hold heads high - Broad

  shares 20

Stuart Broad said England could leave the World T20 with their "heads high" despite going out of the competition after their second defeat in three games. Broad admitted to the wearying effects of a long and arduous winter of touring but was looking forward to the opportunity for rest and recovery before England begin a "new era" in May.

England lost by three runs to South Africa, ending their chances of reaching the semi-finals. A young and slightly experimental squad will play one more game, against Netherlands on Monday, before heading home as the ECB prepares to appoint a new head coach. Broad said he was uncertain about his own future as T20 captain and may miss the start of England's season as he attempts to get over a chronic knee injury.

"We've had a lot of positives come out of this World Cup but we can hold our heads high with some of the performances we've put in," Broad said. "If we had got out of the group there would have been a lot of surprised people. We're disappointed but we've done some good stuff with the squad available to us.

"We lost key men through injury. We can hold heads up high and at the end of the day T20 is an entertainment business and I don't think anybody is going to leave the ground today disappointed with nearly 400 runs scored, sixes, fours, and catches."

The county season gets underway next weekend, with the chance for several players to push for recognition as England look to begin afresh after losing heavily in Australia and following up with mixed results in the Caribbean and Bangladesh. Ashley Giles, the limited-overs coach, is favourite to succeed Andy Flower in charge of England across all three formats, with the ECB expected to hold interviews for the position in early April.

"It's going to be a new era of English cricket isn't it?" Broad said. "It has been a tough winter. We've been away a huge amount of time so there are some fantastic opportunities available for players in the summer. We don't know the shake-up of the Test side but you know the opportunities will arise and that's exciting for players to be involved in. I expect to see some excellent performances this summer, guys really desperate to play, hungry to succeed for England and we'll have to play some good cricket to beat Sri Lanka and India.

"It's an exciting time to be part of English cricket. Change is exciting from time to time. It's been a really tough winter, we've not had a huge amount of success. Australia was a really tough tour, back-to-back Ashes over the past nine months is as tough as it gets for a cricketer, not just on the field but off it too with all the hype that comes with Ashes cricket. So it has been a draining winter and I'll have to be honest, I'm looking forward to a bit of a break come Tuesday."

Broad has been T20 captain since 2011, when England experimented with a tripartite system. He has twice led England at the World T20, both times on the subcontinent, with the next tournament due to be held in India in 2016. Asked about continuing in the role, he said: "I don't know, there's going to be a decision made on coaching staff so there might be a few changes in the next two months or so. I'm probably going to be unavailable for the start of the season in one-day cricket to sort my knee out."

A period of rehabilitation will be required for Broad to get over his patellar tendonitis, an injury that has resulted from his heavy workload over the winter, and discussions with whoever is appointed to take charge of England will determine the way forward. England begin their season with an ODI against Scotland on May 9, followed by limited-overs series against Sri Lanka. The first Test of the summer begins on June 12.

"I need a rehab period on my tendonitis, which is generally about an eight-week period so whether I take just four weeks in April to play in May and then take a couple of months after the season I don't know but it's got to the stage where it's really sore and I need it sorting out. You know in international cricket you can't perform at your best when you're carrying an injury. We've managed it pretty well but it's in the hands of the medical staff and a bit of negotiation with the head coach when that's decided."

England made 193 for 7 against South Africa, their joint fifth-highest score batting second in T20s, despite no one scoring more than 38. The total surpassed their record chase against Sri Lanka from two nights ago but England paid for conceding 55 runs from the last three overs, as AB de Villiers scorched his way to an unbeaten 69 off 28 balls. Broad credited de Villiers for a match-winning innings as the bowlers, particularly Jade Dernbach, again came in for punishment.

"We've come up three runs short and there's some pretty clear ways we could have stopped those three runs," Broad said. "We didn't particularly field well, but that can happen in these conditions. We didn't have the one guy going to get the Hales-like knock like he did the other day or 60 or 70 you realistically need in these sorts of chases.

"But sometimes you have to hold your hands up and that knock from AB de Villiers is as good as you'll ever see. He hits the ball 360 degrees and targeted the short boundary with fantastic success. We tried to go for yorkers but in these conditions it's unrealistic to get your yorkers consistent with a bar of soap. He took it away from us in those last few overs. If we'd been chasing 170 it would have been pretty gettable."

