Zimbabwe cricket July 27, 2014

Zimbabwe battle the winds of change

With seemingly little rationale to back them, Zimbabwe Cricket's decisions to split the captaincy and change the coach seem to be disguised cost-cutting measures

Zimbabwe Cricket's structures have been rigorously shaken over the past few days, including the stepping down of Peter Chingoka, the chairman of 22 years, and his replacement by a non-cricket person. Chingoka's retirement speaks more about the loss of a figurehead than it does about any real change - his power was diluted in latter years by men with money who worked behind the scenes - and, though there are conflicting views on his role in the financial crisis that ultimately put ZC in the difficulty it currently wallows in, there is a consensus view that cricket in the country has been taken out of the hands of people associated with the game and entrusted to businessmen who care more about the bottom line.

The new chairman Wilson Manase is a lawyer and businessman while his deputy Maureen Kuchocha has been described by ZC as a "sports degree graduate and administrator". News of their appointment was accompanied by the announcement of cricketing changes: two others being asked to step up and one person to step sideways, perhaps in an attempt to push them all out.

ZC has split the captaincy across formats by retaining Brendan Taylor in the Tests and promoting Elton Chigumbura to the job in limited-overs. It has also moved national coach Andy Waller to the position of national director of coaching and asked Stephen Mangongo to take over as head coach. In purely cricketing terms there does not seem to be much rationale behind those decisions and they have aroused suspicion that, though designed to fall in line with more sophisticated international outfits, the moves are merely cleverly disguised cost-cutting measures.

Dual (or treble) concurrent captaincies are required by teams who play a lot of cricket and feel any one man would be overburdened by the task of captaining across formats, like South Africa, or teams whose Test captain does not play in some version of the game, like Australia. Although Zimbabwe's calendar could fill up in future, they have had just seven days of international cricket in 2014 so far - hardly enough for Taylor to feel taxed.

Relieving him of the duties in limited-overs cricket may come as a result of the team's first three-Test series in more than 13 years looming against Bangladesh in October but even that is a stretch, especially given the replacement the board has chosen. Chigumbura's focus should lay squarely on his own game as he showed when he suffered a severe loss of form in the brief time he led the team from May 2010 to March 2011.

Then, he captained in 20 ODIs and scored just 316 runs without a single half-century. His batting average dipped from 24.07 overall to 21.06. With the ball, he struggled even more and managed just two wickets in his time as captain. Chigumbura led in four T20s and scraped together 57 runs at 14.25 without taking a wicket. Given that Hamilton Masakadza is far more suited to the role, it is a mystery why Chigumbura was given the job ahead of him.

The same riddle runs through the coaching decision. Waller was displaced on the same day Zimbabwe lost an ODI to Afghanistan and surrendered a series lead to end up sharing the spoils. While that is disappointing enough to merit action, it comes with a year still left on Waller's contract and less than two weeks before Zimbabwe are due to host South Africa and Australia, which could present them with a rare opportunity to get regular game time and develop consistency.

That is not going to happen because Mangongo will take over. Mangongo is an experienced coach who has come through the ranks, and has even stood in as acting head coach, but he is believed to be unpopular with the players because of his approach. He is uncompromising and short-tempered and both attributes were on display when he was involved in an altercation with a young player who refused to follow orders.

The reasons for giving Mangongo another go as head coach are unclear except that it creates the space for Waller to move into an overseeing role. Waller has been put in charge of "development of cricket from grassroots and grooming of coaches", according to a ZC release. He will no longer have anything to do with the national team, at least not directly.

There are two problems with this. While Zimbabwean cricket's club and school programs need looking after, they may not need it from the man who was brought from a cushy job at a public school in England to look after the country's elite cricketers. If ZC wants a development officer, it should employ one. Moving Waller sideways suggests the board no longer wants him as national coach but cannot afford to pay him out and so has created a position for him to fill while he sees out his contract.

The second issue is that there are very few coaches left to groom in Zimbabwe. Over the last few months, they have lost former batting and bowling coaches Grant Flower and Heath Streak to Pakistan and Bangladesh respectively. They failed to renew Gary Brent's contract and the national academy has had to make do without him as well. Before Waller can mentor any coaching hopefuls, ZC need to find them, meaning that part of the job could be negated for a while.

Waller and Taylor's treatment may be a microcosm for the bigger picture. ZC's financial trouble is well documented and the current shifting sands indicate it may be trying to create a storm into which the debt can swirl along with the other issues. If people are moved around and positions created and dissolved, those who may want to stay could be pushed out. If they move on, like Graeme Cremer and Kyle Jarvis have recently done, ZC will owe fewer people money and have fewer commitments to meet. And so the saga will go on.

One long-suffering supporter commented that after Chingoka's retirement, "cricket can finally start." Another mused, "But maybe this is where it will end." The king is dead. But in Zimbabwe, it's the whole monarchy they have to worry about.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • dummy4fb on July 29, 2014, 11:55 GMT

    Well I'm not sad about Chingoka going (long overdue) but I'm not crazy about Stephen Mangongo as head coach either. Anyway, let's see how the "new" blood fares, shall we?

  • grahaam on July 27, 2014, 17:17 GMT

    Very well written, and skeptical piece , I agree with it all , and not much sense in any of it..Its like a bank trying to run a cricket team, Chingoka will be remembered for the ruin of free and equal cricket in Zimbabwe , interesting that the national Rugby structure is just the opposite these days and progress is good , having been in some doldrums before, Zimbabwe must keep all talent at home, again we watch Ballance getting a hundred for England, he is Zimbabwean and proud of it , yet has to play abroad.

  • muvati11 on July 27, 2014, 11:00 GMT

    I think for long many have labelled Chingoka the villian in the whole drama but I feel his role wasn't entirely negative for the game. Chingoka oversaw all the good years in Zim Cricket in the 90's. Unfortunately he also oversaw the bad ones and the bad things are what we usually only remember. He was a convenient scapegoat for all the ills in Zim Cricket but I dont think anyone could have done better in a turbulent economy, a racially skewed sport and a nation without as much abundance of talent as say India for example. Interestingly we also all seem to forget that most of these changes came from recommendations of the Cricket Committee of which Alistair Campbell was chairman the last time I checked. I don't at all agree with these rapid wholesale changes but at times I feel we put too much blame on Chingoka & forgot all the good he did and the circumstances in which he managed the sport. Sure, he overstayed his welcome but would walking away earlier have made the game any better?

  • dummy4fb on July 27, 2014, 8:30 GMT

    There was a time when you could only admire Zimbabwean cricket, it was producing ever competitive, tough hard cricketers, but to be honest, it is now all but dead, it is in a coma on life support. So sad, but I think from the perspective of the ICC they'd be far better off investing in Ireland and Afghanistan. A team that cannot retain its players is no team at all. Perhaps once Zimbabwe can return to democracy and a more fortunate way of life, cricket will once again prosper, but it seems a far away dream for now.

  • No featured comments at the moment.