Worse than a sieve
Fielding has been the difference between the two sides in this series
Osman Samiuddin in Karachi
19-Feb-2006
![]() |
![]()
|
There was news last night that the Pakistan board was trying to bring in
Jonty Rhodes as fielding coach. Inzamam-ul-Haq had admitted at the
pre-match press conference that the fielding had been the difference
between the two sides in this series and Pakistan's had deteriorated
sharply as the series traversed the country. It sounds a mighty impressive
coup, were it to be pulled off and in intent, it is a noble thought. After
today's display, its importance is likely to be magnified.
Pakistan dropped two chances, one crucial, one not so, and that wasn't the
worst of it, not by far. Assessing fielding is an inexact pastime but
there should be little doubt for anyone present at the ground that this
became, as India's chase progressed, Pakistan's most inept, shambolic and
deplorable day of ground fielding yet. If there is anyone out there who
has seen all of Pakistan's matches ever, it might be worth a punt calling
them and asking them whether this was the worst display - so bad was it.
Given Pakistan's traditional fielding reputation, there are likely to be a
few contenders.
At times, it seemed that more direct hits were missed than there were
people in the stands, more balls were fumbled than there are people in
Karachi, throws were backed up in much the manner Brutus backed up Julius
and as a collective, fielders became India's 12th, 13th and 14th men on the field. Indian batsmen gleefully took the piss, tapping straight to fielders and blindly, sans calls,
running because even in the unlikely event of the ball being picked up
clean, stumps weren't going to be struck. Mohammad Sami was particularly
special, bizarrely pulling out of a catch at square leg and throwing
regularly at an imaginary set of stumps on another ground. Many others
made sure he didn't feel left out, with Shoaib Malik dropping Yuvraj Singh
at extra-cover when 94 were needed at nearly eight per over. The only
positive might be that it really can't get any worse.
In Delhi last year, when Pakistan wrapped up the series 4-2, they did so
with one of their brightest efforts in the field. At the time, it seemed
another sign of the impressive work that Bob Woolmer had done with the
team but in the period since - particularly in the Test series against
England - they have fallen away sharply. Inzamam's comments before the
game were prescient, although he was hardly to know what would happen
today. Not least of their worries will be that younger fielders were at
the centre of most misdemeanours. Albeit incompetent today, they at least
remained enthusiastic and energetic; more experienced players lacked even
that urge. In this context, the appointment of Jonty Rhodes might just be
applying band-aid to a bullet wound. What after all can he realistically
do with a side that carries onto the field men such as Abdul Razzaq,
Mohammad Yousuf and Inzamam-ul-Haq?
But defeat, and four thumping ones at that, has a terrific way of opening
eyes. Their top order inflicted collapses upon itself habitually through
the series and their bowlers took only 25 Indian wickets in five matches.
Sri Lanka, England and the Champions Trophy offer a tricky few months and
Pakistan will undoubtedly examine more carefully issues in all three
departments.
But defeat also shakes up perspectives. In a sense, as Woolmer admitted
later, it was better that this happened now rather than in March next
year. In any case, the loss shouldn't overlook Pakistan's considerable
achievements in this home season; two Test series wins over strong
opposition and one ODI series win as well - this series loss was their
first in over a year. Much progress has been made but here has been the
surest sign that much more needs to be made. More startling wake-up calls
than this last fortnight will be difficult to find.
Osman Samiuddin is Pakistan editor of Cricinfo