Alan Gardner is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • jithoosin on April 1, 2014, 1:56 GMT

    @eggyroe In the Wham Bam Thank You Mam competition Eng just lost to Netherlands. And can keep their heads held high while playing Ashes which is ultimate competition in world cricket.

  • goonshow on March 31, 2014, 8:16 GMT

    @ coatsie and Stargazer - a reality check is needed in respect to both your posts chaps... 'Poor umpiring decisions gifting SA 13 runs'... agreed on one of those wides. But you selectively omit Hales being handed a life on just 8, the only one of the errors in the match which he actually admitted and apologised for. By your myopic accounting methods, we should therefor subtract the 2 dozen-odd that he went on to score from England's total. 'A bigger defeat than it actually was'... consider the totality of that match: SA without their captain, a key strike bowler being hauled to Mumbai for some trumped up kangaroo show, repeated blackouts whilst the openers were trying to build the platform for the innings... a shocker of a decision giving England's most dangerous batsman a life in the opening moments of the match - not easy to imagine more adverse conditions surely? Yes - England managed the run rate very well, but at the cost of wickets and Steyn's final over was a net session.

  • coatsie89 on March 30, 2014, 14:25 GMT

    Let's be honest, umpiring cost England this game. 2 extremely poor wide decisions in the last 3 overs resulted in South Africa getting an additional 13 runs. Shows the importance of top quality umpiring in important games which I'm afraid Tucker and Davies are not. Questionable decisions in the Netherlands game beforehand as well. Poor when you consider they are 'International' standard. Well done England, good showing considering the last 5 months' cricket.

  • CricketingStargazer on March 30, 2014, 13:09 GMT

    It probably looked like a bigger defeat than it really was. In fact, England were ahead of South Africa at the same stage until the 18th over and, even then, their worst deficit at the end of an over was only 7 runs. That 18th over was the difference between the sides and, even then, it was only marginal.

  • Monjur_Elahi on March 30, 2014, 8:54 GMT

    It wasn't pleasant for England for last few months and it continued till T20 WC. Changes bring prospect and England will be working for future progression. Good luck!

    Every team goes through ups and downs, Bangladesh is in a similar situation as England. As a Bangladesh supporter, I understand the moments the English players are going through and duly sympathies. However, totally do not appreciate the shallow and harsh criticism on Bangladesh by Mr Michael Vaughn and like minded people. A sports personality of his statute should acquire some knowledge about a team before cracking such a thing. He also offended the Srilankans with their national anthem. I wonder, if he is OK though!

  • on March 30, 2014, 8:41 GMT

    @vjay0204 Chris Broad has nothing to do with the administration of English cricket. the buffoon in charge is Giles Clarke. a man in the BCCI s pocket. a man who has great relations with Srinivasan the soon to be deposed head of the Infian board. the man who destroyed England's chances of being a major player in T20 not once... But twice. the buffoon who got involved with the disgraced Allan Stanford?

    He'll we'd rather have Chris Broad... He couldn't be much worse,

  • mahjut on March 30, 2014, 8:17 GMT

    In reality the loss to SA was a pretty big one ... 3 runs maybe but the game was lost by the beginning of the final over. The last three balls simply had to be bowled and that is all Steyn did with them. Add to that that this is a fairly weak SA team ... or, at least, an SA side with quite a few weaknesses. There is no reason to hold heads high over this ... BUT England are not a lost cause - they are stocked fairly well with talented young cricketers

  • jithoosin on March 30, 2014, 8:04 GMT

    @Ramachadran Narayan - Nobody is against England. In fact, most in subcontinent, root for England during Ashes. But the comments from Broad, is as if they lost T20 WC final by a narrow margin of 3 runs. Doubt if Cook or Strauss would have told any thing like this.

  • LeeHallam on March 30, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    I think Stuart Broad is right, considering what went before, and despite the disappointment of going out, England can be encouraged by their performances with the bat. The rain cost them the chance of beating New Zealand. It is not sour grapes to suggest that a team chasing is at an advantage if they can see rain coming. In the field they did not do well in any of the matches, they did not cope with the conditions. But their batting has been excellent. Broad's captaincy has been good throughout, and those who are saying he should be dropped or that he owes his place in the side, should take a look at the stats. Through all forms (Particularly in tests) he has been England's best player over the last year.

