Middlesex vs Sussex, at Brighton, Jul 20 1998 - Full Scorecard
RESULT
Hove, July 20, 1998, AXA League
Middlesex (35 ovs maximum)
Batting | R | B | M | 4s | 6s | SR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
run out (Bevan) | 3 | 16 | - | 0 | 0 | 18.75 | |||
run out (Adams) | 3 | 4 | - | 0 | 0 | 75.00 | |||
c Kirtley b Bevan | 37 | 74 | - | 4 | 0 | 50.00 | |||
lbw b Martin-Jenkins | 0 | 4 | - | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |||
c †Humphries b Bevan | 19 | 37 | - | 1 | 0 | 51.35 | |||
b Adams | 9 | 6 | - | 1 | 0 | 150.00 | |||
b Adams | 18 | 31 | - | 0 | 0 | 58.06 | |||
lbw b Adams | 0 | 3 | - | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |||
b Adams | 18 | 22 | - | 1 | 0 | 81.81 | |||
not out | 3 | 2 | - | 0 | 0 | 150.00 | |||
lbw b Adams | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |||
Extras | (lb 6, w 9) | 15 | |||||||
Total | 33.2 Ov (RR: 3.75) | 125 | |||||||
Fall of wickets: 1-5 (Justin Langer, 2.5 ov), 2-10 (Keith Brown, 5.2 ov), 3-10 (Paul Weekes, 5.6 ov), 4-70 (Owais Shah, 22.2 ov), 5-70 (David Nash, 22.3 ov), 6-87 (Keith Dutch, 25.1 ov), 7-87 (Alastair Fraser, 25.4 ov), 8-116 (Richard Johnson, 31.6 ov), 9-125 (David Goodchild, 33.1 ov), 10-125 (Angus Fraser, 33.2 ov) |
Bowling | O | M | R | W | ECON | 0s | 4s | 6s | WD | NB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 2.83 | - | - | - | 3 | 0 | |
8 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 1.50 | - | - | - | 1 | 0 | |
5 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 5.60 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | |
4 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 5.75 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 4.60 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | |
5.2 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 3.00 | - | - | - | 2 | 0 |
Sussex (T: 133 runs from 35 ovs)
Batting | R | B | M | 4s | 6s | SR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lbw b ARC Fraser | 38 | 69 | - | 2 | 0 | 55.07 | |||
hit wicket b Hewitt | 4 | 6 | - | 0 | 0 | 66.66 | |||
run out (Nash) | 58 | 85 | - | 5 | 0 | 68.23 | |||
not out | 15 | 26 | - | 1 | 0 | 57.69 | |||
c Shah b Dutch | 5 | 14 | - | 1 | 0 | 35.71 | |||
not out | 4 | 5 | - | 1 | 0 | 80.00 | |||
Extras | (lb 3, nb 4, w 3) | 10 | |||||||
Total | 34 Ov (RR: 3.94) | 134/4 | |||||||
Fall of wickets: 1-11 (Robin Martin-Jenkins, 3.4 ov), 2-109 (Rajesh Rao, 25.2 ov), 3-119 (Chris Adams, 29.3 ov), 4-129 (Mark Newell, 32.6 ov) |
Bowling | O | M | R | W | ECON | 0s | 4s | 6s | WD | NB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 2.85 | - | - | - | 1 | 0 | |
5 | 0 | 28 | 1 | 5.60 | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | |
5 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 4.00 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 3.60 | - | - | - | 1 | 0 | |
7 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 3.14 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 4.60 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 |
Unlocking the magic of Statsguru
Match Flow
- The Duckworth/Lewis rule works on the concept of 'resource percentages', a measure of what percentage of a full 50 over innings is remaining giving the current game position.
- As the AXA games are 40 overs, we start with a resource percentage of 90.3% (of a full 50 overs).
- The Middlesex innings was interrupted after 22 overs with 3 wickets down - i.e. with 18 overs remaining. At this point, we have a resource percentage of 47.4% remaining.
- It resumed after the loss of 5 overs, i.e. with 13 remaining. At this point, Middlesex have a resource percentage of 38.1% remaining.
- Thus, Middlsex have lost 9.3% from their original 90.3%, i.e. their 125 was made from a resource of 81%.
- Sussex only get to bat for 35 overs. This represents a resource percentage of 84.2%, 3.2% more than Middlesex had.
- In this 3.2%, Middlesex *should* have been able to get 3.2% of 225 runs (225 runs is the average number of runs an ECB county should get from a resource percentage of 100%), namely 7.2 runs.
- Thus Sussex are set a target of 125 + 7.2, or (rounding up), 133.
Match Details
County Ground, Hove | |
Toss | Middlesex, elected to bat first |
Series | |
Season | 1998 |
Match days | day (40-over match) |
Umpires | |
TV Umpire | |
Points | Sussex 4, Middlesex 0 |
Instant answers to T20 questions
Sussex Innings
<1 / 3>
AXA League
Team | M | W | L | D | PT | NRR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAN | 17 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 54 | 0.714 |
WAR | 17 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 0.294 |
ESS | 17 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 0.123 |
LEI | 17 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 40 | 0.932 |
KEN | 17 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 38 | 0.113 |
GLO | 17 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 36 | -0.124 |
WOR | 17 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 36 | -0.260 |
HAM | 17 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 34 | 0.146 |
YOR | 17 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 34 | -0.202 |
NOT | 17 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 32 | -0.018 |
GLA | 17 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 32 | -0.020 |
MID | 17 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 32 | -0.335 |
NOR | 17 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 0.234 |
SOM | 17 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 30 | -0.004 |
DER | 17 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 30 | -0.273 |
SUS | 17 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 28 | -0.214 |
DUR | 17 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 24 | -0.534 |
SUR | 17 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 16 | -0.664 |
Brit Univ | - | - | - | - | - | - |
CUniv | - | - | - | - | - | - |
IRE | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Minor C | - | - | - | - | - | - |
SCOT | - | - | - | - | - | - |