  • eggyroe on March 30, 2014, 7:42 GMT

    As I have stated in this column many times before,do all you people in the Sub Continent really understand that a Wham Bam Thank You Mam competition played in pyjamas has any relevance to the ultimate level of playing cricket which of course will be Test Match Cricket.At least now England can now come home,ditch the pyjamas and get on with the real task that needs addressing which is the reclaiming in the Summer of 2015 of the Ashes,the ultimate competition in World Cricket.Also to a previous comment by vjay0204 ,since when has Chris Broad been Chairman of the E.C.B.,I thought he was a Match Referee.

  • jithoosin on April 1, 2014, 1:56 GMT

    @eggyroe In the Wham Bam Thank You Mam competition Eng just lost to Netherlands. And can keep their heads held high while playing Ashes which is ultimate competition in world cricket.

  • goonshow on March 31, 2014, 8:16 GMT

    @ coatsie and Stargazer - a reality check is needed in respect to both your posts chaps... 'Poor umpiring decisions gifting SA 13 runs'... agreed on one of those wides. But you selectively omit Hales being handed a life on just 8, the only one of the errors in the match which he actually admitted and apologised for. By your myopic accounting methods, we should therefor subtract the 2 dozen-odd that he went on to score from England's total. 'A bigger defeat than it actually was'... consider the totality of that match: SA without their captain, a key strike bowler being hauled to Mumbai for some trumped up kangaroo show, repeated blackouts whilst the openers were trying to build the platform for the innings... a shocker of a decision giving England's most dangerous batsman a life in the opening moments of the match - not easy to imagine more adverse conditions surely? Yes - England managed the run rate very well, but at the cost of wickets and Steyn's final over was a net session.

  • coatsie89 on March 30, 2014, 14:25 GMT

    Let's be honest, umpiring cost England this game. 2 extremely poor wide decisions in the last 3 overs resulted in South Africa getting an additional 13 runs. Shows the importance of top quality umpiring in important games which I'm afraid Tucker and Davies are not. Questionable decisions in the Netherlands game beforehand as well. Poor when you consider they are 'International' standard. Well done England, good showing considering the last 5 months' cricket.

  • CricketingStargazer on March 30, 2014, 13:09 GMT

    It probably looked like a bigger defeat than it really was. In fact, England were ahead of South Africa at the same stage until the 18th over and, even then, their worst deficit at the end of an over was only 7 runs. That 18th over was the difference between the sides and, even then, it was only marginal.

  • Monjur_Elahi on March 30, 2014, 8:54 GMT

    It wasn't pleasant for England for last few months and it continued till T20 WC. Changes bring prospect and England will be working for future progression. Good luck!

    Every team goes through ups and downs, Bangladesh is in a similar situation as England. As a Bangladesh supporter, I understand the moments the English players are going through and duly sympathies. However, totally do not appreciate the shallow and harsh criticism on Bangladesh by Mr Michael Vaughn and like minded people. A sports personality of his statute should acquire some knowledge about a team before cracking such a thing. He also offended the Srilankans with their national anthem. I wonder, if he is OK though!

  • on March 30, 2014, 8:41 GMT

    @vjay0204 Chris Broad has nothing to do with the administration of English cricket. the buffoon in charge is Giles Clarke. a man in the BCCI s pocket. a man who has great relations with Srinivasan the soon to be deposed head of the Infian board. the man who destroyed England's chances of being a major player in T20 not once... But twice. the buffoon who got involved with the disgraced Allan Stanford?

    He'll we'd rather have Chris Broad... He couldn't be much worse,

  • mahjut on March 30, 2014, 8:17 GMT

    In reality the loss to SA was a pretty big one ... 3 runs maybe but the game was lost by the beginning of the final over. The last three balls simply had to be bowled and that is all Steyn did with them. Add to that that this is a fairly weak SA team ... or, at least, an SA side with quite a few weaknesses. There is no reason to hold heads high over this ... BUT England are not a lost cause - they are stocked fairly well with talented young cricketers

  • jithoosin on March 30, 2014, 8:04 GMT

    @Ramachadran Narayan - Nobody is against England. In fact, most in subcontinent, root for England during Ashes. But the comments from Broad, is as if they lost T20 WC final by a narrow margin of 3 runs. Doubt if Cook or Strauss would have told any thing like this.

  • LeeHallam on March 30, 2014, 7:47 GMT

    I think Stuart Broad is right, considering what went before, and despite the disappointment of going out, England can be encouraged by their performances with the bat. The rain cost them the chance of beating New Zealand. It is not sour grapes to suggest that a team chasing is at an advantage if they can see rain coming. In the field they did not do well in any of the matches, they did not cope with the conditions. But their batting has been excellent. Broad's captaincy has been good throughout, and those who are saying he should be dropped or that he owes his place in the side, should take a look at the stats. Through all forms (Particularly in tests) he has been England's best player over the last year.

  • eggyroe on March 30, 2014, 7:42 GMT

    As I have stated in this column many times before,do all you people in the Sub Continent really understand that a Wham Bam Thank You Mam competition played in pyjamas has any relevance to the ultimate level of playing cricket which of course will be Test Match Cricket.At least now England can now come home,ditch the pyjamas and get on with the real task that needs addressing which is the reclaiming in the Summer of 2015 of the Ashes,the ultimate competition in World Cricket.Also to a previous comment by vjay0204 ,since when has Chris Broad been Chairman of the E.C.B.,I thought he was a Match Referee.

  • CricketingStargazer on March 30, 2014, 7:29 GMT

    It's nice to see so many balanced comments on here from people who are not England fans and did not see the game.

    Kudos to South Africa. 4 matches. 4 very tight games. 3 of them won. I honestly thought that this was going to fall England's way, but South Africa are proving to be far more resilient that I had imagined. Almost 400 runs in 40 overs: no one can complain about entertainment value.

    England's death bowling and fielding have been the killer here. On strike rate and average, Jade Dernbach's figures compare with the best but, on economy, he's just a luxury. Broad is right to be frustrated: not much has gone right for the side in the tournament, but there are plenty of places where they could have changed their luck with Yorkers at the death and holding chances earlier.

    What has surprised me was that the batting, supposedly the weak suit, has been brilliant. You don't make scores of 172-6, 190-4 and 193-7 if you can't bat and to lose still two of the games is tough.

  • jimbond on March 30, 2014, 6:21 GMT

    The English team should now understand the value of players like Collingwood whom they have long underestimated.

  • on March 30, 2014, 5:49 GMT

    Why are you all against England. I think most of you are Indians or Pakistanis. What Broad said was bang on. They gave lot of full tosses in the last few overs which took the game away from England. When SA made 196 I had told my family before start of England innings they would lose. But they came very close to winning. Had their middle order accelerated the run rate they would have easily won the match. So always try to give credit where it is due. Besides dont expect to win all matches. The team having better lucky on the day wins. What about NZ/NL match. NL gave away only 4 extras whereas England gave 8 Wides therein lies the reason for their loss!!!!!!

  • vjay0204 on March 30, 2014, 5:44 GMT

    Broad is for England as is Dhoni for India....though Dhoni is a better player and captain.. But when u have Srinivasan and Chris Broad as Head of Boards, its too difficult to make changes in team management and team selections. Hope England looks for some neutral selection commitee before its too late

  • mirandola on March 30, 2014, 5:03 GMT

    You really have to wonder what planet Broad is on. England have, in general, been shambolic since they landed in Australia late last year; despite a small handful of individual performances, none of their sides in their recent series have even reached mediocrity - and I don't think the situation can change until senior figures accept that there are many miles to go before England can 'hold their heads up'. Naturally the captain can't be expected to admit that his side (including himself) are playing like hypnotized rabbits, but trying to manufacture slivers of hope from dismal performances is not even starting to address the problems in their camp.

  • Farooq3 on March 29, 2014, 23:49 GMT

    England can hold heads high - yes but are responsible for their own demise - not selecting KP was a telling blow!

  • on March 29, 2014, 23:33 GMT

    Cant go anywhere without KP... I liked England until they used him as a scapegoat since they lack basic management skills.

  • Shongololo on March 29, 2014, 22:35 GMT

    The headline and Broad's sentiments say it all. England is the world champion when it comes to celebrating mediocrity...and that's why, in sporting terms, they'll remain, well, mediocre. The team will probably get a ticket tape parade when they get home, perhaps even a knighthood or two!

  • on March 29, 2014, 22:24 GMT

    Grapes are sour Funny thing about getting positives out of successive THRASHINGS. I was wondering when will English teams come out of denial and make some genuine comments and refrain from pro to type interviews

  • on March 29, 2014, 22:21 GMT

    lol. I didn't see the game and read Broad's comments first. I fully expected that England were defending a total instead of chasing one down because of that 'bar of soap' thing he said. But they were chasing and the ball was a bar of soap for them and just not for South Africa !

    Broad really needs to grow up and stop complaining when his team loses. His cry-baby attitude really doesn't suit an international sportsman, let alone the captain of the team.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on March 29, 2014, 22:21 GMT

    lol. I didn't see the game and read Broad's comments first. I fully expected that England were defending a total instead of chasing one down because of that 'bar of soap' thing he said. But they were chasing and the ball was a bar of soap for them and just not for South Africa !

    Broad really needs to grow up and stop complaining when his team loses. His cry-baby attitude really doesn't suit an international sportsman, let alone the captain of the team.

  • on March 29, 2014, 22:24 GMT

    Grapes are sour Funny thing about getting positives out of successive THRASHINGS. I was wondering when will English teams come out of denial and make some genuine comments and refrain from pro to type interviews

  • Shongololo on March 29, 2014, 22:35 GMT

    The headline and Broad's sentiments say it all. England is the world champion when it comes to celebrating mediocrity...and that's why, in sporting terms, they'll remain, well, mediocre. The team will probably get a ticket tape parade when they get home, perhaps even a knighthood or two!

  • on March 29, 2014, 23:33 GMT

    Cant go anywhere without KP... I liked England until they used him as a scapegoat since they lack basic management skills.

  • Farooq3 on March 29, 2014, 23:49 GMT

    England can hold heads high - yes but are responsible for their own demise - not selecting KP was a telling blow!

  • mirandola on March 30, 2014, 5:03 GMT

    You really have to wonder what planet Broad is on. England have, in general, been shambolic since they landed in Australia late last year; despite a small handful of individual performances, none of their sides in their recent series have even reached mediocrity - and I don't think the situation can change until senior figures accept that there are many miles to go before England can 'hold their heads up'. Naturally the captain can't be expected to admit that his side (including himself) are playing like hypnotized rabbits, but trying to manufacture slivers of hope from dismal performances is not even starting to address the problems in their camp.

  • vjay0204 on March 30, 2014, 5:44 GMT

    Broad is for England as is Dhoni for India....though Dhoni is a better player and captain.. But when u have Srinivasan and Chris Broad as Head of Boards, its too difficult to make changes in team management and team selections. Hope England looks for some neutral selection commitee before its too late

  • on March 30, 2014, 5:49 GMT

    Why are you all against England. I think most of you are Indians or Pakistanis. What Broad said was bang on. They gave lot of full tosses in the last few overs which took the game away from England. When SA made 196 I had told my family before start of England innings they would lose. But they came very close to winning. Had their middle order accelerated the run rate they would have easily won the match. So always try to give credit where it is due. Besides dont expect to win all matches. The team having better lucky on the day wins. What about NZ/NL match. NL gave away only 4 extras whereas England gave 8 Wides therein lies the reason for their loss!!!!!!

  • jimbond on March 30, 2014, 6:21 GMT

    The English team should now understand the value of players like Collingwood whom they have long underestimated.

  • CricketingStargazer on March 30, 2014, 7:29 GMT

    It's nice to see so many balanced comments on here from people who are not England fans and did not see the game.

    Kudos to South Africa. 4 matches. 4 very tight games. 3 of them won. I honestly thought that this was going to fall England's way, but South Africa are proving to be far more resilient that I had imagined. Almost 400 runs in 40 overs: no one can complain about entertainment value.

    England's death bowling and fielding have been the killer here. On strike rate and average, Jade Dernbach's figures compare with the best but, on economy, he's just a luxury. Broad is right to be frustrated: not much has gone right for the side in the tournament, but there are plenty of places where they could have changed their luck with Yorkers at the death and holding chances earlier.

    What has surprised me was that the batting, supposedly the weak suit, has been brilliant. You don't make scores of 172-6, 190-4 and 193-7 if you can't bat and to lose still two of the games is tough.